Vitamin C
Vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid) is a water-soluble vitamin; human studies show benefits for colds, indications for skin and wound healing, and a mixed picture for sepsis.
We evaluated 252 human studies on Vitamin C, including 160 randomised controlled trials and 63 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 26,210 participants in total. As of 13 October 2026.
1. What Is Vitamin C? Occurrence, Origin and Forms
Vitamin C is a water-soluble vitamin, chemically L-ascorbic acid. The human body cannot make it and depends on dietary intake. It became known through the link between vitamin C deficiency and scurvy, the disease that affected sailors on long voyages without fresh fruit and vegetables; today it is taken mainly as a dietary supplement, for example during colds.
Vitamin C occurs in fresh fruit and vegetables, especially in citrus fruits, peppers, kiwi, berries and potatoes. In the body it is found in all cells, in high concentration in the adrenal glands and in white blood cells.
For dietary supplements, vitamin C is produced industrially from glucose and is usually supplied as ascorbic acid or as an ascorbate salt. Studies examine mainly the oral intake of ascorbic acid or sodium ascorbate, liposomal preparations and intravenous administration.
Forms and Preparations Studied
- L-ascorbic acid (pure form)
- Sodium ascorbate and calcium ascorbate (salts, less acidic)
- Ascorbyl palmitate (fat-soluble)
- Liposomal preparations
- Oral intake as tablet, capsule, powder or drink
- Intravenous administration as an infusion
Not covered on this page:
- D-isoascorbic acid (erythorbic acid, E 315), a related substance without vitamin C activity
- Multivitamin preparations and combinations with other substances (e.g. zinc, vitamin D)
- Preparations from vitamin C-rich fruits such as acerola, rose hip or sea buckthorn; a study on these is not a study on isolated vitamin C
- Ascorbic acid as a technical antioxidant and preservative in foods (E 300)
2. What Does Vitamin C Do? Results by Area
| Area | Result in controlled studies | Strength of evidence | Studies | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sepsis and critical care | mixed | high | 17 meta-analyses · 24 controlled · 18 other | 3,389 |
| Oxidative stress and antioxidant status | mixed | high | 5 meta-analyses · 24 controlled · 2 other | 1,147 |
| Skin and connective tissue | mixed | high | 3 meta-analyses · 10 controlled · 2 other | 262 |
| Common cold and respiratory infections | mixed | high | 5 meta-analyses · 7 controlled · 2 other | 2,445 |
| Immune function | mixed | high | 1 meta-analyses · 5 controlled · 1 other | 217 |
| Iron absorption from food | mostly no difference | unclear | 0 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 0 other | 75 |
| Other investigations | mixed | high | 21 meta-analyses · 50 controlled · 18 other | 5,218 |
How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.
3. What the Studies Show in Detail
Vitamin C, Sepsis and Critical Care: Human Studies
In sepsis and intensive care, the studies show a mixed picture with high certainty of evidence. Meta-analyses found a lower mortality with vitamin C, especially intravenously and without adjunctive agents 412131931, which, however, still needs to be confirmed. Other meta-analyses found overall no confirmed difference 81622, and in septic shock no survival benefit 824. Whether high or lower doses are more favorable is answered in opposite ways by two meta-analyses 1219. In the largest single study, death or persistent organ failure combined occurred more often with intravenous vitamin C than with placebo 62. The administration of circulatory agents (vasopressors) was shorter with intravenous vitamin C 816192231, the length of stay in the intensive care unit did not change 16222431. The mixture of vitamin C, thiamine and hydrocortisone shortened the vasopressor duration and lowered the SOFA score in meta-analyses 1121, but not the short-term mortality 21. These findings belong to the mixture, not to vitamin C alone. Predominantly intravenous preparations were investigated, in addition sodium ascorbate; the optimal dose, the timing and which patient groups benefit remain open.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Xu et al. 2023 | meta-analysis · 26,540 participants | Vitamin C oral or intravenous (monotherapy); vs. placebo or no therapy | mortality in sepsis patients: improved (p = 0.005, RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.91, I2 = 47%) |
| 5 Fujii et al. 2022 | systematic review · 10,257 participants | Vitamin C alone or with glucocorticoids and vitamin B1; Categories ≥12, 6 to <12, and <6 g/day; 90-day to 1-year mortality assessment; vs. Placebo or usual care, or other drug combinations | Longer-term mortality (90 days to 1 year): no difference (no significant differences); Organ dysfunction: no difference (no evidence); ICU length of stay: no difference (no evidence) |
| 6 Pham et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 9,366 participants | Vitamin C, also combined with other compounds; high-dose (exact dose not reported); follow-up up to 28 days; vs. melatonin, vitamin E, selenium, N-acetylcysteine, placebo/other antioxidants | 28-day mortality: no difference (not statistically significant); SOFA score / organ dysfunction: unclear (SUCRA = 83.97%) |
| 7 Brown et al. 2022 | systematic review · 4,078 participants | Parenteral vitamin C, alone or with thiamine/glucocorticoids; various dosage regimens (subgroup analysis); vs. standard of care | 28-day mortality: no difference (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.09; p = 0.34); change in SOFA score: no difference; ICU length of stay: no difference |
| 8 Liang et al. 2023 | systematic review · 3,570 participants | intravenous vitamin C (IVVC); vs. control group; monotherapy vs. combination therapy (incl. HAT) | 28-day mortality: no difference (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81-1.04); 28-day mortality with IVVC monotherapy: improved (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.93); 28-day mortality with combination therapy: no difference (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.90-1.17) |
| 9 Liang et al. 2023 | meta-analysis · 3,364 participants | Intravenous vitamin C, alone or with thiamine/hydrocortisone; any dose; subgroup 25-100 mg/kg/day; follow-up 72-96 h or short-term; vs. standard of care, no intervention or placebo | Delta SOFA score at 72-96 h: improved (MD, - 0.62; 95% CI, - 1.00 to - 0.25; p = 0.001); Duration of vasopressor use: improved (MD, - 15.07; 95% CI, - 21.59 to - 8.55; p < 0.00001); Short-term mortality: no difference (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; p = 0.14) |
| 10 Chen et al. 2022 | meta-analysis · 2,985 participants | Vitamin C-containing therapy (mixture, co-components not specified); vs. Placebo or alternative treatment | 28-day mortality: no difference (OR, 0.87; 95% CI: 0.71-1.08; P = .20); 28-day mortality in septic shock: no difference (OR, 1.09; 95% CI: 0.89-1.34; P = .41); intensive care unit mortality: no difference (OR, 1.03; 95% CI: 0.84-1.25; P = .81) |
| 12 Patel et al. 2022 | meta-analysis · 2,490 participants | Intravenous vitamin C; high-dose vs. low-dose (cutoff not stated); vs. Placebo | Overall mortality (all doses): no difference (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-1.00; p = 0.06); Overall mortality (high-dose): improved (relative risk, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.96; p = 0.03); Overall mortality (low-dose): no difference (relative risk, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79-1.07; p = 0.46) |
Further studies in this area: 13 14 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 31 32 39 40 46 49 62 63 72 77 78 84 85 87 95 96 99 100 105 107 115 118 119 120 124 128 134 155 157 159 167 168 169 171 176 178 181 182 183 184 186 187
Vitamin C, Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Status: Human Studies
For oxidative stress and antioxidant status, the studies on vitamin C show a mixed picture with high certainty of evidence. A randomized controlled study found a higher antioxidant capacity after vitamin C administration during cardiopulmonary bypass 93. In overweight individuals, it rose more strongly after vitamin C added to a sugar solution than without 137. Inflammation markers fell compared with the control in several randomized studies, for example IL-8 in ARDS 116 and a TNF receptor in sepsis 95. In healthy individuals with low vitamin C status, isoprostanes, IL-6 and TNF-α fell compared with placebo 146. In moderate pancreatitis, CRP fell more strongly than with placebo 76; after joint replacement, a meta-analysis found lower CRP and IL-6 values on the first day 28. Other randomized controlled studies found no difference in cytokines 121 or in CRP 78. A systematic review on knee prosthesis found inconsistent results for inflammation markers 25; in septic shock, CRP and myeloperoxidase remained the same compared with placebo 118. Isoprostanes did not change with parenteral vitamin C compared with placebo 117. Mixtures of vitamin C and vitamin E lowered malondialdehyde and ROS in endometriosis 35 and, in sarcopenia, malondialdehyde compared with placebo, while glutathione rose 103. In a randomized study in septic shock with separate arms for vitamin C, vitamin E, N-acetylcysteine and melatonin, lipid peroxidation fell in each arm compared with the baseline value 84. The mixture of vitamin C and chromium improved blood lipids in type 2 diabetes compared with placebo; the contribution of vitamin C remains open 104. The investigations predominantly concerned ill or inadequately supplied people; the transferability to well-supplied individuals and the comparison of form, dose and administration remain open.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Vosoughi et al. 2026 | systematic review · 1,364 participants | perioperative vitamin C (ascorbic acid); varied across studies (heterogeneous dose, route, timing); vs. placebo or control in included RCTs | inflammatory markers: no difference |
| 28 Moftakhari et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 1,162 participants | vitamin C, oral or intravenous; postoperative up to 48 hours; vs. control/placebo (not further reported) | CRP at 24 hours: improved (WMD = -11.32 mg/L; P = 0.0007); IL-6 at 24 hours: improved (WMD = -8.27 pg/mL; P < 0.0001) |
| 37 Candeloro et al. 2026 | systematic review | Vitamin C supplementation, various forms; vs. Placebo | IL-6: no difference (MD = 0.00; 95 % CI: -0.25 to 0.25; p = 1.00); MDA: no difference (MD = -0.59; 95 % CI: -1.99 to 0.81; p = 0.41); CRP: improved (MD = -0.44; 95 % CI: -0.66 to -0.22; p = 0.0001) |
| 39 Alangari et al. 2026 | systematic review | High-dose intravenous vitamin C; vs. Placebo or standard care, sometimes combined with chemotherapy | Antioxidant, immune-modulating and pharmacokinetic effects: unclear |
| 46 Thakare et al. 2024 | systematic review | Parenteral vitamin C; vs. Heterogeneous study designs; controls not uniform | Oxidative stress: improved |
| 76 Zhao et al. 2025 | randomised controlled · 212 participants | Vitamin C infusion (ascorbic acid) versus placebo; 200 mg/kg/24 h; 7 days; vs. Placebo infusion | CRP reduction Day 0 to Day 3 (MSAP): improved (median 72 mg/L vs. 46 mg/L, p = 0.003); CRP reduction Day 0 to Day 7 (MSAP): improved (median 168 mg/L vs. 121 mg/L, p = 0.013) |
| 78 Fowler et al. 2019 | randomised controlled · 167 participants | intravenous vitamin C (ascorbic acid) infusion in dextrose 5% in water; 50 mg/kg every 6 hours for 96 hours; 96-hour infusion, follow-up to 168 hours and day 60; vs. placebo (dextrose 5% in water only) | C-reactive protein levels at 168 hours: no difference (54.1 vs 46.1 μg/mL; difference, 7.94 μg/mL; 95% CI, -8.2 to 24.11; P = .33); thrombomodulin levels at 168 hours: no difference (14.5 vs 13.8 ng/mL; difference, 0.69 ng/mL; 95% CI, -2.8 to 4.2; P = .70) |
| 84 Pérez-Torres et al. 2023 | randomised controlled · 131 participants | Vitamin C, vitamin E, N-acetylcysteine or melatonin plus standard therapy; vs. standard therapy (control group) | lipid peroxidation: unclear; nitrates and nitrites: unclear; glutathione reductase: unclear |
Further studies in this area: 88 93 95 116 117 118 120 121 133 137 139 140 143 145 146 147 155 156 158 163 164 179 186
Vitamin C, Skin and Connective Tissue: Human Studies
In second-degree burns, a topical vitamin C solution accelerated epithelialization in a small randomized study 129; a systematic review on perioperative care describes slightly better wound healing 42. In melasma, topical vitamin C was among the more effective treatments versus placebo in a network meta-analysis 50. After microneedling, melasma improved with vitamin C as with tranexamic acid compared with baseline 135. In Bateman purpura of aged skin, topical vitamin C improved skin appearance, skin thickness and elasticity compared with the untreated side 141. After wisdom tooth removal, pain and swelling on the second day were less than with placebo, wound healing did not differ with certainty 106. Vitamin C injections after flexor tendon repair showed no certain difference 126. A mixture of collagen and vitamin C, sometimes with hyaluronic acid, improved dermal density and wrinkles compared with placebo; the contribution of vitamin C remains open 92. Statements on dose-response relationships, on transferability to well-nourished individuals and on long-term effects remain open.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 Banerjee et al. 2026 | systematic review | Vitamin C supplementation (form not specified); perioperative; vs. Control groups without vitamin C | Wound healing: improved (modestly improved wound healing) |
| 47 González-Molina et al. 2022 | systematic review | Topical ascorbic acid as adjuvant; vs. Hydroquinone and triple combination therapy as standard | Efficacy of topical ascorbic acid as adjuvant: improved |
| 50 Liu et al. 2021 | meta-analysis | topical vitamin C compared with 13 other melasma therapies; vs. placebo and other agents (lasers, TCC, tranexamic acid, peeling, HQ) | efficacy ranking versus placebo (Melasma Area and Severity Index): unclear |
| 106 Demirel et al. 2026 | randomised controlled · 56 participants | oral vitamin C (ascorbic acid); started 1 day before surgery, continued for 7 days; vs. placebo (contralateral side, split-mouth) | wound healing: no difference (did not reach statistical significance); facial swelling: improved (significantly reduced on day 2) |
| 122 Pazyar et al. 2025 | randomised controlled · 37 participants | Topical vitamin C after microneedling; vs. Tranexamic acid + microneedling (other side of face) | Improvement of infraorbital hyperpigmentation: unclear (dramatic advancement in all sessions compared to the baseline); Vitamin C vs. tranexamic acid comparison: unclear (P = 0.444) |
| 126 Tajari et al. 2026 | randomised controlled · 30 participants | vitamin C injections after surgery; vs. standard care (control group) | range of motion (ROM): no difference (p>0.05); Strickland Rating Scale (SRS): no difference (p>0.05) |
| 127 Dawar et al. 2026 | randomised controlled · 30 participants | Microneedling with vitamin C serum (group B) vs. PRP (group A); 3 sessions, follow-up at 1, 2 and 3 months; vs. Microneedling with PRP vs. microneedling with vitamin C serum | Scar quality (POSAS): unclear (p < 0.05); Pliability: unclear (p = 0.10) |
| 129 Haddadi et al. 2020 | randomised controlled · 30 participants | Topical vitamin C solution; Assessment on days 1, 3, 7 and 14; vs. Control group with other dressing/placebo (not specified) | Burn wound epithelialization (Bates-Jensen score): improved (P = 0.047) |
Further studies in this area: 135 141 142 143 165 180 183
Vitamin C, Common Cold and Respiratory Infections: Human Studies
Regularly taken vitamin C shortened colds in placebo studies, more clearly in children than in adults 55; an additional dose at the onset of a cold shortened the duration and alleviated fever 54. In a randomized controlled trial with recruits, the frequency of a cold diagnosis decreased 58, as it did in a placebo study over the winter 161. In adults with atrophic gastritis, there were fewer colds at a higher dose, but not shorter ones 74. In children with pneumonia, vitamin C improved the severity compared with placebo, but not the length of hospital stay 81. In ARDS, intravenous vitamin C in an open randomized trial improved oxygen supply and weaning from the ventilator compared with standard treatment 116. In COVID-19, a meta-analysis saw lower mortality, which still needs to be confirmed 4; two other meta-analyses found no difference 1538. The strength of evidence is high, supported by several meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials; however, the individual studies are mixed. However, forms, doses, duration, comparison groups and the baseline status of participants differ considerably; for well-supplied individuals without deficiency, the transferability is open. As an addition to antiviral therapy, vitamin C in a meta-analysis of Chinese studies shortened the time to improvement compared with antiviral therapy alone 52. A randomized trial found no difference in duration or severity compared with a very low vitamin C dose when taken from the onset of a cold 70. In COVID-19, high-dose ascorbic acid alone did not shorten the symptom duration 75. Mixtures with zinc 91 and the preparation ArtemiC made of artemisinin, curcumin, frankincense and vitamin C 110 do not allow conclusions about vitamin C alone.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Xu et al. 2023 | meta-analysis · 26,540 participants | Vitamin C oral or intravenous (monotherapy); vs. placebo or no therapy | COVID-19 patient mortality: improved (p = 0.03, RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, I2 = 0%) |
| 16 Yong et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 2,047 participants | isolated intravenous vitamin C (IVVC); vs. Placebo | pneumonia: no difference (RR 0.85; CI 0.50-1.44; I2 = 0%, P = .552) |
| 52 Ran et al. 2020 | meta-analysis | Vitamin C as supplement to antiviral therapy; vs. antiviral therapy alone | Total efficacy: improved (RR = 1.27, 95% CI (1.08, 1.48), P = 0.003); Time for symptom amelioration: improved (MD = -15.84, 95% CI (-17.02, -14.66), P < 0.00001); Time for healing: improved (95% CI (-14.98, -4.22), P = 0.0005) |
| 54 Ran et al. 2018 | meta-analysis | Vitamin C (oral supplementation); extra therapeutic dose at cold onset in addition to routine supplementation; vs. Placebo | Cold duration: improved (MD = -0.56, 95% CI [-1.03, -0.10], P = 0.02); Time of confinement indoors: improved (MD = -0.41, 95% CI [-0.62, -0.19], P = 0.0002); Chest pain: improved (MD = -0.40, 95% CI [-0.77, -0.03], P = 0.03) |
| 55 Hemilä et al. 1999 | systematic review | Vitamin C supplementation, form not specified; ≥1 g/day regularly, partly ≥2 g/day, 1 g/day in adults; vs. Placebo and dose comparison 1 g/day vs. ≥2 g/day | Reduction in cold duration in children (2 g/day) vs. adults (1 g/day): improved (26%); Reduction in cold duration in adults (1 g/day): improved (6%) |
| 58 Kim et al. 2022 | randomised controlled · 1,444 participants | Oral vitamin C (pure ascorbic acid) vs placebo; 6000 mg/day (vitamin C), 0 mg/day (placebo); 30 days; vs. Placebo, double-blind | Risk of common cold diagnosis (odds ratio): improved (0.80-fold lower risk) |
| 70 Audera et al. 2001 | randomised controlled · 400 participants | Oral vitamin C, 0.03 g ('placebo'), 1 g, 3 g, or 3 g with additives ('Bio-C'); 0.03 g, 1 g or 3 g daily at onset of cold; At onset of cold and following two days; trial ran 18 months; vs. Vitamin C 0.03 g as placebo versus 1 g, 3 g and 3 g Bio-C | Duration of cold symptoms and episodes: no difference (No significant differences were observed in any measure of cold duration or severity between the four medication groups); Cumulative symptom severity scores after 7, 14 and 28 days: no difference (No significant differences were observed in any measure of cold duration or severity between the four medication groups) |
| 74 Sasazuki et al. 2006 | randomised controlled · 244 participants | Oral vitamin C; 50 mg/day (low) or 500 mg/day (high); 5 years; vs. 50 mg versus 500 mg vitamin C | Frequency of common colds (per 1000 person-months): improved (21.3 and 17.1); Relative risk of three or more common colds: improved (0.34 (0.12-0.97)); Severity of common cold: no difference |
Further studies in this area: 75 81 159 161 183 187
Vitamin C and Immune Function: Human Studies
In severe infections and sepsis, a systematic review describes individual studies with favorable effects on the immune response, but no consistent clinical benefit 46. A small randomized controlled pilot study in septic shock found higher neutrophil counts with intravenous L-ascorbic acid than with placebo 118. A randomized controlled study in healthy individuals found better uptake into plasma and white blood cells for a liposomal preparation than for standard vitamin C 132. No difference was shown in acute graft-versus-host disease after stem cell transplantation with intravenous, then oral L-ascorbic acid 125. Larger studies with immune measures as the primary aim are still pending.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Langlois et al. 2019 | meta-analysis · 1,322 participants | Vitamin C, enteral or parenteral, sometimes with other antioxidants; vs. Placebo or none | Incident infections: no difference |
| 46 Thakare et al. 2024 | systematic review | Parenteral vitamin C; vs. Heterogeneous study designs; controls not uniform | Immune function: improved |
| 86 Ahn et al. 2026 | randomised controlled · 120 participants | Aptamin C (vitamin C-aptamer conjugate) vs. placebo; 36.057 mg/day; 4 weeks; vs. Placebo in RCT; in vitro vitamin C in NK-92 cells | NK cell cytotoxicity: improved (significant increases in NK cell cytotoxicity after 2 and 4 weeks); serum cytokines and cytotoxic granules: improved (peaked 4 weeks after Aptamin C intake); NK cell activity in participants older than 40 years: improved |
| 118 Rosengrave et al. 2022 | randomised controlled · 40 participants | intravenous vitamin C versus 5% dextrose (placebo); 25 mg/kg body weight every 6 h; up to 96 h or until death/discharge; vs. placebo (intravenous 5% dextrose) | neutrophil counts: unclear (elevated in the vitamin C group relative to placebo by 72 h (p = 0.01)) |
| 125 Heidari et al. 2026 | randomised controlled · 31 participants | Intravenous then oral vitamin C versus placebo; 50 mg/kg/day i.v. (day +1 to +14), then 500 mg/day orally to day +100; up to day +100 post-transplant; vs. Placebo (triple-blind) | Acute graft-versus-host disease: no difference (33% vs. 44%) |
| 133 Van et al. 2026 | randomised controlled · 26 participants | Vitamin C (form not specified); 1000 mg/day; 4 months; vs. Placebo, crossover, double-blind | Innate immune system underrepresented in pathway enrichment: unclear |
| 149 Sim et al. 2025 | randomised controlled | Vitamin C or placebo, oral; 500 mg vitamin C twice daily; 4 weeks; vs. Placebo (n = 19) | Inflammatory response (e.g. serum LPS, IL-10, classical monocytes): improved |
Vitamin C and Iron Absorption from Food: Human Studies
In young children, an ascorbic acid addition to iron-zinc sprinkles did not change iron absorption in a randomized controlled trial 98. In iron deficiency anemia, hemoglobin increased more under plant iron with vitamin C from amla and under iron alone than under placebo 90. Whether the vitamin C addition provides its own benefit remains open. The strength of evidence is unclear: only one small controlled trial tested the vitamin C addition alone, a meta-analysis is lacking.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 98 Zlotkin et al. 2006 | randomised controlled · 75 participants | Sprinkles containing iron, zinc and ascorbic acid; 50 mg ascorbic acid, 30 mg iron, 5 or 10 mg zinc; Blood sampling at 48 h and 14 days; vs. Groups with 5 vs. 10 mg zinc; with vs. without ascorbic acid | percentage iron absorption: no difference (5.9%; min-max: 0.8-21); percentage iron absorption (zinc groups vs. control): no difference (5.0%; min-max: 1.4-24) |
Vitamin C: Further Outcomes in Studies
In this area, many controlled trials and meta-analyses have been conducted on very different questions; the strength of evidence is high, but the results are mixed. In intensive care patients overall, a meta-analysis saw lower overall mortality with oral or intravenous administration, which is not yet secured 4; an older meta-analysis found no difference 27. In type 2 diabetes, two meta-analyses found better values for long-term blood sugar and fasting blood sugar 2048. After gallbladder surgery, high-dose oral vitamin C did not alleviate pain 71; after joint replacement, according to a meta-analysis, it reduced morphine consumption, but not pain scores 28. For cancer prevention, a meta-analysis of large studies found no difference 3. Statements on precisely defined dosages, on transferability to well-supplied individuals, and on forms such as sodium ascorbate, calcium ascorbate, ascorbyl palmitate and liposomal preparations remain open.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 An et al. 2022 | meta-analysis · 883,627 participants | Vitamin C supplementation (form not reported); 4,895,544 person-years; vs. Placebo or control | Cardiovascular or type 2 diabetes risk: no difference (no effect on CVD or type 2 diabetes risk) |
| 2 Nguyen et al. 2026 | meta-analysis · 673,624 participants | Vitamin C; vs. Control group, various interventions | Ischemic stroke: improved |
| 3 Lee et al. 2015 | meta-analysis · 62,619 participants | vitamin C supplements, some combined with other supplements; vs. placebo or control | cancer incidence (risk): no difference (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence intervals, 0.95-1.05); cancer mortality: no difference |
| 4 Xu et al. 2023 | meta-analysis · 26,540 participants | Vitamin C oral or intravenous (monotherapy); vs. placebo or no therapy | all-cause mortality: improved (p = 0.009, RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97, I2 = 36%) |
| 13 Lee et al. 2023 | meta-analysis · 2,130 participants | Intravenous vitamin C monotherapy; higher (≥ 10,000 mg/day) vs lower dose; longer (> 4 days) vs shorter; vs. placebo/control; subgroups by dose, sepsis, timing | mortality in trials with lower control mortality (≤ 37.5%): no difference (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.68-1.16) |
| 15 Li et al. 2026 | meta-analysis · 2,104 participants | High-dose vitamin C (administration route not specified); not reported; not reported; vs. Placebo/untreated controls in the included RCTs | Mortality (all-cause): no difference (OR 0.97[95% CI 0.80-1.18, P = 0.76]) |
| 20 Nosratabadi et al. 2023 | meta-analysis · 1,447 participants | Vitamin C supplements (ascorbic acid); high-dose ≥1000 mg/day in subgroups; long-term ≥12 weeks; vs. untreated controls | Serum HbA1c: improved; Fasting insulin: improved; Fasting blood glucose (FBG): improved |
| 25 Vosoughi et al. 2026 | systematic review · 1,364 participants | perioperative vitamin C (ascorbic acid); varied across studies (heterogeneous dose, route, timing); vs. placebo or control in included RCTs | postoperative pain: no difference; blood loss: no difference; functional recovery: no difference |
Further studies in this area: 26 27 28 29 33 34 36 38 39 41 42 43 44 45 48 51 53 60 64 68 71 73 76 79 80 82 83 89 93 94 97 99 101 102 106 108 109 111 112 113 114 116 121 123 125 128 130 131 133 136 138 139 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 156 160 162 163 166 169 170 172 173 174 175 177 179 183 184 185 188 189
4. How Is Vitamin C Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies
The studies predominantly used oral L-ascorbic acid as a tablet, capsule or powder as well as intravenous infusions, in addition sodium ascorbate and topical preparations. Individual controlled studies tested liposomal preparations and ascorbyl palmitate. The doses, durations and comparison groups differ considerably between the studies.
| Preparation or form | Dose | Duration | Study |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C combined with vitamin E and selenium (vitamin arm); factorial design with garlic and H. pylori arms | — | 7.3 years supplementation, 14.7 years follow-up | 56 |
| Vitamin C plus vitamin E plus selenium (oral supplements) | — | 7.3 years | 57 |
| Oral vitamin C (pure ascorbic acid) vs placebo | 6000 mg/day (vitamin C), 0 mg/day (placebo) | 30 days | 58 |
| 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate (1L-PEGA) vs. sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) | — | split-dose regimen before colonoscopy | 59 |
| Vitamin C as ascorbic acid orally | 1000 mg daily | until delivery | 60 |
| Oral antioxidant mixture with 500 mg vitamin C plus vitamin E and β-carotene | 500 mg vitamin C, 400 IU vitamin E, 15 mg β-carotene | — | 61 |
| intravenous vitamin C | 50 mg per kilogram body weight every 6 hours | up to 96 hours | 62 |
| Intravenous vitamin C (ascorbic acid) | 50 mg/kg body weight every 6 hours | 4 days | 63 |
| 2% topical vitamin C solution vs 10% N-acetylcysteine vs 0.9% saline | 2% vitamin C solution, applied topically | symptoms assessed at 15 and 30 minutes | 64 |
| perioperative antioxidants: vitamin C plus N-acetylcysteine vs. placebo | — | perioperative, 1-year follow-up | 65 |
| PEG/ascorbic acid (PEGA), sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC), oral sulfate formula (SIR) | — | single- or split-dose before colonoscopy | 66 |
| intravenous vitamin C 1.5 g plus thiamine 100 mg plus hydrocortisone 50 mg | 1.5 g vitamin C every 6 hours | 96 hours or until ICU discharge or death | 67 |
| High-dose intravenous vitamin C plus FOLFOX ± bevacizumab | 1.5 g/kg/d, 3-hour infusion on days 1-3 | — | 68 |
| Vitamin C plus hydrocortisone and thiamine | vitamin C 2 g every 6 h, hydrocortisone 200 mg daily, thiamine 200 mg every 12 h | 5 days or until ICU discharge | 69 |
| Oral vitamin C, 0.03 g ('placebo'), 1 g, 3 g, or 3 g with additives ('Bio-C') | 0.03 g, 1 g or 3 g daily at onset of cold | At onset of cold and following two days; trial ran 18 months | 70 |
5. Is Vitamin C Safe? Side Effects in Studies
Meta-analyses found no increased adverse events with intravenous vitamin C 12 and with the mixture with thiamine and hydrocortisone 1121. Another meta-analysis, by contrast, saw more adverse events 9. Nausea, vomiting, hypotension and tachycardia were mentioned occasionally 45. Reviews describe oxalate nephropathy and hemolysis in G6PD deficiency at very high or repeated doses 3940. After liver transplantation, kidney failure occurred more often with ascorbic acid than with placebo in a small study 121.
| Study | Reported side effects |
|---|---|
| 9 Liang et al. 2023 | Higher rate of adverse events with IVVC |
| 11 Deng et al. 2024 | No increase in adverse events versus placebo/standard of care |
| 12 Patel et al. 2022 | No trial reported increased adverse events |
| 14 Martimbianco et al. 2022 | little to no difference or very uncertain evidence |
| 15 Li et al. 2026 | not reported |
| 18 Sato et al. 2021 | one study: hypernatremia; adverse effects rare, deemed relatively safe |
| 21 Yao et al. 2021 | no statistical differences in adverse events |
| 25 Vosoughi et al. 2026 | no major safety concerns identified |
| 30 Zayed et al. 2022 | acute kidney injury (incidence, no difference) |
| 35 Tsokkou et al. 2026 | safe, no serious adverse events reported |
| 38 Abid et al. 2026 | no significant differences reported |
| 39 Alangari et al. 2026 | Oxalate nephropathy, hemolysis in G6PD deficiency, especially with very large or repeated doses |
6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence
- The optimal dose, the timing and the duration of administration are open for most areas.
- The transferability to well-supplied individuals without deficiency is not clarified.
- Many studies investigated combination preparations whose findings cannot be attributed to vitamin C alone.
- Long-term effects and dose-response relationships are hardly studied.
- The comparison of different vitamin C forms (ascorbic acid, sodium ascorbate, liposomal form) with one another is still largely pending.
7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Vitamin C
Vitamin C is an essential water-soluble vitamin that the body cannot produce itself. Human studies show benefits for colds, especially a shorter duration with regular intake, and indications from small studies of better wound and skin healing. For oxidative stress and inflammation, the results are mixed: some studies found lower inflammation markers, others no difference. In sepsis, the picture is inconsistent: some meta-analyses report a lower mortality, others no difference, and the largest single study saw rather disadvantages. Combination preparations with other substances do not allow a conclusion about vitamin C alone. The tolerability is considered predominantly good; at very high doses, oxalate nephropathy and hemolysis in G6PD deficiency are described.
Frequently Asked Questions
How well has Vitamin C been studied in humans?
We evaluated 252 human studies on Vitamin C, including 160 randomised controlled trials and 63 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 26,210 participants in total. As of 13 October 2026.
Does Vitamin C help with sepsis and critical care? What the studies show
Does Vitamin C help with oxidative stress and antioxidant status? What the studies show
Does Vitamin C help with skin and connective tissue? What the studies show
Does Vitamin C help with common cold and respiratory infections? What the studies show
Does Vitamin C help with immune function? What the studies show
Does Vitamin C help with iron absorption from food? What the studies show
We evaluated one controlled study; the controlled studies include 75 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly no difference. Strength of evidence under our published rules: unclear. Sources: 98
Does vitamin C help against colds?
Regularly taken vitamin C shortened colds in placebo studies 55, and recruits fell ill less often with vitamin C 58; intake only from the start of a cold showed inconsistent results 5470. The studies tested orally taken ascorbic acid; above all, it remains open which dose and which start of intake help most.
Which vitamin C forms were investigated?
Most frequently, L-ascorbic acid was tested orally as a tablet, capsule or powder as well as intravenously as an infusion. In addition, sodium ascorbate, topical preparations and, in individual studies, liposomal preparations were used. Ascorbyl palmitate was investigated only occasionally.
How safe is vitamin C?
Does vitamin C show a benefit in sepsis?
The picture is mixed: meta-analyses found partly a lower mortality, especially without adjunctive agents 412131931, others found no confirmed difference 81622. The largest single study saw death or persistent organ failure combined more often with vitamin C than with placebo 62. Several reviews report a shorter vasopressor duration 816192231. The optimal dose, the timing and which patient groups benefit remain open.
What do studies on oxidative stress show?
Sources
- 1An P, Wan S, Luo Y, Luo J, Zhang X, Zhou S et al. · 2022
- 2Nguyen NQ, Ta KT, Chuang KJ · 2026
- 3Lee B, Oh SW, Myung SK · 2015
- 4Xu C, Yi T, Tan S, Xu H, Hu Y, Ma J et al. · 2023
- 5Fujii T, Salanti G, Belletti A, Bellomo R, Carr A, Furukawa TA et al. · 2022
- 6Pham TP, Le TH, Pham HT, Tran TT, Pham VT, Mafruhah OR et al. · 2024
- 7Brown J, Robertson C, Sevilla L, Garza J, Rashid H, Benitez AC et al. · 2022
- 8Liang H, Mu Q, Sun W, Liu L, Qiu S, Xu Z et al. · 2023
- 9Liang B, Su J, Shao H, Chen H, Xie B · 2023
- 10Chen CY, Chiu CT, Lee HS, Lai CC · 2022
- 11Deng J, Zuo QK, Venugopal K, Hung J, Zubair A, Blais S et al. · 2024
- 12Patel JJ, Ortiz-Reyes A, Dhaliwal R, Clarke J, Hill A, Stoppe C et al. · 2022
- 13Lee ZY, Ortiz-Reyes L, Lew CCH, Hasan MS, Ke L, Patel JJ et al. · 2023
- 14Martimbianco ALC, Pacheco RL, Bagattini ÂM, de Fátima Carreira Moreira Padovez R, Azevedo LCP, Riera R · 2022
- 15Li N, Yan Y, Li Y, Ni J, Gao J, Piao X et al. · 2026
- 16Yong S, Suping L, Peng Z, Dong L, Qing W · 2024
- 17Chen H, Chen P, Li K, Shao J · 2021
- 18Sato R, Hasegawa D, Prasitlumkum N, Ueoka M, Nishida K, Takahashi K et al. · 2021
- 19Hung KC, Chuang MH, Chen JY, Hsu CW, Chiu CC, Chang YJ et al. · 2023
- 20Nosratabadi S, Ashtary-Larky D, Hosseini F, Namkhah Z, Mohammadi S, Salamat S et al. · 2023
- 21Yao R, Zhu Y, Yu Y, Li Z, Wang L, Zheng L et al. · 2021
- 22Luo X, Zhu Y, Zhang R, Zhu J, Kuang H, Shao Y et al. · 2023
- 23Li T, Zeng J, Li DH, Yang GY, Wang K, Deng HF et al. · 2021
- 24Zeng Y, Liu Z, Xu F, Tang Z · 2023
- 25Vosoughi F, Nikeghbalii G, Sharafi M, Najafi E, Menbari Oskouie I · 2026
- 26Hung KC, Chiang MH, Wu SC, Chang YJ, Ho CN, Wang LK et al. · 2021
- 27Langlois PL, Manzanares W, Adhikari NKJ, Lamontagne F, Stoppe C, Hill A et al. · 2019
- 28Moftakhari Hajimirzaei S, Bagherzadeh Cham M, Dolikhani M, Tabatabaee SM, Ebrahimpour A · 2025
- 29Lbban E, Kwon K, Ashor A, Stephan B, Idris I, Tsintzas K et al. · 2023
- 30Zayed Y, Alzghoul BN, Banifadel M, Venigandla H, Hyde R, Sutchu S et al. · 2022
- 31
- 32Feng F, Yang H, Yang W, Li M, Chang X, Chen Y · 2021
- 33Rawat D, Roy A, Maitra S, Gulati A, Khanna P, Baidya DK · 2021
- 34de Oliveira IM, Hauschild DB, Machado RP, Marques BS, Wazlawik E · 2025
- 35Tsokkou S, Matsas A, Konstantinidis I, Karopoulou E, Papamitsou T, Stamoula E · 2026
- 36Wang C, You C, Zhang Y · 2026
- 37Candeloro BM, Miranda ESF, Hizuka LA, Assumpção MCB, Gianini S, Porto AA et al. · 2026
- 38Abid H, Mushtaq I, Munir ABI, Shakil J, Vinjamuri S, Tadasare N et al. · 2026
- 39Alangari A, Arif J, Al Qureshah F, Alkhodairy F · 2026
- 40Ahmed R, Shetty S, Aziz Khan MQ, Kalsoom I, Qasim S, Khan SB et al. · 2026
- 41Kosari A, Shahinfar H, Rostampour K, Ghazal Mirhosseini S, Soltani S · 2026
- 42Banerjee D, Yadav R · 2026
- 43Xu XM, Ruan JH, Tao T, Xiang SL, Meng RL, Chen X · 2025
- 44Sinopoli A, Sciurti A, Isonne C, Santoro MM, Baccolini V · 2024
- 45Sharma Y, Sumanadasa S, Shahi R, Woodman R, Mangoni AA, Bihari S et al. · 2024
- 46Thakare PV, Gaurkar SS, Mohale SA, Bharadia G, Acharya S · 2024
- 47Topical Treatments for Melasma and Their Mechanism of ActionGonzález-Molina V, Martí-Pineda A, González N · 2022
- 48
- 49Guideline committee of The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020, Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Japanese Association for Acute Medicine · 2022
- 50Liu Y, Wu S, Wu H, Liang X, Guo D, Zhuo F · 2021
- 51Borges L, Gennari-Felipe M, Dias BB, Hatanaka E · 2021
- 52Ran L, Zhao W, Wang H, Zhao Y, Bu H · 2020
- 53van Gorkom GNY, Lookermans EL, Van Elssen CHMJ, Bos GMJ · 2019
- 54Ran L, Zhao W, Wang J, Wang H, Zhao Y, Tseng Y et al. · 2018
- 55
- 56Ma JL, Zhang L, Brown LM, Li JY, Shen L, Pan KF et al. · 2012
- 57You WC, Brown LM, Zhang L, Li JY, Jin ML, Chang YS et al. · 2006
- 58
- 59Serradesanferm A, Torá-Rocamora I, Pozo À, Ocaña T, Diaz M, Moreira R et al. · 2025
- 60Kiondo P, Wamuyu-Maina G, Wandabwa J, Bimenya GS, Tumwesigye NM, Okong P · 2014
- 61Keenan TDL, Agrón E, Keane PA, Domalpally A, Chew EY, Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group et al. · 2025
- 62Lamontagne F, Masse MH, Menard J, Sprague S, Pinto R, Heyland DK et al. · 2022
- 63Müller MM, Pinto R, Lamontagne F, Adhikari NKJ, Del Sorbo L, Lessening Organ Dysfunction With Vitamin C (LOVIT) Investigators · 2025
- 64Fu X, Chang J, Peng S, Li C, Xie X, Qin J et al. · 2026
- 65Loft FC, Holse C, Aasvang EK, Vester-Andersen M, Rasmussen LS, Jørgensen LN et al. · 2025
- 66Comparison of efficacy of low-volume bowel cleansers prior to colonoscopy: a randomised, prospective, open-label trialKojecký V, Matouš J, Kianička B, Zádorová Z, Varga M · 2019
- 67Sevransky JE, Rothman RE, Hager DN, Bernard GR, Brown SM, Buchman TG et al. · 2021
- 68Wang F, He MM, Xiao J, Zhang YQ, Yuan XL, Fang WJ et al. · 2022
- 69Lyu QQ, Zheng RQ, Chen QH, Yu JQ, Shao J, Gu XH · 2022
- 70Audera C, Patulny RV, Sander BH, Douglas RM · 2001
- 71
- 72Vandervelden S, Cortens B, Fieuws S, Eegdeman W, Malinverni S, Vanhove P et al. · 2025
- 73Rozemeijer S, Dubois EA, de Grooth HJ, den Uil CA, Rettig TCD, Rijpstra TA et al. · 2026
- 74Sasazuki S, Sasaki S, Tsubono Y, Okubo S, Hayashi M, Tsugane S · 2006
- 75Thomas S, Patel D, Bittel B, Wolski K, Wang Q, Kumar A et al. · 2021
- 76
- 77Qiao X, Kashiouris MG, L'Heureux M, Fisher BJ, Leichtle SW, Truwit JD et al. · 2022
- 78Fowler AA, Truwit JD, Hite RD, Morris PE, DeWilde C, Priday A et al. · 2019
- 79Shorey-Kendrick LE, McEvoy CT, Milner K, Harris J, Brownsberger J, Tepper RS et al. · 2024
- 80Karadžić Kočica M, Ristić A, Soldatović I, Lazović D, Čumić J, Grujić M et al. · 2024
- 81Phuaksaman C, Jampachaisri K, Srisingh K · 2025
- 82Shorey-Kendrick LE, McEvoy CT, Milner K, Harris J, Brownsberger J, Tepper RS et al. · 2025
- 83Moon S, Lim S, Yun J, Lee W, Kim M, Cho K et al. · 2020
- 84Pérez-Torres I, Aisa-Álvarez A, Casarez-Alvarado S, Borrayo G, Márquez-Velasco R, Guarner-Lans V et al. · 2023
- 85Wacker DA, Burton SL, Berger JP, Hegg AJ, Heisdorffer J, Wang Q et al. · 2022
- 86Ahn H, Lee J, Park JH, Barn JS, Kim Y, Kang JS · 2026
- 87Majidi N, Rabbani F, Gholami S, Gholamalizadeh M, BourBour F, Rastgoo S et al. · 2021
- 88Ramón R, Holguín E, Chiriboga JD, Rubio N, Ballesteros C, Ezechieli M · 2023
- 89Jeon Y, Park JS, Moon S, Yeo J · 2016
- 90Patel MN, Patel N, Maheshvari J · 2025
- 91Maggini S, Beveridge S, Suter M · 2012
- 92Žmitek K, Žmitek J, Hristov H, Rogl Butina M, Keršmanc P, Pogačnik T · 2024
- 93Safaei N, Babaei H, Azarfarin R, Jodati AR, Yaghoubi A, Sheikhalizadeh MA · 2017
- 94Mahmoodpoor A, Shadvar K, Sanaie S, Hadipoor MR, Pourmoghaddam MA, Saghaleini SH · 2021
- 95Files DC, Matthay MA, Ware LB, Brower RG, Aggarwal NR, Brown SM et al. · 2025
- 96Mishra PK, Kumar A, Agrawal S, Doneria D, Singh R · 2024
- 97Chambers ST, Storer M, Scott-Thomas A, Slow S, Williman J, Epton M et al. · 2023
- 98Zlotkin SH, Schauer C, Owusu Agyei S, Wolfson J, Tondeur MC, Asante KP et al. · 2006
- 99Labbani-Motlagh Z, Amini S, Aliannejad R, Sadeghi A, Shafiee G, Heshmat R et al. · 2022
- 100Kumar N, Singh A, Kumar R, Kumar M, Chaudhary AK · 2026
- 101Jalili Shahandashti F, Mozayan M, Abdolkarimi L, Kargar F, Ghanbari A, Heidarinia S et al. · 2025
- 102Intravenous vitamin C for bleeding control in elective C-sections: a randomized clinical trial studyKhakifirooz B, Mashak B, Hashemnejad M, Abdullahi S, Miri M, Amirpour-Kondelji F et al. · 2026
- 103Liu X, Chen B, Jin Y, Zhong F, Zhang Y, Li Y et al. · 2025
- 104Synchronizing positive effect of vitamin C and chromium on hyper lipidemia, hyperglycemia, liver enzymes and BMI of diabetes mellitus type 2 patientsSabar N, Hussain MI, Saleem H, Khan MA, Khalid H, Kanwal Z et al. · 2024
- 105Li W, Zhao R, Liu S, Ma C, Wan X · 2024
- 106Demirel M, Aktas A, Kizil M, Yalcin N · 2026
- 107Zhang J, Rao X, Li Y, Zhu Y, Liu F, Guo G et al. · 2021
- 108Vijayakumar TM, Pavitra K, Muthunarayanan L · 2017
- 109Daoust R, Paquet J, Williamson D, Huard V, Arbour C, Perry JJ et al. · 2024
- 110Hellou E, Mohsin J, Elemy A, Hakim F, Mustafa-Hellou M, Hamoud S · 2022
- 111Yanase F, Bitker L, Hessels L, Osawa E, Naorungroj T, Cutuli SL et al. · 2020
- 112Emadi N, Nemati MH, Ghorbani M, Allahyari E · 2019
- 113Pasand ZS, Erfanian R, Masbough F, Asanjarani B, Sohrabpour S · 2025
- 114Enderle J, Dörner R, Tondar D, Hasler M, Gilcher C, Steingass CB et al. · 2026
- 115
- 116Farrag N, Wakeel LE, Abdelhafeez A, Schaalan m · 2024
- 117Vlasiuk E, Rosengrave P, Roberts E, Boden JM, Shaw G, Carr AC · 2022
- 118Rosengrave P, Spencer E, Williman J, Mehrtens J, Morgan S, Doyle T et al. · 2022
- 119Spencer E, Rosengrave P, Williman J, Shaw G, Carr AC · 2022
- 120El Driny WA, Esmat IM, Shaheen SM, Sabri NA · 2022
- 121Gajate Martín L, de la Hoz I, Martín M, Fernández C, Martín Grande A, Parise D et al. · 2025
- 122Pazyar N, Badakhsh F, Yaghoobi R, Seyedtabib M · 2025
- 123Bodeker KL, Smith BJ, Berg DJ, Chandrasekharan C, Sharif S, Fei N et al. · 2024
- 124Vijayaraghavan BKT, Venkataraman R, Ramanathan Y, Margabandhu S, Jayakumar D, Ramachandran P et al. · 2023
- 125Heidari S, Shahrami B, Rad S, Sadeghi K, Sharifi Aliabadi L, Hadjibabaei M et al. · 2026
- 126Tajari F, Toloue Ghamari B, Jafari Kafiabadi M, Shariatzade H, Biglari F, Mahmoudi Nasab O et al. · 2026
- 127Dawar S, Gupta M, Arya V, Kumar S · 2026
- 128Yanase F, Spano S, Maeda A, Chaba A, Naorungroj T, Ow CPC et al. · 2023
- 129Haddadi M, Jaghouri E, Sarpooshi DR, Ghobadi F, Sarpooshi HR · 2020
- 130Mouly S, Mahé I, Knellwolf AL, Simoneau G, Bergmann JF · 2005
- 131Nussbaumer-Pröll A, Hausmann B, Weber M, Pjevac P, Berry D, Zeitlinger M · 2025
- 132Purpura M, Jäger R, Godavarthi A, Bhaskarachar D, Tinsley GM · 2024
- 133Van Grunsven T, Wadley GD, Mason SA · 2026
- 134Belousoviene E, Pranskuniene Z, Vaitkaitiene E, Pilvinis V, Pranskunas A · 2023
- 135El Attar Y, Doghaim N, El Far N, El Hedody S, Hawwam SA · 2022
- 136Ashor AW, Shannon OM, Werner AD, Scialo F, Gilliard CN, Cassel KS et al. · 2020
- 137Grant SM, Wolever TMS, Thompson A, Chiavaroli L, Seider M, Harvey A et al. · 2026
- 138
- 139Basaqr R, Skleres M, Jayswal R, Thomas DT · 2021
- 140Martins ML, da Silva AT, Machado RP, Ramos HP, Martinelli C, Silveira TT et al. · 2021
- 141Humbert P, Fanian F, Lihoreau T, Jeudy A, Pierard GE · 2018
- 142Abdelhay NM, Elzanaty MT, Ibrahim RO · 2026
- 143Protective Effects of an Advanced Antioxidant Serum and an Encapsulated Vitamin C Serum From UV-Induced Erythema and Oxidative StressAmini-Nik S, Law RM, Bhardwaj V, Lynch S, Nelson DB · 2026
- 144Agha A, Afandi B, Yasin J, Sharma C, Alshaer MH, Alshamsi MAS et al. · 2025
- 145Lbban E, Macey A, Rundle J, Ashor A, Idris I, Siervo M · 2024
- 146Nastos GG, Lolli L, Atkinson G, Theodorou AA, Paschalis V, Kyparos A et al. · 2026
- 147Gutierrez AD, Duran-Valdez E, Robinson I, de Serna DG, Schade DS · 2013
- 148Leelasawatsuk P, Supanimitjaroenporn P, Rodsom N, Wongkittithaworn T, Tangthongkum M · 2026
- 149Sim M, Hong S, Jung MH, Choi EY, Hwang GS, Shin DM et al. · 2025
- 150Hosseini-Monfared P, Mirahmadi A, Sarzaeem MM, Pourshahryari S, Aminnia P, Poursalehian M et al. · 2025
- 151Tepper RS, Milner K, Harris J, Lee B, Cunningham M, Tiller C et al. · 2025
- 152Azevedo Filho FAS, Blunck RM, Ali AY, Fucs PMMB, Cotias RB · 2025
- 153Privšek M, Strnad M, Markota A · 2024
- 154LOVIT-COVID Investigators, on behalf of the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, and the REMAP-CAP Investigators, Adhikari NKJ, Hashmi M, Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan BK et al. · 2023
- 155Aisa-Álvarez A, Pérez-Torres I, Guarner-Lans V, Manzano-Pech L, Cruz-Soto R, Márquez-Velasco R et al. · 2023
- 156Kumar V, Bhushan D, Supriya S, Ganapule AA, Lohani P, Shyama et al. · 2022
- 157Nandhini N, Malviya D, Parashar S, Pandey C, Nath SS, Tripathi M · 2022
- 158Miller GD, Nesbit BA, Kim-Shapiro DB, Basu S, Berry MJ · 2022
- 159JamaliMoghadamSiahkali S, Zarezade B, Koolaji S, SeyedAlinaghi S, Zendehdel A, Tabarestani M et al. · 2021
- 160
- 161Van Straten M, Josling P · 2002
- 162Kim MK, Sasaki S, Sasazuki S, Okubo S, Hayashi M, Tsugane S · 2004
- 163Ingwersen LC, Kistenmacher A, Melchert UH, Oltmanns KM · 2025
- 164Davis JL, Paris HL, Beals JW, Binns SE, Giordano GR, Scalzo RL et al. · 2016
- 165Fitzpatrick RE, Rostan EF · 2002
- 166Yu Z, Zhang F, Xu C, Wang Y · 2022
- 167Jung SY, Lee MT, Baek MS, Kim WY · 2022
- 168Legouis D, Monard C, Ourahmoune A, Sgardello S, Quintard H, Criton G et al. · 2024
- 169Kanji S, Hernández-Mitre MP, Blain H, Adhikari NKJ, Lamontagne F, Battista MC et al. · 2026
- 170Iizuka Y, Fukano K, Oki S, Sawada I, Miyazawa K, Ono S et al. · 2025
- 171Hudson EP, Collie JT, Fujii T, Luethi N, Udy AA, Doherty S et al. · 2019
- 172de Jong TMH, Stamatelou E, Rosema NAM, Jansen IDC, Brandt BW, Angelakis A et al. · 2024
- 173Padayatty SJ, Riordan HD, Hewitt SM, Katz A, Hoffer LJ, Levine M · 2006
- 174Mack E, Rau C, Otet C, Schäfer JA, Brendel C, Grass A et al. · 2025
- 175Hutchins AM, McIver IE, Johnston CS · 2005
- 176Angriman F, Muttalib F, Lamontagne F, Adhikari NKJ, LOVIT Investigators · 2023
- 177Zhang X, Zhao H, Man J, Yin X, Zhang T, Yang X et al. · 2022
- 178Radke DI, Homayr AL, Stoppe C, Elke G · 2023
- 179Mummadi MK, Sapavat S, Ettey I, Appala T, Geddam JJB · 2025
- 180Kazemeini S, Nadeem-Tariq A, Luthra A, Suha R, Turna A, Easterly J et al. · 2025
- 181Alissa A, Alrashed MA, Alshaya AI, Al Sulaiman K, Alharbi S · 2024
- 182Halim Z, Huang Y, Lee ZY, Lew CCH · 2024
- 183de Man A, Long MT, Stoppe C · 2024
- 184Stoppe C, Dresen E, de Man A · 2024
- 185Rossi RE, Chen J, Caplin ME · 2022
- 186Ammar MA, Ammar AA, Condeni MS, Bell CM · 2021
- 187Hemilä H, de Man AME · 2020
- 188Ageing, inorganic nitrate and vitamin C : effects on markers of cardiovascular riskAshor AW · 2017
- 189Yao DF, Mills JN · 2016
Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.