Knowledge · Natural Compounds

Glycine

Glycine is a proteinogenic amino acid; human studies show different, mostly small or inconsistent effects depending on form and field.

Last updated:

We evaluated 104 human studies on Glycine, including 11 randomised controlled trials and 4 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 685 participants in total. As of 7 October 2026.

This page as PDF · Summary

1. What Is Glycine? Occurrence, Origin and Forms

Glycine is the smallest proteinogenic amino acid and a building block of almost all proteins. The body produces it itself and takes it up from protein in food. It is used, among other things, as a food additive, as an excipient in medicines and as a dietary supplement.

Glycine occurs in almost all proteins, especially abundantly in collagen and gelatin. In the body it is present in blood and tissue and serves as a signalling molecule in the nervous system.

For studies and preparations, glycine is mostly produced chemically or obtained from proteins and processed into powder, capsules or solutions. Oral doses, infusion solutions and irrigation solutions are the forms mainly examined.

Forms and Preparations Studied

  • Pure glycine as powder, capsules or tablets for oral intake
  • Glycine as a component of amino acid infusion solutions
  • Glycine as an irrigation solution
  • Glycine as a food additive with a sweet taste
  • Glycine as an excipient and buffer in pharmaceutical preparations
  • Glycine bound in proteins such as collagen and gelatin

Not covered on this page:

  • Collagen and gelatin preparations contain glycine, but the protein itself is studied there, not glycine alone.
  • Betaine (trimethylglycine) and sarcosine (dimethylglycine) are substances in their own right with their own research questions.
  • Glyphosate is a pesticide and shares only part of its name with glycine.
  • Combination products of glycine with other amino acids, melatonin or further additives are not investigations of glycine alone.

2. What Does Glycine Do? Results by Area

AreaResult in controlled studiesStrength of evidenceStudiesParticipants
Psychiatry and Nervous Systemmostly no differencemoderate2 meta-analyses · 4 controlled · 22 other93
Sleep and Falling Asleepreviews onlylow1 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 3 other0
Wound Healingmostly improvedlow0 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 1 other96
Metabolism and Blood Sugarmostly no differenceunclear0 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 27 other27
Liver and Fatty Liverobservational data onlyunclear0 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 6 other0
Blood Flow and Tissue Damageobservational data onlyunclear0 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 6 other0
Other investigationsmostly no differencelow0 meta-analyses · 7 controlled · 37 other227

How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.

3. What the Studies Show in Detail

Glycine, Psychiatry and Nervous System: Human Studies

Two systematic reviews report benefits of glycine for psychotic symptoms, one of them as an add-on to antipsychotics; the studies were mostly small and short 45. In addition to clozapine, glycine improved neither positive nor negative symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia; positive symptoms decreased only in the placebo group 22. In the ketamine model in healthy men, glycine prevented the decrease in theta activity, the MMN amplitude remained unchanged 18. In participants with a pronounced increase in the gamma response, glycine also attenuated the ketamine-induced negative symptoms 20; resting gamma activity and psychometric values did not change 19. It remains open whether glycine shows a reproducible benefit in schizophrenia in larger studies and whether it attenuates the effect of clozapine.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
4 Soh et al. 2024systematic reviewOral glycine administration; up to 14 days and 4 months; vs. various controls in the included studiesPsychiatric symptoms: improved
5 Hoenders et al. 2018systematic reviewGlycine added to antipsychotics; vs. Antipsychotics alone or other natural agentsPsychotic symptoms: improved
18 Curic et al. 2025controlled · 25 participantsglycine (NMDAR coagonist), placebo-controlled crossover; vs. placebo or ketamine aloneMMN amplitude (time domain): no difference; P3a amplitude: no difference; dMMN-associated theta power and phase consistency: unclear
19 Haaf et al. 2023controlled · 25 participantsglycine pretreatment, subanesthetic S-ketamine; vs. S-ketamine alone vs. glycine pretreatment plus S-ketamineresting-state gamma activity (EEG): no difference (did not significantly attenuate any of these effects); psychometric scores (PANSS, 5D-ASC): no difference (did not significantly attenuate any of these effects)
20 Haaf et al. 2022controlled · 24 participantsGlycine pretreatment before S-ketamine; vs. Placebo; S-ketamine aloneEarly auditory evoked gamma-band response (amplitude): unclear; PANSS negative symptom score: unclear
22 Potkin et al. 1999controlled · 19 participantsGlycine added to clozapine; 30 g/day glycine; 12 weeks; vs. Placebo added to clozapinePositive symptoms (BPRS): no difference; Negative symptoms (SANS): no difference
43 Guasp et al. 2025case series · 41 participantsno glycine administration; study of GlyR antibodies; median follow-up 24 months; vs. no comparator; own and literature casesfunctional status (mRS <3) in survivors: improved (23 (70%)); deaths: worsened (Eleven patients died, 8 from complications of PERM); relapses: worsened (12 relapses in 10 (28%))
48 Nourbakhsh et al. 2025case report · 1 participantspantothenic acid and mitochondrial cocktail plus low-protein diet; vs. no control (single case)motor function and social interactions: improved (improvement in her motor function and social interactions)

Further studies in this area: 49 52 53 55 57 58 60 61 62 64 68 69 72 74 82 86 88 93 97 99

Glycine, Sleep and Falling Asleep: Human Studies

A systematic review reports better sleep in healthy people with longer glycine intake, based on small studies with a high risk of bias 4. A scoping review found at least one improved sleep measure in all three sleep studies with glycine 2. In an open comparative study in children, sleep problems improved with glycine and with a homeopathic preparation, more so with the latter 16. It remains open whether the sleep effect of glycine is confirmed in larger placebo-controlled studies in people with sleep problems.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
2 Fan et al. 2026systematic reviewGlycine-, collagen- or other glycine-containing supplements; vs. Placebo, alpha-lactalbumin (active comparator)Sleep-related outcomes in 3 glycine trials: improved (All 3 glycine sleep trials reported benefits on at least 1 sleep-related outcome); Polysomnographic awakenings with collagen peptides: improved (fewer polysomnographic awakenings); Sleep-related outcomes collagen peptides vs alpha-lactalbumin: no difference (did not show superiority of collagen peptides for sleep-related outcomes)
4 Soh et al. 2024systematic reviewOral glycine administration; up to 14 days and 4 months; vs. various controls in the included studiesSleep: improved
87 Khosropanah et al. 2026reviewGlycine alongside vitamins, minerals and other amino acidsSleep facilitation via central nervous system inhibition: improved
95 Ramos-Jiménez et al. 2024reviewGlycine dietary supplement; high doses >500 mg/kg body mass (toxic)Sleep quality and recovery: improved

Glycine and Wound Healing: Human Studies

In patients with early peri-implantitis, plaque index, bleeding index as well as IL-6 and IL-1β decreased after powder-jet cleaning with glycine 8. After six months, IL-1β was higher with glycine than with erythritol powder 8. The informative value is limited because only this study is available and glycine there serves as a blasting powder, not as an ingested substance. Hypothesis: A review sees in non-essential amino acids such as glycine a plausible approach for wound and bone healing in older patients in oral and maxillofacial surgery 94. Controlled studies with ingested glycine for wound healing are still pending.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
8 Pan et al. 2025randomised controlled · 96 participantsGlycine-based subgingival sandblasting vs. erythritol sandblasting vs. control; Follow-up up to 6 months; vs. Erythritol sandblasting and controlPlaque index (PLI): improved (P < 0.05); Bleeding index (BI): improved (P < 0.05); Inflammatory factors IL-6, IL-1β: improved (P < 0.05)
94 Kim et al. 2025reviewnonessential amino acids, including glycinebone and mucosal healing: unclear

Glycine, Metabolism and Blood Sugar: Human Studies

A randomized crossover study found no difference between glycine and branched-chain amino acids in hemodialysis patients for glucagon-like peptide 1, cholecystokinin and peptide YY 11. The mixture of glycine and N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) improved mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and insulin resistance in older adults compared with placebo 14. Without a comparison group, triglycerides decreased in people with severe obesity with glycine, body weight remained the same 46. It remains open whether pure glycine alone improves blood sugar or metabolism in people without a specific metabolic disease, since most studies investigated combination preparations, infusions or other forms.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
1 Wittemans et al. 2019cohort study · 80,003 participantsglycine (circulating levels, genetically studied); vs. genetic instruments for glycine vs. disease riskType 2 diabetes: unclear
3 Thimm et al. 2025systematic reviewGlycine supplementation, possibly with carnitineEvidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and management: unclear (15 statements)
11 Genton et al. 2021randomised controlled · 27 participantsOral glycine versus branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs); 7 g twice daily; 4 months per period, 1-month washout, crossover; vs. BCAA supplementation (same dose)Glucagon-like peptide 1: no difference (P = 0.028); Cholecystokinin: no difference (P = 0.021); Peptide YY: no difference (P = 0.002)
27 Li et al. 2026cohort study · 23,634 participantscirculating metabolites, including glycine; no information; up to 26 years of follow-up; vs. participants with vs. without incident type 2 diabetesassociation of glycine with incident type 2 diabetes: unclear (67 associations not previously reported)
31 Huidobro et al. 2026cohort study · 1,738 participantsPlasma amino acids quantified by nuclear magnetic resonance, no glycine preparation; Median follow-up 4.3 years; vs. Cross-sectional and incidence analyses by plasma glycine levels, adjustedType 2 diabetes prevalence (adjusted odds ratio): improved (0.68; 95% CI 0.57-0.80)
32 Feng et al. 2024cross-sectional study · 774 participantsglycine from habitual diet; intake quartiles: <1.32; 1.32-1.82; 1.82-2.26; >2.26; vs. highest vs lowest intake quartile (Q4 vs Q1)prevalence of hyperlipidemia (0.547 (95% CI, 0.327-0.913)); prevalence of overweight/obesity (0.547 (95% CI, 0.353-0.850))
34 García-Gavilán et al. 2026cohort study · 699 participantsPlasma metabolomics profile (LC-MS/MS), glycine part of shared signature; Baseline and 1-year follow-up; vs. Metabolomic scores vs. total mortality; external validation NHS/HPFSAssociation of shared metabolites (incl. glycine) with total mortality: worsened (HR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.04-2.25)
35 Palacios-González et al. 2022cross-sectional study · 602 participantsNo preparation; measurement of 40 serum metabolites; vs. MetS status as well as sex and ageSerum glycine and MetS: unclear; Glycine as sex-specific marker: unclear; Glycine and age-dependent MetS: unclear

Further studies in this area: 36 39 40 42 45 46 52 54 65 70 71 80 81 84 88 89 92 95 98 100

Glycine, Liver and Fatty Liver: Human Studies

For liver and fatty liver, no controlled studies on glycine alone are available; the evidence is therefore unclear. A small study in people with severe obesity found lower aminotransferases and a more favorable glutamate-serine-glycine index with ingested glycine without a comparison arm 46. A cross-sectional study investigated glycine together with serine and threonine and found lower amino acid levels with a higher degree of steatosis, while a high-dose diet with these three amino acids improved MASLD pathogenesis in a mouse model 28. A review reports on glycine as a metabolic marker in chronic liver diseases 85. Another review describes support of detoxification pathways by glycine as a glutathione precursor 84. A third review mentions a possible benefit of glycine rinse solution in ischemia-reperfusion injury of liver transplants, based predominantly on animal and cell findings 102. The efficacy and safety of pure, ingested glycine in humans remain open, since the available human findings are small, uncontrolled, or related to mixtures.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
28 Mino et al. 2024cross-sectional study · 23,036 participantsGlycine combined with serine and threonine (high diet in mouse model); vs. Groups by SLD/CC criteria; MASLD mouse models on FFC dietGlycine, serine and threonine levels by steatosis grade: worsened (significantly decreased); MASLD pathogenesis under high Gly/Ser/Thr diet: improved (ameliorated)
46 Tan et al. 2025study · 19 participantsdietary glycine supplementation; 100 mg/kg/day; two weeks; vs. no control arm, before-afteraminotransferases: improved (significant reductions); glutamate-serine-glycine index (MASLD marker): improved (improved)
59 Lin et al. 2025studyGlycine supplementation, partly combined with interferon-α; vs. Healthy controls or HBV-infected cells/mice without glycineHBV cccDNA levels: improved (approximately 50%); HBsAg levels under combination therapy: improved (60% reduction); Serum glycine in HBV patients vs. healthy controls: unclear (R=0.7650)
84 Draganidis et al. 2026reviewGlycine as glutathione precursor (NAC considered separately)Support of detoxification pathways: improved
85 Huang et al. 2026reviewAmino acid metabolism, including glycine and branched-chain amino acidsglycine levels in MASLD: unclear
102 Habib et al. 2006reviewGlycineHepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury: improved

Glycine, Blood Flow and Tissue Damage: Human Studies

A genetic analysis of large population data links higher blood glycine levels with a lower risk of coronary heart disease, partly via blood pressure 1. In ventilated intensive care patients with severe COVID-19, glycine via the tube lowered the fibrinogen level compared with usual treatment, but not mortality or ventilation duration 13. The mixture of glycine and N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) improved endothelial function in older adults compared with alanine placebo; what proportion glycine contributes to this is open 14. Controlled studies with pure glycine on the heart and vessels are still pending; it is open whether intake lowers the risk indicated by genetically higher blood levels.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
1 Wittemans et al. 2019cohort study · 80,003 participantsglycine (circulating levels, genetically studied); vs. genetic instruments for glycine vs. disease riskCoronary heart disease: improved
25 Li et al. 2025cohort study · 245,072 participantsCirculating choline metabolites including glycine (NMR measurement); Median 14.1 years follow-up; vs. highest vs lowest quartile or per SD; Mendelian randomizationIncident heart failure per SD glycine: improved (HR: 0.97 [95% CI: 0.94-0.99]); Heart failure in Mendelian randomization (glycine): improved (OR: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.88-0.99])
41 Nunes et al. 2025case-control study · 54 participantsNo glycine preparation; measurement of endogenous glycine levels; 24 h in vitro; vs. sFlt-1/PlGF ratio variations in vitro; case-control plasmaCorrelation of sFlt-1 with glycine levels: improved (positively correlated); Glycine levels in endothelial cells under sFlt-1/PlGF: unclear (significant alterations in lactate, succinate, glucose, and glycine levels)
65 Yang et al. 2025case-control studyGlycine supplementation (animal study); plasma metabolomics in humans; vs. Control group or salt-loaded rats without glycineSalt-induced hypertension in Dahl SS rats: improved (p < 0.001)
77 Chang et al. 2021case-control studygenetically determined serum glycine (GWAS); vs. CAD/cardiovascular death cases vs. controlsIncident coronary artery disease: improved; Cardiovascular death: improved; Angiographic CAD severity (Modified Gensini score): improved
96 Anand et al. 2024reviewGlycine in amino acid metabolismEndothelial function and inflammation: unclear

Glycine: Further Outcomes in Studies

The controlled studies in this area predominantly show no advantage of glycine. In people with alcohol dependence, glycine compared with placebo changed neither craving nor drinking amount in the laboratory 9. In ventilated intensive care patients, glycine levels in blood and muscle increased, muscle wasting did not differ with certainty 10. In malnourished hemodialysis patients, the fat-free mass index turned out more favorable with glycine than with branched-chain amino acids 12. The evidence is weak: the studies are small and investigate different forms such as oral intake, enteral administration, and flushing solution. Mixtures such as glycine plus N-acetylcysteine do not allow conclusions about glycine alone, since glycine is not the only difference between the groups 714. It remains open whether the more favorable fat-free mass in hemodialysis patients and a possible protection against muscle wasting in critically ill patients are confirmed in larger studies.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
2 Fan et al. 2026systematic reviewGlycine-, collagen- or other glycine-containing supplements; vs. Placebo, alpha-lactalbumin (active comparator)Fatigue scores with collagen peptides: improved (lower fatigue scores); Circulating glycine concentrations after supplements: improved (generally increased circulating glycine concentrations)
8 Pan et al. 2025randomised controlled · 96 participantsGlycine-based subgingival sandblasting vs. erythritol sandblasting vs. control; Follow-up up to 6 months; vs. Erythritol sandblasting and controlPatient satisfaction (aesthetic, functional): improved (P < 0.05)
9 Olsson et al. 2025randomised controlled · 48 participantsOral glycine versus placebo; 0.12 g/kg per day; 5 days; vs. Placebo, followed by alcohol challenge (up to four 12 g drinks)Serum glycine levels: unclear (raised serum glycine levels by 125%); Laboratory alcohol self-administration: no difference; Alcohol craving: no difference
10 Ali et al. 2025randomised controlled · 29 participantsEnteral glycine added to usual care; 0.2 or 0.4 g/kg/day (median 16.2 and 29.6 g/day); maximum 7 days; vs. PlaceboPlasma glycine availability (AUC240): unclear (Mean difference AUC240 high-dose glycine vs placebo: 759.40 μmol/L.min; 95 % CI 219.27, 1299.54, p = 0.008); Muscle glycine concentration: unclear (Mean difference high-dose glycine vs placebo: 0.16 nmol/mg muscle wet mass; 95 % CI 0.08, 0.23, p = 0.001); Quadriceps muscle thickness: no difference (Mean difference high-dose glycine vs placebo: 0.11 cm; 95 % CI: -0.10, 0.31, p = 0.299)
11 Genton et al. 2021randomised controlled · 27 participantsOral glycine versus branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs); 7 g twice daily; 4 months per period, 1-month washout, crossover; vs. BCAA supplementation (same dose)Serum interleukin-6: no difference (P = 0.002); Gut microbiota composition and diversity: no difference (P = 0.0001); Lacticaseibacillus paracasei: no difference (0.030; Q1-Q3 0.008-0.078 vs. 0.004; Q1-Q3 0.001-0.070)
12 Genton et al. 2021randomised controlled · 27 participantsOral glycine supplementation; 2 × 7 g/day; 4 months, then 1-month washout, then crossover; vs. Oral BCAA (2 × 7 g/day)Fat-free mass index (bioelectrical impedance): improved (coeff -0.27, 95% confidence interval -0.43 to -0.10, P = 0.002); Lean body mass index and body weight: no difference; Clinical parameters, blood chemistry, plasma amino acids: no difference
13 Vargas et al. 2024randomised controlledEnteral glycine added to usual care; 0.5 g/kg/day; until discharge, weekly follow-up; vs. usual care alone (open-label control)mortality: no difference (63.6% vs control group, 52.2%, p = 0.60); time to weaning and total ventilation time: no difference; serum fibrinogen over time: improved (608.7 ± 17.7 mg/dl vs control 712.2 ± 25.0 mg/dl, p = 0.001)
24 Hahn et al. 1989controlled2.2% glycine infusion, 1.5% glycine + 1% ethanol, 5% mannitol (control); glycine irrigation; 1 litre infusion; irrigant absorption 0-2.71 (volumetric); short-term, early post-operative period; vs. mannitol control or baselineurinary oxalate excretion: no difference

Further studies in this area: 26 29 30 32 33 37 38 40 44 47 48 49 50 51 52 56 57 58 62 63 65 66 67 73 75 76 78 80 83 86 88 89 90 91 95 101

4. How Is Glycine Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies

The studies used pure glycine for intake, via a feeding tube or as an infusion, as an irrigation solution during operations and as a powder jet during dental cleaning. Some investigations tested combination preparations such as glycine plus N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) or glycine with carnitine and a protein-restricted diet. The forms are not comparable with one another; the doses are shown in the table.

Preparation or formDoseDurationStudy
Iclepertin (BI 425809), glycine transporter-1 inhibitor10 mg once daily12 weeks6
Glycine plus N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC), 1:12.4 g, 4.8 g or 7.2 g/day2 weeks7
Glycine-based subgingival sandblasting vs. erythritol sandblasting vs. control—Follow-up up to 6 months8
Oral glycine versus placebo0.12 g/kg per day5 days9
Enteral glycine added to usual care0.2 or 0.4 g/kg/day (median 16.2 and 29.6 g/day)maximum 7 days10
Oral glycine versus branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs)7 g twice daily4 months per period, 1-month washout, crossover11
Oral glycine supplementation2 × 7 g/day4 months, then 1-month washout, then crossover12
Enteral glycine added to usual care0.5 g/kg/dayuntil discharge, weekly follow-up13
GlyNAC (glycine plus N-acetylcysteine) versus isonitrogenous alanine placebo—16 weeks in OA, 2 weeks in YA14
GlyNAC (glycine + N-acetylcysteine) vs. isonitrogenous placebo (alanine)—16 weeks (older adults), 2 weeks (young adults)15
Glycine as comparator (ZinCyp-3-02 as test product)—28 days16
Glycine as placebo or 15 g glycine in test meal5 g/day for 14 days; 15 g in test meal14 days of step-reduction17
Isotopically labeled tracer infusion: [1,2-13C2]glycine, [2,3,3-2H3]serine, [2H5]phenylalanine—Re-study 6 months after bariatric surgery21
Glycine added to clozapine30 g/day glycine12 weeks22
[1,2-13C2]glycine infusion as tracer—measured before and 6 months after bariatric surgery23

5. Is Glycine Safe? Side Effects in Studies

In a controlled study in children with sleep disorders, a non-serious adverse drug reaction occurred with glycine; both treatments were well tolerated 16. In schizophrenia with clozapine, positive symptoms decreased only in the placebo group; the authors suspect that glycine could interfere with the effect of clozapine 22. A case report describes confusion, seizures and hyponatremia after uptake of glycine irrigation solution during a hysteroscopy, which resolved after treatment 50.

StudyReported side effects
5 Hoenders et al. 2018All natural agents except reserpine well tolerated
6 Harvey et al. 2025mild to moderate, no new risks identified
7 Lizzo et al. 2022safe and well tolerated
13 Vargas et al. 2024none reported
14 Kumar et al. 2023safe and well-tolerated
16 Jong et al. 2016ZinCyp-3-02: 2, glycine: 1 nonserious adverse drug reactions
27 Li et al. 2026no information
37 Zwart et al. 2026higher glycine concentrations associated with higher risk of toxicity-induced treatment modifications
50 Hameed et al. 2024confusion, disorientation, seizures, hypo-osmolar hyponatremia, hyperammonemia
52 Bozacı et al. 2026LDL cholesterol increase in ketogenic group; mortality similarly high in both groups
79 Kumar et al. 2021supplementation was well tolerated
91 Ifrim et al. 2025tissue biocompatibility varies by powder

6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence

  • Many controlled studies are small and differ in form, dose and comparison group.
  • Positive signals come partly from model investigations in healthy men rather than from patient groups.
  • Several studies tested combination preparations, so the contribution of glycine alone cannot be distinguished.
  • Controlled studies on ingested glycine are still pending in several fields, for example for wound healing.
  • The transferability of blood level and infusion findings to a supplementation is open.

7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Glycine

Glycine is a proteinogenic amino acid that the body produces itself and takes up via protein. Human studies investigate very different forms: pure glycine as powder, capsules or tablets for intake, enteral administration, infusion solutions and irrigation solutions. The findings differ depending on the field. For sleep and psychotic symptoms, systematic reviews report benefits of glycine 45; as an add-on to clozapine, it remained without benefit in a small controlled study 22. Higher blood glycine levels are associated with less coronary heart disease in genetic analyses 1; in ventilated COVID-19 patients, glycine via the tube did not change mortality or ventilation duration 13.

In hemodialysis patients, glycine compared with branched-chain amino acids changed neither gut hormones nor gut microbiota 11. The studies are often small, and combination preparations such as GlyNAC do not allow conclusions about glycine alone; larger studies with pure glycine are still pending.

Frequently Asked Questions

How well has Glycine been studied in humans?

We evaluated 104 human studies on Glycine, including 11 randomised controlled trials and 4 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 685 participants in total. As of 7 October 2026.

Does Glycine help with psychiatry and Nervous System? What the studies show

We evaluated 2 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 4 controlled studies and 22 further studies; the controlled studies include 93 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly no difference. Strength of evidence under our published rules: moderate. Sources: 451819

Does Glycine help with sleep and Falling Asleep? What the studies show

We evaluated one meta-analysis or systematic review and 3 further studies. There are no controlled studies yet, only reviews; the strength of evidence is therefore low at most. Sources: 248795

Does Glycine help with wound Healing? What the studies show

We evaluated one controlled study and one further study; the controlled studies include 96 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: low. Sources: 894

Does Glycine help with metabolism and Blood Sugar? What the studies show

We evaluated one controlled study and 27 further studies; the controlled studies include 27 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly no difference. Strength of evidence under our published rules: unclear. Sources: 131127

What is glycine and how is it used in studies?

Glycine is the smallest proteinogenic amino acid and a building block of almost all proteins. In human studies, it was used as pure powder, in capsules or tablets for intake, enterally, as a component of amino acid infusion solutions and as an irrigation and lavage solution. These forms are not comparable with one another, and the doses are shown in the table.

Do human studies show a benefit of glycine for sleep?

According to a systematic review, healthy people slept better with longer glycine intake; the underlying studies were small and had a high risk of bias 4. A scoping review found at least one improved sleep measure in all three sleep studies with glycine; for collagen peptides the picture was mixed 2. In an open-label comparative study in children, sleep complaints improved with glycine and with a homeopathic preparation, with the latter showing a greater improvement 16.

Is there evidence of effects on psychotic symptoms?

Two systematic reviews reported benefits of oral glycine for psychiatric symptoms 45. This contrasts with a small controlled study in which glycine in addition to clozapine did not improve positive and negative symptoms in treatment-resistant schizophrenia 22. In the ketamine model in healthy men, glycine attenuated individual EEG changes 1820, ketamine-induced negative symptoms only in a subgroup 20; a third study found no difference 19.

How safe is the intake of glycine?

In a controlled study in children with sleep disorders, a non-serious adverse drug reaction occurred with glycine; both treatments were well tolerated 16. In schizophrenia with clozapine, positive symptoms decreased only in the placebo group; the authors suspect that glycine could interfere with the effect of clozapine 22. A case report describes confusion, seizures and hyponatremia after uptake of glycine irrigation solution during a hysteroscopy, which resolved after treatment 50.

What did the studies on metabolism and blood sugar investigate?

In hemodialysis patients, glycine did not differ from branched-chain amino acids for glucagon-like peptide 1, cholecystokinin and peptide YY 11. Without a comparison group, triglycerides and liver values decreased in people with severe obesity with glycine 46. The mixture of glycine and N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) lowered insulin resistance compared with placebo; what proportion glycine contributes to this is open 14.

Sources

  1. 1
    Wittemans LBL, Lotta LA, Oliver-Williams C, Stewart ID, Surendran P, Karthikeyan S et al. · 2019
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
    Hoenders HJR, Bartels-Velthuis AA, Vollbehr NK, Bruggeman R, Knegtering H, de Jong JTVM · 2018
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
    Ali Abdelhamid Y, Bongetti AJ, Caldow MK, Karahalios A, Wittholz K, Fetterplace K et al. · 2025
  11. 11
  12. 12
    Genton L, Teta D, Pruijm M, Stoermann C, Marangon N, Mareschal J et al. · 2021
  13. 13
    Vargas MH, Chávez J, Del-Razo-Rodríguez R, Muñoz-Perea C, Romo-Domínguez KJ, Báez-Saldaña R et al. · 2024
  14. 14
  15. 15
    GLYNAC SUPPLEMENTATION IN OLDER ADULTS PROTECTS FROM MEAL DRIVEN OXIDATIVE STRESS AND INFLAMMATION: RESULTS OF A RCT
    · 2022
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
    Li J, Li J, Sun Y, Fu Y, Tan X, Wang N et al. · 2025
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
    Dehghanbanadaki H, Soltani A, Majidi Z, Rezaei-Tavirani M, Shafiee G, Ostovar A et al. · 2025
  31. 31
    Huidobro L, Cofre S, Santos JL, Godoy F, Paredes F, Bambs C et al. · 2026
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
    García-Gavilán JF, Paz-Graniel I, Pérez-Acosta JA, Ruiz-Canela M, Li J, Clish C et al. · 2026
  35. 35
    Palacios-González B, León-Reyes G, Rivera-Paredez B, Ibarra-González I, Vela-Amieva M, Flores YN et al. · 2022
  36. 36
    Sex-Specific Differences in the Control of Serum Concentrations of Glycine in Subjects with Metabolic Syndrome and Mendelian Randomization Analysis for Obesity
    Asensio E, Coltell O, Sorlí J, Pascual E, Barragán R, Ordovas J et al. · 2020
  37. 37
    Zwart NR, van Duijnhoven FJ, Wesselink E, Lubberman FJ, Ulrich CM, McKay JA et al. · 2026
  38. 38
    Motamed-Gorji N, Khalil Y, Gonzalez-Robles C, Khan S, Mills P, Garcia-Moreno H et al. · 2024
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
    Nunes PR, Bruder RM, Kaihara JNS, de Moraes FR, Tasic L, Bernardino RL et al. · 2025
  42. 42
    Jaskulak M, Rybakowska I, Gregorczyk M, Antoniak-Pietrynczak K, Sośnicka A, Jabłońska P et al. · 2026
  43. 43
    Guasp M, Saiz A, Ruiz-Vives M, Almendrote M, Bruna J, González-Menacho J et al. · 2025
  44. 44
    Saudubray JM, Ogier H, Charpentier C, Depondt E, Coudé FX, Munnich A et al. · 1984
  45. 45
  46. 46
    Tan HC, Hsu JW, Tai ES, Chacko S, Wu V, Yen PM et al. · 2025
  47. 47
    Arimilli B, On TA, Srirama VS, Yang Y, Asampille G, Brender JR et al. · 2025
  48. 48
  49. 49
  50. 50
  51. 51
  52. 52
  53. 53
  54. 54
  55. 55
  56. 56
    May-Lewis H, Perret MJ, Xu Y, Ribeiro RSA, da Silva Correa R, Mafort TT et al. · 2026
  57. 57
    Rodin RE, Healy BC, Polgar-Turcsanyi M, Lokhande HA, Chitnis T · 2026
  58. 58
  59. 59
  60. 60
  61. 61
  62. 62
  63. 63
  64. 64
  65. 65
  66. 66
  67. 67
  68. 68
  69. 69
    Garofalo M, De Simone G, Motta Z, Nuzzo T, De Grandis E, Bruno C et al. · 2024
  70. 70
    Tan HC, Hsu JW, Tai ES, Chacko S, Kovalik JP, Jahoor F · 2024
  71. 71
  72. 72
  73. 73
  74. 74
  75. 75
  76. 76
  77. 77
    Chang X, Wang L, Guan SP, Kennedy BK, Liu J, Khor CC et al. · 2021
  78. 78
  79. 79
  80. 80
  81. 81
    Palmnäs MSA, Kopciuk KA, Shaykhutdinov RA, Robson PJ, Mignault D, Rabasa-Lhoret R et al. · 2018
  82. 82
  83. 83
  84. 84
  85. 85
    Huang Y, Jiang Y, Ye W, Hu X, Abudurexiti N, Li J et al. · 2026
  86. 86
    Kurtz JA, Singleton KM, Vasenina E, Jäger R, Gonzalez D, Schwarz A et al. · 2026
  87. 87
  88. 88
  89. 89
    Zamosteanu D, Filip N, Trandafir LM, Ţarcă E, Pertea M, Bordeianu G et al. · 2025
  90. 90
    Mahmoudi Ghehsareh M, Bakhtiari S, Asri N, Rezaei-Tavirani M, Jahani-Sherafat S, Masotti A et al. · 2025
  91. 91
  92. 92
  93. 93
  94. 94
  95. 95
    Ramos-Jiménez A, Hernández-Torres RP, Hernández-Ontiveros DA, Ortiz-Ortiz M, López-Fregoso RJ, Martínez-Sanz JM et al. · 2024
  96. 96
    Anand SK, Governale TA, Zhang X, Razani B, Yurdagul A, Pattillo CB et al. · 2024
  97. 97
  98. 98
  99. 99
  100. 100
    Alves A, Bassot A, Bulteau AL, Pirola L, Morio B · 2019
  101. 101
    Dietary Glycine Is Rate-Limiting for Glutathione Synthesis and May Have Broad Potential for Health Protection
    McCarty MF, O'Keefe JH, DiNicolantonio JJ · 2018
  102. 102
    Habib MM, Hodgson HJ, Davidson BR · 2006

Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.

International Health Research · https://ih-research.com/en/knowledge/glycine/ · Last updated: 2026-10-15