Glycine
Glycine is a proteinogenic amino acid; human studies show different, mostly small or inconsistent effects depending on form and field.
We evaluated 104 human studies on Glycine, including 11 randomised controlled trials and 4 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 685 participants in total. As of 7 October 2026.
1. What Is Glycine? Occurrence, Origin and Forms
Glycine is the smallest proteinogenic amino acid and a building block of almost all proteins. The body produces it itself and takes it up from protein in food. It is used, among other things, as a food additive, as an excipient in medicines and as a dietary supplement.
Glycine occurs in almost all proteins, especially abundantly in collagen and gelatin. In the body it is present in blood and tissue and serves as a signalling molecule in the nervous system.
For studies and preparations, glycine is mostly produced chemically or obtained from proteins and processed into powder, capsules or solutions. Oral doses, infusion solutions and irrigation solutions are the forms mainly examined.
Forms and Preparations Studied
- Pure glycine as powder, capsules or tablets for oral intake
- Glycine as a component of amino acid infusion solutions
- Glycine as an irrigation solution
- Glycine as a food additive with a sweet taste
- Glycine as an excipient and buffer in pharmaceutical preparations
- Glycine bound in proteins such as collagen and gelatin
Not covered on this page:
- Collagen and gelatin preparations contain glycine, but the protein itself is studied there, not glycine alone.
- Betaine (trimethylglycine) and sarcosine (dimethylglycine) are substances in their own right with their own research questions.
- Glyphosate is a pesticide and shares only part of its name with glycine.
- Combination products of glycine with other amino acids, melatonin or further additives are not investigations of glycine alone.
2. What Does Glycine Do? Results by Area
| Area | Result in controlled studies | Strength of evidence | Studies | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychiatry and Nervous System | mostly no difference | moderate | 2 meta-analyses · 4 controlled · 22 other | 93 |
| Sleep and Falling Asleep | reviews only | low | 1 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 3 other | 0 |
| Wound Healing | mostly improved | low | 0 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 1 other | 96 |
| Metabolism and Blood Sugar | mostly no difference | unclear | 0 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 27 other | 27 |
| Liver and Fatty Liver | observational data only | unclear | 0 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 6 other | 0 |
| Blood Flow and Tissue Damage | observational data only | unclear | 0 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 6 other | 0 |
| Other investigations | mostly no difference | low | 0 meta-analyses · 7 controlled · 37 other | 227 |
How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.
3. What the Studies Show in Detail
Glycine, Psychiatry and Nervous System: Human Studies
Two systematic reviews report benefits of glycine for psychotic symptoms, one of them as an add-on to antipsychotics; the studies were mostly small and short 45. In addition to clozapine, glycine improved neither positive nor negative symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia; positive symptoms decreased only in the placebo group 22. In the ketamine model in healthy men, glycine prevented the decrease in theta activity, the MMN amplitude remained unchanged 18. In participants with a pronounced increase in the gamma response, glycine also attenuated the ketamine-induced negative symptoms 20; resting gamma activity and psychometric values did not change 19. It remains open whether glycine shows a reproducible benefit in schizophrenia in larger studies and whether it attenuates the effect of clozapine.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Soh et al. 2024 | systematic review | Oral glycine administration; up to 14 days and 4 months; vs. various controls in the included studies | Psychiatric symptoms: improved |
| 5 Hoenders et al. 2018 | systematic review | Glycine added to antipsychotics; vs. Antipsychotics alone or other natural agents | Psychotic symptoms: improved |
| 18 Curic et al. 2025 | controlled · 25 participants | glycine (NMDAR coagonist), placebo-controlled crossover; vs. placebo or ketamine alone | MMN amplitude (time domain): no difference; P3a amplitude: no difference; dMMN-associated theta power and phase consistency: unclear |
| 19 Haaf et al. 2023 | controlled · 25 participants | glycine pretreatment, subanesthetic S-ketamine; vs. S-ketamine alone vs. glycine pretreatment plus S-ketamine | resting-state gamma activity (EEG): no difference (did not significantly attenuate any of these effects); psychometric scores (PANSS, 5D-ASC): no difference (did not significantly attenuate any of these effects) |
| 20 Haaf et al. 2022 | controlled · 24 participants | Glycine pretreatment before S-ketamine; vs. Placebo; S-ketamine alone | Early auditory evoked gamma-band response (amplitude): unclear; PANSS negative symptom score: unclear |
| 22 Potkin et al. 1999 | controlled · 19 participants | Glycine added to clozapine; 30 g/day glycine; 12 weeks; vs. Placebo added to clozapine | Positive symptoms (BPRS): no difference; Negative symptoms (SANS): no difference |
| 43 Guasp et al. 2025 | case series · 41 participants | no glycine administration; study of GlyR antibodies; median follow-up 24 months; vs. no comparator; own and literature cases | functional status (mRS <3) in survivors: improved (23 (70%)); deaths: worsened (Eleven patients died, 8 from complications of PERM); relapses: worsened (12 relapses in 10 (28%)) |
| 48 Nourbakhsh et al. 2025 | case report · 1 participants | pantothenic acid and mitochondrial cocktail plus low-protein diet; vs. no control (single case) | motor function and social interactions: improved (improvement in her motor function and social interactions) |
Further studies in this area: 49 52 53 55 57 58 60 61 62 64 68 69 72 74 82 86 88 93 97 99
Glycine, Sleep and Falling Asleep: Human Studies
A systematic review reports better sleep in healthy people with longer glycine intake, based on small studies with a high risk of bias 4. A scoping review found at least one improved sleep measure in all three sleep studies with glycine 2. In an open comparative study in children, sleep problems improved with glycine and with a homeopathic preparation, more so with the latter 16. It remains open whether the sleep effect of glycine is confirmed in larger placebo-controlled studies in people with sleep problems.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Fan et al. 2026 | systematic review | Glycine-, collagen- or other glycine-containing supplements; vs. Placebo, alpha-lactalbumin (active comparator) | Sleep-related outcomes in 3 glycine trials: improved (All 3 glycine sleep trials reported benefits on at least 1 sleep-related outcome); Polysomnographic awakenings with collagen peptides: improved (fewer polysomnographic awakenings); Sleep-related outcomes collagen peptides vs alpha-lactalbumin: no difference (did not show superiority of collagen peptides for sleep-related outcomes) |
| 4 Soh et al. 2024 | systematic review | Oral glycine administration; up to 14 days and 4 months; vs. various controls in the included studies | Sleep: improved |
| 87 Khosropanah et al. 2026 | review | Glycine alongside vitamins, minerals and other amino acids | Sleep facilitation via central nervous system inhibition: improved |
| 95 Ramos-Jiménez et al. 2024 | review | Glycine dietary supplement; high doses >500 mg/kg body mass (toxic) | Sleep quality and recovery: improved |
Glycine and Wound Healing: Human Studies
In patients with early peri-implantitis, plaque index, bleeding index as well as IL-6 and IL-1β decreased after powder-jet cleaning with glycine 8. After six months, IL-1β was higher with glycine than with erythritol powder 8. The informative value is limited because only this study is available and glycine there serves as a blasting powder, not as an ingested substance. Hypothesis: A review sees in non-essential amino acids such as glycine a plausible approach for wound and bone healing in older patients in oral and maxillofacial surgery 94. Controlled studies with ingested glycine for wound healing are still pending.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Pan et al. 2025 | randomised controlled · 96 participants | Glycine-based subgingival sandblasting vs. erythritol sandblasting vs. control; Follow-up up to 6 months; vs. Erythritol sandblasting and control | Plaque index (PLI): improved (P < 0.05); Bleeding index (BI): improved (P < 0.05); Inflammatory factors IL-6, IL-1β: improved (P < 0.05) |
| 94 Kim et al. 2025 | review | nonessential amino acids, including glycine | bone and mucosal healing: unclear |
Glycine, Metabolism and Blood Sugar: Human Studies
A randomized crossover study found no difference between glycine and branched-chain amino acids in hemodialysis patients for glucagon-like peptide 1, cholecystokinin and peptide YY 11. The mixture of glycine and N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) improved mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and insulin resistance in older adults compared with placebo 14. Without a comparison group, triglycerides decreased in people with severe obesity with glycine, body weight remained the same 46. It remains open whether pure glycine alone improves blood sugar or metabolism in people without a specific metabolic disease, since most studies investigated combination preparations, infusions or other forms.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Wittemans et al. 2019 | cohort study · 80,003 participants | glycine (circulating levels, genetically studied); vs. genetic instruments for glycine vs. disease risk | Type 2 diabetes: unclear |
| 3 Thimm et al. 2025 | systematic review | Glycine supplementation, possibly with carnitine | Evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and management: unclear (15 statements) |
| 11 Genton et al. 2021 | randomised controlled · 27 participants | Oral glycine versus branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs); 7 g twice daily; 4 months per period, 1-month washout, crossover; vs. BCAA supplementation (same dose) | Glucagon-like peptide 1: no difference (P = 0.028); Cholecystokinin: no difference (P = 0.021); Peptide YY: no difference (P = 0.002) |
| 27 Li et al. 2026 | cohort study · 23,634 participants | circulating metabolites, including glycine; no information; up to 26 years of follow-up; vs. participants with vs. without incident type 2 diabetes | association of glycine with incident type 2 diabetes: unclear (67 associations not previously reported) |
| 31 Huidobro et al. 2026 | cohort study · 1,738 participants | Plasma amino acids quantified by nuclear magnetic resonance, no glycine preparation; Median follow-up 4.3 years; vs. Cross-sectional and incidence analyses by plasma glycine levels, adjusted | Type 2 diabetes prevalence (adjusted odds ratio): improved (0.68; 95% CI 0.57-0.80) |
| 32 Feng et al. 2024 | cross-sectional study · 774 participants | glycine from habitual diet; intake quartiles: <1.32; 1.32-1.82; 1.82-2.26; >2.26; vs. highest vs lowest intake quartile (Q4 vs Q1) | prevalence of hyperlipidemia (0.547 (95% CI, 0.327-0.913)); prevalence of overweight/obesity (0.547 (95% CI, 0.353-0.850)) |
| 34 García-Gavilán et al. 2026 | cohort study · 699 participants | Plasma metabolomics profile (LC-MS/MS), glycine part of shared signature; Baseline and 1-year follow-up; vs. Metabolomic scores vs. total mortality; external validation NHS/HPFS | Association of shared metabolites (incl. glycine) with total mortality: worsened (HR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.04-2.25) |
| 35 Palacios-González et al. 2022 | cross-sectional study · 602 participants | No preparation; measurement of 40 serum metabolites; vs. MetS status as well as sex and age | Serum glycine and MetS: unclear; Glycine as sex-specific marker: unclear; Glycine and age-dependent MetS: unclear |
Further studies in this area: 36 39 40 42 45 46 52 54 65 70 71 80 81 84 88 89 92 95 98 100
Glycine, Liver and Fatty Liver: Human Studies
For liver and fatty liver, no controlled studies on glycine alone are available; the evidence is therefore unclear. A small study in people with severe obesity found lower aminotransferases and a more favorable glutamate-serine-glycine index with ingested glycine without a comparison arm 46. A cross-sectional study investigated glycine together with serine and threonine and found lower amino acid levels with a higher degree of steatosis, while a high-dose diet with these three amino acids improved MASLD pathogenesis in a mouse model 28. A review reports on glycine as a metabolic marker in chronic liver diseases 85. Another review describes support of detoxification pathways by glycine as a glutathione precursor 84. A third review mentions a possible benefit of glycine rinse solution in ischemia-reperfusion injury of liver transplants, based predominantly on animal and cell findings 102. The efficacy and safety of pure, ingested glycine in humans remain open, since the available human findings are small, uncontrolled, or related to mixtures.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Mino et al. 2024 | cross-sectional study · 23,036 participants | Glycine combined with serine and threonine (high diet in mouse model); vs. Groups by SLD/CC criteria; MASLD mouse models on FFC diet | Glycine, serine and threonine levels by steatosis grade: worsened (significantly decreased); MASLD pathogenesis under high Gly/Ser/Thr diet: improved (ameliorated) |
| 46 Tan et al. 2025 | study · 19 participants | dietary glycine supplementation; 100 mg/kg/day; two weeks; vs. no control arm, before-after | aminotransferases: improved (significant reductions); glutamate-serine-glycine index (MASLD marker): improved (improved) |
| 59 Lin et al. 2025 | study | Glycine supplementation, partly combined with interferon-α; vs. Healthy controls or HBV-infected cells/mice without glycine | HBV cccDNA levels: improved (approximately 50%); HBsAg levels under combination therapy: improved (60% reduction); Serum glycine in HBV patients vs. healthy controls: unclear (R=0.7650) |
| 84 Draganidis et al. 2026 | review | Glycine as glutathione precursor (NAC considered separately) | Support of detoxification pathways: improved |
| 85 Huang et al. 2026 | review | Amino acid metabolism, including glycine and branched-chain amino acids | glycine levels in MASLD: unclear |
| 102 Habib et al. 2006 | review | Glycine | Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury: improved |
Glycine, Blood Flow and Tissue Damage: Human Studies
A genetic analysis of large population data links higher blood glycine levels with a lower risk of coronary heart disease, partly via blood pressure 1. In ventilated intensive care patients with severe COVID-19, glycine via the tube lowered the fibrinogen level compared with usual treatment, but not mortality or ventilation duration 13. The mixture of glycine and N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) improved endothelial function in older adults compared with alanine placebo; what proportion glycine contributes to this is open 14. Controlled studies with pure glycine on the heart and vessels are still pending; it is open whether intake lowers the risk indicated by genetically higher blood levels.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Wittemans et al. 2019 | cohort study · 80,003 participants | glycine (circulating levels, genetically studied); vs. genetic instruments for glycine vs. disease risk | Coronary heart disease: improved |
| 25 Li et al. 2025 | cohort study · 245,072 participants | Circulating choline metabolites including glycine (NMR measurement); Median 14.1 years follow-up; vs. highest vs lowest quartile or per SD; Mendelian randomization | Incident heart failure per SD glycine: improved (HR: 0.97 [95% CI: 0.94-0.99]); Heart failure in Mendelian randomization (glycine): improved (OR: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.88-0.99]) |
| 41 Nunes et al. 2025 | case-control study · 54 participants | No glycine preparation; measurement of endogenous glycine levels; 24 h in vitro; vs. sFlt-1/PlGF ratio variations in vitro; case-control plasma | Correlation of sFlt-1 with glycine levels: improved (positively correlated); Glycine levels in endothelial cells under sFlt-1/PlGF: unclear (significant alterations in lactate, succinate, glucose, and glycine levels) |
| 65 Yang et al. 2025 | case-control study | Glycine supplementation (animal study); plasma metabolomics in humans; vs. Control group or salt-loaded rats without glycine | Salt-induced hypertension in Dahl SS rats: improved (p < 0.001) |
| 77 Chang et al. 2021 | case-control study | genetically determined serum glycine (GWAS); vs. CAD/cardiovascular death cases vs. controls | Incident coronary artery disease: improved; Cardiovascular death: improved; Angiographic CAD severity (Modified Gensini score): improved |
| 96 Anand et al. 2024 | review | Glycine in amino acid metabolism | Endothelial function and inflammation: unclear |
Glycine: Further Outcomes in Studies
The controlled studies in this area predominantly show no advantage of glycine. In people with alcohol dependence, glycine compared with placebo changed neither craving nor drinking amount in the laboratory 9. In ventilated intensive care patients, glycine levels in blood and muscle increased, muscle wasting did not differ with certainty 10. In malnourished hemodialysis patients, the fat-free mass index turned out more favorable with glycine than with branched-chain amino acids 12. The evidence is weak: the studies are small and investigate different forms such as oral intake, enteral administration, and flushing solution. Mixtures such as glycine plus N-acetylcysteine do not allow conclusions about glycine alone, since glycine is not the only difference between the groups 714. It remains open whether the more favorable fat-free mass in hemodialysis patients and a possible protection against muscle wasting in critically ill patients are confirmed in larger studies.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Fan et al. 2026 | systematic review | Glycine-, collagen- or other glycine-containing supplements; vs. Placebo, alpha-lactalbumin (active comparator) | Fatigue scores with collagen peptides: improved (lower fatigue scores); Circulating glycine concentrations after supplements: improved (generally increased circulating glycine concentrations) |
| 8 Pan et al. 2025 | randomised controlled · 96 participants | Glycine-based subgingival sandblasting vs. erythritol sandblasting vs. control; Follow-up up to 6 months; vs. Erythritol sandblasting and control | Patient satisfaction (aesthetic, functional): improved (P < 0.05) |
| 9 Olsson et al. 2025 | randomised controlled · 48 participants | Oral glycine versus placebo; 0.12 g/kg per day; 5 days; vs. Placebo, followed by alcohol challenge (up to four 12 g drinks) | Serum glycine levels: unclear (raised serum glycine levels by 125%); Laboratory alcohol self-administration: no difference; Alcohol craving: no difference |
| 10 Ali et al. 2025 | randomised controlled · 29 participants | Enteral glycine added to usual care; 0.2 or 0.4 g/kg/day (median 16.2 and 29.6 g/day); maximum 7 days; vs. Placebo | Plasma glycine availability (AUC240): unclear (Mean difference AUC240 high-dose glycine vs placebo: 759.40 μmol/L.min; 95 % CI 219.27, 1299.54, p = 0.008); Muscle glycine concentration: unclear (Mean difference high-dose glycine vs placebo: 0.16 nmol/mg muscle wet mass; 95 % CI 0.08, 0.23, p = 0.001); Quadriceps muscle thickness: no difference (Mean difference high-dose glycine vs placebo: 0.11 cm; 95 % CI: -0.10, 0.31, p = 0.299) |
| 11 Genton et al. 2021 | randomised controlled · 27 participants | Oral glycine versus branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs); 7 g twice daily; 4 months per period, 1-month washout, crossover; vs. BCAA supplementation (same dose) | Serum interleukin-6: no difference (P = 0.002); Gut microbiota composition and diversity: no difference (P = 0.0001); Lacticaseibacillus paracasei: no difference (0.030; Q1-Q3 0.008-0.078 vs. 0.004; Q1-Q3 0.001-0.070) |
| 12 Genton et al. 2021 | randomised controlled · 27 participants | Oral glycine supplementation; 2 × 7 g/day; 4 months, then 1-month washout, then crossover; vs. Oral BCAA (2 × 7 g/day) | Fat-free mass index (bioelectrical impedance): improved (coeff -0.27, 95% confidence interval -0.43 to -0.10, P = 0.002); Lean body mass index and body weight: no difference; Clinical parameters, blood chemistry, plasma amino acids: no difference |
| 13 Vargas et al. 2024 | randomised controlled | Enteral glycine added to usual care; 0.5 g/kg/day; until discharge, weekly follow-up; vs. usual care alone (open-label control) | mortality: no difference (63.6% vs control group, 52.2%, p = 0.60); time to weaning and total ventilation time: no difference; serum fibrinogen over time: improved (608.7 ± 17.7 mg/dl vs control 712.2 ± 25.0 mg/dl, p = 0.001) |
| 24 Hahn et al. 1989 | controlled | 2.2% glycine infusion, 1.5% glycine + 1% ethanol, 5% mannitol (control); glycine irrigation; 1 litre infusion; irrigant absorption 0-2.71 (volumetric); short-term, early post-operative period; vs. mannitol control or baseline | urinary oxalate excretion: no difference |
Further studies in this area: 26 29 30 32 33 37 38 40 44 47 48 49 50 51 52 56 57 58 62 63 65 66 67 73 75 76 78 80 83 86 88 89 90 91 95 101
4. How Is Glycine Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies
The studies used pure glycine for intake, via a feeding tube or as an infusion, as an irrigation solution during operations and as a powder jet during dental cleaning. Some investigations tested combination preparations such as glycine plus N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) or glycine with carnitine and a protein-restricted diet. The forms are not comparable with one another; the doses are shown in the table.
| Preparation or form | Dose | Duration | Study |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iclepertin (BI 425809), glycine transporter-1 inhibitor | 10 mg once daily | 12 weeks | 6 |
| Glycine plus N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC), 1:1 | 2.4 g, 4.8 g or 7.2 g/day | 2 weeks | 7 |
| Glycine-based subgingival sandblasting vs. erythritol sandblasting vs. control | — | Follow-up up to 6 months | 8 |
| Oral glycine versus placebo | 0.12 g/kg per day | 5 days | 9 |
| Enteral glycine added to usual care | 0.2 or 0.4 g/kg/day (median 16.2 and 29.6 g/day) | maximum 7 days | 10 |
| Oral glycine versus branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) | 7 g twice daily | 4 months per period, 1-month washout, crossover | 11 |
| Oral glycine supplementation | 2 × 7 g/day | 4 months, then 1-month washout, then crossover | 12 |
| Enteral glycine added to usual care | 0.5 g/kg/day | until discharge, weekly follow-up | 13 |
| GlyNAC (glycine plus N-acetylcysteine) versus isonitrogenous alanine placebo | — | 16 weeks in OA, 2 weeks in YA | 14 |
| GlyNAC (glycine + N-acetylcysteine) vs. isonitrogenous placebo (alanine) | — | 16 weeks (older adults), 2 weeks (young adults) | 15 |
| Glycine as comparator (ZinCyp-3-02 as test product) | — | 28 days | 16 |
| Glycine as placebo or 15 g glycine in test meal | 5 g/day for 14 days; 15 g in test meal | 14 days of step-reduction | 17 |
| Isotopically labeled tracer infusion: [1,2-13C2]glycine, [2,3,3-2H3]serine, [2H5]phenylalanine | — | Re-study 6 months after bariatric surgery | 21 |
| Glycine added to clozapine | 30 g/day glycine | 12 weeks | 22 |
| [1,2-13C2]glycine infusion as tracer | — | measured before and 6 months after bariatric surgery | 23 |
5. Is Glycine Safe? Side Effects in Studies
In a controlled study in children with sleep disorders, a non-serious adverse drug reaction occurred with glycine; both treatments were well tolerated 16. In schizophrenia with clozapine, positive symptoms decreased only in the placebo group; the authors suspect that glycine could interfere with the effect of clozapine 22. A case report describes confusion, seizures and hyponatremia after uptake of glycine irrigation solution during a hysteroscopy, which resolved after treatment 50.
| Study | Reported side effects |
|---|---|
| 5 Hoenders et al. 2018 | All natural agents except reserpine well tolerated |
| 6 Harvey et al. 2025 | mild to moderate, no new risks identified |
| 7 Lizzo et al. 2022 | safe and well tolerated |
| 13 Vargas et al. 2024 | none reported |
| 14 Kumar et al. 2023 | safe and well-tolerated |
| 16 Jong et al. 2016 | ZinCyp-3-02: 2, glycine: 1 nonserious adverse drug reactions |
| 27 Li et al. 2026 | no information |
| 37 Zwart et al. 2026 | higher glycine concentrations associated with higher risk of toxicity-induced treatment modifications |
| 50 Hameed et al. 2024 | confusion, disorientation, seizures, hypo-osmolar hyponatremia, hyperammonemia |
| 52 Bozacı et al. 2026 | LDL cholesterol increase in ketogenic group; mortality similarly high in both groups |
| 79 Kumar et al. 2021 | supplementation was well tolerated |
| 91 Ifrim et al. 2025 | tissue biocompatibility varies by powder |
6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence
- Many controlled studies are small and differ in form, dose and comparison group.
- Positive signals come partly from model investigations in healthy men rather than from patient groups.
- Several studies tested combination preparations, so the contribution of glycine alone cannot be distinguished.
- Controlled studies on ingested glycine are still pending in several fields, for example for wound healing.
- The transferability of blood level and infusion findings to a supplementation is open.
7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Glycine
Glycine is a proteinogenic amino acid that the body produces itself and takes up via protein. Human studies investigate very different forms: pure glycine as powder, capsules or tablets for intake, enteral administration, infusion solutions and irrigation solutions. The findings differ depending on the field. For sleep and psychotic symptoms, systematic reviews report benefits of glycine 45; as an add-on to clozapine, it remained without benefit in a small controlled study 22. Higher blood glycine levels are associated with less coronary heart disease in genetic analyses 1; in ventilated COVID-19 patients, glycine via the tube did not change mortality or ventilation duration 13.
In hemodialysis patients, glycine compared with branched-chain amino acids changed neither gut hormones nor gut microbiota 11. The studies are often small, and combination preparations such as GlyNAC do not allow conclusions about glycine alone; larger studies with pure glycine are still pending.
Frequently Asked Questions
How well has Glycine been studied in humans?
We evaluated 104 human studies on Glycine, including 11 randomised controlled trials and 4 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 685 participants in total. As of 7 October 2026.
Does Glycine help with psychiatry and Nervous System? What the studies show
Does Glycine help with sleep and Falling Asleep? What the studies show
Does Glycine help with wound Healing? What the studies show
Does Glycine help with metabolism and Blood Sugar? What the studies show
What is glycine and how is it used in studies?
Glycine is the smallest proteinogenic amino acid and a building block of almost all proteins. In human studies, it was used as pure powder, in capsules or tablets for intake, enterally, as a component of amino acid infusion solutions and as an irrigation and lavage solution. These forms are not comparable with one another, and the doses are shown in the table.
Do human studies show a benefit of glycine for sleep?
According to a systematic review, healthy people slept better with longer glycine intake; the underlying studies were small and had a high risk of bias 4. A scoping review found at least one improved sleep measure in all three sleep studies with glycine; for collagen peptides the picture was mixed 2. In an open-label comparative study in children, sleep complaints improved with glycine and with a homeopathic preparation, with the latter showing a greater improvement 16.
Is there evidence of effects on psychotic symptoms?
Two systematic reviews reported benefits of oral glycine for psychiatric symptoms 45. This contrasts with a small controlled study in which glycine in addition to clozapine did not improve positive and negative symptoms in treatment-resistant schizophrenia 22. In the ketamine model in healthy men, glycine attenuated individual EEG changes 1820, ketamine-induced negative symptoms only in a subgroup 20; a third study found no difference 19.
How safe is the intake of glycine?
In a controlled study in children with sleep disorders, a non-serious adverse drug reaction occurred with glycine; both treatments were well tolerated 16. In schizophrenia with clozapine, positive symptoms decreased only in the placebo group; the authors suspect that glycine could interfere with the effect of clozapine 22. A case report describes confusion, seizures and hyponatremia after uptake of glycine irrigation solution during a hysteroscopy, which resolved after treatment 50.
What did the studies on metabolism and blood sugar investigate?
In hemodialysis patients, glycine did not differ from branched-chain amino acids for glucagon-like peptide 1, cholecystokinin and peptide YY 11. Without a comparison group, triglycerides and liver values decreased in people with severe obesity with glycine 46. The mixture of glycine and N-acetylcysteine (GlyNAC) lowered insulin resistance compared with placebo; what proportion glycine contributes to this is open 14.
Sources
- 1Wittemans LBL, Lotta LA, Oliver-Williams C, Stewart ID, Surendran P, Karthikeyan S et al. · 2019
- 2Fan Z, Nelson JM, Wallace TC · 2026
- 3Thimm E, Riederer A, Vockley J, Dobbelaere D, Williams M, MacDonald A et al. · 2025
- 4Soh J, Raventhiran S, Lee JH, Lim ZX, Goh J, Kennedy BK et al. · 2024
- 5Hoenders HJR, Bartels-Velthuis AA, Vollbehr NK, Bruggeman R, Knegtering H, de Jong JTVM · 2018
- 6Harvey PD, McDonald S, Fu E, Reuteman-Fowler C · 2025
- 7Lizzo G, Migliavacca E, Lamers D, Frézal A, Corthesy J, Vinyes-Parès G et al. · 2022
- 8Pan T, Meng W, Zhang M, Xie Y, Chen Z, Zhou M et al. · 2025
- 9Olsson Y, Lidö H, Ericson M, Söderpalm B · 2025
- 10Ali Abdelhamid Y, Bongetti AJ, Caldow MK, Karahalios A, Wittholz K, Fetterplace K et al. · 2025
- 11Genton L, Pruijm M, Teta D, Bassi I, Cani PD, Gaïa N et al. · 2021
- 12Genton L, Teta D, Pruijm M, Stoermann C, Marangon N, Mareschal J et al. · 2021
- 13Vargas MH, Chávez J, Del-Razo-Rodríguez R, Muñoz-Perea C, Romo-Domínguez KJ, Báez-Saldaña R et al. · 2024
- 14Kumar P, Liu C, Suliburk J, Hsu JW, Muthupillai R, Jahoor F et al. · 2023
- 15GLYNAC SUPPLEMENTATION IN OLDER ADULTS PROTECTS FROM MEAL DRIVEN OXIDATIVE STRESS AND INFLAMMATION: RESULTS OF A RCT· 2022
- 16Jong MC, Ilyenko L, Kholodova I, Verwer C, Burkart J, Weber S et al. · 2016
- 17Devries MC, Breen L, Von Allmen M, MacDonald MJ, Moore DR, Offord EA et al. · 2015
- 18Curic S, Haaf M, Zokai D, Korkutan T, Rusche S, Rauh J et al. · 2025
- 19Haaf M, Curic S, Rauh J, Steinmann S, Mulert C, Leicht G · 2023
- 20Haaf M, Curic S, Steinmann S, Rauh J, Leicht G, Mulert C · 2022
- 21Tan HC, Hsu JW, Tai ES, Chacko S, Wu V, Lee CF et al. · 2022
- 22Potkin SG, Jin Y, Bunney BG, Costa J, Gulasekaram B · 1999
- 23Tan HC, Hsu JW, Tai ES, Chacko S, Kovalik JP, Jahoor F · 2024
- 24Hahn RG · 1989
- 25Li J, Li J, Sun Y, Fu Y, Tan X, Wang N et al. · 2025
- 26Xiang S, Li Y, Wang Y, Nie H, Wang C, Che X et al. · 2026
- 27Li J, Hu J, Yun H, Mei Z, Wang X, Luo K et al. · 2026
- 28Mino M, Kakazu E, Sano A, Tsuruoka M, Matsubara H, Kakisaka K et al. · 2024
- 29Chen S, Lu R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Cao X, Yang H et al. · 2026
- 30Dehghanbanadaki H, Soltani A, Majidi Z, Rezaei-Tavirani M, Shafiee G, Ostovar A et al. · 2025
- 31Huidobro L, Cofre S, Santos JL, Godoy F, Paredes F, Bambs C et al. · 2026
- 32Feng Y, Gu XB, Zhou M, Wang HL, Feng RN, Zhang ZH · 2024
- 33Meisinger C, Freuer D, Raake P, Linseisen J, Schmitz T · 2026
- 34García-Gavilán JF, Paz-Graniel I, Pérez-Acosta JA, Ruiz-Canela M, Li J, Clish C et al. · 2026
- 35Palacios-González B, León-Reyes G, Rivera-Paredez B, Ibarra-González I, Vela-Amieva M, Flores YN et al. · 2022
- 36Sex-Specific Differences in the Control of Serum Concentrations of Glycine in Subjects with Metabolic Syndrome and Mendelian Randomization Analysis for ObesityAsensio E, Coltell O, Sorlí J, Pascual E, Barragán R, Ordovas J et al. · 2020
- 37Zwart NR, van Duijnhoven FJ, Wesselink E, Lubberman FJ, Ulrich CM, McKay JA et al. · 2026
- 38Motamed-Gorji N, Khalil Y, Gonzalez-Robles C, Khan S, Mills P, Garcia-Moreno H et al. · 2024
- 39Lim JJ, Prodhan UK, Silvestre MP, Liu AY, McLay J, Fogelholm M et al. · 2024
- 40Fajar A, Warsinggih, Syarifuddin E, Hendarto J, Labeda I, Lusikooy RE et al. · 2022
- 41Nunes PR, Bruder RM, Kaihara JNS, de Moraes FR, Tasic L, Bernardino RL et al. · 2025
- 42Branched-Chain and Aromatic Amino Acids Mark Early Metabolic Shifts in Adults with Varying AdiposityJaskulak M, Rybakowska I, Gregorczyk M, Antoniak-Pietrynczak K, Sośnicka A, Jabłońska P et al. · 2026
- 43Guasp M, Saiz A, Ruiz-Vives M, Almendrote M, Bruna J, González-Menacho J et al. · 2025
- 44Saudubray JM, Ogier H, Charpentier C, Depondt E, Coudé FX, Munnich A et al. · 1984
- 45Cagigas ML, Santiappillai NT, Commissati S, Fiorito G, Masedunskas A, Rajakumar G et al. · 2025
- 46Tan HC, Hsu JW, Tai ES, Chacko S, Wu V, Yen PM et al. · 2025
- 47Arimilli B, On TA, Srirama VS, Yang Y, Asampille G, Brender JR et al. · 2025
- 48Nourbakhsh M, Miryounesi M, Tale A, Karimzadeh P, Sadeghi H, Ghasemi MR et al. · 2025
- 49Pereira D, Santos T, Janeiro P, Palaré MJ · 2025
- 50
- 51Huang J, Wei Y, Wang D, Yin Z, Chen J, Jian C et al. · 2026
- 52Bozacı AE, Erdal İ, Öner G, Clark ÖA, Köken ÖY, Soyuçen E · 2026
- 53Yang J, Wu D, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Zheng X, Wang S et al. · 2026
- 54Xu M, Zhang D, Luan S, Huang Q · 2026
- 55Gervasoni J, Di Maio A, Serra M, Cicchinelli M, Santucci L, Ciasca G et al. · 2026
- 56May-Lewis H, Perret MJ, Xu Y, Ribeiro RSA, da Silva Correa R, Mafort TT et al. · 2026
- 57Rodin RE, Healy BC, Polgar-Turcsanyi M, Lokhande HA, Chitnis T · 2026
- 58Deng Z, Wu G, Chen S, He H, Zhang Y, Luo X et al. · 2026
- 59Lin C, Huang Y, Ran N, Liu J, Luo L, Zhang X et al. · 2025
- 60Liu M, Du X, Xue K, Gao Y, Cao X, Li J et al. · 2025
- 61Gervasoni J, Marino C, Imarisio A, Santucci L, Napolitano E, Nuzzo T et al. · 2025
- 62
- 63Bayrak H, Sharafi P, Özketen AÇ, Kılıç M · 2025
- 64Liu M, Pan W, He J, Ling S, He Y, Yang J et al. · 2025
- 65Yang P, Chen X, Liu M, Li X, Wang Y, Mu J et al. · 2025
- 66Zeng X, Song R, Zhang Z, Yao J, Liao H, Wang C et al. · 2025
- 67Slater KB, Shagun S, May-Lewis H, Xu Y, Ribeiro RSA, Correa RS et al. · 2025
- 68Isomura Y, Ohno M, Sudo S, Ono M, Kaminishi Y, Sumi Y et al. · 2024
- 69Garofalo M, De Simone G, Motta Z, Nuzzo T, De Grandis E, Bruno C et al. · 2024
- 70Tan HC, Hsu JW, Tai ES, Chacko S, Kovalik JP, Jahoor F · 2024
- 71Mogos M, Socaciu C, Socaciu AI, Vlad A, Gadalean F, Bob F et al. · 2024
- 72Boguszewicz Ł, Heyda A, Ciszek M, Bieleń A, Skorupa A, Mrochem-Kwarciak J et al. · 2024
- 73Manjunath J, Parthasarathy V, Joel MZ, Deng J, Ma EZ, Lee KK et al. · 2024
- 74Ho CSH, Tay GWN, Wee HN, Ching J · 2023
- 75Kurdi C, Lelovics V, Hesszenberger D, Lajtai A, Lakatos Á, Herczeg R et al. · 2023
- 76Tise CG, Palma MJ, Cusmano-Ozog KP, Matalon DR · 2023
- 77Chang X, Wang L, Guan SP, Kennedy BK, Liu J, Khor CC et al. · 2021
- 78Park S, Lee J, Yang SH, Lee H, Kim JY, Park M et al. · 2021
- 79Kumar P, Liu C, Hsu JW, Chacko S, Minard C, Jahoor F et al. · 2021
- 80Zeng L, Yu Y, Cai X, Xie S, Chen J, Zhong L et al. · 2019
- 81Serum Metabolomics of Activity Energy Expenditure and its Relation to Metabolic Syndrome and ObesityPalmnäs MSA, Kopciuk KA, Shaykhutdinov RA, Robson PJ, Mignault D, Rabasa-Lhoret R et al. · 2018
- 82Kim SY, Kaufman MJ, Cohen BM, Jensen JE, Coyle JT, Du F et al. · 2018
- 83Liappis N, Kochbeck E, Eckhardt G, Hahne H, Kesseler K, Bantzer P · 1980
- 84Glutathione precursors: a new opportunity for dietary interventions in obesity and metabolic health?Draganidis D, Rosvoglou A, Fatouros IG, Jamurtas AZ · 2026
- 85Huang Y, Jiang Y, Ye W, Hu X, Abudurexiti N, Li J et al. · 2026
- 86Kurtz JA, Singleton KM, Vasenina E, Jäger R, Gonzalez D, Schwarz A et al. · 2026
- 87Khosropanah A, Hosseini SA, Keshavarz A · 2026
- 88Wang X, Hou R, Chen Z, Wang X, Wang H · 2026
- 89Zamosteanu D, Filip N, Trandafir LM, Ţarcă E, Pertea M, Bordeianu G et al. · 2025
- 90Mahmoudi Ghehsareh M, Bakhtiari S, Asri N, Rezaei-Tavirani M, Jahani-Sherafat S, Masotti A et al. · 2025
- 91Ifrim ȘS, Bârdea A, Roman A, Soancă A, Albu S, Gâta A et al. · 2025
- 92Rizo-Roca D, Henderson JD, Zierath JR · 2025
- 93Fadgyas-Stanculete M, Capatina OO · 2025
- 94
- 95Ramos-Jiménez A, Hernández-Torres RP, Hernández-Ontiveros DA, Ortiz-Ortiz M, López-Fregoso RJ, Martínez-Sanz JM et al. · 2024
- 96Anand SK, Governale TA, Zhang X, Razani B, Yurdagul A, Pattillo CB et al. · 2024
- 97Terry-Lorenzo RT, Fan RH, Khin NA, Singh JB · 2024
- 98Imenshahidi M, Hossenzadeh H · 2022
- 99Pei JC, Luo DZ, Gau SS, Chang CY, Lai WS · 2021
- 100Alves A, Bassot A, Bulteau AL, Pirola L, Morio B · 2019
- 101Dietary Glycine Is Rate-Limiting for Glutathione Synthesis and May Have Broad Potential for Health ProtectionMcCarty MF, O'Keefe JH, DiNicolantonio JJ · 2018
- 102Habib MM, Hodgson HJ, Davidson BR · 2006
Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.