Knowledge · Natural Compounds

Potassium

Potassium is an essential mineral; human studies show partly clear, partly mixed effects, especially on blood pressure and potassium balance.

Last updated:

We evaluated 165 human studies on Potassium, including 126 randomised controlled trials and 16 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 120,229 participants in total. As of 4 October 2026.

This page as PDF · Summary

1. What Is Potassium? Occurrence, Origin and Forms

Potassium is an essential mineral and electrolyte. It occurs naturally in many foods, especially fruits, vegetables, legumes, and potatoes. In studies, it is investigated as a dietary component or in the form of salts, for example in relation to blood pressure and cardiovascular function.

Potassium is present in almost all plant and animal cells. In research, it is considered both as part of the usual diet and as an isolated intake in the form of salts.

Potassium salts are obtained from mineral deposits such as sylvite or from salt lakes; various potassium salts are produced for dietary supplements. Studies mainly examine potassium chloride, potassium citrate, potassium bicarbonate, and potassium gluconate, as well as potassium from food.

Forms and Preparations Studied

  • Potassium chloride
  • Potassium citrate
  • Potassium bicarbonate
  • Potassium gluconate
  • Potassium aspartate
  • Dietary potassium

Not covered on this page:

  • Sodium and other electrolytes
  • Potassium permanganate
  • Potassium-sparing diuretics

2. What Does Potassium Do? Results by Area

AreaResult in controlled studiesStrength of evidenceStudiesParticipants
Blood pressuremostly improvedhigh9 meta-analyses · 40 controlled · 11 other26,131
Cardiovascularmixedmoderate1 meta-analyses · 18 controlled · 7 other20,157
Kidneymixedmoderate0 meta-analyses · 12 controlled · 8 other1,062
Diabetesmostly no differencelow0 meta-analyses · 5 controlled · 2 other675
Musclemostly no differencelow0 meta-analyses · 4 controlled · 1 other310
Bonemostly no differencelow0 meta-analyses · 2 controlled · 1 other21,031
Strokemostly improvedlow0 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 3 other15,249
Other investigationsmixedmoderate1 meta-analyses · 61 controlled · 13 other63,907

How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.

3. What the Studies Show in Detail

Potassium and Blood Pressure: Human Studies

Several meta-analyses of controlled trials showed that increased potassium intake lowers systolic and diastolic blood pressure, markedly in hypertension, more weakly in normotensive individuals 3478911. With potassium chloride, office, home and long-term blood pressure fell in hypertension 77, with another potassium supplement long-term blood pressure fell 92; potassium-enriched salt substitutes lowered blood pressure in hypertension 5. No confirmed blood pressure difference was found by controlled trials with a potassium-rich diet 101 and a plant-based nutrition program 89 in kidney disease as well as with a single potassium-rich meal 99. A potassium supplement also did not change blood pressure in healthy participants 105. A dose-response meta-analysis found a U-shaped course: with very high additional intake the reduction diminished, with medically treated hypertension blood pressure rose 16. The evidence is strong, and most studies show a reduction, especially with supplements and salt substitutes; the data on potassium from food are inconsistent. The forms studied include potassium chloride, potassium citrate, potassium bicarbonate, potassium gluconate, potassium aspartate and potassium from food, partly as combination preparations with sodium chloride or magnesium. It remains open which salt form and dose are most effective and how the effects differ in various pre-existing conditions.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
1 Huang et al. 2021meta-analysis · 5,708 participantsDietary potassium intake (24-h urine); Median 67.7 mmol/day (IQR 54.6-76.4); vs. 50 mmol sodium reduction at different potassium intake levelsSystolic blood pressure with 50 mmol sodium reduction: no difference (p > 0.05); Diastolic blood pressure with 50 mmol sodium reduction: no difference (p > 0.05)
3 Whelton et al. 1999meta-analysis · 2,609 participantsOral potassium supplementation; vs. Placebo/control without potassiumSystolic blood pressure: improved (-4.44 (range, -2.53 to -6.36) mm Hg); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (-2.45 (range, -0.74 to -4.16) mm Hg)
4 Whelton et al. 1997meta-analysis · 2,609 participantsOral potassium supplementation as sole difference from control; vs. Control group without potassium supplementationSystolic blood pressure: improved (-3.11 mm Hg (-1.91 to -4.31 mm Hg)); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (-1.97 mm Hg (-0.52 to -3.42 mm Hg))
5 Kelly et al. 2026meta-analysis · 1,430 participantsPotassium-enriched salt substitute (potassium chloride replacing sodium chloride); vs. Regular salt (sodium chloride)Systolic blood pressure: improved (MD, -5.75 mmHg; 95% CI, -6.98 to -2.39 mmHg; I2 = 37%; p < 0.01); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (MD, -1.62 mmHg; 95% CI, -2.34 to -0.91 mmHg; I2 = 0%; p < 0.001)
7 Poorolajal et al. 2017meta-analysis · 1,213 participantsOral potassium supplementation (salt form not specified); at least 4 weeks; vs. PlaceboSystolic blood pressure (final follow-up): improved (MD -4.25 mmHg; 95% CI: -5.96 to -2.53); Diastolic blood pressure (final follow-up): improved (MD -2.53 mmHg; 95% CI: -4.05 to -1.02); Systolic blood pressure (change from baseline): improved (MD -8.89 mmHg; 95% CI: -13.67 to -4.11)
8 Binia et al. 2015meta-analysis · 917 participantsPotassium supplementation (salt form not specified); intake corresponding to urinary excretion 60 to 100 mmol/day; vs. control without potassium supplementationsystolic blood pressure, all patients: improved (4.7 mmHg [95% CI 2.4-7.0]); diastolic blood pressure, all patients: improved (3.5 mmHg (95% CI 1.3-5.7)); systolic blood pressure, hypertensive patients: improved (6.8 mmHg (95% CI 4.3-9.3))
9 Ravichagua et al. 2025meta-analysis · 803 participantsOral potassium supplements (salt form not reported); Median 4 weeks; vs. Placebo, sodium chloride, or no treatmentClinic systolic blood pressure: improved (−7.2 mmHg (95% CI −11.1 to −3.4)); Clinic diastolic blood pressure: improved (−4.0 mmHg (−6.2 to −1.7)); 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure: no difference (−2.4 mmHg (−5.2 to 0.4))
11 Granal et al. 2025meta-analysisPotassium supplementation, form not specified; 50 mmol/day increase in 24-h urinary potassium excretion; vs. Dose-response comparison of urinary potassium excretionSystolic blood pressure in subjects without hypertension: improved (0.5 mmHg reduction); Diastolic blood pressure in subjects without hypertension: improved (0.12 mmHg reduction); Systolic blood pressure in subjects with hypertension: improved (5.3 mmHg reduction)

Further studies in this area: 13 14 15 16 20 22 28 31 38 40 41 43 56 57 65 67 70 71 73 74 75 76 77 78 83 84 87 89 92 93 96 97 99 101 105 106 107 114 116 117 118 119 121 122 126 129 133 135 136 138 141 143

Potassium and Cardiovascular: Human Studies

In stroke survivors, a salt substitute of potassium chloride and sodium chloride lowered mortality in a randomized controlled trial 20. In ICD carriers, potassium-increasing treatment in addition to standard care reduced atrial fibrillation-related events 26. A potassium-rich meal mitigated the drop in flow-mediated dilation after the meal in healthy individuals 99; potassium-increasing treatment slightly improved two diastolic values in ICD carriers 35. Randomized controlled trials found no difference in atrial fibrillation after heart surgery when potassium was supplemented less often 25, and in cardiac rhythm events with a potassium binder during dialysis 24. The evidence is moderate; it remains open which potassium form and dose benefits which patient groups.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
6 Bensaaud et al. 2025systematic review · 1,397 participantsDASH diet as a dietary component with increased potassium; Intervention 16 weeks to 12 months, follow-up 16 weeks to 18 months; vs. No intervention/usual care, minimal intervention, or other dietsMyocardial infarction: no difference (no myocardial infarctions in either group)
10 Ono et al. 2026meta-analysisSerum potassium levels (no preparation administered); median 24.2 months (HFrEF) and 36.8 months (HFpEF); vs. potassium <3.5 vs. 4.0-4.5 mmol/L; range 4.2-5.0 mmol/L most favorableall-cause mortality at potassium <3.5 mmol/L (HFrEF): worsened (adjusted hazard ratio 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.76); cardiovascular, sudden, and pump failure death (HFrEF): worsened; lowest risk for all outcomes at potassium 4.2-5.0 mmol/L: improved (4.2-5.0 mmol/L)
12 Zwager et al. 2025meta-analysisEstimated dietary Na+/K+-ratio (diet); Na+/K+-ratio 2.0 ± 0.6 mmol/mmol; vs. Higher vs. lower Na+/K+-ratioCardiovascular events and mortality: worsened (hazard ratio 1.10 [95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.16])
15 Brand et al. 2022systematic reviewPotassium-containing low-sodium salt substitutes (LSSS) replacing regular salt; vs. Regular salt or no active interventionCardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality: unclear
20 Ding et al. 2025randomised controlled · 15,249 participantsSalt substitute with 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride vs regular salt; median 61.2 months; vs. regular saltdeath rates: improved (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.96; P = .003); stroke-related deaths: improved (relative reduction 21%; P = .01)
25 O'Brien et al. 2024randomised controlled · 1,690 participantsPotassium supplementation (potassium chloride) triggered by serum potassium threshold; Supplement only if serum potassium <4.5 mEq/L (tight) vs <3.6 mEq/L (relaxed); First 120 hours after CABG or until discharge; vs. Tight vs relaxed potassium controlNew-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: no difference (risk difference of 1.7% (95% CI, -2.6% to 5.9%)); At least 1 AFACS episode by any means: no difference; Non-AFACS dysrhythmias: no difference
26 Zheng et al. 2026randomised controlled · 1,200 participantsPotassium-increasing treatment (form not specified) plus standard care; Uptitration to high-normal plasma potassium (increase 0.3 mmol/L); median follow-up 3.3 person-years; vs. standard care alone (control group)Composite endpoint of atrial fibrillation-related hospitalizations, cardioversion/ablation, inappropriate shock therapy and amiodarone loading: improved (subdistribution hazard ratio, .65; 95% confidence interval, .45-.93, P = .02)
27 Jøns et al. 2025randomised controlled · 1,200 participantsPotassium supplementation, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, or both plus dietary guidance; Target plasma potassium 4.5–5.0 mmol/l; Median follow-up 39.6 months; vs. Standard care alonePrimary composite end point (sustained VT, ICD therapy, hospitalization, death): improved (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.95; P = 0.01)

Further studies in this area: 35 48 65 67 81 89 92 96 99 103 105 106 112 117 124 128 136 139

Potassium and Kidney: Human Studies

In hemodialysis with hyperkalemia, potassium binders reduced hyperkalemia events in a meta-analysis; sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and sodium polystyrene sulfonate lowered the potassium level, while with patiromer the reduction was not confirmed 2. A randomized controlled trial found fewer hyperkalemia episodes with patiromer 95. A two-phase potassium profile in the dialysate lowered serum potassium after dialysis more than a fixed one in a randomized controlled trial 72. In a randomized trial, hyperoxaluria decreased from baseline with potassium magnesium citrate, and more so with an Oxalobacter preparation 62. A randomized controlled trial with extended-release potassium citrate increased urinary potassium 82. In healthy individuals, a potassium supplement increased urinary AQP2 excretion and lowered free water clearance in a randomized controlled trial 105. The studies are mostly small and short; several tested mixtures, such as low-sodium, high-potassium seasonings and salts 3843, and apply only to that preparation.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
20 Ding et al. 2025randomised controlled · 15,249 participantsSalt substitute with 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride vs regular salt; median 61.2 months; vs. regular salthyperkalemia (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.74-1.38; P = .96)
32 Khalid et al. 2026randomised controlled · 290 participantsTablets: T1 supplement, T2 placebo, T3 magnesium, T4 magnesium plus potassium; 60 days follow-up; vs. placebo (T2) and magnesium (T3) vs. potassium (T4)serum urea: improved (p = 0.000); serum creatinine: improved (p = 0.000)
36 Reddy et al. 2014randomised controlled · 247 participantsUrikind-KM6: 1,100 mg potassium citrate, 375 mg magnesium citrate, 20 mg pyridoxine hydrochloride per 5 mL; every 8 hours; 3 years; vs. Control group 1 (discontinued due to intolerance), control group 2 (no prophylaxis)24-hour urinary citrate excretion: improved (221.79±13.39 mg/dL to 604.04±5.00 mg/dL); urinary pH: improved (5.62±0.2 to 6.87±0.01); stone recurrence rate per patient per year: improved (3.23±1.04 to 0.35±0.47)
37 Khalid et al. 2023randomised controlled · 200 participantsMagnesium and potassium supplements (Mg+ and K+), salt form not stated; vs. four groups by supplement, single-blind randomizedkidney markers dependent on cholesterol: no difference
53 Fomkin et al. 2025randomised controlled · 100 participantsDietary supplement Astracit-Asfarma (potassium citrate + magnesium citrate); 60 days; vs. Standard therapy alone (group 3A/3B)Total volume of residual fragments: improved (decreased by ~30% from the initial postoperative level and more than twice compared to the control group); Density of fragments: improved (decreased by 10-12%); Stone-free rate ≤2 mm: improved (60% in group 1,72% in group 2, and 52% in the control group)
74 Mu et al. 2024randomised controlled · 59 participantsCM-DASH diet with 52% low-sodium salt; 8 weeks; vs. CM-DASH diet with regular salt (control group)Urinary albumin creatinine ratio: improved; Serum creatinine: improved
82 Li et al. 2025randomised controlled · 46 participantsExtended-release potassium citrate vs. low-PRAL diet; 4 weeks; vs. Control groupUrine pH: no difference; Urine calcium: no difference; Urine oxalate: no difference
89 Liebman et al. 2025randomised controlled · 40 participants15-day whole-food plant-based diet (WFPBD) education program; 15 days; vs. Control group without the education programSerum potassium (p = 0.52); Albumin: no difference; Phosphorus: no difference

Further studies in this area: 97 101 104 105 107 109 113 115 130 136 140 142

Potassium and Diabetes: Human Studies

For diabetes, five controlled studies are available, but they do not give a uniform picture. In a randomized controlled trial with a mixture of olive leaf extract and potassium, fasting insulin and HOMA index decreased in mildly elevated blood pressure; fasting glucose and HbA1c remained unchanged 65. In a randomized controlled trial with an adapted DASH diet, which among other things contained more potassium, calcium, magnesium and fiber, glycated hemoglobin decreased similarly in both groups in pregnant women with diabetes 67. A randomized controlled trial with magnesium and potassium supplements found no difference in quality of life and cholesterol 37. The evidence is low, because the studies examined different forms, mixtures and populations and no meta-analysis is available. It remains open whether potassium in a specific form or preparation has a benefit in diabetes.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
29 Khalid et al. 2026randomised controlled · 320 participantsPotassium alone (T3) and magnesium+potassium (T4); vs. Placebo (T1) and magnesium alone (T2)HOMA-IR (magnesium+potassium): improved (3.01 ± 0. 54, and post-treatment mean was 2.54 ± 0.29, showing a significant reduction (p = 0.001)); HOMA-IR among treatment groups: improved (p = 0.001); Fasting blood sugar: improved (p = 0.001)
37 Khalid et al. 2023randomised controlled · 200 participantsMagnesium and potassium supplements (Mg+ and K+), salt form not stated; vs. four groups by supplement, single-blind randomizedeffect of Mg/K therapy on quality of life and cholesterol: no difference
65 Fladerer-Grollitsch et al. 2026randomised controlled · 70 participantsOlive leaf extract-potassium supplement vs. placebo; 1000 mg OLE, ≥160 mg oleuropein, 300 mg potassium/day; 12 weeks; vs. placebo, double-blind randomizedFasting glucose: no difference (unchanged); HbA1c: no difference (unchanged); Fasting insulin and HOMA index: improved (declined in the verum group)
67 Belfort et al. 2023randomised controlled · 68 participantsAdapted DASH diet with higher potassium, calcium, magnesium and fibre content; until delivery (18 weeks); vs. Standard diet with 45-65 % carbohydrates, 15-20 % protein, 25-30 % lipidsGlycated haemoglobin: no difference (SDG: -0⋅61 [CI -0⋅26, -0⋅96], P = 0⋅00 v. DDG: -1⋅1 [CI -0⋅57, -1⋅62], P = 0⋅00)
108 Juett et al. 2026randomised controlled · 17 participants100% fruit juice (Raw Hydrate®) vs. glucose-based sports drink vs. water; Water volume equal to 150% of body mass loss (~2,300 mL juice); 1 h rehydration, 5 h observation; vs. Sports drink and waterBlood glucose AUC: improved (P < 0.001)
125 Chatterjee et al. 2012cohort study · 4,754 participantsDietary potassium (no supplement); 15 and 20 years follow-up; vs. lowest vs highest potassium quintilesIncident type 2 diabetes, lowest vs highest urinary potassium quintile: worsened (HR 2.45; 95% CI 1.08, 5.59); Diabetes risk with lower potassium intake (African-Americans): worsened
137 Eser et al. 2025cohort study · 113 participantsPotassium chloride (KCl) alone or KCl plus potassium phosphate (KPO4); 13-year treatment period; vs. KCl+KPO4 (n=36) versus KCl alone (n=77)Severity of acidosis: no difference; Duration of acidosis recovery: no difference; Incidence of hypokalemia: no difference

Potassium and Muscle: Human Studies

Potassium bicarbonate as a supplement, partly combined with whey protein, showed no difference in muscle performance, physical performance and muscle mass in healthy older adults 46. A randomized controlled trial with glucosamine sulfate potassium salt found no difference in the WOMAC score compared with glucosamine sulfate sodium salt in knee osteoarthritis 58. The evidence is low, the studies are small and examine different forms and populations; it remains open whether other potassium forms or higher intakes have an effect in specific groups.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
46 Ceglia et al. 2026randomised controlled · 128 participantsPotassium bicarbonate (KHCO3) supplement, partly combined with whey protein; 81 mmol KHCO3 per day; 24 weeks; vs. Placebo-KHCO3 or placebo-whey protein (2×2 factorial)Muscle power (double leg press): no difference (-13.6 watts [95% CI: -39.6, 12.4; P = 0.30]); Physical performance: no difference; Muscle mass: no difference
58 Wangroongsub et al. 2010randomised controlled · 90 participantsGlucosamine sulfate potassium salt (GS-K) vs. glucosamine sulfate sodium salt (GS-Na); 1500 mg daily; until the sixteenth week of treatment; vs. GS-Na 1500 mg dailyWOMAC score: no difference
61 Polo-Ferrero et al. 2025randomised controlled · 80 participantsDietary potassium (nutrient intake assessed by food frequency questionnaire); 32-week intervention; vs. High-speed resistance training vs. multicomponent trainingCorrelation between potassium intake and 5STS performance (H-RT group): improved (r<sub>p</sub> = -0.47)
112 Killick et al. 2026randomised controlled · 12 participantsSodium-potassium drink vs. water vs. coconut water; 300 ml before and at 0, 30, 60 min postexercise; 60 min cycling at 1.5 W/kg, measures to 90 min postexercise; vs. Water and coconut waterHandgrip strength, countermovement jump, fatigue: no difference (p ≥ .152)
132 Zhang et al. 2022cohort study · 392 participantsdietary potassium (assessed by FFQ); 24 months; vs. higher vs. lower potassium intakelower limb muscle strength: improved

Potassium and Bone: Human Studies

For bone, the controlled studies do not show a uniform picture: A randomized controlled trial in prehypertensive adults with potassium chloride capsules found changes in phosphate and calcium metabolism parameters, while parathyroid hormone, vitamin D status and plasma calcium remained unchanged 91. A large randomized controlled trial with a potassium chloride-containing salt substitute mixed with sodium chloride found no difference in the frequency of fractures in adults at high cardiovascular and fracture risk 18. An observational study with potassium from food, recorded together with calcium, magnesium and phosphorus, showed no association with knee joint structures in people with knee osteoarthritis 132. The evidence for bone endpoints is low; potassium chloride as a supplement or in the salt substitute as well as potassium from food were examined. It is open whether potassium without sodium chloride influences bone strength.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
18 Wang et al. 2024randomised controlled · 20,995 participantsSalt substitute (potassium chloride-containing) vs. regular salt; 5 years; vs. regular salt (control)Incidence of all fractures: no difference (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.14); Incidence of vertebral fracture: no difference (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.53 to 1.26); Incidence of non-vertebral fracture: no difference (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.29)
91 Humalda et al. 2020randomised controlled · 36 participantsCapsules containing potassium chloride, sodium chloride, or placebo; 3 g/d potassium chloride or 3 g/d sodium chloride; vs. Placebo (randomized, blinded, crossover)plasma phosphate: improved (from 1.10 ± 0.19 to 1.15 ± 0.19 mmol/L, P = 0.004); tubular maximum of phosphate reabsorption: improved (from 0.93 ± 0.21 to 1.01 ± 0.20 mmol/L, P < 0.001); FGF23: improved (114.3 [96.8-135.0] to 108.5 [93.5-125.9] RU/mL, P = 0.01)
132 Zhang et al. 2022cohort study · 392 participantsdietary potassium (assessed by FFQ); 24 months; vs. higher vs. lower potassium intakeknee joint structures: no difference

Potassium and Stroke: Human Studies

In stroke prevention, the results differ depending on the form and use of potassium. A randomized controlled trial with a salt substitute of potassium chloride and sodium chloride found fewer recurrent strokes and fewer hemorrhagic strokes in stroke survivors in northern China 20. A systematic review of the DASH diet, which besides more potassium also includes calcium, magnesium, fiber and less sodium, could not establish an effect on stroke risk 6. In people who newly took furosemide, additional potassium in an observational study was not associated with strokes 139. The evidence is low, because only one controlled study is available and the remaining findings come from mixed preparations or observational data. It remains open whether potassium alone, independent of salt substitution or accompanying nutrients, lowers stroke risk.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
6 Bensaaud et al. 2025systematic review · 1,397 participantsDASH diet as a dietary component with increased potassium; Intervention 16 weeks to 12 months, follow-up 16 weeks to 18 months; vs. No intervention/usual care, minimal intervention, or other dietsStroke: no difference (no strokes in either group)
20 Ding et al. 2025randomised controlled · 15,249 participantsSalt substitute with 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride vs regular salt; median 61.2 months; vs. regular saltrecurrent stroke: improved (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.95; P = .005); hemorrhagic stroke: improved (relative reduction, 30%; P = .002)
124 Li et al. 2026study · 15,249 participantsPotassium-enriched salt substitute replacing regular salt; lifetime horizon; vs. regular saltrecurrent stroke events: improved (454,559 recurrent stroke events (a 3·7% reduction)); stroke deaths: improved (482,632 stroke deaths (a 15·0% reduction))
139 Pham et al. 2026cohort studyEmpiric potassium supplementation; vs. Potassium vs. no potassium at furosemide initiationStroke: no difference (1.03 (1.00-1.06))

Potassium: Further Outcomes in Studies

Urinary potassium excretion increased with potassium chloride supplements 4177 and after a short medical nutrition counseling 117. In dialysis patients with predialysis hyperkalemia, sodium zirconium cyclosilicate maintained normokalemia better than placebo over twelve months 24, and bananas at the start of hemodialysis kept serum potassium higher during dialysis and made hypokalemia less common 48. The evidence is moderate: A meta-analysis and numerous controlled studies are available, but the forms and populations examined are very heterogeneous. Potassium chloride, potassium citrate, potassium bicarbonate, potassium gluconate, potassium aspartate, potassium from food as well as potassium binders, partly as mixed preparations with sodium or magnesium, were examined.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
6 Bensaaud et al. 2025systematic review · 1,397 participantsDASH diet as a dietary component with increased potassium; Intervention 16 weeks to 12 months, follow-up 16 weeks to 18 months; vs. No intervention/usual care, minimal intervention, or other dietsAll-cause mortality: no difference (no deaths)
9 Ravichagua et al. 2025meta-analysis · 803 participantsOral potassium supplements (salt form not reported); Median 4 weeks; vs. Placebo, sodium chloride, or no treatmentAny adverse event (RR 2.41); Total withdrawals: worsened (RR 1.32); AE-related withdrawals (RR 1.28)
15 Brand et al. 2022systematic reviewPotassium-containing low-sodium salt substitutes (LSSS) replacing regular salt; vs. Regular salt or no active interventionChange in blood potassium, hyperkalaemia, hypokalaemia: unclear
17 Zhang et al. 2025randomised controlled · 20,996 participantsSodium-reduced potassium-enriched salt substitute; mean follow-up 4.7 years; vs. continued regular salt usetotal stomach cancer: no difference (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.08); adjudicated fatal stomach cancer: improved (RR 0.66 (95% CI 0.44 to 1.00)); unadjudicated non-fatal stomach cancer: no difference (RR 0.88 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.37))
19 Haghdoost et al. 2024randomised controlled · 20,995 participantsSalt substitute with 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride; mean follow-up 4.7 years; vs. regular salt (100% sodium chloride)Headache frequency: no difference (RR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.16, p = 0.48); Headache severity: no difference (p = 0.90)
21 Lin et al. 2026randomised controlled · 14,989 participantsReal-time AI-enabled ECG alert in the electronic health record; 6 months (2022); vs. Physicians without alerts (control group)Hyperkalemia-related treatment within 3 hours (all patients): no difference (8.0% vs. 7.7%; hazard ratio 1.05; 95% CI 0.94-1.17; p = 0.420); Hypokalemia-related treatment within 3 hours: no difference (2.1% vs. 2.4%; hazard ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.74-1.13; p = 0.392); Hyperkalemia-related treatment among AI-ECG-identified patients: improved (69.1% vs. 41.6%; hazard ratio 2.23; 95% CI 1.44-3.46; p < 0.001)
25 O'Brien et al. 2024randomised controlled · 1,690 participantsPotassium supplementation (potassium chloride) triggered by serum potassium threshold; Supplement only if serum potassium <4.5 mEq/L (tight) vs <3.6 mEq/L (relaxed); First 120 hours after CABG or until discharge; vs. Tight vs relaxed potassium controlIn-patient mortality: no difference; Length of stay: no difference; Per-patient cost for purchasing and administering potassium: improved (mean difference, $111.89 [95% CI, $103.60-$120.19]; P <.001)
30 Hao et al. 2025randomised controlled · 309 participantsFree medically tailored groceries high in fibre or healthy fats; 12-week intervention, follow-up up to 12 months; vs. Usual care without grocery provisionPotassium intake during intervention: improved (+ 279 mg (95%CI 0 to 558 mg)); Potassium intake at follow-up: no difference

Further studies in this area: 31 32 33 34 37 39 40 41 42 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 55 56 58 59 60 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 77 78 79 80 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 94 98 100 102 103 106 110 111 112 117 118 120 121 123 124 126 127 130 131 132 134 135 136 139

4. How Is Potassium Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies

The studies used potassium chloride, potassium citrate, potassium bicarbonate, potassium gluconate, potassium aspartate as well as potassium from food, partly as salt substitutes with sodium chloride or as combination products with magnesium. Some investigations used potassium binders such as patiromer or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in hyperkalemia. The doses, durations and preparations differ greatly and are shown in the table.

Preparation or formDoseDurationStudy
Sodium-reduced potassium-enriched salt substitute—mean follow-up 4.7 years17
Salt substitute (potassium chloride-containing) vs. regular salt—5 years18
Salt substitute with 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride—mean follow-up 4.7 years19
Salt substitute with 75% sodium chloride and 25% potassium chloride vs regular salt—median 61.2 months20
Real-time AI-enabled ECG alert in the electronic health record—6 months (2022)21
Multifaceted intervention including potassium-enriched low-sodium salt substitute—6-month active phase, follow-up to 12 months22
Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), potassium binderStarting dose 5 g once daily on non-dialysis days, titrated as needed—23
Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), a potassium binder5 g once daily on nondialysis days, titrated weekly over 4 weeks between 0 and 15 gup to 12 months (normokalemia at 12 months reported)24
Potassium supplementation (potassium chloride) triggered by serum potassium thresholdSupplement only if serum potassium <4.5 mEq/L (tight) vs <3.6 mEq/L (relaxed)First 120 hours after CABG or until discharge25
Potassium-increasing treatment (form not specified) plus standard careUptitration to high-normal plasma potassium (increase 0.3 mmol/L)median follow-up 3.3 person-years26
Potassium supplementation, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, or both plus dietary guidanceTarget plasma potassium 4.5–5.0 mmol/lMedian follow-up 39.6 months27
Salt substitute with 70% sodium chloride and 30% potassium chloride replacing all home salt—until end of trial (duration not reported)28
Free medically tailored groceries high in fibre or healthy fats—12-week intervention, follow-up up to 12 months30
Legume-based DASH diet (dietary potassium)—16 weeks31
Tablets: T1 supplement, T2 placebo, T3 magnesium, T4 magnesium plus potassium—60 days follow-up32

5. Is Potassium Safe? Side Effects in Studies

In a meta-analysis, adverse events and discontinuations occurred more frequently with potassium 9. Details are shown in the table.

StudyReported side effects
2 Zirino et al. 2025Adverse event data limited, no significant differences in total AEs; mortality data sparse (one death in placebo group)
6 Bensaaud et al. 2025Adverse effects were a secondary outcome, not reported in the abstract
7 Poorolajal et al. 2017No important adverse effects; described as safe
9 Ravichagua et al. 2025Adverse events more frequent (RR 2.41); more withdrawals (RR 1.32)
15 Brand et al. 2022Hyperkalaemia and hypokalaemia assessed as safety outcomes
20 Ding et al. 2025no significant difference in hyperkalemia (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.74-1.38; P = .96)
22 Du et al. 2026serious adverse events 2.8% vs 2.3%
23 Fishbane et al. 2026Edema 5% vs 5%, heart failure 5% vs 5%, hypertension 9% vs 8%
24 Fishbane et al. 2025Serious adverse events 38.6% (SZC) vs 37.6% (placebo); hypokalemia 3.0% vs 1.4%
25 O'Brien et al. 2024No increase in dysrhythmias or adverse clinical outcomes in relaxed group
27 Jøns et al. 2025Hospitalization for hyperkalemia or hypokalemia similar in both groups
36 Reddy et al. 2014drug intolerance in 61 patients within 1 month

6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence

  • The studies differ greatly in salt form, dose, duration and population, which makes a direct comparison difficult.
  • Many investigations on kidney and cardiovascular system are small and short, partly with combination products.
  • For potassium from food, the blood pressure data are inconsistent; studies with endpoints such as heart attack or stroke are still pending.
  • For muscle, diabetes and bone, only a few controlled studies with different forms are available.
  • The transferability to healthy individuals is limited, since many findings were obtained in patients with hyperkalemia, dialysis or diabetes.

7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Potassium

Potassium is an essential mineral and electrolyte that has been studied in humans in various forms and preparations. A blood pressure reduction is most evident with supplements and potassium-enriched salt substitutes, while the data on potassium from food are inconsistent. In hyperkalemia on dialysis, potassium binders reduce hyperkalemia events, and most also lower the potassium level. For cardiovascular endpoints, the evidence is moderate, for muscle, diabetes and bone it is low; many studies are small, short or investigated combination products. The results apply in each case only to the potassium form and preparation studied.

Frequently Asked Questions

How well has Potassium been studied in humans?

We evaluated 165 human studies on Potassium, including 126 randomised controlled trials and 16 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 120,229 participants in total. As of 4 October 2026.

Does Potassium help with blood pressure? What the studies show

We evaluated 9 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 40 controlled studies and 11 further studies; the controlled studies include 26,131 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 1345

Does Potassium help with cardiovascular? What the studies show

We evaluated one meta-analysis or systematic review, 18 controlled studies and 7 further studies; the controlled studies include 20,157 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mixed. Strength of evidence under our published rules: moderate. Sources: 6101215

Does Potassium help with kidney? What the studies show

We evaluated 12 controlled studies and 8 further studies; the controlled studies include 1,062 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mixed. Strength of evidence under our published rules: moderate. Sources: 20323637

Does Potassium help with diabetes? What the studies show

We evaluated 5 controlled studies and 2 further studies; the controlled studies include 675 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly no difference. Strength of evidence under our published rules: low. Sources: 29376567

Does Potassium help with muscle? What the studies show

We evaluated 4 controlled studies and one further study; the controlled studies include 310 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly no difference. Strength of evidence under our published rules: low. Sources: 465861112

Does Potassium help with bone? What the studies show

We evaluated 2 controlled studies and one further study; the controlled studies include 21,031 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly no difference. Strength of evidence under our published rules: low. Sources: 1891132

Does potassium lower blood pressure?

Several meta-analyses of controlled studies show that increased potassium intake lowers blood pressure, especially in hypertension and as a supplement 3478911; potassium-containing salt substitutes also lowered it 5. Other controlled studies found no confirmed difference, for example with a higher-potassium diet in kidney disease 101 or after a single potassium-rich meal 99. The results therefore depend on form, preparation and population.

Which potassium forms were studied?

Potassium chloride, potassium citrate, potassium bicarbonate, potassium gluconate, potassium aspartate and potassium from food were studied, partly as combination products with sodium chloride or magnesium. Some studies used potassium binders such as patiromer or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in hyperkalemia. The results apply in each case only to the form and preparation studied.

How safe is potassium in the studies?

A salt substitute made of potassium chloride and sodium chloride did not lead to hyperkalemia more frequently than normal salt 20, and a potassium-increasing treatment did not lead to hospital admissions due to hyperkalemia or hypokalemia more frequently 27. In a meta-analysis, adverse events and discontinuations occurred more frequently with potassium 9. With the potassium binder sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, hypokalemia occurred somewhat more frequently in dialysis patients than with placebo 24.

Are there studies on potassium in diabetes?

There are five controlled studies that do not give a consistent picture. A randomized controlled study with a mixture of olive leaf extract and potassium found decreasing fasting insulin and HOMA values; fasting glucose and HbA1c remained unchanged 65. The evidence is low, since forms, mixtures and populations vary greatly.

What do the studies on potassium and stroke show?

A randomized controlled study with a salt substitute made of potassium chloride and sodium chloride found fewer recurrent strokes and fewer hemorrhagic strokes in stroke survivors in northern China 20. A systematic review on the DASH diet, which includes further nutrient changes in addition to more potassium, could not confirm any effect on stroke risk 6. The evidence is low, since only one controlled study is available and the remaining findings come from combination products or observational data.

Sources

  1. 1
  2. 2
    Zirino F, Maressa V, Messina RM, Stancanelli MR, Gembillo G, Longhitano E et al. · 2025
  3. 3
    Potassium in preventing and treating high blood pressure
    Whelton PK, He J · 1999
  4. 4
    Whelton PK, He J, Cutler JA, Brancati FL, Appel LJ, Follmann D et al. · 1997
  5. 5
    Kelly FA, Dantas CR, Sobreira LER, Almeida AM, Bezerra FB, Sousa MG et al. · 2026
  6. 6
    Bensaaud A, Seery S, Gibson I, Jones J, Flaherty G, McEvoy JW et al. · 2025
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
    Ono R, Chimura M, Docherty KF, Henderson AD, Campbell R, Desai AS et al. · 2026
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
    Filippini T, Naska A, Kasdagli MI, Torres D, Lopes C, Carvalho C et al. · 2020
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
    Ding X, Zhang X, Huang L, Xiong S, Li Z, Zhao Y et al. · 2025
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
    Fishbane S, Dember LM, Jadoul M, Kovesdy CP, Guzman N, Kordzakhia G et al. · 2025
  25. 25
  26. 26
    Zheng C, Winsløw UCG, Danielsen EM, Sakthivel T, Iversen KK, Bosselmann HS et al. · 2026
  27. 27
    Jøns C, Zheng C, Winsløw UCG, Danielsen EM, Sakthivel T, Frandsen EA et al. · 2025
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
    Sakthivel T, Winsløw UC, Zheng C, Danielsen EM, Bosselmann HS, Vinther M et al. · 2026
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
  47. 47
  48. 48
  49. 49
  50. 50
  51. 51
  52. 52
    Schnuck J, Jones IA, Schmicker RH, Comstock BA, Rodriguez Martinez AE, DePaoli S et al. · 2026
  53. 53
    [Clinical efficacy of the dietary supplement Astracit-Asfarma as a synergistic adjuvant to standard therapy for the elimination of residual fragments after endoscopic and shock wave lithotripsy in patients with urolithiasis (a pilot study)]
    Fomkin R N, Osnovin O V, Popkov V M, Fomkina O A · 2025
  54. 54
    A randomized controlled clinical evaluation of anti-gingivitis and desensitizing efficacy of a newly developed toothpaste with zinc chloride and oriental herb extract
    Moon KT, Lim JH, Oh K, Ha W, Cho MJ, Lee KH · 2026
  55. 55
  56. 56
  57. 57
  58. 58
    Comparable clinical outcomes between glucosamine sulfate-potassium chloride and glucosamine sulfate sodium chloride in patients with mild and moderate knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind study
    Wangroongsub Y, Tanavalee A, Wilairatana V, Ngarmukos S · 2010
  59. 59
  60. 60
  61. 61
    Polo-Ferrero L, Recio-Rodriguez JI, González-Manzano S, Martín-Vallejo J, Barbero-Iglesias FJ, Montero-Errasquín B et al. · 2025
  62. 62
    Jairath A, Parekh N, Otano N, Mishra S, Ganpule A, Sabnis R et al. · 2015
  63. 63
    Xavier GMB, Paes YFO, de Meneses Costa Ferreira LM, Lamarão MLN, Silva CM, Ribeiro-Costa RM et al. · 2025
  64. 64
    The use of desensitizing agents during in-office bleaching might not decrease tooth bleaching sensitivity: a randomized clinical trial
    de Lima TM, França FMG, do Amaral FLB, Turssi CP, Basting RT · 2022
  65. 65
  66. 66
    Haider JCMC, Vian I, Bonfante JW, Gonçalves JDS, Hoffmann CL · 2025
  67. 67
  68. 68
  69. 69
  70. 70
  71. 71
    Dos Santos ECB, de Souza Lima Bitar Y, Dos Anjos JLM, de Macedo CRB, Brito AMN, Ferreira MP et al. · 2026
  72. 72
  73. 73
  74. 74
  75. 75
  76. 76
  77. 77
  78. 78
  79. 79
  80. 80
  81. 81
    Winsløw U, Sakthivel T, Zheng C, Philbert B, Vinther M, Frandsen E et al. · 2023
  82. 82
  83. 83
  84. 84
  85. 85
    Juraschek SP, Miller ER, Wu B, White K, Charleston J, Gelber AC et al. · 2021
  86. 86
    Kitamura W, Fujii K, Kobayashi H, Abe M, Fukumi T, Ikeuchi K et al. · 2025
  87. 87
  88. 88
    Effective treatment of seborrheic dermatitis using a low dose, oral homeopathic medication consisting of potassium bromide, sodium bromide, nickel sulfate, and sodium chloride in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Smith SA, Baker AE, Williams JH · 2002
  89. 89
  90. 90
  91. 91
    Humalda JK, Yeung SMH, Geleijnse JM, Gijsbers L, Riphagen IJ, Hoorn EJ et al. · 2020
  92. 92
  93. 93
    Barros CL, Sousa AL, Chinem BM, Rodrigues RB, Jardim TS, Carneiro SB et al. · 2015
  94. 94
    Martins JM, Nogueira MFF, de Oliveira GJPL, Machado AC, de Freitas Santos Filho PC, Carlo HL et al. · 2026
  95. 95
  96. 96
    Malta D, Esfandiari S, Goldraich LA, Allard JP, Newton GE · 2024
  97. 97
  98. 98
    Pereira-Lores P, Alonso DE LA Peña V, Gancedo-Gancedo T, Villasenín-Sánchez C, Bello-Castro A, Martín-Biedma B et al. · 2025
  99. 99
  100. 100
  101. 101
  102. 102
  103. 103
  104. 104
  105. 105
  106. 106
    Lin PH, Allen JD, Li YJ, Yu M, Lien LF, Svetkey LP · 2012
  107. 107
  108. 108
    Juett LA, van der Wolf-Ong J, Gyamfi PA, Ebrahim SD, Codd EB, Pugh CF et al. · 2026
  109. 109
    Moest WT, Snoeker B, Mallat MJK, Vermanen LAH, Kuipers HT, de Borst MH et al. · 2026
  110. 110
  111. 111
  112. 112
  113. 113
  114. 114
  115. 115
  116. 116
  117. 117
    D'Elia L, Strazzullo P, Del Giudice A, Desideri G, Di Quattro R, Ferri C et al. · 2025
  118. 118
    Yano Y, Kitaoka K, Ohkubo T, Okamura T, Kanegae H, Yoshita K et al. · 2025
  119. 119
  120. 120
    Malik N, Tonstad S, Paalani M, Dos Santos H, Luiz do Prado W · 2020
  121. 121
  122. 122
  123. 123
  124. 124
  125. 125
  126. 126
  127. 127
  128. 128
  129. 129
    Tayo BO, Luke A, McKenzie CA, Kramer H, Cao G, Durazo-Arvizu R et al. · 2012
  130. 130
    Leonberg-Yoo AK, Tighiouart H, Levey AS, Beck GJ, Sarnak MJ · 2017
  131. 131
  132. 132
  133. 133
    Ndanuko RN, Tapsell LC, Charlton KE, Neale EP, O'Donnell KM, Batterham MJ · 2017
  134. 134
  135. 135
    Rodrigues J, Costa M, Sousa D, Costa AR, Lunet N, Cruz VT et al. · 2024
  136. 136
  137. 137
  138. 138
    Viroli G, Gonçalves C, Pinho O, Silva-Santos T, Padrão P, Moreira P · 2021
  139. 139
    Pham Nguyen TP, Hennessy S, Brensinger CM, Bilker WB, Dember LM, Miano TA et al. · 2026
  140. 140
  141. 141
  142. 142
  143. 143

Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.

International Health Research · https://ih-research.com/en/knowledge/potassium/ · Last updated: 2026-10-15