Milk Thistle (Silymarin)
In meta-analyses, milk thistle extracts mainly lowered liver values, in fatty liver and preventively under tuberculosis drugs; individual studies were inconsistent.
We evaluated 212 human studies on Milk Thistle (Silymarin), including 56 randomised controlled trials and 42 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 3,909 participants in total. As of 7 October 2026.
1. What Is Milk Thistle (Silymarin)? Occurrence, Origin and Forms
Milk thistle (Silybum marianum) is a thistle-like plant in the daisy family. Its ripe fruits yield the extract silymarin, a mixture of flavonolignans. Traditionally the plant is used for upper abdominal complaints and in connection with the liver.
Milk thistle grows in dry, sunny locations and is cultivated for its fruits. The ripe fruits are the part used, and the extract is made from them.
For the extract, the ripe fruits are harvested and extracted with solvents; the result is adjusted to a defined silymarin content. Studies examine, among other things, standardized silymarin extracts, the single compound silibinin, a complex of silymarin and phosphatidylcholine, and silibinin-containing infusion solutions.
Forms and Preparations Studied
- Whole or ground fruits (tea, powder)
- Standardized silymarin extract
- Silibinin (silybin) as a single compound
- Silymarin–phosphatidylcholine complex
- Silibinin infusion solution
- Other flavonolignans such as silychristin and silydianin
Not covered on this page:
- Other liver plants such as artichoke, dandelion and greater celandine
- Milk thistle seed oil pressed from the seeds, which is not obtained through silymarin extraction
- Combination products in which silymarin appears alongside other substances
- Silibinin as a laboratory reagent in cell experiments without reference to use in humans
2. What Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) Do? Results by Area
| Area | Result in controlled studies | Strength of evidence | Studies | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver values during drug treatment | mostly improved | high | 7 meta-analyses · 6 controlled · 15 other | 385 |
| Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease | mostly no difference | high | 5 meta-analyses · 7 controlled · 27 other | 564 |
| Diabetes and blood glucose | mostly no difference | moderate | 3 meta-analyses · 2 controlled · 15 other | 117 |
| Chronic hepatitis | mostly improved | moderate | 1 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 6 other | 141 |
| Liver cirrhosis | mostly no difference | moderate | 1 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 7 other | 141 |
| Cancer (silibinin) | reviews only | low | 1 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 10 other | 0 |
| Death cap mushroom poisoning | observational data only | unclear | 0 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 10 other | 0 |
| Other investigations | mostly improved | high | 14 meta-analyses · 36 controlled · 64 other | 1,757 |
How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.
3. What the Studies Show in Detail
Milk Thistle (Silymarin) and Liver Values During Drug Treatment: Human Studies
During treatment with tuberculosis drugs, silymarin in a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies preventively reduced the risk of liver damage as well as ALT, AST and ALP 15. A small randomized study confirmed lower AST and ALP values after two weeks 74. For drug-induced liver injury overall, however, a larger meta-analysis found no confirmed effect 3. In children undergoing chemotherapy, a traditional fruit infusion lowered ALT more than silymarin 52. Compared with placebo, controlled studies under chemotherapy found more favorable ALP and bilirubin values 47 and less liver fat accumulation on ultrasound 95, and under fingolimod lower ALT and AST 70. In children with leukemia undergoing maintenance therapy, ALT, AST, GGT and bilirubin decreased slightly more than under placebo 45.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Calderon et al. 2023 | systematic review · 3,846 participants | Silymarin supplements (extract); 140 mg to 420 mg; vs. Placebo or control in the included RCTs | Proportion of studies with reduced liver enzyme levels: improved (65.5%); Proportion of studies with no significant change: no difference (20.7%); Proportion of studies with elevated liver enzymes: worsened (13.8%) |
| 3 Shahsavari et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 3,545 participants | Silymarin (Silybum marianum); low dose <400 mg vs. higher doses; ≤2 months vs. longer treatment; vs. Control or subgroups by dose, duration, BMI, age, etiology | Serum AST levels: no difference (SMD [95% CI]: - 0.670 [- 0.931, - 0.408], p-value = 0.000); Serum ALT levels: no difference (SMD [95% CI]: - 0.912 [- 1.177, - 0.646], p-value = 0.000); Serum ALP levels: no difference (SMD [95% CI]: - 0.236 [- 1.929, 1.458], p-value = 0.159) |
| 9 Huang et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 1,691 participants | Silymarin (preparation, form and dose not reported); vs. Placebo | ALT activity: improved (MD: -6.44 U/L, 95% CI: -10.03 to -2.85, p = 0.0004); AST activity: improved (MD: -6.99 U/L, 95% CI: -8.56 to -5.42, p < 0.00001) |
| 15 Tao et al. 2019 | meta-analysis · 1,198 participants | Silymarin (extract, exact preparation not reported); not reported; prophylaxis until week 4 after treatment start; vs. placebo | occurrence of anti-TB DILI at week 4: improved (RR: 0.33, 95% CI (0.15, 0.75)); ALT: improved (SMD = - 0.15, 95% CI (-0.24, -0.07), P < 0.001); AST: improved (SMD =-0.14, 95% CI (-0.23, -0.06), P = 0.001) |
| 17 Brooks et al. 2026 | systematic review · 785 participants | Silymarin among several polyphenols tested; vs. Placebo or control, per trial | Hepatoprotection: improved (SM showed potential hepatoprotective effects) |
| 21 Mohtashaminia et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 549 participants | Berberine–silymarin combination; vs. Control (placebo or other treatment) | Alanine aminotransferase (ALT): no difference (WMD: −0.39 mg/dl; 95% CI: −1.67 to 0.89, P=0.55); Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): no difference (WMD: −0.44 mg/dl; 95% CI: −2.02 to 1.14, P=0.58) |
| 32 Służały et al. 2024 | systematic review | Silymarin among 12 other natural products; vs. other natural products or placebo (not reported) | liver enzymes: improved (decrease in liver enzymes) |
| 35 Rahimi-Dehkordi et al. 2024 | systematic review | Silymarin (flavonoid complex); vs. Control groups of included clinical trials | AST, ALT, ALP, total bilirubin, total protein: improved |
Further studies in this area: 38 40 41 45 47 70 74 77 95 103 105 134 138 157 158 163 165 178 182 185
Milk Thistle (Silymarin) and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Human Studies
In non-alcoholic fatty liver, silymarin lowered ALT and AST compared with control in meta-analyses 3433. A meta-analysis also found lower blood lipids and less fat in liver tissue 4. In a placebo-controlled study, by contrast, only GGT and liver stiffness decreased, not the transaminases 51. Compared with essential phospholipids, silymarin performed worse for cholesterol, while liver values and fat did not differ 49. A randomized study found a better ultrasound classification, but no difference in the NAFLD score 67. A randomized controlled study on the silymarin extract Legalon® found no histological improvement in NASH 56. Combinations with diet, lifestyle change or medications lowered transaminases in a meta-analysis; this applies only to the respective combination 5. A Cochrane review rates the ALT reduction by silymarin alone as very uncertain 6. The results are based mainly on blood values; preparations, doses and comparison groups differ greatly, and an improvement of inflammation in liver tissue in NASH has not been demonstrated.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Calderon et al. 2023 | systematic review · 3,846 participants | Silymarin supplements (extract); 140 mg to 420 mg; vs. Placebo or control in the included RCTs | Decrease of liver enzyme levels: improved |
| 3 Shahsavari et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 3,545 participants | Silymarin (Silybum marianum); low dose <400 mg vs. higher doses; ≤2 months vs. longer treatment; vs. Control or subgroups by dose, duration, BMI, age, etiology | AST and ALT levels in NAFLD: improved |
| 4 Li et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 2,375 participants | Silymarin (milk thistle extract); vs. Control group (placebo/usual care) | Total cholesterol: improved (SMD[95%CI]=-0.85[-1.23, -0.47]); Triglycerides: improved (SMD[95%CI]=-0.62[-1.14, -0.10]); LDL-C: improved (SMD[95%CI]=-0.81[-1.31, -0.31]) |
| 5 Zhang et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 2,283 participants | silymarin alone or in combination; vs. placebo, Mediterranean hypocaloric diet, medications, lifestyle modifications | total cholesterol (silymarin + diet): no difference (SMD: -0.39 (-0.81, 0.03), p=0.072); total cholesterol (silymarin + medications): improved (SMD: -1.12 (-1.67, -0.58), p<0.001); triglycerides (silymarin + medications): no difference (SMD: -0.92 (-1.98, 0.14), p=0.080) |
| 6 Wang et al. 2025 | systematic review · 2,069 participants | Silymarin monotherapy or silymarin complex; Follow-up 4 to 48 weeks; vs. No intervention, placebo, or other interventions | ALT: improved (MD -7.21 U/L, 95% CI -10.62 to -3.80); GGT: improved (MD -8.30 U/L, 95% CI -12.43 to -4.17) |
| 8 Ranneh et al. 2024 | systematic review · 1,840 participants | Silymarin as dietary supplement (one of eleven phenolic compounds); vs. Control/placebo (not specified) | liver enzymes: improved (a reduction in liver enzymes); lipid profile: improved (a reduction in ... lipid profile); inflammatory cytokines: no difference (no changes were observed in inflammatory cytokine levels) |
| 9 Huang et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 1,691 participants | Silymarin (preparation, form and dose not reported); vs. Placebo | improvement in hepatic steatosis: unclear |
| 12 Zhang et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 1,335 participants | TCM combined with Silibinin capsules; vs. Silibinin alone | Total effective rate: improved; ALT, AST, GGT: improved; Total cholesterol and triglycerides: improved |
Further studies in this area: 18 30 33 49 51 56 66 67 90 92 99 100 104 118 132 133 135 143 148 149 150 152 155 158 159 160 161 169 177 178 182
Milk Thistle (Silymarin), Diabetes and Blood Glucose: Human Studies
For diabetes and blood sugar, meta-analyses on silymarin show predominantly favorable effects on blood sugar, fasting insulin and HbA1c. A meta-analysis of controlled studies found lower fasting blood sugar, fasting insulin and HbA1c 7, and a meta-analysis on fatty liver found lower fasting insulin 4. A systematic review on silibinin relies predominantly on cell and animal studies 30. This contrasts with a controlled study in diabetes in which a standardized extract over twelve weeks did not change fasting blood sugar, HbA1c and blood lipids 69. Mixtures with berberine 2223 or with nettle and frankincense 64 lowered fasting blood sugar compared with placebo; this applies only to the respective mixture. The meta-analyses 47 are especially robust; preparations and doses differ, and the transferability to individual milk thistle products remains open.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Li et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 2,375 participants | Silymarin (milk thistle extract); vs. Control group (placebo/usual care) | Fasting insulin: improved (SMD[95%CI]=-0.59[-0.91, -0.28]); HOMA-IR: unclear (SMD[95%CI]=-0.37[-0.77, 0.04]) |
| 7 Mohammadi et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 1,943 participants | Silymarin (SIL) supplementation; vs. Silymarin-treated groups versus untreated counterparts | Fasting blood glucose (FBG): improved (WMD: -21.68 mg/dL, 95% CI: -31.37, -11.99; p < 0.001); Fasting insulin: improved (WMD: -3.76 mU/mL, 95% CI: -4.80, -2.72; p < 0.001); Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c): improved (WMD: -0.85%, 95% CI: -1.27, -0.43; p < 0.001) |
| 11 Miao et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 1,337 participants | Silymarin as one of several phytochemicals; vs. Placebo and other phytochemicals (resveratrol, curcumin, berberine) | Fasting plasma glucose (FPG): improved (P < 0.05); HOMA-IR: improved (P < 0.05); HbA1c: improved (MD -2.08, 95%Cl -3.50 to -0.72) |
| 18 Yin et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 673 participants | Silymarin supplementation (Silybum marianum); not reported (subgroups by dosage); at least 4 weeks; vs. Placebo | HOMA-IR: improved (WMD = -2.29, 95 % CI: -4.55 to -0.03, p = 0.047); Fasting insulin: no difference (WMD = -2.56, 95 % CI: -7.60 to 2.48, p = 0.862); QUICKI: no difference |
| 22 Fogacci et al. 2019 | meta-analysis · 497 participants | Berberine and silymarin combination; vs. Placebo | Fasting plasma glucose: improved (MD: -7.5, 95% CI [-13, -1.9] mg/dl; p = 0.008) |
| 23 Tóth et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 491 participants | Fixed combination of Berberis aristata and Silybum marianum (Berberol); 3 months; vs. Placebo | Fasting plasma glucose levels: improved (significantly lowered); Homeostatic Model Assessment index: improved (significantly lowered) |
| 30 Zare et al. 2024 | review | Silibinin, main component of silymarin from milk thistle seeds | insulin resistance: improved; blood glucose: improved; HbA1C: improved |
| 69 Ferdowsi et al. 2024 | randomised controlled · 48 participants | Silymarin capsules, 3×140 mg daily; three 140 mg silymarin capsules daily; 12 weeks; vs. Diet plan alone (control group) | Fasting blood sugar: no difference (p = 0.789); HbA1c: no difference (p = 0.719); Lipid profile: no difference |
Further studies in this area: 91 140 145 153 155 170 173 174 178 183 184 188
Milk Thistle (Silymarin) and Chronic Hepatitis: Human Studies
In chronic hepatitis, a meta-analysis showed that a standardized silymarin extract improved liver enzymes in viral hepatitis 3. A controlled study (not randomized) found a greater ALT and AST reduction with silymarin tablets plus standard therapy than with standard therapy alone 90. In hepatitis C, silymarin performed equal to spirulina for viral response and worse for ALT reduction in a randomized study 59. The findings are thus based on one meta-analysis and two controlled studies with different preparations and endpoints. For chronic hepatitis C, there is therefore no clear advantage of silymarin over other approaches; for chronic hepatitis B and other etiologies, the data situation is inconsistent.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Shahsavari et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 3,545 participants | Silymarin (Silybum marianum); low dose <400 mg vs. higher doses; ≤2 months vs. longer treatment; vs. Control or subgroups by dose, duration, BMI, age, etiology | AST and ALT levels in viral hepatitis: improved |
| 90 Amjad et al. 2024 | controlled · 141 participants | Silymarin tablets plus standard care; 200 mg twice daily; 12 weeks; vs. standard care alone | ALT and AST reduction in stratified analysis (HBV): improved |
| 127 Trifonov et al. 2026 | case report · 1 participants | Silymarin as part of supportive infusion therapy; vs. no control group | Normalization of liver enzymes at 1 month: improved |
| 146 Cui et al. 2026 | review | Silybin, active component of silymarin | inflammatory response in acute hepatitis: improved; progression of chronic hepatitis: improved |
| 158 Jaffar et al. 2024 | review | Silymarin extract (Legalon®, Eurosil 85®) | symptoms: improved (alleviation of symptoms) |
| 160 Dhande et al. 2024 | review | Silymarin from milk thistle seeds | Liver function and histology: improved |
| 173 Islam et al. 2021 | review | silymarin extract or silybin | traditional use in liver disorders: unclear |
| 182 Abenavoli et al. 2018 | review | Milk thistle fruits/silymarin, silybin as main component | Clinical potential in viral hepatitis: unclear |
Milk Thistle (Silymarin) and Liver Cirrhosis: Human Studies
In liver cirrhosis, a systematic review found lower AST and ALT values in three of six silymarin studies; side effects were rare 19. A non-randomized controlled study in chronic liver diseases of various causes found no difference in encephalopathy, ascites, CTP class, and FibroScan values in addition to standard therapy 90. It remains open whether standardized extract has a clinically relevant benefit in cirrhosis; the forms studied were standardized silymarin extract, silymarin without further specification, and silibinin.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Amini et al. 2023 | systematic review · 613 participants | Silymarin (preparation not specified); vs. Control/other treatment (not reported) | AST and ALT: improved (Three of six studies showed the beneficial effects); Side effects |
| 90 Amjad et al. 2024 | controlled · 141 participants | Silymarin tablets plus standard care; 200 mg twice daily; 12 weeks; vs. standard care alone | hepatic encephalopathy, ascites and CTP class: no difference (p > 0.05); FibroScan scores: no difference |
| 101 Huang et al. 2024 | cohort study · 319 participants | Silymarin added to antiviral therapy; at least 30 days of silymarin; vs. AVT alone (control cohort) | Overall mortality (1 and 2 years): improved |
| 146 Cui et al. 2026 | review | Silybin, active component of silymarin | transition from decompensated to compensated cirrhosis: improved |
| 158 Jaffar et al. 2024 | review | Silymarin extract (Legalon®, Eurosil 85®) | mortality rate: improved (reduced mortality rates) |
| 160 Dhande et al. 2024 | review | Silymarin from milk thistle seeds | Liver function and histology: improved |
| 173 Islam et al. 2021 | review | silymarin extract or silybin | traditional use in liver disorders: unclear |
| 178 Gillessen et al. 2020 | review | silymarin extract, mostly Eurosil 85; vs. no uniform comparator (narrative review) | liver-related deaths (pooled analysis): improved (significant reduction) |
Further studies in this area: 182
Milk Thistle (Silymarin) and Cancer (Silibinin): Human Studies
On the effect on cancer diseases themselves, only observational data and reviews are available; the strength of evidence is low. A case series reports better tolerability, quality of life and fewer neurological symptoms with silibinin in addition to standard therapy 108. An observational study found better response with a silibinin-containing dietary supplement in addition to chemotherapy in lung cancer, but no confirmed survival benefit 109. An observational study on silymarin in addition to antiviral therapy found no difference in the incidence of liver cancer 101. Review articles on silymarin and silibinin in gastrointestinal tumors rely predominantly on preclinical findings 172173. The standardized extract, silibinin as a single substance, the silybin-phosphatidylcholine complex as well as unspecified milk thistle preparations were studied; data on whole fruits or tea are lacking in this area.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Li et al. 2023 | meta-analysis · 1,333 participants | Silymarin (one included controlled trial); vs. Placebo or no additional therapy | Systolic function and cardiac biomarkers: improved (less reduction of systolic function and fewer cardiac biomarker abnormalities) |
| 101 Huang et al. 2024 | cohort study · 319 participants | Silymarin added to antiviral therapy; at least 30 days of silymarin; vs. AVT alone (control cohort) | HCC occurrence (1 and 2 years): no difference |
| 108 Roca et al. 2025 | case series · 86 participants | silibinin in addition to standard treatment; April 2020 to April 2025 (observation period); vs. no control group, descriptive retrospective | tolerability/safety profile (only one mild adverse event was reported); quality of life: improved (good quality of life that was maintained over a long period of time); neurological symptoms and overall well-being: improved (an improvement in neurological symptoms and overall patient well-being was also documented) |
| 109 Bosch-Barrera et al. 2021 | cohort study · 59 participants | Oral nutraceutical containing silibinin plus nintedanib/docetaxel; vs. Cohort without silibinin supplementation | Overall response rate: improved (55%); Time to treatment failure: improved (hazard ratio 0.43, p = 0.013); Overall survival: no difference (hazard ratio 0.63, p = 0.190) |
| 111 Pochet et al. 2022 | case series · 51 participants | Milk thistle (Silybum marianum); no product or silymarin extract specified; vs. VigiBase case reports compared with the literature | VigiBase case reports on milk thistle-drug interactions: improved (half of the rationalizable ICSRs involved Viscum album and Silybum marianum) |
| 118 Elgendy et al. 2025 | study · 15 participants | Curcuminoids and silymarin, individually and in combination; 4 weeks | anticancer potential against liver and colorectal cancers: improved (anticancer potential) |
| 122 Yang et al. 2026 | case series · 7 participants | Adjunctive silymarin alongside endoscopic surveillance; Median follow-up 38.0 months; vs. No control group | Tolerability of silymarin (well-tolerated); Clinical efficacy of silymarin: unclear (strictly hypothesis-generating) |
| 144 Lazzeroni et al. 2020 | study | Siliphos, oral silybin-phosphatidylcholine complex | Silybin concentration in plasma, urine and breast tissue: unclear (0.5 ng/mL); Selective accumulation of silybin in breast tumor tissue: unclear |
Further studies in this area: 154 172 173
Milk Thistle (Silymarin) and Death Cap Mushroom Poisoning: Human Studies
On death cap mushroom poisoning, no controlled studies are available; the assessment is based on observational data and review articles. A systematic evaluation of case reports found higher survival rates with silibinin or penicillin alone as well as with combinations with N-acetylcysteine than with purely supportive treatment 16. In confirmed poisoning, the differences were not significant 16. An observational study with oral silymarin found no differences in hospital mortality, acute liver failure, and hospital length of stay 102. A case series with silibinin infusion and penicillin describes less treatment failure with the combination than with silibinin alone 106. A single-arm study with silibinin infusion, fluid administration, and octreotide reports frequent recovery without transplantation; silibinin predicted survival, N-acetylcysteine and activated charcoal did not 107. A review article considers the benefit in liver diseases including mushroom poisoning as not yet proven despite encouraging preclinical data 182. Since the data come predominantly from uncontrolled observations and the preparations examined — silibinin infusion, oral extract, combinations — are not comparable, no reliable statement can be derived from them.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Tan et al. 2022 | systematic review · 877 participants | Silibinin (SIL), partly with N-acetylcysteine and/or benzylpenicillin; vs. silibinin, penicillin, NAC combinations vs. supportive care alone | Survival rate with silibinin: improved (90% (OR 6.40 [3.14-13.04])); Survival rate with penicillin: improved (89% (OR 5.24 [2.87-9.56])); Survival rate with NAC/SIL combination: improved (85% (OR 3.85 [2.04, 7.25])) |
| 102 Tangsuwanaruk et al. 2026 | cohort study · 255 participants | Oral silymarin; vs. Silymarin group vs. non-silymarin group | In-hospital mortality: no difference; Acute liver failure: no difference; Acute kidney injury: improved (adjusted risk difference = -13.9% [95% CI: -23.6 to -4.1%]; P = 0.005) |
| 106 Dluholucký et al. 2022 | case series · 141 participants | silibinin infusion, partly with penicillin; vs. penicillin + silibinin versus silibinin alone | treatment failure (death or transplantation): improved (1.5 % (2 of 127 patients)); treatment failure with silibinin alone: worsened (41.7 % (5 of 12 patients, p = 0.00058)); recovered patients: improved (127 patients were recovered) |
| 107 Mitchell et al. 2026 | study · 99 participants | Intravenous silibinin plus hydration, octreotide, N-acetylcysteine, charcoal; vs. Single-arm study, no control group | Transplant-free recovery among protocol-adherent patients: improved (98.8%); Silibinin as predictor of survival: improved (P=0.003) |
| 119 Ma et al. 2026 | cohort study · 9 participants | Standard care with silibinin, N-acetylcysteine, dehydration; percutaneous or endoscopic biliary drainage in 5 patients; Biliary drainage at median 3 days after ingestion; follow-up to discharge; vs. Biliary drainage vs. non-BD controls (4 patients) | Survival to hospital discharge: improved (100% vs 25%; P = 0.048); ALT decrease within 48 h: improved (67.6%); AST decrease within 48 h: improved (91.6%) |
| 126 Frass et al. 2014 | case series · 2 participants | silibinin as hepatoprotective agent within conventional care, plus adjunctive classical homeopathy; vs. no control arm, adjunctive homeopathic treatment added to intensive care | survival without residual pathological sequelae: improved (The 2 patients survived without any residual pathological sequelae) |
| 131 Murad et al. 2024 | case report · 1 participants | silibinin plus activated charcoal and N-acetylcysteine; vs. no comparison (case report) | treatment success of the combination therapy: improved |
| 139 Weinhard et al. 2025 | case report | silibinin, together with N-acetylcysteine; vs. no comparator; course after treatment | liver injury: improved (liver injury subsided) |
Further studies in this area: 168 182
Milk Thistle (Silymarin): Further Outcomes in Studies
In this area, very different endpoints were examined, predominantly with standardized silymarin extract, and additionally with silibinin as a single substance, nanomicelles, cream, and combination preparations. Controlled studies found less oxidative stress with silymarin 7072, a lower CRP after bypass surgery 89, and more HDL and fewer triglycerides 72. In emergency patients with oxygen deficiency, silymarin lowered liver enzymes more than placebo 88. A randomized split-face study in melasma found fewer side effects with silymarin cream than with hydroquinone and no confirmed difference in lightening 78. Many results in this area are based on small, partly non-randomized studies. Mixtures with berberine lowered blood lipids in meta-analyses; this cannot be attributed to silymarin alone 2223. A systematic review on antioxidants in melasma describes silymarin as effective with few side effects 26. Forms examined were standardized extract, silibinin, and topical and nanomicellar preparations.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Osadnik et al. 2022 | meta-analysis · 13,062 participants | Silymarin among other LDL-C-lowering nutraceuticals; vs. Placebo/no intervention and other nutraceuticals | LDL cholesterol: improved (-1.21 [-46.8 mg/dL] to -0.17 [-6.6 mg/dL] mmol/l reduction); Total cholesterol: improved (-1.75 [-67.7 mg/dL] to -0.18 [7 mg/dL] mmol/l reduction) |
| 3 Shahsavari et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 3,545 participants | Silymarin (Silybum marianum); low dose <400 mg vs. higher doses; ≤2 months vs. longer treatment; vs. Control or subgroups by dose, duration, BMI, age, etiology | AST and ALT levels in alcohol-related liver disease: no difference |
| 6 Wang et al. 2025 | systematic review · 2,069 participants | Silymarin monotherapy or silymarin complex; Follow-up 4 to 48 weeks; vs. No intervention, placebo, or other interventions | Serious adverse events (Peto OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.26 to 9.28); Non-serious adverse events (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.89) |
| 7 Mohammadi et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 1,943 participants | Silymarin (SIL) supplementation; vs. Silymarin-treated groups versus untreated counterparts | Diastolic blood pressure (DBP): improved (WMD: -1.25 mmHg; 95% CI: -2.25, -0.26; p = 0.013); Total cholesterol (TC): improved (WMD: -13.97 mg/dL, 95% CI: -23.09, -4.85; p = 0.003); Triglycerides (TG): improved (WMD: -26.22 mg/dL, 95% CI: -40.32, -12.12; p < 0.001) |
| 10 Zhong et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 1,626 participants | Antioxidant supplements, including silymarin; vs. Control/placebo in 21 RCTs | Pelvic pain: improved (SMD = -2.68; p < 0.00001); Dysmenorrhea: improved (SMD = -1.77; p = 0.01); Dyspareunia: improved (SMD = -2.33; p = 0.01) |
| 14 Wang et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 1,221 participants | Silibinin capsules; vs. Non-Silibinin group | ALT (alanine aminotransferase): improved (SMD = -1.16, 95% CI (-1.84, -0.47)); AST (aspartate aminotransferase): improved (SMD = -1.56, 95% CI (-2.18, -0.95)); GGT (gamma-glutamyl transferase): improved (SMD = -1.48, 95% CI (-2.09, -0.87)) |
| 17 Brooks et al. 2026 | systematic review · 785 participants | Silymarin among several polyphenols tested; vs. Placebo or control, per trial | Disability/EDSS: no difference (no significant impact on disability); Relapse rate/ARR: no difference (no significant impact on relapse rates); MRI outcomes: no difference (no significant impact on ... MRI outcomes) |
| 20 Que et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 562 participants | Silymarin, calendula or aloe vera; vs. Standard medication or placebo | amelioration of radiodermatitis damage: improved; efficacy of calendula and aloe vera: unclear |
Further studies in this area: 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 34 35 36 37 39 40 42 43 47 50 51 53 55 56 58 60 61 62 63 65 66 67 69 70 71 72 73 75 76 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 86 87 88 89 90 93 94 96 97 98 101 107 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 120 121 123 124 125 128 129 130 136 137 139 140 141 142 147 151 153 156 162 163 164 166 167 170 171 173 174 175 176 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 189
4. How Is Milk Thistle (Silymarin) Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies
The studies predominantly tested standardized silymarin extracts (partly as named commercial preparations, partly nanomicellar or as a cream) as well as silibinin as a single substance, alongside milk thistle fruit powder extract and the silybin-phosphatidylcholine complex. Larger controlled studies on whole or ground fruits (tea, powder) are lacking; individual topicals used milk thistle ointment without a further specified extract. Strikingly many studies examined combination preparations in which silymarin was combined with other components; their results apply only to the respective mixture, not to silymarin alone.
| Preparation or form | Dose | Duration | Study |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heptex® capsules: 200 mg Phyllanthus niruri + 100 mg Silybum marianum powdered extract | low: one capsule; high: two capsules | 36 weeks | 44 |
| Oral silymarin capsules or syrup | 70 mg capsule twice daily or syrup three times daily (50 mg/5 ml) | 9 months, monthly assessment | 45 |
| SPS tablets: Silybum marianum, Pueraria lobata, Salvia miltiorrhiza (BYHEALTH) | 3 tablets per dose, twice daily; each tablet ~23.0 mg silybin, 11.4 mg puerarin, 10.9 mg salvianolic acid | 24 weeks | 46 |
| Silymarin (extract, form not specified) | 140 mg daily | 6 weeks, assessments at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks | 47 |
| silibinin meglumine tablets plus tenofovir, plus Ganshuang granules in treatment group | — | 12 and 24 weeks | 48 |
| Silymarin 150 mg twice daily vs. essential phospholipids 825 mg twice daily | silymarin 150 mg b.i.d. | six months | 49 |
| Silybum marianum ointment, topical | twice daily, fingertip size, 10 days | 10 days | 50 |
| Silymarin (standardized extract, alone) | 103.2 mg/d | 24 weeks | 51 |
| Silymarin (comparator arm) vs. Naqu Fawakeh fruit infusion | 5 mL (<30 kg) or 10 mL (≥30 kg), three times daily | 8 weeks | 52 |
| Silymarin alone or with cholecalciferol | Silymarin 480 mg for 3 months; cholecalciferol 50,000 IU/week for 8 weeks | 3 months follow-up | 53 |
| Zeta Colest: milk thistle dry extract 87.5 mg with 70 mg silymarin, combined | 1 pill/evening for 8 weeks | 8 weeks after 8-week stabilization diet | 54 |
| Silybum marianum extract capsules | 400 mg/d | 12 weeks | 55 |
| Legalon® (standardized silymarin extract, Rottapharm|Madaus, Mylan) | 420 mg or 700 mg three times daily | 48 weeks (assessment at 48–50 weeks) | 56 |
| Nutraceutical blend (NSupple) vs. silymarin-enriched blend (NSupple_Silybum) | — | 90 days | 57 |
| Silymarin (standardized extract) | 140 mg twice daily | 12 weeks | 58 |
5. Is Milk Thistle (Silymarin) Safe? Side Effects in Studies
The tolerability of silymarin is predominantly described as good; mostly only mild complaints such as gastrointestinal reactions or insomnia were reported 1419354347. A meta-analysis on fatty liver found adverse effects more frequently under silymarin, especially gastrointestinal complaints 5. A possible bleeding risk with simultaneous intake of anticoagulants is also reported 39.
| Study | Reported side effects |
|---|---|
| 5 Zhang et al. 2025 | silymarin increased adverse effect rate (RR 1.98); mostly gastrointestinal |
| 6 Wang et al. 2025 | Serious adverse events Peto OR 1.55; non-serious RR 1.29 |
| 14 Wang et al. 2025 | Only mild gastrointestinal reactions and insomnia |
| 15 Tao et al. 2019 | adverse events similar to placebo |
| 17 Brooks et al. 2026 | Intervention adverse events generally mild |
| 18 Yin et al. 2025 | not reported |
| 19 Amini et al. 2023 | no or negligible side effects reported |
| 23 Tóth et al. 2020 | Safe; no increase in ALT, AST, creatine kinase |
| 25 Liang et al. 2025 | serious adverse events, among products most frequently associated with SAEs |
| 26 Sarkar et al. 2025 | Silymarin: minimal adverse effects |
| 35 Rahimi-Dehkordi et al. 2024 | No serious side effects at investigated dosage |
| 39 Hatfield et al. 2022 | Bleeding risk with anticoagulants |
6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence
- The tested preparations (standardized extract, silibinin, complex, commercial preparations) and doses differ greatly, so results cannot be transferred to all products.
- Controlled studies in humans are lacking for whole or ground fruits (tea, powder) and for milk thistle seed oil.
- An improvement of inflammation in liver tissue in NASH is not proven 56; many endpoints are based only on blood values or ultrasound.
- Many results on combination preparations cannot be attributed to silymarin alone because other components were also studied.
- For several areas (mushroom poisoning, cancer), the data come predominantly from uncontrolled observations.
7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Milk Thistle (Silymarin)
Milk thistle (Silybum marianum) provides with silymarin a mixture of flavonolignans that has been tested in many studies in humans. Liver values are best studied: meta-analyses found lower transaminases in fatty liver and viral hepatitis 34, and less frequent liver damage under tuberculosis drugs 15. In diabetes, silymarin lowered fasting blood glucose, insulin and HbA1c in a meta-analysis 7, while a controlled single study found no difference 69. Liver tissue in NASH did not improve in a placebo-controlled study 56.
Many investigations also used combination preparations whose results apply only to the respective combination. Tolerability is mostly described as good; a meta-analysis found adverse effects more frequently, especially gastrointestinal complaints 5, and a bleeding risk is described under anticoagulants 39.
Frequently Asked Questions
How well has Milk Thistle (Silymarin) been studied in humans?
We evaluated 212 human studies on Milk Thistle (Silymarin), including 56 randomised controlled trials and 42 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 3,909 participants in total. As of 7 October 2026.
Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) help with liver values during drug treatment? What the studies show
Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) help with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease? What the studies show
Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) help with diabetes and blood glucose? What the studies show
Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) help with chronic hepatitis? What the studies show
Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) help with liver cirrhosis? What the studies show
Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) help with cancer (silibinin)? What the studies show
Which milk thistle forms were tested in the studies?
Standardized silymarin extracts were most frequently studied, partly as named commercial preparations or nanomicellar formulations. In addition, silibinin as a single substance, the silybin-phosphatidylcholine complex and milk thistle fruit powder extracts were used. Larger controlled studies on tea or powder from the whole fruits are lacking.
What do the studies show in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease?
Meta-analyses found lower transaminases in fatty liver 3433 as well as lower triglycerides and more HDL 433. A placebo-controlled study, by contrast, found an advantage only for GGT and liver stiffness 51. Liver fat and fatty liver scores improved in a meta-analysis 4, while in two randomized studies liver fat content remained without difference 4951.
How safe is the intake?
The tolerability of silymarin is predominantly described as good, with mostly mild complaints such as gastrointestinal reactions or insomnia 1419354347. The studies on liver cirrhosis also reported no or hardly any side effects 19. A meta-analysis on fatty liver, however, found adverse effects more frequently, especially gastrointestinal complaints 5; with simultaneous intake of anticoagulants, a bleeding risk is described 39.
Does this also apply to combination preparations with other substances?
No. Many studies tested silymarin together with other components such as berberine, alpha-lipoic acid or other plant extracts. Their results apply only to the respective mixture and cannot be attributed to silymarin alone 21222354646885. Statements on the effect of silymarin alone are based on studies with standardized extract or silibinin without other active substances.
What is known about chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis?
In chronic hepatitis, a standardized silymarin extract improved liver enzymes in a meta-analysis 3, but in hepatitis C silymarin showed no clear advantage over other approaches 59. In liver cirrhosis, three of six silymarin studies in an overview found lower liver enzymes 19; a controlled study found no difference in complications such as ascites and in fibrosis values 90.
Sources
- 1Osadnik T, Goławski M, Lewandowski P, Morze J, Osadnik K, Pawlas N et al. · 2022
- 2Calderon Martinez E, Herrera D, Mogan S, Hameed Z, Jangda AA, Khan TJ et al. · 2023
- 3Shahsavari K, Ardekani SS, Ardekani MRS, Esfahani MM, Kazemizadeh H, Jamialahmadi T et al. · 2025
- 4Li S, Duan F, Li S, Lu B · 2024
- 5
- 6Wang C, Shang Y, Kanaan G, Chai L, Li H, Qi X · 2025
- 7Mohammadi S, Asbaghi O, Afrisham R, Farrokhi V, Jadidi Y, Mofidi F et al. · 2024
- 8Ranneh Y, Bedir AS, Abu-Elsaoud AM, Al Raish S · 2024
- 9Huang Q, An Z, Xin X, Gou X, Tian X, Hu Y et al. · 2024
- 10Zhong Y, Qiao X, Huang X, Li Y, Wang R, Liang J et al. · 2025
- 11Miao R, Zhang B, Zhou D, Kang M, Tian J, Zhao L et al. · 2025
- 12Zhang X, Jiang Z, Jin X, Zhou Q · 2024
- 13Li J, Lee ARYB, Chen CK, Koo C, Lee MX, Sia C · 2023
- 14Wang Y, Yang W, Yang Y, Liu X, Peng L, Huang Q et al. · 2025
- 15Tao L, Qu X, Zhang Y, Song Y, Zhang SX · 2019
- 16Tan JL, Stam J, van den Berg AP, van Rheenen PF, Dekkers BGJ, Touw DJ · 2022
- 17Brooks L, Farid AFBA, Poobalan A, Johnstone A, Myint PK · 2026
- 18Yin S, Zhu F, Liu Y, Chen Q · 2025
- 19Amini S, Bagherniya M, Butler AE, Askari G, Sahebkar A · 2023
- 20
- 21Mohtashaminia F, Amini MR, Shab-Bidar S, djafarian k · 2024
- 22Fogacci F, Grassi D, Rizzo M, Cicero AFG · 2019
- 23Tóth B, Németh D, Soós A, Hegyi P, Pham-Dobor G, Varga O et al. · 2020
- 24Darvishi-Khezri H, Naderisorki M, Zahedi M, Mortazavi P, Tajik F, Nasirzadeh A et al. · 2021
- 25Liang CJW, Woerdenbag HJ, Ekhart C, Vitalone A, van Hunsel FPAM · 2025
- 26Sarkar R, Sahu A · 2025
- 27Frounchi N, Mahmoodpoor F, Zakavi SS, Eyvazova K, Yagubova S, Ardalan M et al. · 2025
- 28Mohammadi S, Ashtary-Larky D, Asbaghi O, Farrokhi V, Jadidi Y, Mofidi F et al. · 2024
- 29Bahari H, Shahraki Jazinaki M, Rashidmayvan M, Taheri S, Amini MR, Malekahmadi M · 2024
- 30Zare Mehrjerdi P, Asadi S, Ehsani E, Askari VR, Baradaran Rahimi V · 2024
- 31White CM, Sedensky A, Sicignano D, Galli KJ · 2024
- 32Służały P, Paśko P, Galanty A · 2024
- 33
- 34Ghahfarrokhi SH, Heidari-Soureshjani S, Sherwin CMT, Azadegan-Dehkordi Z · 2024
- 35Rahimi-Dehkordi N, Heidari-Soureshjani S, Sherwin CMT · 2024
- 36Speeckaert R, Bulat V, Speeckaert MM, van Geel N · 2023
- 37Latacela GA, Ramaiah P, Ramaiah P, Patra I, Jalil AT, Gupta R et al. · 2023
- 38Mirjalili M, Mirzaei E, Vazin A · 2022
- 39Hatfield J, Saad S, Housewright C · 2022
- 40Tvrdý V, Pourová J, Jirkovský E, Křen V, Valentová K, Mladěnka P · 2021
- 41de Avelar CR, Pereira EM, de Farias Costa PR, de Jesus RP, de Oliveira LPM · 2017
- 42Langhorst J, Wulfert H, Lauche R, Klose P, Cramer H, Dobos GJ et al. · 2015
- 43Posadzki P, Watson LK, Ernst E · 2013
- 44Shaker MK, Hassany M, Eysa B, Adel A, Zidan A, Mohamed S · 2025
- 45Eghbali A, Sadeghian M, Ghasemi A, Afzal RR, Eghbali A, Ghaffari K · 2024
- 46Li BY, Xi Y, Liu YP, Wang D, Wang C, Chen CG et al. · 2024
- 47Erfanian SS, Ansari H, Javanmard SH, Amini Z, Hajigholami A · 2024
- 48
- 49Manuc T, Preda CM, Istratescu D, Gheorghe L, Cerban R, Ester C et al. · 2024
- 50Toomari E, Hajian S, Mojab F, Omidkhah T, Nasiri M · 2021
- 51Jin Y, Wang X, Chen K, Chen Y, Zhou L, Zeng Y et al. · 2024
- 52Ettehadi F, Zekavat OR, Tavakkoli A, Namjoyan F, Sayadi M, Vazani Y · 2025
- 53Valipour R, Narouie B, Momeni H, Radpour N, Torabinavid P, Momeni A et al. · 2024
- 54Fogacci F, Giovannini M, D'Addato S, Grandi E, Cicero AFG · 2023
- 55Saberi Z, Gorji N, Gorji N, Memariani Z, Moeini R, Shirafkan H et al. · 2020
- 56Navarro VJ, Belle SH, D'Amato M, Adfhal N, Brunt EM, Fried MW et al. · 2019
- 57Santamarina AB, Filho VN, de Freitas JA, Franco LAM, Martins RC, Fonseca JV et al. · 2025
- 58Mirzaei N, Jahanian Sadatmahalleh S, Rouholamin S, Nasiri M · 2022
- 59
- 60Soleimani V, Khodashahi R, Arian M, Tavanaee A, Omidkhoda N, Karimi G et al. · 2026
- 61Keshavarzi A, Akrami R, Zarshenas MM, Zareie S, Ghadimi T, Najafi A et al. · 2024
- 62Karbasforooshan H, Rahimi H, Arasteh O, Allahyari A, Varmaghani M, Jannati M et al. · 2024
- 63Gholami AH, Ansari H, Dadkhah A · 2024
- 64Khalili N, Fereydoonzadeh R, Mohtashami R, Mehrzadi S, Heydari M, Huseini HF · 2017
- 65Baghbahadorani FK, Miraj S · 2016
- 66Atarodi H, Pazouki A, Gholizadeh B, Karami R, Kabir A, Sadri G et al. · 2022
- 67Mirhashemi SH, Hakakzadeh A, Yeganeh FE, Oshidari B, Rezaee SP · 2022
- 68Ghorbani A, Zarvandi M, Rakhshandeh H · 2019
- 69Ferdowsi S, Shidfar F, Heidari I, Kashi M, Sohouli MH, Sarrafi Zadeh S · 2024
- 70Ghiasian M, Nafisi H, Ranjbar A, Mohammadi Y, Ataei S · 2021
- 71Karbasforooshan H, Hosseini S, Elyasi S, Fani Pakdel A, Karimi G · 2019
- 72Rustamzadeh A, Sadigh N, Vahabi Z, Khamseh F, Mohebi N, Ghobadi Z et al. · 2024
- 73Rustamzadeh A, Sadigh N, Shabani R, Ahadi R, Vahabi Z, Shabani A et al. · 2023
- 74Talebi A, Soltani R, Khorvash F, Jouabadi SM · 2023
- 75
- 76Navabi SM, Elieh-Ali-Komi D, Afshari D, Goudarzi F, Mohammadi-Noori E, Heydari K et al. · 2024
- 77Moezian GSA, Javadinia SA, Sales SS, Fanipakdel A, Elyasi S, Karimi G · 2022
- 78Wattanakrai P, Nimmannitya K · 2022
- 79Feily A, Hosseinpour M, Samipour L, Parvar SY, Hadibarhaghtalab M, Goodarzian M · 2024
- 80Gharakhanlou BJ, Rahmani B, Amaghani A, Solaimanian S, Shiri-Shahsavar MR · 2023
- 81Grant JE, Redden SA, Chamberlain SR · 2019
- 82Chang C, Zhang Y, Kuo YC, Du M, Roh K, Gahler R et al. · 2025
- 83Gurley BJ, Gardner SF, Hubbard MA, Williams DK, Gentry WB, Carrier J et al. · 2004
- 84Karimian A, Karimzadeh I, Shafiekhani M, Heidari R, Masjedi F, Izadi F et al. · 2025
- 85Cheng FY, Chen C, Wang FY, Zhao BH · 2025
- 86Zugravu GS, Pintilescu C, Cumpat CM, Miron SD, Miron A · 2024
- 87Ponce Martínez C, Murcia García E, Pérez Sánchez H, Milagro FI, Riezu-Boj JI, Ramos Molina B et al. · 2024
- 88Jamalian M, Mahmodiyeh B, Saveiee S, Solhi H · 2020
- 89Okiljevic B, Zdravkovic R, Preveden A, Preveden M, Mladenovic N, Susak S · 2024
- 90Amjad MZ, Hassan MU, Rehman M, Shamim A, Zeeshan HM, Iftikhar Z et al. · 2024
- 91Di Pierro F, Putignano P, Villanova N, Montesi L, Moscatiello S, Marchesini G · 2013
- 92Jaffar HM, Bader Ul Ain H, Tufail T, Hanif A, Malik T · 2024
- 93Boira C, Chapuis E, Lapierre L, Tiguemounine J, Scandolera A, Reynaud R · 2025
- 94Boira C, Chapuis E, Lapierre L, Tiguemounine J, Scandolera A, Reynaud R · 2024
- 95Fatemi Shandiz A, Karimi G, Dayyani M, Hosseini S, Elyasi S · 2025
- 96Atallah DA, Badran AY, Makhlouf AG, Mekkawy MM · 2024
- 97RATIONALIZED AND COMPLEMENTARY FINDINGS OF SILYMARIN (MILK THISTLE) IN PAKISTANI HEALTHY VOLUNTEERSAshraf M, Abid F, Riffat S, Bashir S, Iqbal J, Sarfraz M et al. · 2015
- 98Bageorgou F, Li L, Beausillon C, Stennevin A, Ortiz-Brugués A, Saurat JH · 2023
- 99Dumitru E, Condur L, Alexandrescu L, Chirila S, Greere M, Radu C et al. · 2020
- 100Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Chaiteerakij R, Gonzalez EV, Alcasid MA, Rani RA, Andal Gamutan MTR et al. · 2026
- 101Huang CH, Wu VC, Wang CL, Wu CL, Huang YT, Chang SH · 2024
- 102Tangsuwanaruk T, Tansuwannarat P, Tongpoo A, Mirin K, Trakulsrichai S · 2026
- 103Diana NS, Monica T, Florina G · 2026
- 104Gheonea DI, Tocia C, Sacerdoțianu VM, Bocioagă AG, Doica IP, Manea NC et al. · 2025
- 105Kohutek F, Bystricky B · 2023
- 106Dluholucký S, Snitková M, Knapková M, Cibirová M, Mydlová Z · 2022
- 107Mitchell ST, Spyker DA, Robbins G, Rumack BH · 2026
- 108Roca E, Roca E, Cucinella A, Madonia G, Centonze G, Lombardo F et al. · 2025
- 109Bosch-Barrera J, Verdura S, Ruffinelli JC, Carcereny E, Sais E, Cuyàs E et al. · 2021
- 110Liu W, An M, Wang Q, Liu Y, Shang Y, Dong X et al. · 2025
- 111Pochet S, Lechon AS, Lescrainier C, De Vriese C, Mathieu V, Hamdani J et al. · 2022
- 112Elahi ME, Elieh-Ali-Komi D, Goudarzi F, Mohammadi Noori E, Assar S, Shavandi M et al. · 2024
- 113Shavandi M, Yazdani Y, Asar S, Mohammadi A, Mohammadi-Noori E, Kiani A · 2022
- 114Usefi F, Rustamzadeh A, Ghobadi Z, Sadigh N, Mohebi N, Ariaei A et al. · 2024
- 115Fontao F, von Engelbrechten M, Seilaz C, Sorg O, Saurat JH · 2020
- 116Kim J, Lee YN, Lee J, Lee SG, Kim H, Choi YS et al. · 2023
- 117M, Acanfora L, Tamellini G, Vassallo A · 2025
- 118Elgendy EM, El Sherbiny WA, Sedki AG, Gaber HH · 2025
- 119Ma X, Han B, Yue W, Shen Y, Geng J · 2026
- 120Kawaguchi-Suzuki M, Frye RF, Zhu HJ, Brinda BJ, Chavin KD, Bernstein HJ et al. · 2014
- 121Crocco EI, Vasconcelos RC, Andrade CS, Beltrão FC, Santos MM, Coutinho AL · 2025
- 122Yang CH, Tsai HL, Chen YC, Chen PJ, Chang TK, Su WC et al. · 2026
- 123Psoriasis Management Using Herbal Supplementation: A Retrospective Clinical Case StudyAlkhatib B, Alhilo S, Alhilo I · 2023
- 124Paulis G, De Giorgio G · 2022
- 125Bosch-Barrera J, Roqué A, Teixidor E, Carmona-Garcia MC, Arbusà A, Brunet J et al. · 2021
- 126Two Cases of Fulminant Hepatic Failure from Amanita phalloides Poisoning Treated Additively by HomeopathyFrass M, Zagorchev P, Yurukova V, Wulkersdorfer B, Thieves K, Zedtwitz-Liebenstein K et al. · 2014
- 127Trifonov P, Todovichin D, Marinova C, Zasheva A, Komitov D, Nikolov R et al. · 2026
- 128Bosch-Barrera J, Sais E, Teixidor-Vilà E, Vásquez-Dongo C, Hernandez-Martínez A, Romera A et al. · 2025
- 129Lindner E, Alhmouz MM, Abuhalimeh R, Abuhalimeh L, Chin J, Qadura M et al. · 2025
- 130
- 131Murad M, Anslinger TM, Frank D, Hohlstein P, van den Burg L, Brozat JF et al. · 2024
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136Wojas O, Krzych-Fałta E, Samel-Kowalik P, Żalikowska-Gardocka M, Majsiak E, Mari A et al. · 2020
- 137Ma CC, Lu CC, Chien WC, Chung CH, Weng TH, Tsai CT et al. · 2026
- 138
- 139Weinhard J, Serre J, Frère P, Adam C, Lafargue MC, Buob D et al. · 2025
- 140MacDonald-Ramos K, Monroy A, Bobadilla-Bravo M, Cerbón M · 2024
- 141Santamarina AB, Nehmi Filho V, Freitas JA, Franco LAM, Fonseca JV, Martins RC et al. · 2024
- 142Reisi N, Esmaeil N, Gharagozloo M, Moayedi B · 2022
- 143Chen LJ, Lin XX, Guo J, Xu Y, Zhang SX, Chen D et al. · 2021
- 144Lazzeroni M, Petrangolini G, Legarreta Iriberri JA, Pascual Avellana J, Tost Robusté D, Cagnacci S et al. · 2020
- 145Zhou H, Ding C, Qiao J, Wang Q, Zhang X · 2026
- 146Cui C, Shi J, Sun Y, Gao S, Wang K · 2026
- 147Jamali S, Jamali B, Golabi M, Rostami M, Yousefi Z, Dabbaghipour R et al. · 2026
- 148Vrentzos E, Pavlidis G, Korakas E, Kountouri A, Pliouta L, Dimitriadis GD et al. · 2025
- 149
- 150Simancas-Racines D, Annunziata G, Verde L, Fascì-Spurio F, Reytor-González C, Muscogiuri G et al. · 2025
- 151Khabarov IA, Sergazy SD, Amanzhan A, Maikenova AS, Zhabayeva AN, Adekenov SM · 2025
- 152Martínez-Sánchez FD, Martínez-Vázquez SE, Gutiérrez-Monterrubio R, Muñoz-Martínez S, Garcia-Juarez I · 2025
- 153Fallah Huseini H, Haghighi M, Kianbakht S, Ziaee M · 2025
- 154Conti V, Polcaro G, De Bellis E, Donnarumma D, De Rosa F, Stefanelli B et al. · 2024
- 155Tauil RB, Golono PT, de Lima EP, de Alvares Goulart R, Guiguer EL, Bechara MD et al. · 2024
- 156Zhao Y, Zhou Y, Gong T, Liu Z, Yang W, Xiong Y et al. · 2024
- 157Sethi N, Khokhar M, Mathur M, Batra Y, Mohandas A, Tomo S et al. · 2024
- 158Jaffar HM, Al-Asmari F, Khan FA, Rahim MA, Zongo E · 2024
- 159Ezhilarasan D, Langeswaran K · 2024
- 160Dhande D, Dhok A, Anjankar A, Nagpure S · 2024
- 161
- 162Tomou EM, Papakyriakopoulou P, Skaltsa H, Valsami G, Kadoglou NPE · 2023
- 163Ghodousi M, Karbasforooshan H, Arabi L, Elyasi S · 2023
- 164Pharmaceutical prospects of Silymarin for the treatment of neurological patients: an updated insightRanjan S, Gautam A · 2023
- 165Mobasheri L, Ahadi M, Beheshti Namdar A, Alavi MS, Bemidinezhad A, Moshirian Farahi SM et al. · 2023
- 166Degirmenci Y, Angelopoulou E, Georgakopoulou VE, Bougea A · 2023
- 167Sebastiani F, D'Alterio C, Vocca C, Gallelli L, Palumbo F, Cai T et al. · 2023
- 168Horowitz BZ · 2022
- 169Ezhilarasan D, Lakshmi T · 2022
- 170Kadoglou NPE, Panayiotou C, Vardas M, Balaskas N, Kostomitsopoulos NG, Tsaroucha AK et al. · 2022
- 171
- 172Fallah M, Davoodvandi A, Nikmanzar S, Aghili S, Mirazimi SMA, Aschner M et al. · 2021
- 173Islam A, Mishra A, Siddiqui MA, Siddiquie S · 2021
- 174MacDonald-Ramos K, Michán L, Martínez-Ibarra A, Cerbón M · 2021
- 175Babbush KM, Babbush RA, Khachemoune A · 2021
- 176Asgharpour M, Alirezaei A · 2021
- 177Tighe SP, Akhtar D, Iqbal U, Ahmed A · 2020
- 178Gillessen A, Schmidt HH · 2020
- 179Camini FC, Costa DC · 2020
- 180Soleimani V, Delghandi PS, Moallem SA, Karimi G · 2019
- 181Francini-Pesenti F, Spinella P, Calò LA · 2019
- 182Abenavoli L, Izzo AA, Milić N, Cicala C, Santini A, Capasso R · 2018
- 183Tajmohammadi A, Razavi BM, Hosseinzadeh H · 2018
- 184Vahabzadeh M, Amiri N, Karimi G · 2018
- 185Frassová Z, Rudá-Kučerová J · 2017
- 186Dietz BM, Hajirahimkhan A, Dunlap TL, Bolton JL · 2016
- 187Choi YH, Chin YW, Kim YG · 2011
- 188Insulin resistance: lifestyle and nutritional interventionsKelly GS · 2000
- 189Wagner H · 1999
Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.