Knowledge · Natural Compounds

Milk Thistle (Silymarin)

Database-based evaluation · 1,747 studies in our database, 75 of them controlled human trials · As of · How we work

In meta-analyses, milk thistle extracts mainly lowered liver values, in fatty liver and preventively under tuberculosis drugs; individual studies were inconsistent.

We evaluated 212 human studies on Milk Thistle (Silymarin), including 56 randomised controlled trials and 42 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 3,909 participants in total. As of 7 October 2026.

This page as PDF · Summary

1. What Is Milk Thistle (Silymarin)? Occurrence, Origin and Forms

Milk thistle (Silybum marianum) is a thistle-like plant in the daisy family. Its ripe fruits yield the extract silymarin, a mixture of flavonolignans. Traditionally the plant is used for upper abdominal complaints and in connection with the liver.

Milk thistle grows in dry, sunny locations and is cultivated for its fruits. The ripe fruits are the part used, and the extract is made from them.

For the extract, the ripe fruits are harvested and extracted with solvents; the result is adjusted to a defined silymarin content. Studies examine, among other things, standardized silymarin extracts, the single compound silibinin, a complex of silymarin and phosphatidylcholine, and silibinin-containing infusion solutions.

Forms and Preparations Studied

  • Whole or ground fruits (tea, powder)
  • Standardized silymarin extract
  • Silibinin (silybin) as a single compound
  • Silymarin–phosphatidylcholine complex
  • Silibinin infusion solution
  • Other flavonolignans such as silychristin and silydianin

Not covered on this page:

  • Other liver plants such as artichoke, dandelion and greater celandine
  • Milk thistle seed oil pressed from the seeds, which is not obtained through silymarin extraction
  • Combination products in which silymarin appears alongside other substances
  • Silibinin as a laboratory reagent in cell experiments without reference to use in humans

2. What Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) Do? Results by Area

AreaResult in controlled studiesStrength of evidenceStudiesParticipants
Liver values during drug treatmentmostly improvedhigh7 meta-analyses · 6 controlled · 15 other385
Non-alcoholic fatty liver diseasemostly no differencehigh5 meta-analyses · 7 controlled · 27 other564
Diabetes and blood glucosemostly no differencemoderate3 meta-analyses · 2 controlled · 15 other117
Chronic hepatitismostly improvedmoderate1 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 6 other141
Liver cirrhosismostly no differencemoderate1 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 7 other141
Cancer (silibinin)reviews onlylow1 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 10 other0
Death cap mushroom poisoningobservational data onlyunclear0 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 10 other0
Other investigationsmostly improvedhigh14 meta-analyses · 36 controlled · 64 other1,757

How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.

3. What the Studies Show in Detail

Milk Thistle (Silymarin) and Liver Values During Drug Treatment: Human Studies

During treatment with tuberculosis drugs, silymarin in a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies preventively reduced the risk of liver damage as well as ALT, AST and ALP 15. A small randomized study confirmed lower AST and ALP values after two weeks 74. For drug-induced liver injury overall, however, a larger meta-analysis found no confirmed effect 3. In children undergoing chemotherapy, a traditional fruit infusion lowered ALT more than silymarin 52. Compared with placebo, controlled studies under chemotherapy found more favorable ALP and bilirubin values 47 and less liver fat accumulation on ultrasound 95, and under fingolimod lower ALT and AST 70. In children with leukemia undergoing maintenance therapy, ALT, AST, GGT and bilirubin decreased slightly more than under placebo 45.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
2 Calderon et al. 2023systematic review · 3,846 participantsSilymarin supplements (extract); 140 mg to 420 mg; vs. Placebo or control in the included RCTsProportion of studies with reduced liver enzyme levels: improved (65.5%); Proportion of studies with no significant change: no difference (20.7%); Proportion of studies with elevated liver enzymes: worsened (13.8%)
3 Shahsavari et al. 2025meta-analysis · 3,545 participantsSilymarin (Silybum marianum); low dose <400 mg vs. higher doses; ≤2 months vs. longer treatment; vs. Control or subgroups by dose, duration, BMI, age, etiologySerum AST levels: no difference (SMD [95% CI]: - 0.670 [- 0.931, - 0.408], p-value = 0.000); Serum ALT levels: no difference (SMD [95% CI]: - 0.912 [- 1.177, - 0.646], p-value = 0.000); Serum ALP levels: no difference (SMD [95% CI]: - 0.236 [- 1.929, 1.458], p-value = 0.159)
9 Huang et al. 2024meta-analysis · 1,691 participantsSilymarin (preparation, form and dose not reported); vs. PlaceboALT activity: improved (MD: -6.44 U/L, 95% CI: -10.03 to -2.85, p = 0.0004); AST activity: improved (MD: -6.99 U/L, 95% CI: -8.56 to -5.42, p < 0.00001)
15 Tao et al. 2019meta-analysis · 1,198 participantsSilymarin (extract, exact preparation not reported); not reported; prophylaxis until week 4 after treatment start; vs. placebooccurrence of anti-TB DILI at week 4: improved (RR: 0.33, 95% CI (0.15, 0.75)); ALT: improved (SMD = - 0.15, 95% CI (-0.24, -0.07), P < 0.001); AST: improved (SMD =-0.14, 95% CI (-0.23, -0.06), P = 0.001)
17 Brooks et al. 2026systematic review · 785 participantsSilymarin among several polyphenols tested; vs. Placebo or control, per trialHepatoprotection: improved (SM showed potential hepatoprotective effects)
21 Mohtashaminia et al. 2024meta-analysis · 549 participantsBerberine–silymarin combination; vs. Control (placebo or other treatment)Alanine aminotransferase (ALT): no difference (WMD: −0.39 mg/dl; 95% CI: −1.67 to 0.89, P=0.55); Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): no difference (WMD: −0.44 mg/dl; 95% CI: −2.02 to 1.14, P=0.58)
32 Służały et al. 2024systematic reviewSilymarin among 12 other natural products; vs. other natural products or placebo (not reported)liver enzymes: improved (decrease in liver enzymes)
35 Rahimi-Dehkordi et al. 2024systematic reviewSilymarin (flavonoid complex); vs. Control groups of included clinical trialsAST, ALT, ALP, total bilirubin, total protein: improved

Further studies in this area: 38 40 41 45 47 70 74 77 95 103 105 134 138 157 158 163 165 178 182 185

Milk Thistle (Silymarin) and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Human Studies

In non-alcoholic fatty liver, silymarin lowered ALT and AST compared with control in meta-analyses 3433. A meta-analysis also found lower blood lipids and less fat in liver tissue 4. In a placebo-controlled study, by contrast, only GGT and liver stiffness decreased, not the transaminases 51. Compared with essential phospholipids, silymarin performed worse for cholesterol, while liver values and fat did not differ 49. A randomized study found a better ultrasound classification, but no difference in the NAFLD score 67. A randomized controlled study on the silymarin extract Legalon® found no histological improvement in NASH 56. Combinations with diet, lifestyle change or medications lowered transaminases in a meta-analysis; this applies only to the respective combination 5. A Cochrane review rates the ALT reduction by silymarin alone as very uncertain 6. The results are based mainly on blood values; preparations, doses and comparison groups differ greatly, and an improvement of inflammation in liver tissue in NASH has not been demonstrated.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
2 Calderon et al. 2023systematic review · 3,846 participantsSilymarin supplements (extract); 140 mg to 420 mg; vs. Placebo or control in the included RCTsDecrease of liver enzyme levels: improved
3 Shahsavari et al. 2025meta-analysis · 3,545 participantsSilymarin (Silybum marianum); low dose <400 mg vs. higher doses; ≤2 months vs. longer treatment; vs. Control or subgroups by dose, duration, BMI, age, etiologyAST and ALT levels in NAFLD: improved
4 Li et al. 2024meta-analysis · 2,375 participantsSilymarin (milk thistle extract); vs. Control group (placebo/usual care)Total cholesterol: improved (SMD[95%CI]=-0.85[-1.23, -0.47]); Triglycerides: improved (SMD[95%CI]=-0.62[-1.14, -0.10]); LDL-C: improved (SMD[95%CI]=-0.81[-1.31, -0.31])
5 Zhang et al. 2025meta-analysis · 2,283 participantssilymarin alone or in combination; vs. placebo, Mediterranean hypocaloric diet, medications, lifestyle modificationstotal cholesterol (silymarin + diet): no difference (SMD: -0.39 (-0.81, 0.03), p=0.072); total cholesterol (silymarin + medications): improved (SMD: -1.12 (-1.67, -0.58), p<0.001); triglycerides (silymarin + medications): no difference (SMD: -0.92 (-1.98, 0.14), p=0.080)
6 Wang et al. 2025systematic review · 2,069 participantsSilymarin monotherapy or silymarin complex; Follow-up 4 to 48 weeks; vs. No intervention, placebo, or other interventionsALT: improved (MD -7.21 U/L, 95% CI -10.62 to -3.80); GGT: improved (MD -8.30 U/L, 95% CI -12.43 to -4.17)
8 Ranneh et al. 2024systematic review · 1,840 participantsSilymarin as dietary supplement (one of eleven phenolic compounds); vs. Control/placebo (not specified)liver enzymes: improved (a reduction in liver enzymes); lipid profile: improved (a reduction in ... lipid profile); inflammatory cytokines: no difference (no changes were observed in inflammatory cytokine levels)
9 Huang et al. 2024meta-analysis · 1,691 participantsSilymarin (preparation, form and dose not reported); vs. Placeboimprovement in hepatic steatosis: unclear
12 Zhang et al. 2024meta-analysis · 1,335 participantsTCM combined with Silibinin capsules; vs. Silibinin aloneTotal effective rate: improved; ALT, AST, GGT: improved; Total cholesterol and triglycerides: improved

Further studies in this area: 18 30 33 49 51 56 66 67 90 92 99 100 104 118 132 133 135 143 148 149 150 152 155 158 159 160 161 169 177 178 182

Milk Thistle (Silymarin), Diabetes and Blood Glucose: Human Studies

For diabetes and blood sugar, meta-analyses on silymarin show predominantly favorable effects on blood sugar, fasting insulin and HbA1c. A meta-analysis of controlled studies found lower fasting blood sugar, fasting insulin and HbA1c 7, and a meta-analysis on fatty liver found lower fasting insulin 4. A systematic review on silibinin relies predominantly on cell and animal studies 30. This contrasts with a controlled study in diabetes in which a standardized extract over twelve weeks did not change fasting blood sugar, HbA1c and blood lipids 69. Mixtures with berberine 2223 or with nettle and frankincense 64 lowered fasting blood sugar compared with placebo; this applies only to the respective mixture. The meta-analyses 47 are especially robust; preparations and doses differ, and the transferability to individual milk thistle products remains open.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
4 Li et al. 2024meta-analysis · 2,375 participantsSilymarin (milk thistle extract); vs. Control group (placebo/usual care)Fasting insulin: improved (SMD[95%CI]=-0.59[-0.91, -0.28]); HOMA-IR: unclear (SMD[95%CI]=-0.37[-0.77, 0.04])
7 Mohammadi et al. 2024meta-analysis · 1,943 participantsSilymarin (SIL) supplementation; vs. Silymarin-treated groups versus untreated counterpartsFasting blood glucose (FBG): improved (WMD: -21.68 mg/dL, 95% CI: -31.37, -11.99; p < 0.001); Fasting insulin: improved (WMD: -3.76 mU/mL, 95% CI: -4.80, -2.72; p < 0.001); Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c): improved (WMD: -0.85%, 95% CI: -1.27, -0.43; p < 0.001)
11 Miao et al. 2025meta-analysis · 1,337 participantsSilymarin as one of several phytochemicals; vs. Placebo and other phytochemicals (resveratrol, curcumin, berberine)Fasting plasma glucose (FPG): improved (P < 0.05); HOMA-IR: improved (P < 0.05); HbA1c: improved (MD -2.08, 95%Cl -3.50 to -0.72)
18 Yin et al. 2025meta-analysis · 673 participantsSilymarin supplementation (Silybum marianum); not reported (subgroups by dosage); at least 4 weeks; vs. PlaceboHOMA-IR: improved (WMD = -2.29, 95 % CI: -4.55 to -0.03, p = 0.047); Fasting insulin: no difference (WMD = -2.56, 95 % CI: -7.60 to 2.48, p = 0.862); QUICKI: no difference
22 Fogacci et al. 2019meta-analysis · 497 participantsBerberine and silymarin combination; vs. PlaceboFasting plasma glucose: improved (MD: -7.5, 95% CI [-13, -1.9] mg/dl; p = 0.008)
23 Tóth et al. 2020meta-analysis · 491 participantsFixed combination of Berberis aristata and Silybum marianum (Berberol); 3 months; vs. PlaceboFasting plasma glucose levels: improved (significantly lowered); Homeostatic Model Assessment index: improved (significantly lowered)
30 Zare et al. 2024reviewSilibinin, main component of silymarin from milk thistle seedsinsulin resistance: improved; blood glucose: improved; HbA1C: improved
69 Ferdowsi et al. 2024randomised controlled · 48 participantsSilymarin capsules, 3×140 mg daily; three 140 mg silymarin capsules daily; 12 weeks; vs. Diet plan alone (control group)Fasting blood sugar: no difference (p = 0.789); HbA1c: no difference (p = 0.719); Lipid profile: no difference

Further studies in this area: 91 140 145 153 155 170 173 174 178 183 184 188

Milk Thistle (Silymarin) and Chronic Hepatitis: Human Studies

In chronic hepatitis, a meta-analysis showed that a standardized silymarin extract improved liver enzymes in viral hepatitis 3. A controlled study (not randomized) found a greater ALT and AST reduction with silymarin tablets plus standard therapy than with standard therapy alone 90. In hepatitis C, silymarin performed equal to spirulina for viral response and worse for ALT reduction in a randomized study 59. The findings are thus based on one meta-analysis and two controlled studies with different preparations and endpoints. For chronic hepatitis C, there is therefore no clear advantage of silymarin over other approaches; for chronic hepatitis B and other etiologies, the data situation is inconsistent.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
3 Shahsavari et al. 2025meta-analysis · 3,545 participantsSilymarin (Silybum marianum); low dose <400 mg vs. higher doses; ≤2 months vs. longer treatment; vs. Control or subgroups by dose, duration, BMI, age, etiologyAST and ALT levels in viral hepatitis: improved
90 Amjad et al. 2024controlled · 141 participantsSilymarin tablets plus standard care; 200 mg twice daily; 12 weeks; vs. standard care aloneALT and AST reduction in stratified analysis (HBV): improved
127 Trifonov et al. 2026case report · 1 participantsSilymarin as part of supportive infusion therapy; vs. no control groupNormalization of liver enzymes at 1 month: improved
146 Cui et al. 2026reviewSilybin, active component of silymarininflammatory response in acute hepatitis: improved; progression of chronic hepatitis: improved
158 Jaffar et al. 2024reviewSilymarin extract (Legalon®, Eurosil 85®)symptoms: improved (alleviation of symptoms)
160 Dhande et al. 2024reviewSilymarin from milk thistle seedsLiver function and histology: improved
173 Islam et al. 2021reviewsilymarin extract or silybintraditional use in liver disorders: unclear
182 Abenavoli et al. 2018reviewMilk thistle fruits/silymarin, silybin as main componentClinical potential in viral hepatitis: unclear

Milk Thistle (Silymarin) and Liver Cirrhosis: Human Studies

In liver cirrhosis, a systematic review found lower AST and ALT values in three of six silymarin studies; side effects were rare 19. A non-randomized controlled study in chronic liver diseases of various causes found no difference in encephalopathy, ascites, CTP class, and FibroScan values in addition to standard therapy 90. It remains open whether standardized extract has a clinically relevant benefit in cirrhosis; the forms studied were standardized silymarin extract, silymarin without further specification, and silibinin.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
19 Amini et al. 2023systematic review · 613 participantsSilymarin (preparation not specified); vs. Control/other treatment (not reported)AST and ALT: improved (Three of six studies showed the beneficial effects); Side effects
90 Amjad et al. 2024controlled · 141 participantsSilymarin tablets plus standard care; 200 mg twice daily; 12 weeks; vs. standard care alonehepatic encephalopathy, ascites and CTP class: no difference (p > 0.05); FibroScan scores: no difference
101 Huang et al. 2024cohort study · 319 participantsSilymarin added to antiviral therapy; at least 30 days of silymarin; vs. AVT alone (control cohort)Overall mortality (1 and 2 years): improved
146 Cui et al. 2026reviewSilybin, active component of silymarintransition from decompensated to compensated cirrhosis: improved
158 Jaffar et al. 2024reviewSilymarin extract (Legalon®, Eurosil 85®)mortality rate: improved (reduced mortality rates)
160 Dhande et al. 2024reviewSilymarin from milk thistle seedsLiver function and histology: improved
173 Islam et al. 2021reviewsilymarin extract or silybintraditional use in liver disorders: unclear
178 Gillessen et al. 2020reviewsilymarin extract, mostly Eurosil 85; vs. no uniform comparator (narrative review)liver-related deaths (pooled analysis): improved (significant reduction)

Further studies in this area: 182

Milk Thistle (Silymarin) and Cancer (Silibinin): Human Studies

On the effect on cancer diseases themselves, only observational data and reviews are available; the strength of evidence is low. A case series reports better tolerability, quality of life and fewer neurological symptoms with silibinin in addition to standard therapy 108. An observational study found better response with a silibinin-containing dietary supplement in addition to chemotherapy in lung cancer, but no confirmed survival benefit 109. An observational study on silymarin in addition to antiviral therapy found no difference in the incidence of liver cancer 101. Review articles on silymarin and silibinin in gastrointestinal tumors rely predominantly on preclinical findings 172173. The standardized extract, silibinin as a single substance, the silybin-phosphatidylcholine complex as well as unspecified milk thistle preparations were studied; data on whole fruits or tea are lacking in this area.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
13 Li et al. 2023meta-analysis · 1,333 participantsSilymarin (one included controlled trial); vs. Placebo or no additional therapySystolic function and cardiac biomarkers: improved (less reduction of systolic function and fewer cardiac biomarker abnormalities)
101 Huang et al. 2024cohort study · 319 participantsSilymarin added to antiviral therapy; at least 30 days of silymarin; vs. AVT alone (control cohort)HCC occurrence (1 and 2 years): no difference
108 Roca et al. 2025case series · 86 participantssilibinin in addition to standard treatment; April 2020 to April 2025 (observation period); vs. no control group, descriptive retrospectivetolerability/safety profile (only one mild adverse event was reported); quality of life: improved (good quality of life that was maintained over a long period of time); neurological symptoms and overall well-being: improved (an improvement in neurological symptoms and overall patient well-being was also documented)
109 Bosch-Barrera et al. 2021cohort study · 59 participantsOral nutraceutical containing silibinin plus nintedanib/docetaxel; vs. Cohort without silibinin supplementationOverall response rate: improved (55%); Time to treatment failure: improved (hazard ratio 0.43, p = 0.013); Overall survival: no difference (hazard ratio 0.63, p = 0.190)
111 Pochet et al. 2022case series · 51 participantsMilk thistle (Silybum marianum); no product or silymarin extract specified; vs. VigiBase case reports compared with the literatureVigiBase case reports on milk thistle-drug interactions: improved (half of the rationalizable ICSRs involved Viscum album and Silybum marianum)
118 Elgendy et al. 2025study · 15 participantsCurcuminoids and silymarin, individually and in combination; 4 weeksanticancer potential against liver and colorectal cancers: improved (anticancer potential)
122 Yang et al. 2026case series · 7 participantsAdjunctive silymarin alongside endoscopic surveillance; Median follow-up 38.0 months; vs. No control groupTolerability of silymarin (well-tolerated); Clinical efficacy of silymarin: unclear (strictly hypothesis-generating)
144 Lazzeroni et al. 2020studySiliphos, oral silybin-phosphatidylcholine complexSilybin concentration in plasma, urine and breast tissue: unclear (0.5 ng/mL); Selective accumulation of silybin in breast tumor tissue: unclear

Further studies in this area: 154 172 173

Milk Thistle (Silymarin) and Death Cap Mushroom Poisoning: Human Studies

On death cap mushroom poisoning, no controlled studies are available; the assessment is based on observational data and review articles. A systematic evaluation of case reports found higher survival rates with silibinin or penicillin alone as well as with combinations with N-acetylcysteine than with purely supportive treatment 16. In confirmed poisoning, the differences were not significant 16. An observational study with oral silymarin found no differences in hospital mortality, acute liver failure, and hospital length of stay 102. A case series with silibinin infusion and penicillin describes less treatment failure with the combination than with silibinin alone 106. A single-arm study with silibinin infusion, fluid administration, and octreotide reports frequent recovery without transplantation; silibinin predicted survival, N-acetylcysteine and activated charcoal did not 107. A review article considers the benefit in liver diseases including mushroom poisoning as not yet proven despite encouraging preclinical data 182. Since the data come predominantly from uncontrolled observations and the preparations examined — silibinin infusion, oral extract, combinations — are not comparable, no reliable statement can be derived from them.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
16 Tan et al. 2022systematic review · 877 participantsSilibinin (SIL), partly with N-acetylcysteine and/or benzylpenicillin; vs. silibinin, penicillin, NAC combinations vs. supportive care aloneSurvival rate with silibinin: improved (90% (OR 6.40 [3.14-13.04])); Survival rate with penicillin: improved (89% (OR 5.24 [2.87-9.56])); Survival rate with NAC/SIL combination: improved (85% (OR 3.85 [2.04, 7.25]))
102 Tangsuwanaruk et al. 2026cohort study · 255 participantsOral silymarin; vs. Silymarin group vs. non-silymarin groupIn-hospital mortality: no difference; Acute liver failure: no difference; Acute kidney injury: improved (adjusted risk difference = -13.9% [95% CI: -23.6 to -4.1%]; P = 0.005)
106 Dluholucký et al. 2022case series · 141 participantssilibinin infusion, partly with penicillin; vs. penicillin + silibinin versus silibinin alonetreatment failure (death or transplantation): improved (1.5 % (2 of 127 patients)); treatment failure with silibinin alone: worsened (41.7 % (5 of 12 patients, p = 0.00058)); recovered patients: improved (127 patients were recovered)
107 Mitchell et al. 2026study · 99 participantsIntravenous silibinin plus hydration, octreotide, N-acetylcysteine, charcoal; vs. Single-arm study, no control groupTransplant-free recovery among protocol-adherent patients: improved (98.8%); Silibinin as predictor of survival: improved (P=0.003)
119 Ma et al. 2026cohort study · 9 participantsStandard care with silibinin, N-acetylcysteine, dehydration; percutaneous or endoscopic biliary drainage in 5 patients; Biliary drainage at median 3 days after ingestion; follow-up to discharge; vs. Biliary drainage vs. non-BD controls (4 patients)Survival to hospital discharge: improved (100% vs 25%; P = 0.048); ALT decrease within 48 h: improved (67.6%); AST decrease within 48 h: improved (91.6%)
126 Frass et al. 2014case series · 2 participantssilibinin as hepatoprotective agent within conventional care, plus adjunctive classical homeopathy; vs. no control arm, adjunctive homeopathic treatment added to intensive caresurvival without residual pathological sequelae: improved (The 2 patients survived without any residual pathological sequelae)
131 Murad et al. 2024case report · 1 participantssilibinin plus activated charcoal and N-acetylcysteine; vs. no comparison (case report)treatment success of the combination therapy: improved
139 Weinhard et al. 2025case reportsilibinin, together with N-acetylcysteine; vs. no comparator; course after treatmentliver injury: improved (liver injury subsided)

Further studies in this area: 168 182

Milk Thistle (Silymarin): Further Outcomes in Studies

In this area, very different endpoints were examined, predominantly with standardized silymarin extract, and additionally with silibinin as a single substance, nanomicelles, cream, and combination preparations. Controlled studies found less oxidative stress with silymarin 7072, a lower CRP after bypass surgery 89, and more HDL and fewer triglycerides 72. In emergency patients with oxygen deficiency, silymarin lowered liver enzymes more than placebo 88. A randomized split-face study in melasma found fewer side effects with silymarin cream than with hydroquinone and no confirmed difference in lightening 78. Many results in this area are based on small, partly non-randomized studies. Mixtures with berberine lowered blood lipids in meta-analyses; this cannot be attributed to silymarin alone 2223. A systematic review on antioxidants in melasma describes silymarin as effective with few side effects 26. Forms examined were standardized extract, silibinin, and topical and nanomicellar preparations.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
1 Osadnik et al. 2022meta-analysis · 13,062 participantsSilymarin among other LDL-C-lowering nutraceuticals; vs. Placebo/no intervention and other nutraceuticalsLDL cholesterol: improved (-1.21 [-46.8 mg/dL] to -0.17 [-6.6 mg/dL] mmol/l reduction); Total cholesterol: improved (-1.75 [-67.7 mg/dL] to -0.18 [7 mg/dL] mmol/l reduction)
3 Shahsavari et al. 2025meta-analysis · 3,545 participantsSilymarin (Silybum marianum); low dose <400 mg vs. higher doses; ≤2 months vs. longer treatment; vs. Control or subgroups by dose, duration, BMI, age, etiologyAST and ALT levels in alcohol-related liver disease: no difference
6 Wang et al. 2025systematic review · 2,069 participantsSilymarin monotherapy or silymarin complex; Follow-up 4 to 48 weeks; vs. No intervention, placebo, or other interventionsSerious adverse events (Peto OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.26 to 9.28); Non-serious adverse events (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.89)
7 Mohammadi et al. 2024meta-analysis · 1,943 participantsSilymarin (SIL) supplementation; vs. Silymarin-treated groups versus untreated counterpartsDiastolic blood pressure (DBP): improved (WMD: -1.25 mmHg; 95% CI: -2.25, -0.26; p = 0.013); Total cholesterol (TC): improved (WMD: -13.97 mg/dL, 95% CI: -23.09, -4.85; p = 0.003); Triglycerides (TG): improved (WMD: -26.22 mg/dL, 95% CI: -40.32, -12.12; p < 0.001)
10 Zhong et al. 2025meta-analysis · 1,626 participantsAntioxidant supplements, including silymarin; vs. Control/placebo in 21 RCTsPelvic pain: improved (SMD = -2.68; p < 0.00001); Dysmenorrhea: improved (SMD = -1.77; p = 0.01); Dyspareunia: improved (SMD = -2.33; p = 0.01)
14 Wang et al. 2025meta-analysis · 1,221 participantsSilibinin capsules; vs. Non-Silibinin groupALT (alanine aminotransferase): improved (SMD = -1.16, 95% CI (-1.84, -0.47)); AST (aspartate aminotransferase): improved (SMD = -1.56, 95% CI (-2.18, -0.95)); GGT (gamma-glutamyl transferase): improved (SMD = -1.48, 95% CI (-2.09, -0.87))
17 Brooks et al. 2026systematic review · 785 participantsSilymarin among several polyphenols tested; vs. Placebo or control, per trialDisability/EDSS: no difference (no significant impact on disability); Relapse rate/ARR: no difference (no significant impact on relapse rates); MRI outcomes: no difference (no significant impact on ... MRI outcomes)
20 Que et al. 2024meta-analysis · 562 participantsSilymarin, calendula or aloe vera; vs. Standard medication or placeboamelioration of radiodermatitis damage: improved; efficacy of calendula and aloe vera: unclear

Further studies in this area: 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 34 35 36 37 39 40 42 43 47 50 51 53 55 56 58 60 61 62 63 65 66 67 69 70 71 72 73 75 76 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 86 87 88 89 90 93 94 96 97 98 101 107 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 120 121 123 124 125 128 129 130 136 137 139 140 141 142 147 151 153 156 162 163 164 166 167 170 171 173 174 175 176 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 189

4. How Is Milk Thistle (Silymarin) Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies

The studies predominantly tested standardized silymarin extracts (partly as named commercial preparations, partly nanomicellar or as a cream) as well as silibinin as a single substance, alongside milk thistle fruit powder extract and the silybin-phosphatidylcholine complex. Larger controlled studies on whole or ground fruits (tea, powder) are lacking; individual topicals used milk thistle ointment without a further specified extract. Strikingly many studies examined combination preparations in which silymarin was combined with other components; their results apply only to the respective mixture, not to silymarin alone.

Preparation or formDoseDurationStudy
Heptex® capsules: 200 mg Phyllanthus niruri + 100 mg Silybum marianum powdered extractlow: one capsule; high: two capsules36 weeks44
Oral silymarin capsules or syrup70 mg capsule twice daily or syrup three times daily (50 mg/5 ml)9 months, monthly assessment45
SPS tablets: Silybum marianum, Pueraria lobata, Salvia miltiorrhiza (BYHEALTH)3 tablets per dose, twice daily; each tablet ~23.0 mg silybin, 11.4 mg puerarin, 10.9 mg salvianolic acid24 weeks46
Silymarin (extract, form not specified)140 mg daily6 weeks, assessments at baseline, 3 and 6 weeks47
silibinin meglumine tablets plus tenofovir, plus Ganshuang granules in treatment group—12 and 24 weeks48
Silymarin 150 mg twice daily vs. essential phospholipids 825 mg twice dailysilymarin 150 mg b.i.d.six months49
Silybum marianum ointment, topicaltwice daily, fingertip size, 10 days10 days50
Silymarin (standardized extract, alone)103.2 mg/d24 weeks51
Silymarin (comparator arm) vs. Naqu Fawakeh fruit infusion5 mL (<30 kg) or 10 mL (≥30 kg), three times daily8 weeks52
Silymarin alone or with cholecalciferolSilymarin 480 mg for 3 months; cholecalciferol 50,000 IU/week for 8 weeks3 months follow-up53
Zeta Colest: milk thistle dry extract 87.5 mg with 70 mg silymarin, combined1 pill/evening for 8 weeks8 weeks after 8-week stabilization diet54
Silybum marianum extract capsules400 mg/d12 weeks55
Legalon® (standardized silymarin extract, Rottapharm|Madaus, Mylan)420 mg or 700 mg three times daily48 weeks (assessment at 48–50 weeks)56
Nutraceutical blend (NSupple) vs. silymarin-enriched blend (NSupple_Silybum)—90 days57
Silymarin (standardized extract)140 mg twice daily12 weeks58

5. Is Milk Thistle (Silymarin) Safe? Side Effects in Studies

The tolerability of silymarin is predominantly described as good; mostly only mild complaints such as gastrointestinal reactions or insomnia were reported 1419354347. A meta-analysis on fatty liver found adverse effects more frequently under silymarin, especially gastrointestinal complaints 5. A possible bleeding risk with simultaneous intake of anticoagulants is also reported 39.

StudyReported side effects
5 Zhang et al. 2025silymarin increased adverse effect rate (RR 1.98); mostly gastrointestinal
6 Wang et al. 2025Serious adverse events Peto OR 1.55; non-serious RR 1.29
14 Wang et al. 2025Only mild gastrointestinal reactions and insomnia
15 Tao et al. 2019adverse events similar to placebo
17 Brooks et al. 2026Intervention adverse events generally mild
18 Yin et al. 2025not reported
19 Amini et al. 2023no or negligible side effects reported
23 Tóth et al. 2020Safe; no increase in ALT, AST, creatine kinase
25 Liang et al. 2025serious adverse events, among products most frequently associated with SAEs
26 Sarkar et al. 2025Silymarin: minimal adverse effects
35 Rahimi-Dehkordi et al. 2024No serious side effects at investigated dosage
39 Hatfield et al. 2022Bleeding risk with anticoagulants

6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence

  • The tested preparations (standardized extract, silibinin, complex, commercial preparations) and doses differ greatly, so results cannot be transferred to all products.
  • Controlled studies in humans are lacking for whole or ground fruits (tea, powder) and for milk thistle seed oil.
  • An improvement of inflammation in liver tissue in NASH is not proven 56; many endpoints are based only on blood values or ultrasound.
  • Many results on combination preparations cannot be attributed to silymarin alone because other components were also studied.
  • For several areas (mushroom poisoning, cancer), the data come predominantly from uncontrolled observations.

7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Milk Thistle (Silymarin)

Milk thistle (Silybum marianum) provides with silymarin a mixture of flavonolignans that has been tested in many studies in humans. Liver values are best studied: meta-analyses found lower transaminases in fatty liver and viral hepatitis 34, and less frequent liver damage under tuberculosis drugs 15. In diabetes, silymarin lowered fasting blood glucose, insulin and HbA1c in a meta-analysis 7, while a controlled single study found no difference 69. Liver tissue in NASH did not improve in a placebo-controlled study 56.

Many investigations also used combination preparations whose results apply only to the respective combination. Tolerability is mostly described as good; a meta-analysis found adverse effects more frequently, especially gastrointestinal complaints 5, and a bleeding risk is described under anticoagulants 39.

Frequently Asked Questions

How well has Milk Thistle (Silymarin) been studied in humans?

We evaluated 212 human studies on Milk Thistle (Silymarin), including 56 randomised controlled trials and 42 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 3,909 participants in total. As of 7 October 2026.

Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) help with liver values during drug treatment? What the studies show

We evaluated 7 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 6 controlled studies and 15 further studies; the controlled studies include 385 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 23915

Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) help with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease? What the studies show

We evaluated 5 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 7 controlled studies and 27 further studies; the controlled studies include 564 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly no difference. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 2345

Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) help with diabetes and blood glucose? What the studies show

We evaluated 3 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 2 controlled studies and 15 further studies; the controlled studies include 117 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly no difference. Strength of evidence under our published rules: moderate. Sources: 471118

Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) help with chronic hepatitis? What the studies show

We evaluated one meta-analysis or systematic review, one controlled study and 6 further studies; the controlled studies include 141 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: moderate. Sources: 390127146

Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) help with liver cirrhosis? What the studies show

We evaluated one meta-analysis or systematic review, one controlled study and 7 further studies; the controlled studies include 141 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly no difference. Strength of evidence under our published rules: moderate. Sources: 1990101146

Does Milk Thistle (Silymarin) help with cancer (silibinin)? What the studies show

We evaluated one meta-analysis or systematic review and 10 further studies. There are no controlled studies yet, only reviews; the strength of evidence is therefore low at most. Sources: 13101108109

Which milk thistle forms were tested in the studies?

Standardized silymarin extracts were most frequently studied, partly as named commercial preparations or nanomicellar formulations. In addition, silibinin as a single substance, the silybin-phosphatidylcholine complex and milk thistle fruit powder extracts were used. Larger controlled studies on tea or powder from the whole fruits are lacking.

What do the studies show in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease?

Meta-analyses found lower transaminases in fatty liver 3433 as well as lower triglycerides and more HDL 433. A placebo-controlled study, by contrast, found an advantage only for GGT and liver stiffness 51. Liver fat and fatty liver scores improved in a meta-analysis 4, while in two randomized studies liver fat content remained without difference 4951.

How safe is the intake?

The tolerability of silymarin is predominantly described as good, with mostly mild complaints such as gastrointestinal reactions or insomnia 1419354347. The studies on liver cirrhosis also reported no or hardly any side effects 19. A meta-analysis on fatty liver, however, found adverse effects more frequently, especially gastrointestinal complaints 5; with simultaneous intake of anticoagulants, a bleeding risk is described 39.

Does this also apply to combination preparations with other substances?

No. Many studies tested silymarin together with other components such as berberine, alpha-lipoic acid or other plant extracts. Their results apply only to the respective mixture and cannot be attributed to silymarin alone 21222354646885. Statements on the effect of silymarin alone are based on studies with standardized extract or silibinin without other active substances.

What is known about chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis?

In chronic hepatitis, a standardized silymarin extract improved liver enzymes in a meta-analysis 3, but in hepatitis C silymarin showed no clear advantage over other approaches 59. In liver cirrhosis, three of six silymarin studies in an overview found lower liver enzymes 19; a controlled study found no difference in complications such as ascites and in fibrosis values 90.

Sources

  1. 1
    Osadnik T, Goławski M, Lewandowski P, Morze J, Osadnik K, Pawlas N et al. · 2022
  2. 2
    Calderon Martinez E, Herrera D, Mogan S, Hameed Z, Jangda AA, Khan TJ et al. · 2023
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
    Tan JL, Stam J, van den Berg AP, van Rheenen PF, Dekkers BGJ, Touw DJ · 2022
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
    Amini S, Bagherniya M, Butler AE, Askari G, Sahebkar A · 2023
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
    Liang CJW, Woerdenbag HJ, Ekhart C, Vitalone A, van Hunsel FPAM · 2025
  26. 26
  27. 27
    Frounchi N, Mahmoodpoor F, Zakavi SS, Eyvazova K, Yagubova S, Ardalan M et al. · 2025
  28. 28
    Mohammadi S, Ashtary-Larky D, Asbaghi O, Farrokhi V, Jadidi Y, Mofidi F et al. · 2024
  29. 29
    Bahari H, Shahraki Jazinaki M, Rashidmayvan M, Taheri S, Amini MR, Malekahmadi M · 2024
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
    Hatfield J, Saad S, Housewright C · 2022
  40. 40
    Tvrdý V, Pourová J, Jirkovský E, Křen V, Valentová K, Mladěnka P · 2021
  41. 41
    de Avelar CR, Pereira EM, de Farias Costa PR, de Jesus RP, de Oliveira LPM · 2017
  42. 42
    Langhorst J, Wulfert H, Lauche R, Klose P, Cramer H, Dobos GJ et al. · 2015
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
  47. 47
  48. 48
  49. 49
  50. 50
  51. 51
  52. 52
  53. 53
  54. 54
  55. 55
  56. 56
  57. 57
  58. 58
    Mirzaei N, Jahanian Sadatmahalleh S, Rouholamin S, Nasiri M · 2022
  59. 59
  60. 60
  61. 61
  62. 62
  63. 63
  64. 64
  65. 65
  66. 66
  67. 67
  68. 68
  69. 69
    Ferdowsi S, Shidfar F, Heidari I, Kashi M, Sohouli MH, Sarrafi Zadeh S · 2024
  70. 70
  71. 71
  72. 72
  73. 73
  74. 74
  75. 75
  76. 76
  77. 77
  78. 78
  79. 79
  80. 80
  81. 81
  82. 82
  83. 83
  84. 84
  85. 85
  86. 86
  87. 87
    Ponce Martínez C, Murcia García E, Pérez Sánchez H, Milagro FI, Riezu-Boj JI, Ramos Molina B et al. · 2024
  88. 88
    Jamalian M, Mahmodiyeh B, Saveiee S, Solhi H · 2020
  89. 89
    Okiljevic B, Zdravkovic R, Preveden A, Preveden M, Mladenovic N, Susak S · 2024
  90. 90
    Amjad MZ, Hassan MU, Rehman M, Shamim A, Zeeshan HM, Iftikhar Z et al. · 2024
  91. 91
  92. 92
  93. 93
  94. 94
  95. 95
  96. 96
  97. 97
    RATIONALIZED AND COMPLEMENTARY FINDINGS OF SILYMARIN (MILK THISTLE) IN PAKISTANI HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS
    Ashraf M, Abid F, Riffat S, Bashir S, Iqbal J, Sarfraz M et al. · 2015
  98. 98
  99. 99
  100. 100
    Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Chaiteerakij R, Gonzalez EV, Alcasid MA, Rani RA, Andal Gamutan MTR et al. · 2026
  101. 101
  102. 102
    Tangsuwanaruk T, Tansuwannarat P, Tongpoo A, Mirin K, Trakulsrichai S · 2026
  103. 103
  104. 104
  105. 105
  106. 106
    Dluholucký S, Snitková M, Knapková M, Cibirová M, Mydlová Z · 2022
  107. 107
  108. 108
    Roca E, Roca E, Cucinella A, Madonia G, Centonze G, Lombardo F et al. · 2025
  109. 109
    Bosch-Barrera J, Verdura S, Ruffinelli JC, Carcereny E, Sais E, Cuyàs E et al. · 2021
  110. 110
  111. 111
    Pochet S, Lechon AS, Lescrainier C, De Vriese C, Mathieu V, Hamdani J et al. · 2022
  112. 112
  113. 113
  114. 114
  115. 115
    Fontao F, von Engelbrechten M, Seilaz C, Sorg O, Saurat JH · 2020
  116. 116
  117. 117
  118. 118
  119. 119
  120. 120
    Kawaguchi-Suzuki M, Frye RF, Zhu HJ, Brinda BJ, Chavin KD, Bernstein HJ et al. · 2014
  121. 121
  122. 122
  123. 123
    Psoriasis Management Using Herbal Supplementation: A Retrospective Clinical Case Study
    Alkhatib B, Alhilo S, Alhilo I · 2023
  124. 124
  125. 125
    Bosch-Barrera J, Roqué A, Teixidor E, Carmona-Garcia MC, Arbusà A, Brunet J et al. · 2021
  126. 126
    Two Cases of Fulminant Hepatic Failure from Amanita phalloides Poisoning Treated Additively by Homeopathy
    Frass M, Zagorchev P, Yurukova V, Wulkersdorfer B, Thieves K, Zedtwitz-Liebenstein K et al. · 2014
  127. 127
    Trifonov P, Todovichin D, Marinova C, Zasheva A, Komitov D, Nikolov R et al. · 2026
  128. 128
  129. 129
    Lindner E, Alhmouz MM, Abuhalimeh R, Abuhalimeh L, Chin J, Qadura M et al. · 2025
  130. 130
  131. 131
    Murad M, Anslinger TM, Frank D, Hohlstein P, van den Burg L, Brozat JF et al. · 2024
  132. 132
  133. 133
  134. 134
  135. 135
  136. 136
    Wojas O, Krzych-Fałta E, Samel-Kowalik P, Żalikowska-Gardocka M, Majsiak E, Mari A et al. · 2020
  137. 137
  138. 138
  139. 139
    Weinhard J, Serre J, Frère P, Adam C, Lafargue MC, Buob D et al. · 2025
  140. 140
    MacDonald-Ramos K, Monroy A, Bobadilla-Bravo M, Cerbón M · 2024
  141. 141
  142. 142
  143. 143
  144. 144
    Lazzeroni M, Petrangolini G, Legarreta Iriberri JA, Pascual Avellana J, Tost Robusté D, Cagnacci S et al. · 2020
  145. 145
  146. 146
  147. 147
    Jamali S, Jamali B, Golabi M, Rostami M, Yousefi Z, Dabbaghipour R et al. · 2026
  148. 148
    Vrentzos E, Pavlidis G, Korakas E, Kountouri A, Pliouta L, Dimitriadis GD et al. · 2025
  149. 149
  150. 150
  151. 151
    Khabarov IA, Sergazy SD, Amanzhan A, Maikenova AS, Zhabayeva AN, Adekenov SM · 2025
  152. 152
    Martínez-Sánchez FD, Martínez-Vázquez SE, Gutiérrez-Monterrubio R, Muñoz-Martínez S, Garcia-Juarez I · 2025
  153. 153
  154. 154
    Conti V, Polcaro G, De Bellis E, Donnarumma D, De Rosa F, Stefanelli B et al. · 2024
  155. 155
  156. 156
    Zhao Y, Zhou Y, Gong T, Liu Z, Yang W, Xiong Y et al. · 2024
  157. 157
    Sethi N, Khokhar M, Mathur M, Batra Y, Mohandas A, Tomo S et al. · 2024
  158. 158
  159. 159
  160. 160
  161. 161
  162. 162
  163. 163
  164. 164
  165. 165
    Mobasheri L, Ahadi M, Beheshti Namdar A, Alavi MS, Bemidinezhad A, Moshirian Farahi SM et al. · 2023
  166. 166
  167. 167
  168. 168
  169. 169
  170. 170
    Kadoglou NPE, Panayiotou C, Vardas M, Balaskas N, Kostomitsopoulos NG, Tsaroucha AK et al. · 2022
  171. 171
  172. 172
    Fallah M, Davoodvandi A, Nikmanzar S, Aghili S, Mirazimi SMA, Aschner M et al. · 2021
  173. 173
  174. 174
    MacDonald-Ramos K, Michán L, Martínez-Ibarra A, Cerbón M · 2021
  175. 175
    Babbush KM, Babbush RA, Khachemoune A · 2021
  176. 176
  177. 177
  178. 178
  179. 179
    Camini FC, Costa DC · 2020
  180. 180
  181. 181
  182. 182
  183. 183
  184. 184
    Vahabzadeh M, Amiri N, Karimi G · 2018
  185. 185
  186. 186
    Dietz BM, Hajirahimkhan A, Dunlap TL, Bolton JL · 2016
  187. 187
  188. 188
    Insulin resistance: lifestyle and nutritional interventions
    Kelly GS · 2000
  189. 189

Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.

International Health Research · https://ih-research.com/en/knowledge/milk-thistle/ · Last updated: 2026-10-16