Knowledge · Natural Compounds

Maca (Lepidium Meyenii)

Maca is the root of an Andean Brassicaceae; controlled studies show improvements in menopausal symptoms, libido and mood.

Last updated:

We evaluated 36 human studies on Maca (Lepidium meyenii), including 15 randomised controlled trials and 8 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 802 participants in total. As of 14 October 2026.

This page as PDF · Summary

1. What Is Maca (Lepidium Meyenii)? Occurrence, Origin and Forms

Maca is a cruciferous plant (Brassicaceae) cultivated in the highlands of the Andes. Its main use is the thickened root, which is eaten dried as a food. Traditionally, it is regarded in its region of origin as a food and a tonic, mentioned in connection with fertility, energy and well-being during menopause.

Maca thrives at high altitude on poor soils of the Andes and is cultivated there as a crop. Outside that region it is grown as a crop only in a few places.

The root is harvested, dried and processed into powder or flour; for supplements it is additionally heated (gelatinized) or processed into extracts. Human studies mainly use dried root powder, gelatinized powder, and aqueous or alcoholic extracts.

Forms and Preparations Studied

  • Dried root powder
  • Gelatinized powder (heated material)
  • Aqueous extract
  • Alcoholic extract
  • Root colour types: yellow, red, black
  • Maca flour as a food

Not covered on this page:

  • Other Lepidium species, such as garden cress (Lepidium sativum)
  • Preparations combining maca with other ingredients (mixtures)
  • Other root and tuber crops used in a similar way, such as ginseng

2. What Does Maca (Lepidium Meyenii) Do? Results by Area

AreaResult in controlled studiesStrength of evidenceStudiesParticipants
Sexual Function and Libidomostly improvedmoderate1 meta-analyses · 5 controlled · 6 other189
Menopausal Symptomsmostly improvedmoderate1 meta-analyses · 5 controlled · 2 other265
Semen Quality and Male Fertilitymostly no differencemoderate2 meta-analyses · 3 controlled · 5 other139
Mood and Psychological Well-Beingmostly improvedmoderate0 meta-analyses · 3 controlled · 3 other225
Fatigue and Exhaustionmostly improvedlow0 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 2 other175
Other investigationsmixedhigh2 meta-analyses · 14 controlled · 7 other668

How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.

3. What the Studies Show in Detail

Maca (Lepidium Meyenii), Sexual Function and Libido: Human Studies

In men with symptoms of late-onset hypogonadism, gelatinized maca improved erectile function more than placebo 11. In men with mild erectile dysfunction, the IIEF-5 score increased more with a dry extract than with placebo; the effect was small 14. In women with antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, the remission rate was higher with maca than with placebo, especially in postmenopausal women 15. In a dose-comparison study, sexual function improved only with the higher dose, not with the lower one 19. A randomized controlled trial in postmenopausal women found an improvement in sexual dysfunction 21. Another randomized controlled trial in healthy men found increased sexual desire 23. The findings are predominantly based on dried root powder and gelatinized powder, the individual studies are small and short, and a meta-analysis on herbal agents for erectile dysfunction provides no clear result specifically for maca 1.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
1 Borrelli et al. 2018meta-analysis · 2,080 participantsHerbal dietary supplements, including Lepidium meyenii (n=50); vs. Placebo or other herbal treatmentsErectile function (IIEF-5): unclear (very preliminary positive results)
11 Shin et al. 2023randomised controlled · 80 participantsGelatinized Maca (Lepidium meyenii); 1,000 mg three times daily before food; 12 weeks; vs. PlaceboInternational Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): improved (p<0.05)
14 Zenico et al. 2009randomised controlled · 50 participantsMaca dry extract; 2400 mg; 12 weeks; vs. PlaceboIIEF-5 score: improved (1.6 +/- 1.1 versus 0.5 +/- 0.6, P < 0.001)
15 Dording et al. 2015randomised controlled · 45 participantsMaca root (dried powder); 3.0 g/day; 12 weeks; vs. PlaceboASEX total score ≤ 10 (remission): improved (9.5% for maca versus 4.8% for placebo); MGH-SFQ score ≤ 12 (remission): improved (30.0% for maca versus 20.0% for placebo); MGH-SFQ score ≤ 8 (remission): improved (9.5% for maca versus 5.0% for placebo)
19 Dording et al. 2008study · 20 participantsMaca root (L. meyenii); 1.5 g/day or 3.0 g/day; vs. Low dose (1.5 g/day) versus high dose (3.0 g/day)ASEX score (ITT, 3.0 g/day): improved (from 22.8+/-3.8 to 16.9+/-6.2; z=-2.20, P=0.028); MGH-SFQ score (ITT, 3.0 g/day): improved (from 24.1+/-1.9 to 17.0+/-5.7; z=-2.39, P=0.017); ASEX and MGH-SFQ scores (1.5 g/day): no difference
21 Brooks et al. 2008randomised controlled · 14 participantsMaca root powder (Lepidium meyenii); 3.5 g/day; 6 weeks Maca, 6 weeks placebo (crossover, 12 weeks); vs. placebo, randomized double-blindGreene Climacteric Scale: sexual dysfunction: improved (P < 0.05)
23 Gonzales et al. 2002randomised controlledMaca Gelatinizada; 1,500 mg or 3,000 mg daily; 12 weeks; vs. PlaceboSelf-perception of sexual desire: improved (since 8 weeks of treatment)
26 Ross et al. 2024case series · 2 participantsMaca-OG™, gelatinized, highly bioavailable powder of specific phenotypesTotal testosterone: improved

Further studies in this area: 28 32 33 34

Maca (Lepidium Meyenii) and Menopausal Symptoms: Human Studies

For menopausal symptoms, a systematic review and a randomized controlled trial found lower scores on Kupperman and Greene scales; the review rates the evidence as limited 816. Two randomized controlled trials found an improved Kupperman index 1020. Two randomized controlled trials reported a decrease in hot flashes and night sweats 1016, one randomized controlled trial reported an improvement in depressive mood 17 and another reported higher estradiol, FSH and progesterone levels 20. For the remaining laboratory values, one randomized controlled trial found no difference 17. Predominantly gelatinized powder was examined, as well as dried root powder of the maca root; the studies were small and short, and information on the ecotype of the root and on manufacturer funding is mostly missing.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
8 Lee et al. 2011systematic reviewmaca-based intervention (form not reported); vs. placeboKupperman Menopausal Index and Greene Climacteric Score: unclear
10 Meissner et al. 2006randomised controlled · 168 participantsPre-gelatinized organic maca (Maca-GO) in capsules; 2 × 500 mg twice daily with meals, total 2 g/day; three (Trial I, n=102) or four (Trial II, n=66) months; vs. Placebo, double-blind, randomized, multi-centreKupperman's Index: improved (from 22 to 10); frequency and severity of individual menopausal symptoms (hot flushes, night sweating): improved
16 Meissner et al. 2006randomised controlled · 34 participantsPre-gelatinized organic maca (Maca-GO) capsules; Two 500 mg capsules twice daily with meals, 2 g/day; four months, crossover, outpatient; vs. placebo, double-blind randomizedMenopausal symptoms (Greene's Score, Kupperman Index): improved (alleviated (P<0.001) menopausal symptoms); Hot flushes and night sweating: improved (relieved symptoms of menopausal discomfort, (hot flushes and night sweating in particular))
17 Stojanovska et al. 2015randomised controlled · 29 participantsMaca (Lepidium meyenii); 3.3 g/day; 6 weeks each phase, 12 weeks total; vs. placebo, randomized double-blind cross-overdepression (mood): improved (significant decreases in diastolic blood pressure and depression); estradiol, FSH, TSH, SHBG, glucose, lipid profiles, serum cytokines: no difference (no differences)
20 Meissner et al. 2006randomised controlled · 20 participantsPre-gelatinized organic Maca (Maca-GO), capsules; 2 x 500 mg twice daily, total 2 g/day; 4 months, crossover after 2 months; vs. Placebo capsules, double-blind, randomizedKupperman Menopausal Index: improved (74%-87%); Estradiol (E2): improved; FSH: improved
21 Brooks et al. 2008randomised controlled · 14 participantsMaca root powder (Lepidium meyenii); 3.5 g/day; 6 weeks Maca, 6 weeks placebo (crossover, 12 weeks); vs. placebo, randomized double-blindGreene Climacteric Scale: psychological symptoms (anxiety, depression): improved (P < 0.05)
28 Ulloa et al. 2024reviewMaca preparations of varying form and processingmenopausal symptoms: improved
30 Depypere et al. 2014reviewLepidium meyenii (Maca) extracts; vs. Placebo (RCTs)Vasomotor symptoms: improved

Maca (Lepidium Meyenii), Semen Quality and Male Fertility: Human Studies

On sperm quality and male fertility, several controlled studies and two review articles are available that do not show a uniform picture. A randomized controlled trial reported a higher sperm concentration in men with mild astheno- and/or oligozoospermia taking 2 g of maca daily than with placebo 12. For sperm motility, semen volume and normal sperm morphology, the same study found no difference 12. A small randomized controlled pilot study in healthy men saw only increasing trends compared with placebo for sperm concentration and motility 18. Another randomized controlled trial with yellow maca powder found no difference in sperm concentration in infertile men 13. A systematic review reports better sperm motility in infertile men and better semen quality parameters in healthy men 7, while a meta-analysis shows no difference in sperm concentration and unclear results for semen quality parameters 5. The findings come predominantly from small, short studies in different populations; the forms used range from dried root powder to gelatinized powder to preparations not further specified, and the evidence is inconsistent regarding ecotypes, amount and duration of use.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
5 Lee et al. 2022meta-analysisMaca (Lepidium meyenii), form not reported; vs. Placebosperm concentration: no difference (weighted mean difference, 2.22, 95% confidence interval -2.94 to 7.37, p = 0.4); semen quality parameters (sperm concentration, sperm motility): unclear
7 Lee et al. 2016systematic reviewMaca (Lepidium meyenii), form not specified; vs. Placebo or baseline (3 RCTs, 2 uncontrolled observational studies)Sperm mobility in infertile men: improved; Several semen quality parameters in healthy men: improved
12 Alcalde et al. 2020randomised controlled · 69 participantsMaca (Lepidium meyenii), form not specified; 2 g/day; 12 weeks; vs. Placebosperm concentration: improved (15.04 ± 5.61 vs. 10.16 ± 3.59, respectively; p = .011); semen volume: no difference (2.95 ± 0.52 vs. 2.90 ± 0.52; p = .392); sperm motility: no difference (22.34 ± 2.22 vs. 23.05 ± 2.22; p = .462)
13 Melnikovova et al. 2021randomised controlled · 50 participantsYellow maca (Lepidium meyenii Walpers); 16 weeks; vs. Placebosperm concentration: no difference (improved the percentage of sperm concentration by 40%, whereas the placebo improved by 76%)
18 Melnikovova et al. 2015randomised controlled · 20 participantsmilled maca hypocotyl or placebo; 1.75 g/day; 12 weeks; vs. placebo, double-blind randomizedsperm concentration: no difference (rising trends); sperm motility: no difference (rising trends)
26 Ross et al. 2024case series · 2 participantsMaca-OG™, gelatinized, highly bioavailable powder of specific phenotypesSperm concentration, motility, total sperm count: improved
29 Abarikwu et al. 2020reviewLepidium meyenii and other medicinal plantsspermatogenesis-inducing effect: unclear
32 Gonzales et al. 2012reviewMaca (Lepidium meyenii), form not specifiedsperm count and motility: improved

Further studies in this area: 34 35

Maca (Lepidium Meyenii), Mood and Psychological Well-Being: Human Studies

A randomized controlled trial with aqueous extract of black or red maca found better mood in adults at low and high altitude 9. Another randomized controlled trial with maca dry extract found a greater increase in the score for mental performance in the satisfaction profile SAT-P in men with mild erectile dysfunction than with placebo 14. In contrast, a randomized controlled trial with gelatinized powder (Maca Gelatinizada) found no difference in depression and anxiety in healthy men 23. The evidence is moderate; the findings come from three controlled studies with a total of 225 participants that investigated different forms and ecotypes, and no meta-analysis is available.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
9 Gonzales-Arimborgo et al. 2016randomised controlled · 175 participantsspray-dried extracts of black or red maca; 3 g daily; 12 weeks; vs. placebomood: improved
14 Zenico et al. 2009randomised controlled · 50 participantsMaca dry extract; 2400 mg; 12 weeks; vs. PlaceboSAT-P psychological performance-related score: improved (+9 +/- 6 versus +6 +/- 5, P < 0.05)
23 Gonzales et al. 2002randomised controlledMaca Gelatinizada; 1,500 mg or 3,000 mg daily; 12 weeks; vs. PlaceboHamilton test for depression: no difference; Hamilton test for anxiety: no difference
26 Ross et al. 2024case series · 2 participantsMaca-OG™, gelatinized, highly bioavailable powder of specific phenotypesMood: improved
28 Ulloa et al. 2024reviewMaca preparations of varying form and processingsubjective wellbeing: improved
34 Gonzales et al. 2009reviewMaca as powder, capsules, pills, flour, liquor, extracts; vs. Placebo in randomized clinical trialsmood: improved; anxiety: improved

Maca (Lepidium Meyenii), Fatigue and Exhaustion: Human Studies

A randomized controlled trial with 175 adults at low and high altitude found better energy with an aqueous extract of black or red maca compared with placebo 9. A case series reports more energy with gelatinized powder in one of two men with andropause and sperm dysfunction 26. A review article mentions favorable effects on energy and mood 34. The evidence is low, as only one controlled study is available and the remaining observations have no control group. An aqueous extract and gelatinized powder were investigated, but not the raw root as a food; effects with longer use and with other preparations remain open.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
9 Gonzales-Arimborgo et al. 2016randomised controlled · 175 participantsspray-dried extracts of black or red maca; 3 g daily; 12 weeks; vs. placeboenergy: improved
26 Ross et al. 2024case series · 2 participantsMaca-OG™, gelatinized, highly bioavailable powder of specific phenotypesEnergy: improved
34 Gonzales et al. 2009reviewMaca as powder, capsules, pills, flour, liquor, extracts; vs. Placebo in randomized clinical trialsenergy: improved

Maca (Lepidium Meyenii): Further Outcomes in Studies

In this area, 14 controlled studies with a total of 668 participants as well as two meta-analyses and two systematic reviews were examined. Several controlled studies found improvements in blood pressure values after dried root powder or gelatinized powder 1720. Several controlled studies also found improved blood lipid values after gelatinized powder 1020. For hormones, a mixed picture emerged: Two controlled studies found higher estradiol and lower FSH values after gelatinized powder 1016, while several controlled studies found no differences in serum hormones 18212223. One controlled study reported a decrease in free testosterone 13. The studies are heterogeneous with regard to the maca form used, the ecotype, and the number of participants, and several investigations include only small samples.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
2 Huerta et al. 2024meta-analysisMaca (Lepidium meyenii Walp.) supplementation; higher doses showed greater effect (dose-response effect); vs. Control groups in randomized controlled studiesForced swimming test (FST): improved (SMD = 2.26); Rota-rod test (RRT): improved (SMD = 6.26); Grip strength test (GST): improved (SMD = 5.23)
3 Huerta et al. 2024meta-analysisLepidium meyenii Walp (Maca), including macamides; higher dose produced greater antioxidant effect; vs. control groups (randomized controlled trials)Reduced glutathione: improved (SMD = 0.89); Glutathione peroxidase: improved (SMD = 0.96); Superoxide dismutase: improved (SMD = 0.68)
4 Morgado et al. 2024systematic review27 proposed testosterone boosters, including Lepidium meyenii; vs. PlaceboSerum total testosterone: no difference
6 Brunetti et al. 2020systematic reviewLepidium meyenii Walp. (maca) as herbal aphrodisiacPsychiatric and neurological adverse effects
9 Gonzales-Arimborgo et al. 2016randomised controlled · 175 participantsspray-dried extracts of black or red maca; 3 g daily; 12 weeks; vs. placebohealth-related quality of life score (HRQL): improved; chronic mountain sickness (CMS) score: improved; hemoglobin in highlanders with abnormally high levels: improved
10 Meissner et al. 2006randomised controlled · 168 participantsPre-gelatinized organic maca (Maca-GO) in capsules; 2 × 500 mg twice daily with meals, total 2 g/day; three (Trial I, n=102) or four (Trial II, n=66) months; vs. Placebo, double-blind, randomized, multi-centreEstradiol (E2): improved (P<0.001); FSH: improved (P<0.05); HDL: improved (P<0.05)
11 Shin et al. 2023randomised controlled · 80 participantsGelatinized Maca (Lepidium meyenii); 1,000 mg three times daily before food; 12 weeks; vs. PlaceboAging Males' Symptoms scale (AMS): improved (p<0.05); International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS): improved (p<0.05); ADAM positive rate: improved (p<0.0001)
13 Melnikovova et al. 2021randomised controlled · 50 participantsYellow maca (Lepidium meyenii Walpers); 16 weeks; vs. Placeboserum hormone levels: no difference (No statistically significant change in hormone levels); free testosterone: worsened (a decrease in the level of free testosterone)

Further studies in this area: 14 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 31 34

4. How Is Maca (Lepidium Meyenii) Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies

The studies predominantly used dried root powder and gelatinized powder, as well as aqueous and alcoholic extracts. Individual investigations examined specific ecotypes such as yellow, red or black maca. The amounts administered can be found in the table.

Preparation or formDoseDurationStudy
spray-dried extracts of black or red maca3 g daily12 weeks9
Pre-gelatinized organic maca (Maca-GO) in capsules2 × 500 mg twice daily with meals, total 2 g/daythree (Trial I, n=102) or four (Trial II, n=66) months10
Gelatinized Maca (Lepidium meyenii)1,000 mg three times daily before food12 weeks11
Maca (Lepidium meyenii), form not specified2 g/day12 weeks12
Yellow maca (Lepidium meyenii Walpers)—16 weeks13
Maca dry extract2400 mg12 weeks14
Maca root (dried powder)3.0 g/day12 weeks15
Pre-gelatinized organic maca (Maca-GO) capsulesTwo 500 mg capsules twice daily with meals, 2 g/dayfour months, crossover, outpatient16
Maca (Lepidium meyenii)3.3 g/day6 weeks each phase, 12 weeks total17
milled maca hypocotyl or placebo1.75 g/day12 weeks18
Pre-gelatinized organic Maca (Maca-GO), capsules2 x 500 mg twice daily, total 2 g/day4 months, crossover after 2 months20
Maca root powder (Lepidium meyenii)3.5 g/day6 weeks Maca, 6 weeks placebo (crossover, 12 weeks)21
Maca Gelatinizada1500 mg or 3000 mg per day12 weeks22
Maca Gelatinizada1,500 mg or 3,000 mg daily12 weeks23
Lepidium meyenii extract (form unspecified)2.25 g twice daily12 weeks24

5. Is Maca (Lepidium Meyenii) Safe? Side Effects in Studies

In the studies, maca was predominantly well tolerated; one placebo-controlled study reported no serious side effects 91519. A review reports rare side effects and good tolerability at therapeutic dose, but points to risks with overdose or self-medication 628. A case report mentions an elevated blood lead concentration 27.

StudyReported side effects
1 Borrelli et al. 2018Recorded in 19 of 24 trials, no significant differences vs placebo
6 Brunetti et al. 2020Psychiatric and neurological adverse effects; mostly safe at therapeutic doses, risks with overdose or self-medication
8 Lee et al. 2011safety not proven
9 Gonzales-Arimborgo et al. 2016good acceptability, no serious adverse effects
11 Shin et al. 2023Maca called safe, no figures reported
15 Dording et al. 2015Maca was well tolerated
19 Dording et al. 2008Maca was well tolerated
20 Meissner et al. 2006Rat toxicity safe at 7.5 mg/kg body weight
27 Johnson-Arbor et al. 2018whole blood lead concentration 44 µg/dL
28 Ulloa et al. 2024generally safe, rare adverse effects, good tolerance

6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence

  • Most studies are small and short; information on ecotype and manufacturer funding is often missing.
  • The forms and preparations used differ greatly, which makes comparison difficult.
  • Regarding semen quality, the results are inconsistent and the evidence is heterogeneous.
  • Long-term effects and effects with longer use are hardly studied.
  • Combination products with other ingredients do not allow any statement about maca alone.

7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Maca (Lepidium Meyenii)

Maca is the thickened root of the Andean Brassicaceae Lepidium meyenii, which has been studied dried as a food and in various preparations. Controlled human studies show improvements in menopausal symptoms, sexual function and libido, as well as in mood and energy. The strength of evidence is moderate for menopausal symptoms, sexual function and mood, and low for fatigue. For semen quality, the picture is inconsistent. The studies are predominantly small and short, and the forms, ecotypes and amounts used vary greatly.

Frequently Asked Questions

How well has Maca (Lepidium meyenii) been studied in humans?

We evaluated 36 human studies on Maca (Lepidium meyenii), including 15 randomised controlled trials and 8 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 802 participants in total. As of 14 October 2026.

Does Maca (Lepidium meyenii) help with sexual Function and Libido? What the studies show

We evaluated one meta-analysis or systematic review, 5 controlled studies and 6 further studies; the controlled studies include 189 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: moderate. Sources: 1111415

Does Maca (Lepidium meyenii) help with menopausal Symptoms? What the studies show

We evaluated one meta-analysis or systematic review, 5 controlled studies and 2 further studies; the controlled studies include 265 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: moderate. Sources: 8101617

Does Maca (Lepidium meyenii) help with semen Quality and Male Fertility? What the studies show

We evaluated 2 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 3 controlled studies and 5 further studies; the controlled studies include 139 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly no difference. Strength of evidence under our published rules: moderate. Sources: 571213

Does Maca (Lepidium meyenii) help with mood and Psychological Well-Being? What the studies show

We evaluated 3 controlled studies and 3 further studies; the controlled studies include 225 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: moderate. Sources: 9142326

Does Maca (Lepidium meyenii) help with fatigue and Exhaustion? What the studies show

We evaluated one controlled study and 2 further studies; the controlled studies include 175 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: low. Sources: 92634

Which forms of maca were examined in the studies?

Primarily dried root powder and gelatinized powder were examined, as well as aqueous and alcoholic extracts. Individual studies examined specific ecotypes such as yellow, red or black maca. The amounts administered can be found in the table.

Do studies in humans show an effect on menopausal symptoms?

A systematic review and a randomized controlled trial found lower scores on Kupperman and Greene scales; the review rates the evidence as limited 816. Two controlled studies found an improved Kupperman index 1020. However, the studies were small and short.

How does maca affect sexual function?

Two controlled studies found a greater improvement in erectile function in men with maca than with placebo 1114. In women with antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, the remission rate was higher with maca, especially after menopause 15. A study in postmenopausal women found an improvement in sexual dysfunction 21. Another study in healthy men found increased sexual desire 23.

Are there side effects or risks?

In the studies, maca was predominantly well tolerated; one placebo-controlled study reported no serious side effects 91519. A review reports rare side effects and good tolerability at therapeutic dose, but points to risks with overdose or self-medication 628. A case report mentions an elevated blood lead concentration 27.

What should be considered with combination products?

Combination products that combine maca with other ingredients do not allow any statement about the effect of maca alone. A review on testosterone boosters 4 and one on ingredients such as macamides 3 do not consider maca alone. Such results do not apply to maca as a single product.

Sources

  1. 1
  2. 2
    Huerta Ojeda Á, Rodríguez Rojas J, Cancino-López J, Barahona-Fuentes G, Pavez L, Yeomans-Cabrera MM et al. · 2024
  3. 3
    Huerta Ojeda Á, Rodríguez Rojas J, Cuevas Guíñez J, Ciriza Velásquez S, Cancino-López J, Barahona-Fuentes G et al. · 2024
  4. 4
    Morgado A, Tsampoukas G, Sokolakis I, Schoentgen N, Urkmez A, Sarikaya S · 2024
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
    Hormone-Balancing Effect of Pre-Gelatinized Organic Maca (Lepidium peruvianum Chacon): (II) Physiological and Symptomatic Responses of Early-Postmenopausal Women to Standardized doses of Maca in Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Centre Clinical Study
    Meissner HO, Mscisz A, Reich-Bilinska H, Kapczynski W, Mrozikiewicz P, Bobkiewicz-Kozlowska T et al. · 2006
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
    Dording CM, Schettler PJ, Dalton ED, Parkin SR, Walker RS, Fehling KB et al. · 2015
  16. 16
    Hormone-Balancing Effect of Pre-Gelatinized Organic Maca (Lepidium peruvianum Chacon): (III) Clinical responses of early-postmenopausal women to Maca in double blind, randomized, Placebo-controlled, crossover configuration, outpatient study
    Meissner HO, Mscisz A, Reich-Bilinska H, Mrozikiewicz P, Bobkiewicz-Kozlowska T, Kedzia B et al. · 2006
  17. 17
    Stojanovska L, Law C, Lai B, Chung T, Nelson K, Day S et al. · 2015
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
    Therapeutic Effects of Pre-Gelatinized Maca (Lepidium Peruvianum Chacon) used as a Non-Hormonal Alternative to HRT in Perimenopausal Women - Clinical Pilot Study
    Meissner HO, Reich-Bilinska H, Mscisz A, Kedzia B · 2006
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
    Ulloa Del Carpio N, Alvarado-Corella D, Quiñones-Laveriano DM, Araya-Sibaja A, Vega-Baudrit J, Monagas-Juan M et al. · 2024
  29. 29
    Abarikwu SO, Onuah CL, Singh SK · 2020
  30. 30
  31. 31
    Zeng Y, Yang J, Du J, Pu X, Yang X, Yang S et al. · 2014
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35

Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.

International Health Research · https://ih-research.com/en/knowledge/maca/ · Last updated: 2026-10-15