Knowledge · Natural Compounds

Iron

Iron is a trace element for haemoglobin, myoglobin and many enzymes; human studies show benefit mainly in iron deficiency, anaemia and heart failure.

Last updated:

We evaluated 280 human studies on Iron, including 198 randomised controlled trials and 66 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 70,680 participants in total. As of 3 October 2026.

This page as PDF · Summary

1. What Is Iron? Occurrence, Origin and Forms

Iron is a trace element the body needs above all for the red blood pigment haemoglobin, which carries oxygen, and also for the muscle pigment myoglobin and many enzymes. Iron is stored as ferritin, whose blood level serves as a measure of the iron reserves.

Readily absorbed haem iron occurs in meat, liver and fish; plant iron from pulses, whole grains, seeds and green vegetables is absorbed less well, better together with vitamin C.

Oral supplements contain ferrous iron (such as ferrous sulfate, fumarate, gluconate, bisglycinate) or ferric iron in complexes. In severe deficiency or intolerance, iron is given as an infusion.

Forms and Preparations Studied

  • Oral iron salts (sulfate, fumarate, gluconate, bisglycinate)
  • Oral ferric iron complexes and liposomal iron
  • Iron infusions, such as ferric carboxymaltose
  • Iron-fortified foods
  • Combination products with iron – the other ingredients are named in each case

Not covered on this page:

  • Iron removal with chelators in iron overload (deferasirox, deferoxamine, deferiprone)
  • Iron oxide nanoparticles as contrast agents and in technology

2. What Does Iron Do? Results by Area

AreaResult in controlled studiesStrength of evidenceStudiesParticipants
Iron deficiency and anaemiamostly improvedhigh40 meta-analyses · 163 controlled · 15 other49,713
Fatigue and physical performancemostly improvedhigh12 meta-analyses · 24 controlled · 0 other5,186
Heart failuremixedhigh18 meta-analyses · 15 controlled · 0 other10,421
Infants and childrenmostly no differencehigh4 meta-analyses · 16 controlled · 3 other14,516
Sleep and restless legsmostly improvedhigh3 meta-analyses · 2 controlled · 1 other176
Concentration and cognitive developmentmixedmoderate1 meta-analyses · 17 controlled · 2 other7,673
Pregnancymixedlow3 meta-analyses · 11 controlled · 4 other10,556
Other outcomesmixedhigh24 meta-analyses · 95 controlled · 24 other30,425

How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.

3. What the Studies Show in Detail

Iron, Iron Deficiency and Anaemia: Human Studies

In iron deficiency and anaemia, haemoglobin rose more with iron infusions in several controlled studies than with placebo or oral iron 518202224. Oral iron reduced iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy compared with placebo or no administration 2864162. The strength of evidence is high; studied were iron sulfate, fumarate, gluconate and bisglycinate for oral intake, trivalent complexes, liposomal iron as well as infusions such as ferric carboxymaltose. Iron infusions reduced the need for transfusion around operations and during chemotherapy compared with placebo or oral iron 182732383940. In tumour-related anaemia, iron in addition to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents improved the blood count more than these agents alone 57.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
1 van et al. 2024systematic review · 930,436 participantsOral and intravenous iron preparations; cumulative monthly IV: 108–750 mg (HD) vs. 65–250 mg (PD); vs. hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysisprevalence of intravenous iron supplementation: improved (11.7% to 84.4% in HD patients, compared to 1.6% to 49.0% in PD patients); cumulative monthly IV iron dose: improved (108 to 750 mg in the HD group, compared to 65 to 250 mg in the PD group); hemoglobin levels: no difference (10.0 to 12.0 g/dL in HD patients, versus 9.6 to 11.9 g/dL in PD patients)
2 Hou et al. 2026meta-analysis · 18,376 participants12 phosphorus-lowering drugs, including iron-containing phosphate binders; vs. Placebo and other phosphorus-lowering drugsserum phosphorus: improved; iron parameters: improved
3 Zheng et al. 2023meta-analysis · 14,737 participantsHIF-PHIs (e.g., roxadustat) versus erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs); vs. HIF-PHIs versus ESAsTransferrin saturation: no difference (MD, 0.65; 95%CI, -0.45 to 1.75); Ferritin: no difference (SMD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.07); Iron: improved (MD, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.40 to 3.20)
5 Awad et al. 2024meta-analysis · 7,813 participantsintravenous iron; vs. placeboserum ferritin: improved; haemoglobin: improved
8 Du et al. 2026meta-analysis · 7,009 participantsIntravenous iron therapy; vs. Control groupAll-cause mortality in anemic patients: unclear (RR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.70–1.01, P = 0.06); All-cause mortality in non-anemic patients: unclear (RR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.90–1.81, P = 0.16)
17 Tanrıverdi et al. 2025meta-analysis · 4,757 participantsFerric carboxymaltose vs. iron sucrose, intravenous; vs. Ferric carboxymaltose versus iron sucroseChange in hemoglobin: improved (MD: 0.45 g/dL, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.83, p=0.02); Change in ferritin: improved (MD: 37.32 ng/mL, 95% CI: 18.98 to 55.65, p<0.01)
18 Xue et al. 2026meta-analysis · 4,688 participantsIntravenous iron preparations, including ferric carboxymaltose and iron isomaltoside; vs. Placebo or other intravenous iron preparations in the networkHemoglobin concentration: improved (MD 0.76 g/dL, 95 % CrI 0.56 to 0.96); Hemoglobin concentration: improved (MD 0.65 g/dL, 95 % CrI 0.33 to 0.97); Transfusion requirements: improved (OR 0.72, 95 % CrI 0.55 to 0.91)
19 Chen et al. 2025meta-analysis · 4,257 participantsintravenous iron; high-dose versus low-dose IV iron; vs. placebo/usual care, oral iron, varying IV iron dosesall-cause mortality versus placebo/usual care: no difference (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.60-3.09); all-cause mortality versus oral iron: no difference (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.18-1.90); all-cause mortality high-dose versus low-dose IV iron: improved (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67-0.97)

Further studies in this area: 20 21 22 23 24 27 28 29 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 52 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 66 67 69 70 71 72 73 77 79 80 81 86 88 89 90 91 93 94 95 96 97 98 100 101 102 103 105 106 108 110 112 113 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 126 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 210 212 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 233 234 235 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 247 249 250 251 253 255 256 257 258 259 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 271 272 275 276 277 279 280

Iron, Fatigue and Physical Performance: Human Studies

In heart failure with iron deficiency, exercise capacity improved more with iron infusions than with placebo or standard treatment 531. After childbirth, fatigue decreased more with iron infusions than with oral iron 20. Studied were predominantly people with iron deficiency and underlying diseases such as heart failure, anaemia or tumour disease; on healthy people without iron deficiency, the evaluated studies allow no statement.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
5 Awad et al. 2024meta-analysis · 7,813 participantsintravenous iron; vs. placebo6-min walk test: improved (MD 34.87, 95% CI [20.02, 49.72], p < 0.00001); peak VO2: improved
6 Liu et al. 2025meta-analysis · 7,786 participantsintravenous iron therapy; vs. control/placebo6-minute walking test distance: improved (WMD = 18.99 [7.41, 30.57])
10 Mejía-Zambrano et al. 2024meta-analysis · 6,717 participantsIron supplementation (form not specified); vs. Placebo6-minute walk test: improved (OR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.64-0.98)
12 Mhanna et al. 2024meta-analysis · 6,614 participantsintravenous iron therapy; vs. standard of care6-minute walk test: improved
14 Ahmed et al. 2026meta-analysis · 6,493 participantsIntravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM); Follow-up at 1 year and maximum follow-up; vs. Placebo or standard care6-minute walk test: improved (MD 29.19 m, 95% CI 11.95-46.43)
15 Mohamed et al. 2026meta-analysis · 6,405 participantsFerric carboxymaltose (FCM); vs. Control group6-minute walk test: improved
16 Padda et al. 2024meta-analysis · 5,132 participantsIntravenous ferric carboxymaltose; vs. Placebo or standard of careChange in 6-min walk test distance: no difference (WMD of 14.03 (95% CI: -10.94 to 38.99, p = 0.27))
18 Xue et al. 2026meta-analysis · 4,688 participantsIntravenous iron preparations, including ferric carboxymaltose and iron isomaltoside; vs. Placebo or other intravenous iron preparations in the networkQuality of life: fatigue and dyspnea (QLQ-C30): improved; Physical functioning (SF-36): improved

Further studies in this area: 20 31 47 60 72 101 112 132 145 147 157 166 174 175 176 198 200 205 208 222 225 232 239 252 255 258 259 264

Iron and Heart Failure: Human Studies

In heart failure with iron deficiency, iron infusions, including ferric carboxymaltose, improved the combined endpoint of heart failure hospitalisation and cardiovascular death in several meta-analyses 678101112. Heart failure hospitalisation alone also decreased in several meta-analyses 567121314. Regarding cardiovascular death, meta-analyses reported both improvements 67 and no differences 1525. NYHA class was better with iron infusions than with control in several meta-analyses 51225. For quality of life, two meta-analyses found an advantage 512, two others found no confirmed difference 1516. In acute heart failure, one meta-analysis found no difference in repeat hospital admissions and mortality 24. For cardiovascular hospital admissions and deaths combined, another meta-analysis showed no confirmed difference 16. Ejection fraction increased in two meta-analyses on iron infusions 525 and in one on oral iron 47; another meta-analysis found no substantial effect 12. In preserved ejection fraction, ferric carboxymaltose improved diastolic function in a placebo-controlled study 198. In a controlled study, ferric carboxymaltose improved NYHA class and self-assessment compared with standard treatment; the advantage in oxygen uptake was not robust 146. In a placebo-controlled study, oral ferrous sulfate lengthened walking distance 211, whereas a meta-analysis on oral iron found no difference 47. Mostly intravenous iron preparations such as ferric carboxymaltose were studied in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; the certainty of evidence is considered high. The benefit in acute heart failure as well as the best dose and the rhythm of administration remain open.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
5 Awad et al. 2024meta-analysis · 7,813 participantsintravenous iron; vs. placeboKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: improved (MD 7.39, 95% CI [3.55, 11.22], p = 0.0002); left ventricular ejection fraction: improved (MD 3.76, 95% CI [2.32, 5.21], p < 0.00001); NYHA class: improved
6 Liu et al. 2025meta-analysis · 7,786 participantsintravenous iron therapy; vs. control/placeboComposite of total HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death: improved (RR = 0.82 [0.72, 0.92]); Total hospitalization for heart failure: improved (RR = 0.78 [0.66, 0.91]); First hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death: improved (OR = 0.78 [0.65, 0.93])
7 Shalabi et al. 2025meta-analysis · 7,491 participantsIntravenous ferric carboxymaltose; vs. PlaceboHeart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death: improved (RR 0.89, 95 % CI 0.83-0.96; P = 0.0016); Heart failure hospitalizations: improved (RR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.77-0.87; P < 0.0001); Cardiovascular death: improved (RR 0.89, 95 % CI 0.80-0.99; P = 0.0384)
8 Du et al. 2026meta-analysis · 7,009 participantsIntravenous iron therapy; vs. Control groupFirst heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death: improved (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72–0.86, P < 0.001); Heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death: improved (RR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75–0.98, P = 0.02)
10 Mejía-Zambrano et al. 2024meta-analysis · 6,717 participantsIron supplementation (form not specified); vs. PlaceboHospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death: improved (OR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.54-0.70)
11 Ahmed et al. 2025meta-analysis · 6,651 participantsintravenous iron therapy; vs. placebo or standard of careComposite of first heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality: improved (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.92); Cardiovascular mortality: unclear (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.01); First heart failure hospitalization: unclear (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.05)
12 Mhanna et al. 2024meta-analysis · 6,614 participantsintravenous iron therapy; vs. standard of carecomposite of HF hospitalizations or cardiovascular mortality: improved (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.96; P = 0.01); HF hospitalizations: improved (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.89; P = 0.002); all-cause, HF, and cardiovascular mortality: no difference
13 Wang et al. 2024meta-analysis · 6,511 participantsintravenous iron therapy; subgroup analysis: treatment duration ≥ 24 weeks; vs. placebo or controlheart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death: improved (21% relative reduction (P<0.01)); heart failure hospitalization: improved (24% relative reduction (P<0.01)); cardiovascular hospitalizations and cardiovascular death: improved (28% relative reduction (P<0.01))

Further studies in this area: 14 15 16 19 24 25 26 31 47 65 72 74 79 82 83 84 146 198 206 209 211 218 232 255 258

Iron, Infants and Children: Human Studies

Birth weight differed neither between iron infusion and oral iron in anaemia in pregnancy 4896 nor between iron supplementation and placebo or no supplementation 64. Preterm births, low birth weight and small-for-gestational-age newborns were also not less frequent with iron supplementation than with placebo or no supplementation 64. A systematic review found low birth weight and small-for-gestational-age newborns less often with oral iron than without iron in non-anaemic pregnant women with normal iron status 28. In fully breastfed healthy infants, weight and head circumference increased somewhat less with iron supplementation than without iron according to a meta-analysis 43. In children with iron deficiency without anaemia, the authors of a placebo-controlled study also report more favourable growth with liposomal iron; the summary does not provide measured values for this 109. In children with iron deficiency anaemia, weight at the end of the study was higher with liposomal iron than with conventional iron polymaltose complex 140. A drink enriched with iron, zinc and other micronutrients as well as spirulina, by contrast, did not change length growth and body size 86143. Newborns of mothers who took ferrous fumarate had higher cord ferritin than after placebo 162. In one study, a micronutrient powder with much zinc and little iron slowed the decline in length-for-age z-score somewhat more than placebo 73, in another a similar powder did not change growth 69. For birth weight and growth, findings without difference predominated. Oral iron salts, liposomal iron, iron-enriched foods as well as infusions with ferric carboxymaltose and iron sucrose were studied. It remains open for which subgroups and administration rhythms a benefit nevertheless exists.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
28 Hansen et al. 2023systematic review · 2,822 participantsOral iron supplements; vs. No iron supplementsLow birthweight newborns: improved (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13-0.68); Small for gestational age newborns: improved (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17-0.86)
43 Tian et al. 2025meta-analysis · 685 participantsOral iron supplementation; Daily until 6 or 12 months; vs. No iron supplementationWeight gain: worsened (MD = -0.04, 95%CI -0.07 to -0.01, p = 0.004); Head circumference gain: worsened (MD = -0.14, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.09, p < 0.001)
48 Shi et al. 2015meta-analysis · 576 participantsIntravenous iron sucrose vs. oral iron; vs. intravenous iron sucrose versus oral ironFoetal birth weight: no difference
61 Apte et al. 2025systematic reviewProbiotics and/or prebiotics, with or without oral iron; vs. Placebo or ironHemoglobin, ferritin and fractional iron absorption in children: no difference (did not result in any significant change)
64 Cantor et al. 2024systematic reviewOral iron supplements; vs. Placebo or no iron supplementationPreterm birth: no difference; Infant low birth weight: no difference; Infants small for gestational age: no difference
69 Barffour et al. 2019randomised controlled · 3,407 participantsDaily zinc tablet, micronutrient powder with zinc and iron, therapeutic zinc, placebo; Powder: 10 mg zinc, 6 mg iron daily; about 9 months; vs. preventive zinc, therapeutic zinc, placeboStunting: no difference (P = .37)
70 Rattigan et al. 2025randomised controlled · 3,332 participantsMMN, MQ-LNS or IFA (iron supplements); MMN 30 mg iron; MQ-LNS 30 mg iron; IFA 60 mg iron; Pregnancy, second and third trimesters; vs. MMN or MQ-LNS vs. IFAbirth weight: no difference (mean difference MMN vs IFA=39 g, 95% CI -55, 134; mean difference MQ-LNS vs IFA=50 g, 95% CI -55, 156)
73 Islam et al. 2022randomised controlled · 2,886 participantsMicronutrient powder with zinc and iron or zinc tablets; Iron 10 mg or 6 mg daily or every other day; 24 weeks; vs. Placebo powder dailyChange in length-for-age z-score: improved (P < 0.05)

Further studies in this area: 75 86 90 96 103 107 108 109 140 143 157 162 170 236 278

Iron, Sleep and Restless Legs: Human Studies

In adults with restless legs syndrome, iron, taken orally or as an infusion, improved the IRLS score more than placebo in a meta-analysis and a systematic review 5053. RLS quality of life improved compared with placebo 5053; for self-rated sleep quality, one meta-analysis found an advantage 50, one review found no difference 53. In blood donors with iron deficiency, sleep quality, fatigue and leg restlessness improved after ferric carboxymaltose as after oral ferrous fumarate; there was no group without iron 145. In children with autism spectrum disorder and sleep disorders, iron preparations showed hardly any effect on sleep in a network meta-analysis 30. In restless legs syndrome with iron deficiency anaemia, oral ferrous sulfate and a ferumoxytol infusion improved the symptoms equally markedly in a double-blind study 248. It remains open which iron compound, which daily amount and which administration rhythm are most favourable for sleep disorders and restless legs.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
30 Sirao et al. 2026meta-analysis · 2,700 participantsIron supplements as adjunctive therapy; vs. Melatonin, parent education, behavioral interventions, physical activitySleep disturbances: no difference (had little impact)
50 Mahmoud et al. 2025meta-analysis · 511 participantsvarious iron supplements, including ferric carboxymaltose; vs. placeboIRLS score: improved (MD = -5.28; 95% CI -7.66, -2.90; P < 0.0001); patients with improved IRLS score: improved (RR = 2.06; 95% CI 1.49, 2.84; P < 0.0001); RLS-QOL: improved (MD = 7.42; 95% CI 1.32, 13.51; P = 0.02)
51 González-Parejo et al. 2024systematic review · 482 participantsDietary supplements, including oral iron; vs. various supplements or controlRLS symptoms and sleep quality: improved (promising results)
53 Trotti et al. 2019systematic review · 428 participantsOral or parenteral iron, various formulations; Follow-up 2 to 16 weeks; vs. Placebo, pramipexole, or no treatmentRestlessness or uncomfortable leg sensations (IRLS): improved (MD -3.78, 95% CI -6.25 to -1.31); Restlessness (different scale): improved (SMD -0.74, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.23); RLS severity versus pramipexole: no difference (MD -0.40, 95% CI -5.93 to 5.13)
145 Macher et al. 2020randomised controlled · 176 participants1 g ferric carboxymaltose i.v. or 10 g oral iron fumarate (100 capsules); 1 g i.v. or 10 g oral iron fumarate as 100 capsules; Follow-up after 8-12 weeks; vs. intravenous versus oral ironRestless legs syndrome severity: improved (p < 0.001); Sleep quality: improved (p < 0.001)
248 Short et al. 2024randomised controlledoral ferrous sulfate versus intravenous ferumoxytol; 6 weeks; vs. oral versus intravenous iron (double-blind, double-dummy)improvement in RLS symptoms (IRLS severity): improved (marked improvement in RLS symptoms); difference between oral and intravenous iron: no difference (no statistically significant difference between treatment groups)

Iron, Concentration and Cognitive Development: Human Studies

In children with iron deficiency without anaemia, liposomal iron improved developmental scores more than placebo 109. In preterm infants who all received iron, care by a pharmacist, better adherence and higher developmental scores went hand in hand 185. In fully breastfed infants, iron did not change the Mental Development Index at twelve months 43. In a follow-up of pregnant women with iron deficiency anaemia, better iron values went hand in hand with better mood and mental health; the iron polymaltose infusion raised iron values more than oral iron 157. Weekly iron with folic acid lowered the score for frequent mental complaints in adolescent girls more than no supplementation 114.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
4 Sajedi et al. 2020systematic review · 11,559 participantsZinc alone or zinc with iron; up to 9 years follow-up; vs. Placebo or controlmental development (Bayley Scales): no difference; motor development (Bayley Scales): no difference
43 Tian et al. 2025meta-analysis · 685 participantsOral iron supplementation; Daily until 6 or 12 months; vs. No iron supplementationMental development index at 12 months: no difference
71 Larson et al. 2023randomised controlled · 3,300 participantsDaily iron syrup (12.5 mg iron) or multiple micronutrient powders with 12.5 mg iron; 12.5 mg iron daily; 3 months intervention, follow-up at 12 months; vs. Placebo (double-blind, double-dummy, 3 arms)Mismatch response amplitude (ERP) at month 3: no difference (MD = 0.07μV [95% CI: -1.22, 1.37]); Mismatch response amplitude (MNP vs placebo) at month 3: no difference (MD = 0.58μV [95% CI: -0.74, 1.90]); Secondary ERP outcomes at months 3 and 12: no difference
77 Nguyen et al. 2026randomised controlled · 1,599 participantsWeekly iron and folic acid (IFA) or multiple micronutrients (MM) vs. folic acid alone; Weekly before conception, daily IFA during pregnancy; vs. Folic acid alonePerceptual reasoning: improved (MM: 1.68 (0.01, 3.35); IFA: 2.04 (0.33, 3.74)); Reading scores: improved (0.78 (0.11, 1.44)); Full-scale IQ: no difference
99 Gutema et al. 2024randomised controlled · 504 participantsIntermittent iron supplementation vs. placebo, plus vitamin A; vs. Placebo iron or placebo vitamin A in 2x2 designCognitive development (Raven, digit span, Tower of London, visual search): no difference; Performance index of visual search task: worsened (-0.17 SD, 95% confidence interval: -0.32, -0.02); Digit span z-score (vitamin A vs. placebo): improved (0.30 SD (95% confidence interval: 0.14, 0.46))
109 Bahbah et al. 2025randomised controlled · 433 participantsLiposomal iron versus placebo; four months; vs. placebo in non-anemic iron deficiency; plus IDA groupdevelopmental total score change: improved (+29.57 versus +0.96 (P < 0.001)); final developmental score: improved (181.5, compared to the IDA group, 175.0 (P < 0.001))
114 Kedir et al. 2026randomised controlled · 306 participantsweekly iron-folic acid supplementation (WIFAS); endline 6 months after WIFAS completion; vs. control group without WIFAScommon mental disorder score (SRQ-20): improved (β = -1.12; 95% CI: -1.68, -0.55)
124 Ayete et al. 2025randomised controlled · 231 participantsPrenatal iron-folic acid supplements vs. maternal and child SQ-LNS; Prenatally to 6 months postpartum; child 6–18 months; vs. Iron-folic acid group vs. SQ-LNS groupTotal gray matter volume: no difference; Cortical gray matter thickness/volume: no difference; Right caudal anterior cingulate cortex thickness: improved (2.78 (2.73, 2.84) vs. 2.72 (2.67, 2.77); effect size = 0.21)

Further studies in this area: 125 127 134 150 157 177 185 189 213 214 232 269

Iron and Pregnancy: Human Studies

In healthy pregnant women, low-dose ferrous bisglycinate caused fewer gastrointestinal complaints and less often black stool than fumarate or sulfate in a randomised study 104. The highest tested amount of fumarate led more often to constipation and laxative use than lower amounts 104. Compared with placebo or oral iron, there were no differences in bleeding and transfusions 2264, in maternal disease frequency 6475 as well as in quality of life, gestational diabetes and caesarean section 64. In one study, multimicronutrient preparations were taken more faithfully than iron with folic acid 78 and in another they slightly increased mean birth weight compared with iron with folic acid 246. The certainty of evidence is overall low; mainly oral iron salts (sulfate, fumarate, gluconate, bisglycinate), iron infusions (ferric carboxymaltose, iron sucrose) and iron-enriched foods were studied, often in mixed preparations with other micronutrients.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
9 Tolkien et al. 2015meta-analysis · 6,831 participantsoral ferrous sulfate; not reported; not reported; vs. placebo or intravenous ironGI side-effects in pregnant women (OR = 3.33, 95% CI 1.19-9.28, p = 0.02, I2 = 66.1%)
22 Nicholson et al. 2024systematic review · 3,939 participantsIntravenous iron (sucrose, carboxymaltose, derisomaltose, ferumoxytol) vs oral iron (sulfate, fumarate, gluconate); Follow-up 3–6 weeks after start, around birth and postpartum; vs. Intravenous iron versus oral ironPostpartum haemorrhage: no difference (RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.50 to 4.20); Need for blood transfusion: no difference (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.60)
59 Guerra et al. 2026systematic reviewIntravenous iron (ferric carboxymaltose, iron sucrose) vs. oral iron preparations (ferrous sulfate); vs. Intravenous iron vs. oral iron or one intravenous formulation vs. anotherMajor maternal and neonatal outcomes: no difference
64 Cantor et al. 2024systematic reviewOral iron supplements; vs. Placebo or no iron supplementationMaternal quality of life: no difference; Gestational diabetes: no difference; Maternal hemorrhage: no difference
70 Rattigan et al. 2025randomised controlled · 3,332 participantsMMN, MQ-LNS or IFA (iron supplements); MMN 30 mg iron; MQ-LNS 30 mg iron; IFA 60 mg iron; Pregnancy, second and third trimesters; vs. MMN or MQ-LNS vs. IFAtotal weight gain in pregnancy: no difference (p values >0.05); rate of weight gain per week during second and third trimesters: no difference (p values >0.05); adequacy of gestational weight gain: no difference (p values >0.05)
75 Neogi et al. 2019randomised controlled · 2,018 participantsIntravenous iron sucrose vs. oral iron (100 mg elemental iron twice daily); Iron sucrose by formula based on bodyweight and Hb deficit; oral 100 mg twice daily; follow-up to 6 weeks post-randomisation; vs. standard oral ironPrimary maternal composite outcome: no difference (adjusted odds ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·70-1·29); Serious maternal adverse events (16 (2%) of 958 vs 13 (1%) of 976)
76 Chan et al. 2023randomised controlled · 1,729 participantsSupplement with myo-inositol, probiotics, micronutrients (incl. iron) vs. standard; up to 12 months; vs. standard supplement (folic acid, iron, calcium, iodine, β-carotene)time to natural conception: no difference (90.5 days (95% confidence interval: 80.7, 103.5) in the intervention group compared with 92.0 days (76.0, 105.1) in the control group); cumulative pregnancy rate at 12 months: no difference; time to conception in overweight women: improved (12-month HR=1.47 [1.07, 2.02], P=.016; 20% conceived by 84.5 vs. 117.0 days)
78 Sauer et al. 2025randomised controlled · 1,546 participantsIron and folic acid (IFA) vs. multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS); IFA 90 days; MMS 180 days; vs. IFA-90 vs. MMS-180 vs. MMS-90 (cluster-randomized)Adherence rate: improved (3.9% (1.7, 6.2)); ANC visits: no difference (0.0 (-0.1, 0.2)); Acceptability of MMS (6 domains): improved (90%-100% "agreement")

Further studies in this area: 87 104 107 162 236 246 254 268 274 279

Iron: Further Outcomes in Studies

In dialysis patients, high-dose iron as an infusion did not lead to more infections than low-dose iron in a randomised study 74. Before heart surgery, ferric carboxymaltose did not reduce transfusions and infections in people without anaemia; the prematurely terminated study was manufacturer-funded 190.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
2 Hou et al. 2026meta-analysis · 18,376 participants12 phosphorus-lowering drugs, including iron-containing phosphate binders; vs. Placebo and other phosphorus-lowering drugsintact parathyroid hormone: improved; risk of hypercalcemia: improved; gastrointestinal discomfort: worsened
5 Awad et al. 2024meta-analysis · 7,813 participantsintravenous iron; vs. placeboall-cause death: improved
6 Liu et al. 2025meta-analysis · 7,786 participantsintravenous iron therapy; vs. control/placeboAll-cause mortality: no difference (OR = 0.93 [0.83, 1.04])
7 Shalabi et al. 2025meta-analysis · 7,491 participantsIntravenous ferric carboxymaltose; vs. PlaceboTotal all-cause hospitalization: no difference (RR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.85-1.01; P = 0.0830)
8 Du et al. 2026meta-analysis · 7,009 participantsIntravenous iron therapy; vs. Control groupRelevant biomarkers: improved
9 Tolkien et al. 2015meta-analysis · 6,831 participantsoral ferrous sulfate; not reported; not reported; vs. placebo or intravenous ironGI side-effects vs. placebo (OR 2.32 [95% CI 1.74-3.08, p<0.0001, I2 = 53.6%]); GI side-effects vs. i.v. iron (OR 3.05 [95% CI 2.07-4.48, p<0.0001, I2 = 41.6%]); GI side-effects in IBD vs. i.v. iron (OR = 3.14, 95% CI 1.34-7.36, p = 0.008, I2 = 0%)
10 Mejía-Zambrano et al. 2024meta-analysis · 6,717 participantsIron supplementation (form not specified); vs. PlaceboAdverse events (OR, 0.78; 95%CI, 0.67-0.91)
11 Ahmed et al. 2025meta-analysis · 6,651 participantsintravenous iron therapy; vs. placebo or standard of care1-year all-cause mortality: unclear (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.02)

Further studies in this area: 12 13 15 16 17 18 20 25 26 31 32 33 35 36 38 39 40 41 42 44 45 46 48 50 52 53 58 59 60 66 67 68 72 74 75 77 79 81 85 86 88 91 92 95 100 101 103 105 106 108 111 112 113 116 119 121 122 128 130 132 133 136 138 140 141 142 145 146 148 149 150 153 155 157 158 159 160 166 167 169 170 171 172 173 174 176 178 179 180 182 184 185 188 189 190 191 192 194 195 198 201 202 204 207 208 215 216 217 219 221 223 224 225 226 228 237 238 239 241 242 243 245 249 251 252 253 255 259 260 261 262 264 270 273 276

4. How Is Iron Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies

Studied were oral iron salts such as sulfate, fumarate and bisglycinate 104211, ferric citrate 35, liposomal iron 140, fortified foods as well as infusions such as ferric carboxymaltose and iron sucrose 48146. The studies compared in part infusion with oral intake 7581, in part different daily amounts 29 or intake rhythms 73. Often combination preparations with folic acid, zinc or other micronutrients were used, for example in pregnancy 70246 and in children 73.

Preparation or formDoseDurationStudy
multiple micronutrient powder (MNP) with 6 mg iron and 10 mg zincdaily 6 mg iron, 10 mg zinc, 13 other micronutrients9 months67
Daily multiple micronutrient powder with 6 mg iron and 10 mg zinc6 mg iron dailyabout 36 weeks68
Daily zinc tablet, micronutrient powder with zinc and iron, therapeutic zinc, placeboPowder: 10 mg zinc, 6 mg iron dailyabout 9 months69
MMN, MQ-LNS or IFA (iron supplements)MMN 30 mg iron; MQ-LNS 30 mg iron; IFA 60 mg ironPregnancy, second and third trimesters70
Daily iron syrup (12.5 mg iron) or multiple micronutrient powders with 12.5 mg iron12.5 mg iron daily3 months intervention, follow-up at 12 months71
Ferric carboxymaltose vs placebo—6 months follow-up72
Micronutrient powder with zinc and iron or zinc tabletsIron 10 mg or 6 mg daily or every other day24 weeks73
intravenous iron infusionhigh-dose versus low-dose regimen—74
Intravenous iron sucrose vs. oral iron (100 mg elemental iron twice daily)Iron sucrose by formula based on bodyweight and Hb deficit; oral 100 mg twice dailyfollow-up to 6 weeks post-randomisation75
Supplement with myo-inositol, probiotics, micronutrients (incl. iron) vs. standard—up to 12 months76
Weekly iron and folic acid (IFA) or multiple micronutrients (MM) vs. folic acid alone—Weekly before conception, daily IFA during pregnancy77
Iron and folic acid (IFA) vs. multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS)—IFA 90 days; MMS 180 days78
Iron isomaltoside 1000 (ferric derisomaltose) vs. iron sucrose1000 mg single dose vs. 200 mg up to five timeseight weeks follow-up79
Daily iron supplementation (60 mg)60 mg iron dailyfrom first trimester to delivery80
Single i.v. dose ferric carboxymaltose vs. oral ferrous sulphate 200 mg (65 mg elemental iron)20 mg/kg i.v. up to max 1000 mg once; oral one tablet twice dailyOral until 6 weeks postpartum; i.v. single dose81

5. Is Iron Safe? Side Effects in Studies

Several meta-analyses found no more serious adverse events with iron infusions than with control 121316; in restless legs syndrome, milder adverse events occurred more often with iron than with placebo 50. Hypersensitivity reactions occurred more often with ferric carboxymaltose than with iron sucrose 17; with oral iron, dark stool was common 81. Details are shown in the table.

StudyReported side effects
2 Hou et al. 2026Colestilan, tenapanor and PA21 posed higher risk of gastrointestinal discomfort
8 Du et al. 2026Long-term safety unclear, further trials needed
9 Tolkien et al. 2015gastrointestinal side-effects significantly increased
10 Mejía-Zambrano et al. 2024Fewer adverse events with iron (OR 0.78; 95%CI 0.67-0.91)
12 Mhanna et al. 2024adverse events remained stable
13 Wang et al. 2024no additional risk of treatment-related complications (P = 0.93)
16 Padda et al. 2024No significant difference in serious adverse events (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.49-1.10; p = 0.13)
17 Tanrıverdi et al. 2025More hypersensitivity reactions with ferric carboxymaltose; severe adverse events and hypophosphatemia not significantly different
18 Xue et al. 2026No significant differences in adverse events; hypersensitivity and hypophosphatemia assessed
19 Chen et al. 2025all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs)
20 Caljé et al. 2024Total adverse events reduced with IV-iron vs. oral iron (RR 0.63)
21 Elías et al. 2026No serious events; mainly mild gastrointestinal symptoms

6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence

  • Whether iron infusions prevent repeat hospital admissions in acute heart failure is open 24.
  • Which iron compound, daily amount and which intake rhythm are most favourable in sleep disorders and restless legs remains open 5053248.
  • Whether the hepcidin value predicts the response is open: in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases it succeeded 240, in chronic kidney disease it did not 93.
  • Combination preparations with folic acid, zinc or several micronutrients make it difficult to attribute individual effects 4.

7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Iron

Iron is a trace element that the body needs for haemoglobin, myoglobin and numerous enzymes and stores as ferritin. The benefit is best documented in iron deficiency and anaemia: iron infusions raised haemoglobin and ferritin more than placebo or oral iron and reduced the need for transfusion around operations 518222732. Oral iron reduced iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy compared with placebo or no administration 2864162. In restless legs syndrome, iron improved the symptoms more than placebo 5053, after childbirth iron infusions alleviated fatigue more than oral iron 20.

In heart failure with iron deficiency, iron infusions reduced hospital admissions due to heart failure and lengthened the walking distance; for cardiovascular death the results were inconsistent 67121525. Iron in pregnancy had predominantly no influence on birth weight 486496. The strength of evidence ranges from high to low depending on the area; form, dose and intake rhythm differed between the studies, and individual studies were manufacturer-funded 190.

Frequently Asked Questions

How well has Iron been studied in humans?

We evaluated 280 human studies on Iron, including 198 randomised controlled trials and 66 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 70,680 participants in total. As of 3 October 2026.

Does Iron help with iron deficiency and anaemia? What the studies show

We evaluated 40 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 163 controlled studies and 15 further studies; the controlled studies include 49,713 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 1235

Does Iron help with fatigue and physical performance? What the studies show

We evaluated 12 meta-analyses or systematic reviews and 24 controlled studies; the controlled studies include 5,186 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 561012

Does Iron help with heart failure? What the studies show

We evaluated 18 meta-analyses or systematic reviews and 15 controlled studies; the controlled studies include 10,421 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mixed. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 5678

Does Iron help with infants and children? What the studies show

We evaluated 4 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 16 controlled studies and 3 further studies; the controlled studies include 14,516 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly no difference. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 28434861

Does Iron help with sleep and restless legs? What the studies show

We evaluated 3 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 2 controlled studies and one further study; the controlled studies include 176 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 30505153

Does Iron help with concentration and cognitive development? What the studies show

We evaluated one meta-analysis or systematic review, 17 controlled studies and 2 further studies; the controlled studies include 7,673 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mixed. Strength of evidence under our published rules: moderate. Sources: 4437177

What is iron and what does the body need it for?

Iron is a trace element that is needed above all for the red blood pigment haemoglobin, which transports oxygen. It is also contained in the muscle pigment myoglobin and in many enzymes. Iron is stored as ferritin, whose blood value serves as a measure of the iron reserves.

Which forms of iron were studied in the studies?

Studied were oral iron salts, liposomal iron and infusions such as ferric carboxymaltose and iron sucrose; several studies compared infusion and oral intake directly 224881.

Do human studies show a benefit in anaemia?

In iron deficiency and anaemia, haemoglobin rose more with iron infusions in several controlled studies than with placebo or oral iron 518202224. Oral iron reduced iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy compared with placebo or no administration 2864162. Iron infusions also reduced the need for transfusion around operations and during chemotherapy 182732383940.

How do the studies report side effects?

Several meta-analyses found no more serious adverse events with iron infusions than with control 121316. Details are shown in the table.

Which questions are still open?

On fatigue and performance in healthy people without iron deficiency, the evaluated studies allow no statement; studied were people with heart failure or anaemia 520. Whether iron infusions prevent repeat hospital admissions in acute heart failure is open 24. It remains open which iron compound, daily amount and which intake rhythm are most favourable in sleep disorders and restless legs 5053248. Whether the hepcidin value predicts the response is open: in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases it succeeded 240, in chronic kidney disease it did not 93.

Sources

  1. 1
    van Lieshout TS, Klerks AK, Mahic O, Vernooij RWM, Eisenga MF, van Jaarsveld BC et al. · 2024
  2. 2
    Hou W, Xie P, Fu Y, Wang C, Wang K, Sun Y et al. · 2026
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
    Caljé E, Groom KM, Dixon L, Marriott J, Foon R, Oyston C et al. · 2024
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
    Graham FJ, Pellicori P, Kalra PR, Ford I, Bruzzese D, Cleland JGF · 2023
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
    Khatib MN, Sinha AP, Gaidhane S, Upadhyay S, Waghmare N, Anil A et al. · 2024
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
    Kamath S, Parveen RS, Hegde S, Mathias EG, Nayak V, Boloor A · 2024
  47. 47
  48. 48
  49. 49
  50. 50
  51. 51
    González-Parejo P, Martín-Núñez J, Cabrera-Martos I, Valenza MC · 2024
  52. 52
  53. 53
  54. 54
  55. 55
  56. 56
  57. 57
  58. 58
  59. 59
  60. 60
  61. 61
  62. 62
  63. 63
    Levy AT, Weingarten SJ, Robinson K, Suner T, McLaren RA, Saad A et al. · 2025
  64. 64
  65. 65
  66. 66
    Chertow GM, Block GA, Neylan JF, Pergola PE, Uhlig K, Fishbane S · 2017
  67. 67
  68. 68
  69. 69
  70. 70
  71. 71
    Larson LM, Feuerriegel D, Hasan MI, Braat S, Jin J, Tipu SMU et al. · 2023
  72. 72
    Lewis GD, Giczewska A, Mentz RJ, Butler J, Ezekowitz JA, De Pasquale C et al. · 2025
  73. 73
  74. 74
  75. 75
  76. 76
  77. 77
  78. 78
  79. 79
  80. 80
  81. 81
  82. 82
  83. 83
  84. 84
  85. 85
  86. 86
  87. 87
  88. 88
    Karregat JHM, Meulenbeld A, Quee FA, Novotny VMJ, de Haas M, Swinkels D et al. · 2025
  89. 89
  90. 90
  91. 91
  92. 92
    Nti H, Hastings PD, Adu-Afarwuah S, Adjetey E, Amponsah B, Arnold CD et al. · 2026
  93. 93
    Gaillard CA, Bock AH, Carrera F, Eckardt KU, Van Wyck DB, Bansal SS et al. · 2016
  94. 94
    Wasim T, Bushra N, Nasrin T, Humayun S, Tajammul A, Khawaja KI et al. · 2026
  95. 95
  96. 96
    Pasricha SR, Moya E, Ataíde R, Mzembe G, Harding R, Mwangi MN et al. · 2025
  97. 97
  98. 98
  99. 99
  100. 100
  101. 101
    Bauler S, George CM, Leontsini E, Mandlate M, Gittelsohn J, Perin J et al. · 2026
  102. 102
  103. 103
  104. 104
  105. 105
  106. 106
  107. 107
  108. 108
  109. 109
  110. 110
  111. 111
  112. 112
  113. 113
  114. 114
  115. 115
  116. 116
  117. 117
  118. 118
  119. 119
  120. 120
    Bencaiova G, von Mandach U, Zimmermann R · 2009
  121. 121
  122. 122
  123. 123
  124. 124
    Ayete Labi FB, Midrigan-Ciochina L, Prado EL, Adu-Afarwuah S, Dewey KG, Arnold CD et al. · 2025
  125. 125
    Iglesias-Vázquez L, Canals J, Hernández-Martínez C, Voltas N, Arija V · 2024
  126. 126
  127. 127
    Svensson LK, Chmielewski G, Domellöf M, Konarska Z, Pieścik-Lech M, Späth C et al. · 2026
  128. 128
  129. 129
  130. 130
    Block GA, Block MS, Smits G, Mehta R, Isakova T, Wolf M et al. · 2019
  131. 131
  132. 132
  133. 133
  134. 134
    Svensson L, Chmielewski G, Czyzewska E, Domellöf M, Konarska Z, Piescik-Lech M et al. · 2024
  135. 135
    Susantitaphong P, Siribumrungwong M, Takkavatakarn K, Chongthanakorn K, Lieusuwan S, Katavetin P et al. · 2020
  136. 136
  137. 137
    Houry M, Tohme J, Sleilaty G, Jabbour K, Bou Gebrael W, Jebara V et al. · 2023
  138. 138
  139. 139
  140. 140
  141. 141
  142. 142
    Divyaveer S, Kekan K, Kashyap M, Kaur M, Prajapati K, Premkumar M et al. · 2026
  143. 143
  144. 144
  145. 145
  146. 146
    van Veldhuisen DJ, Ponikowski P, van der Meer P, Metra M, Böhm M, Doletsky A et al. · 2017
  147. 147
  148. 148
  149. 149
  150. 150
    Gibbons JA, Nelson RM, Dabrowski CN, Narkhede A, Szalacha LA, Kneusel ML et al. · 2026
  151. 151
    Chang A, Rugivarodom M, Pungpipattrakul N, Akarapatima K, Suwanno K, Rattanasupar A et al. · 2023
  152. 152
  153. 153
    von Siebenthal HK, Gessler S, Vallelian F, Steinwendner J, Kuenzi UM, Moretti D et al. · 2023
  154. 154
  155. 155
  156. 156
  157. 157
    Khalafallah AA, Dennis AE, Ogden K, Robertson I, Charlton RH, Bellette JM et al. · 2012
  158. 158
  159. 159
  160. 160
    Chávez-Iñiguez JS, Ibarra-Estrada M, Carmona-Morales EJ, Ron-Magaña A, Claure-Del Granado R, Velez JC et al. · 2026
  161. 161
  162. 162
  163. 163
    Keeler BD, Simpson JA, Ng O, Padmanabhan H, Brookes MJ, Acheson AG et al. · 2017
  164. 164
  165. 165
  166. 166
  167. 167
  168. 168
  169. 169
  170. 170
  171. 171
  172. 172
  173. 173
  174. 174
  175. 175
  176. 176
  177. 177
  178. 178
    Effects of 12-Week Multivitamin Supplementation on Serum Folate Levels in Pre-Menopausal Females
    Osburn S, Roberson P, Medler J, Shake J, Arnold R, Alamdari N et al. · 2020
  179. 179
  180. 180
    Al RA, Unlubilgin E, Kandemir O, Yalvac S, Cakir L, Haberal A · 2005
  181. 181
  182. 182
  183. 183
  184. 184
  185. 185
  186. 186
  187. 187
    Sood V, Kamboj K, Bhatia P, Sharma V, Kundu M, Ghosh A et al. · 2023
  188. 188
    El Amrousy D, El-Afify D, Elsawy A, Elsheikh M, Donia A, Nassar M · 2022
  189. 189
  190. 190
    Kiviniemi TO, Anttila V, Pälve K, Vesanen M, Lehto J, Malmberg M et al. · 2024
  191. 191
    Guetterman HM, Rajagopalan K, Fox AM, Johnson CB, Fothergill A, George N et al. · 2025
  192. 192
  193. 193
  194. 194
  195. 195
    Comparative Study between Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose versus Iron Sucrose in the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Postpartum Patients
    Hossain S, Siddiqui H, Munira S · 2026
  196. 196
  197. 197
  198. 198
  199. 199
  200. 200
  201. 201
  202. 202
  203. 203
  204. 204
  205. 205
    Tsilika M, Mitrou J, Antonakos N, Tseti IK, Damoraki G, Leventogiannis K et al. · 2023
  206. 206
  207. 207
  208. 208
  209. 209
  210. 210
  211. 211
    Suryani LD, Raharjo SB, Sagita R, Angkasa H, Prasetyadi YL, Suyatna FD et al. · 2022
  212. 212
  213. 213
    Pongpitakdamrong A, Chirdkiatgumchai V, Ruangdaraganon N, Roongpraiwan R, Sirachainan N, Soongprasit M et al. · 2022
  214. 214
    The Effect of Combined Iron and Methylphenidate Use in Iron Deficient Attention deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Children of Bangladesh
    Saha D, Sarkar UK, Parvin J, Mistry B, Khan HA, Begum SA et al. · 2026
  215. 215
    Goitre I, Ponzo V, Ferrocino I, Franciosa I, Valla A, Lucatello BG et al. · 2026
  216. 216
  217. 217
  218. 218
    Mollar A, García-Conejo C, Revuelta-López E, Cardells I, López R, Del Canto I et al. · 2026
  219. 219
  220. 220
    Jain G, Palaria U, Jha SK · 2013
  221. 221
  222. 222
  223. 223
  224. 224
  225. 225
  226. 226
  227. 227
    Garbowski MW, Bansal S, Porter JB, Mori C, Burckhardt S, Hider RC · 2021
  228. 228
    Reiser AE, Thiersch M, Gassmann M, Schneider SR, Mayer L, Saxer S et al. · 2026
  229. 229
  230. 230
  231. 231
    Secrest AH, Norgan Radler C, Kelly J, Keratsopoulos N, Faterkowski A, Kolodziejczyk K et al. · 2025
  232. 232
    Miliotis PG, Ntalapera SD, Lakeas P, Loukas I, Toubekis AG, Geladas ND et al. · 2026
  233. 233
  234. 234
  235. 235
  236. 236
  237. 237
  238. 238
  239. 239
  240. 240
  241. 241
    Ortiz-Gutiérrez S, Serralde-Zúñiga AE, González-Salazar LE, Estrada-Trujillo MG, Flores-Lopéz A, Hernández-Gómez KG et al. · 2026
  242. 242
  243. 243
  244. 244
  245. 245
  246. 246
  247. 247
  248. 248
  249. 249
  250. 250
  251. 251
  252. 252
  253. 253
  254. 254
  255. 255
  256. 256
  257. 257
  258. 258
    Howard LSGE, He J, Watson GMJ, Huang L, Wharton J, Luo Q et al. · 2021
  259. 259
  260. 260
    Wolf M, Chertow GM, Macdougall IC, Kaper R, Krop J, Strauss W · 2018
  261. 261
    Adkinson NF, Strauss WE, Macdougall IC, Bernard KE, Auerbach M, Kaper RF et al. · 2018
  262. 262
  263. 263
  264. 264
  265. 265
  266. 266
    Bäckström F, Chmielewska A, Domellöf M, Berglund SK · 2023
  267. 267
  268. 268
    Bone JN, Bellad M, Goudar S, Mallapur A, Charantimath U, Ramadurg U et al. · 2022
  269. 269
  270. 270
  271. 271
  272. 272
  273. 273
    Crist BL, Alekel DL, Ritland LM, Hanson LN, Genschel U, Reddy MB · 2009
  274. 274
  275. 275
  276. 276
  277. 277
  278. 278
  279. 279
  280. 280

Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.

International Health Research · https://ih-research.com/en/knowledge/iron/ · Last updated: 2026-10-15