Knowledge · Natural Compounds

Dietary Fibre and Psyllium

Fibre and psyllium husks change the gut microbiome, blood lipids and blood sugar; weight and digestion improve only in part.

Last updated:

We evaluated 234 human studies on Dietary Fibre and Psyllium, including 186 randomised controlled trials and 42 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 14,547 participants in total. As of 4 October 2026.

This page as PDF · Summary

1. What Is Dietary Fibre and Psyllium? Occurrence, Origin and Forms

Dietary fibre is the part of plant foods that the human digestive tract does not break down. Psyllium husk is the outer layer of the seeds of Plantago ovata, a species in the plantain family; it swells strongly in water and forms a gel-like mass. Both are commonly used to support digestion and are added to foods.

Psyllium husk occurs in the seeds of Plantago ovata and is the swelling part of those seeds. Dietary fibre occurs in all plant foods, particularly in whole grains, legumes, vegetables, fruit, nuts and seeds.

The husks are obtained by separating the seeds of Plantago ovata from their coat and then milling the husks; the husks can also be used whole. Studies examine whole and milled husks, granules, powders stirred into liquid and foods fortified with them; for dietary fibre generally, isolated fibre powders and fibre-rich foods are also examined.

Forms and Preparations Studied

  • Psyllium husk, whole or milled
  • Whole psyllium seed with its coat
  • Psyllium granules and powders stirred into liquid
  • Foods and beverages fortified with psyllium husk
  • Fibre-rich plant foods such as whole grains, legumes, vegetables and fruit
  • Isolated fibre powders such as inulin or resistant starch

Not covered on this page:

  • Probiotics, that is living microorganisms; they are not dietary fibre.
  • Digestive enzymes such as lactase; they are proteins and not dietary fibre.
  • Synthetic bulking and laxative agents; they do not come from plant foods.

2. What Does Dietary Fibre and Psyllium Do? Results by Area

AreaResult in controlled studiesStrength of evidenceStudiesParticipants
Gut Microbiomemostly improvedhigh3 meta-analyses · 66 controlled · 2 other5,196
Blood Lipids and Cholesterolmostly improvedhigh10 meta-analyses · 46 controlled · 3 other4,100
Blood Glucose and Insulinmostly improvedhigh5 meta-analyses · 50 controlled · 8 other4,069
Satiety and Body Weightmixedhigh8 meta-analyses · 41 controlled · 3 other2,128
Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Digestive Complaintsmixedhigh1 meta-analyses · 40 controlled · 5 other2,970
Bowel Function and Stool Habitsmixedhigh1 meta-analyses · 32 controlled · 5 other2,356
Tolerance and Adverse Effectsmixedlow0 meta-analyses · 13 controlled · 19 other1,417
Other investigationsmixedhigh10 meta-analyses · 99 controlled · 11 other8,161

How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.

3. What the Studies Show in Detail

Dietary Fibre and Psyllium and Gut Microbiome: Human Studies

Several controlled studies showed that fibre changes the gut microbiome. The frequency of individual bacterial groups shifted, for example towards more bifidobacteria, Parabacteroides, Lachnospira or Faecalibacterium 6983100112. Short-chain fatty acids increased with resistant starch, short-chain fructo-oligosaccharides and inulin 100108210; other studies found more bacteria that form such fatty acids 76105200. Microbial functions and metabolic products in the stool also changed 133139197204217. The composition of the gut flora also changed with inulin-type fructans and resistant starch 147204. This contrasts with results showing no difference: almonds changed neither the gut flora nor short-chain fatty acids in adults with anxiety or depressive symptoms 87. The findings come predominantly from isolated fibre powders such as inulin, resistant starch and fructo-oligosaccharides, as well as from fibre-rich foods such as oat bran. There are few microbiome studies on psyllium husk itself: in women with constipation, it changed the gut flora compared with placebo 230, but not in children with irritable bowel syndrome 77. The strength of evidence is high, but the studies are mostly small and short. Mixed preparations with probiotics or other additives do not allow conclusions about the individual fibre 202745.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
20 Chalif et al. 2026systematic review · 663 participantsProbiotic, prebiotic, or dietary fiber supplementation (heterogeneous formulations); vs. Control/placebo in included RCTsGut permeability and microbial composition: unclear
27 Wang et al. 2026systematic review · 320 participantssynbiotics and low-protein high-fiber diet; vs. pooled analysis of 3 cross-sectional and 1 RCT studySCFA-producing bacteria in CKD: worsened (P < 0.001)
31 Xi et al. 2025meta-analysis · 187 participantsDietary fiber supplements (form not reported); vs. Control without fiber supplementationFecal bifidobacteria concentration: improved (SMD = 5.142, 95% CI [3.716, 6.568], p = 0.000)
40 Ribeiro et al. 2024systematic reviewvarious prebiotics, mostly inulin-type fructans; 1 to 36 weeks; vs. randomized controlled trialsBifidobacterium genus in gut microbiome: improved
41 Ojo et al. 2021meta-analysisDietary fibre, form not specified; vs. Control groupRelative abundance of Bifidobacterium: improved (0.73 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.89))
43 Song et al. 2025randomised controlled · 802 participantsdietary fiber intervention, form not specified; 6 months; vs. usual care with patient education and dietary recommendationsmicrobiome-based clinical decision score (LightGBM): unclear
45 Zhang et al. 2025randomised controlled · 478 participantsProbiotic and dietary fibre fermented milk (PFM); From first trimester until OGTT; vs. Intensive dietary and lifestyle (IDL) and standard care (SC)Acidovorax abundance negatively associated with OGTT 0h glucose: unclear (p < 0.05)
56 Lai et al. 2023randomised controlled · 250 participantsA polydextrose; B psyllium husk; C wheat bran+psyllium husk; D probiotics; placebo maltodextrin; 4 weeks; vs. placebo (maltodextrin), double-blinded randomizedBifidobacterium abundance, group A vs placebo: improved (higher Bifidobacterium abundance than placebo at week 2 and 4); Anaerostipes trend, groups B and C: improved (increasing trends in groups B and C, associated with BMF increase)

Further studies in this area: 57 62 63 65 66 67 69 72 76 77 82 83 85 87 88 96 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 108 110 112 121 124 125 126 129 133 137 138 139 140 147 148 152 156 157 158 160 167 173 174 178 179 186 187 192 193 197 200 204 206 208 209 210 213 217 229 230

Dietary Fibre and Psyllium, Blood Lipids and Cholesterol: Human Studies

For blood lipids and cholesterol, several controlled studies and meta-analyses showed improvements: in several studies psyllium husks lowered LDL cholesterol 7234253151. In a meta-analysis, oats and isolated beta-glucan lowered total and LDL cholesterol 11. In a meta-analysis, inulin-type fructans lowered LDL cholesterol and triglycerides 6, as did low-dose arabinoxylan with regular intake 206, and alpha-cyclodextrin reduced small LDL particles 98. A meta-analysis on fibre supplements, a study with a beta-glucan tablet and one with psyllium husks found no difference in LDL cholesterol 1855144. Triglycerides remained unchanged with psyllium husks in several studies 753151, HDL cholesterol remained the same 753 or fell slightly 151; sago starch changed no blood lipid value in type 2 diabetes 78. The findings are based on 46 controlled studies and 10 meta-analyses with around 4100 participants, predominantly on psyllium husks and oat beta-glucan; mixed preparations with further additives do not allow any statement about the individual fibre, and much remains open regarding dose, duration and long-term benefit.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
5 Juhász et al. 2023meta-analysis · 2,685 participantsSoluble dietary fibers, including galactomannans and psyllium; vs. Another fiber type or no fiberTriglycerides: improved (SUCRA: 82.77%); LDL cholesterol: improved (SUCRA: 86.56%); Cholesterol: improved (SUCRA: 84.59%)
6 Talukdar et al. 2024meta-analysis · 2,518 participantsInulin-type fructans (ITF) supplementation; at least 2 weeks; vs. placebo, control, foods, or dietsLDL cholesterol: improved (MD -0.14 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.24, -0.05); triglycerides: improved (MD -0.06 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.12, -0.01); other cardiovascular disease risk factors: no difference (little to no significant effect)
7 Gholami et al. 2025meta-analysis · 2,049 participantsPsyllium supplementation; dose-response analysis, exact amounts not reported; duration-response analysis, exact duration not reported; vs. control groups of included RCTstotal cholesterol: improved (Weighted Mean Differences: -9.05; 95% Confidence Intervals: -13.71, -4.40; p-value < 0.05); LDL cholesterol: improved (Weighted Mean Differences: -8.55; 95% Confidence Intervals: -12.92, -4.19; p < 0.001); triglycerides: no difference (Weighted Mean Differences: -5.29; 95% Confidence Intervals: -12.14, 1.54; p-value > 0.05)
8 Xiang et al. 2025meta-analysis · 1,804 participantsDietary fiber supplementation of different specificities; 1.5 to 40 g/day; 3 to 16 weeks; vs. Placebo, without energy restrictionLDL cholesterol (intermediate specificity): worsened (9.03-mg/dL increase in LDL cholesterol)
10 Hartley et al. 2016systematic review · 1,513 participantsDietary fibre from various sources, supplements or fibre-rich foods; mostly ≤ 12 weeks; vs. no intervention or minimal interventionTotal cholesterol: improved (mean difference -0.23 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.06); LDL cholesterol: improved (mean difference -0.14 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.22 to -0.06); Triglycerides: no difference (mean difference 0.00 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.05)
11 de et al. 2023meta-analysis · 1,494 participantsOats or isolated beta-glucan; at least two weeks; vs. placebo or control groupTotal cholesterol (oats): improved (-0.61, 95%CI: -0.84;-0.39, p < 0.00001); Total cholesterol (oats, second analysis): improved (-0.70, 95%CI: -1.07;-0.34, p = 0.0002); LDL cholesterol (oats): improved (-0.51, 95%CI: -0.71;-0.31, p < 0.00001)
14 Jiang et al. 2025meta-analysis · 1,140 participantsIntrinsic arabinoxylan-rich foods or isolated arabinoxylans/AXOS; vs. Control in randomized controlled trialsTotal cholesterol (isolated AXOS): improved (MD: -0.14; 95 % CI: -0.27, -0.01; p = 0.03)
18 Ranneh et al. 2026meta-analysis · 773 participantsDietary fibre supplementation, form not specified; vs. Control group without fibre supplementationHDL: no difference; LDL: no difference

Further studies in this area: 21 23 34 41 42 43 49 50 53 55 70 73 78 79 80 84 90 91 98 107 112 114 116 118 119 120 127 131 132 135 136 142 143 144 150 151 155 163 164 170 174 181 182 185 201 206 215 221 222 225 226

Dietary Fibre and Psyllium, Blood Glucose and Insulin: Human Studies

In meta-analyses, psyllium husks lowered fasting blood sugar and HbA1c more than the control 1623, in one of them also insulin resistance 16. In meta-analyses, isolated fibre supplements in overweight lowered fasting insulin and insulin resistance more than the control 812, in a subgroup also HbA1c 8. In healthy people, alpha-cyclodextrin slightly lowered fasting blood sugar and insulin resistance compared with placebo 98. In healthy people, oat products dampened the rise in blood sugar after a meal more than white rice 203; a fibre-rich cereal supplement in type 2 diabetes with fatty liver lowered HbA1c and fasting blood sugar more than the control 211. In type 2 diabetes, biscuits with psyllium husks lowered HbA1c and fasting blood sugar more than placebo biscuits 131, psyllium husks added to a moderately carbohydrate-containing diet lowered fasting insulin 162. A meta-analysis on psyllium husks 16 and a study with sago starch in type 2 diabetes, which also did not lower blood sugar and HbA1c, found no difference in fasting insulin 78. In overweight pregnant women, a fibre powder lowered the frequency of gestational diabetes compared with the control 84, in a second study it did not 83. The robustness is high, but the results apply in each case to the form and preparation studied — whole or ground husks, granules, stirred powder or enriched foods — and cannot be transferred between isolated powders and fibre-rich foods. Mixed preparations of several fibre types do not allow any statement about the individual substance 2129.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
2 Colak et al. 2025meta-analysis · 3,420 participantsDietary fiber supplementation as single isolated fibers, fiber mixtures, or fiber-rich whole foods; 1 to 12 months; vs. PlaceboFasting glucose: improved (-0.07 mmol/L (95 % CI: -0.12, -0.02; P = 0.0005; I2 = 54 %)); Fasting insulin: improved (-5.89 pmol/L (95 % CI -9.18, -2.60, P = 0.0004; I2 = 89 %)); HOMA-IR: improved (-0.38 (95 % CI: -0.68, -0.08; P < 0.00001; I2 = 94 %))
4 Oliveira et al. 2025systematic review · 2,935 participantsMediterranean diet high in fiber, MUFA and phenolics; at least 4 weeks; vs. usual diet or controlserum advanced glycation end product (AGE) concentrations: improved; skin autofluorescence levels: improved; gene expression of RAGE, AGER1 and glyoxalase I: improved
5 Juhász et al. 2023meta-analysis · 2,685 participantsSoluble dietary fibers, including galactomannans and psyllium; vs. Another fiber type or no fiberHbA1c: improved (SUCRA: 92.33%); Fasting blood glucose: improved (SUCRA: 85.92%); Fasting insulin: improved (SUCRA: 73.45%)
8 Xiang et al. 2025meta-analysis · 1,804 participantsDietary fiber supplementation of different specificities; 1.5 to 40 g/day; 3 to 16 weeks; vs. Placebo, without energy restrictionHbA1c: improved (reduced glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by 0.13%); Fasting insulin: improved (fasting insulin by 0.82 μIU/mL); HOMA-IR: improved (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) by 0.33)
12 Huwiler et al. 2022meta-analysis · 1,428 participantsIsolated soluble dietary fibre supplements; at least 12 weeks; vs. Control groupFasting blood insulin: improved; HOMA-IR: improved
14 Jiang et al. 2025meta-analysis · 1,140 participantsIntrinsic arabinoxylan-rich foods or isolated arabinoxylans/AXOS; vs. Control in randomized controlled trialsFasting blood glucose: improved (SMD: -0.44; 95 % CI: -0.75, -0.13; p = 0.005); Fasting blood glucose in overweight/obesity: improved (SMD: -0.25; 95 % CI: -0.48, -0.03; p = 0.03); Fasting blood glucose (isolated AXOS): improved (SMD: -0.19; 95 % CI: -0.36, -0.02; p = 0.03)
16 Gholami et al. 2024meta-analysis · 962 participantsPsyllium; Subgroups: less and more than 10 g/day; Subgroups: less than 50 days and longer; vs. PlaceboFasting blood sugar: improved (WMD: -6.89; 95% CI: -10.62, -3.16; p < .001); HbA1c: improved (WMD: -0.75; 95% CI: -1.21, -0.29; p < .001); HOMA IR: improved (WMD: -1.17; 95% CI: -2.11, -0.23; p < .05)
21 Hebbar et al. 2026systematic review · 641 participantsDietary fiber of various types and sources (whole grains, legumes, flaxseed, composite flour); 5-50 g/day; 1 to 6 months; vs. randomized controlled trials, control groups not further describedInsulin resistance (HOMA-IR and related indices): improved (significantly improved); Fasting glucose: improved (notable improvements); HbA1c: improved (notable improvements)

Further studies in this area: 23 28 29 32 33 43 45 49 62 67 68 73 78 79 83 84 85 91 94 98 105 108 112 113 114 116 119 123 127 131 135 137 142 150 159 162 165 167 172 175 181 185 189 190 194 196 198 199 201 202 203 205 211 214 215

Dietary Fibre and Psyllium, Satiety and Body Weight: Human Studies

For satiety and body weight, a mixed picture emerges. Several meta-analyses found an improvement in body weight and BMI from isolated soluble fibre powders, including inulin-type fructans from chicory root 681213. Psyllium husk also improved weight, BMI and waist circumference in a meta-analysis 26. A meta-analysis with chicory inulin-type fructans found an improvement in body composition 13, a randomised controlled trial with short-chain fructo-oligosaccharides did likewise 108, and one randomised controlled trial each with konjac glucomannan and with oligofructose-enriched inulin found a more favourable fat distribution 155209. These stand in contrast to findings with no difference: meta-analyses on psyllium husk in diabetes and on quinoa found no difference in weight and BMI 2328, and short-chain fructo-oligosaccharides none in body weight 108. The strength of evidence is high, but the results apply only to the form and preparation studied in each case; isolated powders, psyllium husk and enriched foods are not interchangeable. Mixed preparations of several fibres or with probiotics do not allow any statement about the individual substance 2174.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
6 Talukdar et al. 2024meta-analysis · 2,518 participantsInulin-type fructans (ITF) supplementation; at least 2 weeks; vs. placebo, control, foods, or dietsbody weight: improved (MD -0.97 kg, 95% CI: -1.28, -0.66)
8 Xiang et al. 2025meta-analysis · 1,804 participantsDietary fiber supplementation of different specificities; 1.5 to 40 g/day; 3 to 16 weeks; vs. Placebo, without energy restrictionBody weight (intermediate specificity): improved (2.85-kg decrease in body weight)
12 Huwiler et al. 2022meta-analysis · 1,428 participantsIsolated soluble dietary fibre supplements; at least 12 weeks; vs. Control groupBody weight: improved (MD -1.25 kg, 95% CI -2.24, -0.25); BMI: improved; Waist circumference: improved
13 Reimer et al. 2024meta-analysis · 1,184 participantsChicory inulin-type fructans (ITF); Subgroup analysis for >8 weeks; vs. PlaceboBody weight: improved (MD: -0.97 kg; 95% CI: -1.34, -0.59); Body mass index: improved (MD: -0.39 kg/m2; 95% CI: -0.57, -0.20); Fat mass: improved (MD: -0.37 kg; 95% CI: -0.61, -0.13)
15 de et al. 2026systematic review · 1,085 participantsDietary fibers categorized by structure (dextrins, β-glucans, mannans, others); mostly acute interventions (71%); vs. control groups of included RCTssatiety when GLP-1 increased: no difference (OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 0.87-9.98); satiety with dextrins: improved (5 positive studies); satiety with β-glucans: improved
21 Hebbar et al. 2026systematic review · 641 participantsDietary fiber of various types and sources (whole grains, legumes, flaxseed, composite flour); 5-50 g/day; 1 to 6 months; vs. randomized controlled trials, control groups not further describedBody weight: improved (notable improvements)
23 Xiao et al. 2020meta-analysis · 395 participantsPsyllium; vs. Control (placebo/usual care)Weight: no difference; Body mass index: no difference
26 Gibb et al. 2023meta-analysis · 354 participantsPsyllium (psyllium husk), gel-forming fiber; mean dose 10.8 g/day, just before meals; mean duration 4.8 months; vs. control groups of included randomized trialsbody weight: improved (MD = -2.1 kg [95% CI: -2.6 to -1.6]; p < .001); body mass index: improved (MD = -0.8 kg/m 2 [95% CI: -1.0 to -0.6]; p < .001); waist circumference: improved (MD = -2.2 cm [95% CI: -2.9 to -1.4]; p < .001)

Further studies in this area: 28 29 41 45 65 74 78 83 84 90 94 108 112 114 118 126 131 132 137 142 150 155 159 162 163 167 171 172 174 181 189 190 194 195 199 202 205 206 209 211 213 214 221 228

Dietary Fibre and Psyllium, Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Digestive Complaints: Human Studies

Psyllium husk reduced the severity of irritable bowel syndrome more than placebo, in adults in general practices 54 as well as in children 219; in children the number of pain episodes also fell 77. In children with functional abdominal pain, psyllium husk relieved the pain and improved quality of life more than placebo 75; in adults with irritable bowel syndrome, quality of life did not differ from placebo 54. In chronic constipation, bloating improved with kiwis, but not with psyllium husk 95; inulin relieved abdominal complaints in functional constipation more than placebo 160. A randomised controlled trial with psyllium husk in addition to a proton pump inhibitor showed better symptom resolution in laryngopharyngeal reflux 44. A meta-analysis on inflammatory bowel diseases reports better remission rates in ulcerative colitis with certain fibres, but no difference for Plantago ovata in maintaining remission 35. The strength of evidence is overall high, but the form matters: in the study from general practices, bran did not reduce severity, and in the bran group the most participants dropped out because of worsened complaints 54. It remains open which preparation and dose work best for which complaints; mixed preparations with probiotics or laxatives do not allow conclusions about individual fibres.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
3 Xu et al. 2025meta-analysis · 3,005 participantsNon-pharmacological interventions incl. dietary fiber; partly >4 weeks; vs. conventional treatmentSymptom score (eight indicators): improved (p < 0.05)
20 Chalif et al. 2026systematic review · 663 participantsProbiotic, prebiotic, or dietary fiber supplementation (heterogeneous formulations); vs. Control/placebo in included RCTsPostoperative bowel recovery and complications: improved
24 Petticrew et al. 1997systematic review · 367 participantslaxatives of bulk, osmotic, stimulant and faecal softener classes, including psyllium; vs. single agent versus placebo and one laxative versus anotherabdominal pain: unclear
35 Limketkai et al. 2025meta-analysisPrebiotics including Plantago ovata, inulin, FOS, lactulose, oat bran; vs. Placebo or lower-dose controlClinical remission in ulcerative colitis (induction): improved (relative risk, 2.75, 95% confidence interval, 1.05-7.20); Clinical remission in ulcerative colitis (induction), OF-IN and lactulose: no difference; Maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis, germinated barley foodstuff: improved (relative risk, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-1.03)
36 Ashoorion et al. 2025systematic reviewMediterranean diet, rich in fibers; vs. high vs. low adherence to Mediterranean dietlikelihood of functional dyspepsia: improved (AR:151 fewer, 95%CI: 74 to 203 fewer in 1,000)
40 Ribeiro et al. 2024systematic reviewvarious prebiotics, mostly inulin-type fructans; 1 to 36 weeks; vs. randomized controlled trialsinflammatory conditions overall: improved
44 Rana et al. 2025randomised controlled · 505 participantspsyllium husk as adjunct to PPI; 16 weeks; vs. PPI monotherapy and PPI plus prokineticssymptom resolution rate: improved (82%); mean RSI reduction: improved (9.70 ± 1.50); mean RFS reduction: improved (5.00 ± 0.95)
47 Peng et al. 2019randomised controlled · 412 participantshigh-fiber DASH diet vs. low-fiber Western diet; 32 g fiber/d (DASH) vs. 11 g/d (control); sodium 50, 100, 150 mmol/d; three 30-day periods with 5-day breaks between; vs. low-fiber Western control diet; three sodium levels in crossoverrisk of bloating on high-fiber DASH diet: worsened (risk ratio = 1.41; 95% confidence interval: 1.22-1.64; P < 0.001); risk of bloating with high sodium intake: worsened (risk ratio = 1.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.52; P = 0.01)

Further studies in this area: 54 71 75 77 87 89 93 95 96 102 103 109 113 114 122 126 128 129 134 140 141 146 148 152 160 166 168 178 179 180 187 191 206 213 216 218 219 224

Dietary Fibre and Psyllium, Bowel Function and Stool Habits: Human Studies

Psyllium husk reduced the number of episodes in faecal incontinence more than placebo 58 and worked similarly to loperamide 93. In type 2 diabetes with chronic constipation, biscuits with psyllium husk relieved the constipation complaints 131, and inulin increased stool frequency in functional constipation more than placebo 160. A meta-analysis in older people with constipation found no difference in stool frequency, but less use of laxatives and enemas 31. In healthy people, fibre-rich foods improved gut-related quality of life 76. It remains open which preparation form and dose work most reliably in which patient group; the studies were partly small and short.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
3 Xu et al. 2025meta-analysis · 3,005 participantsNon-pharmacological interventions incl. dietary fiber; partly >4 weeks; vs. conventional treatmentEfficacy of constipation treatment: improved (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.21, p < 0.00001); Bristol stool scale: improved (SMD = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.14-1.60, p = 0.02); CSBM scale: improved (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI = -0.52-0.12, p = 0.03)
20 Chalif et al. 2026systematic review · 663 participantsProbiotic, prebiotic, or dietary fiber supplementation (heterogeneous formulations); vs. Control/placebo in included RCTsIncidence and severity of radiation-induced diarrhea: improved (P<.05); Stool consistency: improved; Antidiarrheal use: improved (P<.05)
24 Petticrew et al. 1997systematic review · 367 participantslaxatives of bulk, osmotic, stimulant and faecal softener classes, including psyllium; vs. single agent versus placebo and one laxative versus anotherbowel movements per week, symptom improvement, stool consistency: unclear
31 Xi et al. 2025meta-analysis · 187 participantsDietary fiber supplements (form not reported); vs. Control without fiber supplementationStool frequency: no difference (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI [-0.488, 0.988], p = 0.507); Frequency of laxative or enema use: improved (SMD = -1.224, 95% CI [-1.786, -0.662], p = 0.000)
49 Shen et al. 2024randomised controlled · 376 participantsHigh-fiber diet plus daily soluble fiber supplement; until delivery; vs. intervention group vs. control (standard care)need for constipation medication: improved
56 Lai et al. 2023randomised controlled · 250 participantsA polydextrose; B psyllium husk; C wheat bran+psyllium husk; D probiotics; placebo maltodextrin; 4 weeks; vs. placebo (maltodextrin), double-blinded randomizedbowel movement frequency (BMF): no difference (No time-by-group effect was observed for bowel movement frequency (BMF)); Bristol stool scale score (BSS): improved (mean increases of 0.95-1.05 in group A to D (all P < 0.05)); Bristol stool scale score (BSS), placebo: no difference (P = 0.170)
58 Bliss et al. 2014randomised controlled · 189 participantsPsyllium vs. carboxymethylcellulose, gum arabic, placebo; 16 g total fiber/day; 32 days after 14-day baseline; vs. Placebo and other fiber typesFecal incontinence episodes per week: improved (2.5 for Psyllium); Fecal incontinence episodes per week: worsened (6.2 for CMC)
69 Perreau et al. 2026randomised controlled · 124 participantsResistant dextrin (NUTRIOSE® soluble fiber) vs. placebo (maltodextrin); 15 g/day; 4 weeks; vs. Placebo (maltodextrin)Stool consistency and frequency: no difference (p > 0.05)

Further studies in this area: 76 77 81 86 87 89 93 95 106 111 113 122 130 131 134 137 141 146 160 168 179 180 183 216 218 223 227 230 232 233

Dietary Fibre and Psyllium, Tolerance and Adverse Effects: Human Studies

The tolerability of fibres and psyllium husk was examined in 13 controlled studies with a total of 1417 participants, but the results are mixed and the strength of evidence is low. Individual studies reported abdominal distension, bloating and discomfort with psyllium husk 144 or more side effects than with kiwis 95. With beta-glucan tablets, one of three dose groups had gastrointestinal complaints more often than placebo 55, and a fibre-rich DASH diet increased the risk of bloating 47. With mixed preparations of several fibres or with further additives such as probiotics, PPI or colestipol, the effect of the individual substance cannot be derived 335. It remains open how tolerability behaves with longer administration and with different dosages, since many studies were short and small.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
3 Xu et al. 2025meta-analysis · 3,005 participantsNon-pharmacological interventions incl. dietary fiber; partly >4 weeks; vs. conventional treatmentAdverse events (RR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.74, p = 0.006)
10 Hartley et al. 2016systematic review · 1,513 participantsDietary fibre from various sources, supplements or fibre-rich foods; mostly ≤ 12 weeks; vs. no intervention or minimal interventionAdverse events
20 Chalif et al. 2026systematic review · 663 participantsProbiotic, prebiotic, or dietary fiber supplementation (heterogeneous formulations); vs. Control/placebo in included RCTsAdverse events
35 Limketkai et al. 2025meta-analysisPrebiotics including Plantago ovata, inulin, FOS, lactulose, oat bran; vs. Placebo or lower-dose controlAdverse events
44 Rana et al. 2025randomised controlled · 505 participantspsyllium husk as adjunct to PPI; 16 weeks; vs. PPI monotherapy and PPI plus prokineticsadherence rate: improved (85%)
49 Shen et al. 2024randomised controlled · 376 participantsHigh-fiber diet plus daily soluble fiber supplement; until delivery; vs. intervention group vs. control (standard care)safety of long-term soluble fiber supplementation
50 MacMahon et al. 1998randomised controlled · 340 participantsIspaghula husk; 7.0 or 10.5 g/day; 12 weeks treatment, some further 12 weeks; 8-week diet period; vs. Placebo plus dietary advicetolerability (well tolerated)
54 Bijkerk et al. 2009randomised controlled · 275 participants10 g psyllium vs. 10 g bran vs. 10 g placebo (rice flour); 10 g daily; 12 weeks; vs. Placebo (rice flour) and bran (insoluble fibre)Completion of the 3-month treatment period: unclear (Fifty four (64%) of the patients allocated to psyllium, 54 (56%) in the bran group, and 56 (60%) in the placebo group)

Further studies in this area: 55 58 70 73 74 81 87 90 93 95 98 105 107 135 144 157 163 164 182 184 212 214 216 224

Dietary Fibre and Psyllium: Further Outcomes in Studies

Several controlled studies found improvements in inflammatory markers, for instance in IL-6 through psyllium husk in obese adolescents and in hs-CRP through inulin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome 8097. In a controlled study, Parkinson's symptoms improved with resistant starch 100. In chronic kidney disease, resistant starch lowered indoxyl sulfate and blood urea nitrogen in a meta-analysis 25. In a meta-analysis, psyllium husk lowered systolic blood pressure, more so with a higher baseline value 22; resistant starch lowered it slightly in women with metabolic risks, but increased body fat and triglycerides 174. A prebiotic fibre did not change lipopolysaccharide-binding protein overall in healthy young adults, but lowered it in a subgroup with an elevated baseline value 188. In type 2 diabetes with fatty liver, the fibrosis index FIB-4 fell with a fibre-rich cereal supplement 211. Inulin improved quality of life in functional constipation 160 and in rheumatoid arthritis lowered CRP, disease activity and the number of swollen joints more than the control 115. In women with migraine, inulin reduced the severity, duration and frequency of attacks as well as depressive symptoms more than placebo 92. Other studies with psyllium husk found no difference from the control in intestinal permeability 77 and quality of life 58. The robustness is overall high, but many studies were small, short and examined different forms, dosages and populations; mixed preparations do not allow conclusions about individual fibres.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
1 Shi et al. 2026meta-analysis · 10,262 participantsBlueberry combined with dietary fiber (one of 24 strategies); vs. Standard controlsCesarean section rate in high-risk pregnant women: improved (RR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.90; SUCRA = 97.8%)
8 Xiang et al. 2025meta-analysis · 1,804 participantsDietary fiber supplementation of different specificities; 1.5 to 40 g/day; 3 to 16 weeks; vs. Placebo, without energy restrictionSystolic blood pressure (mixed subgroup): worsened (increase in systolic blood pressure by 3.85 mmHg)
9 Nada et al. 2026systematic review · 1,615 participantsMediterranean diet (plant-based, fiber-rich); vs. lower vs. higher MedDiet adherence or controlinflammatory markers (CRP): improved; disease activity: improved; quality of life: improved
10 Hartley et al. 2016systematic review · 1,513 participantsDietary fibre from various sources, supplements or fibre-rich foods; mostly ≤ 12 weeks; vs. no intervention or minimal interventionDiastolic blood pressure: improved (mean difference -1.77 mmHg, 95% CI -2.61 to -0.92); Systolic blood pressure: unclear (mean difference -1.92 mmHg, 95% CI -4.02 to 0.19)
14 Jiang et al. 2025meta-analysis · 1,140 participantsIntrinsic arabinoxylan-rich foods or isolated arabinoxylans/AXOS; vs. Control in randomized controlled trialsSystolic blood pressure: improved (MD: -2.86; 95 % CI: -5.45, -0.27; p = 0.03); Lymphocyte count (isolated AXOS): improved (MD: 3.52; 95 % CI: 0.75, 6.29; p = 0.01)
15 de et al. 2026systematic review · 1,085 participantsDietary fibers categorized by structure (dextrins, β-glucans, mannans, others); mostly acute interventions (71%); vs. control groups of included RCTsGLP-1 secretion with dextrins: improved (4 positive studies); GLP-1 secretion with mannans: improved
17 Gholami et al. 2024meta-analysis · 802 participantsPsyllium; dose-response analysis, exact amounts not reported; duration-response analysis, exact duration not reported; vs. control groups of included RCTsSystolic blood pressure: improved (WMD: -2.24; 95% CI: -3.13, -1.35; p < .05); Diastolic blood pressure: no difference (WMD: 0.04; 95% CI: -0.52, 0.61; p > .05)
18 Ranneh et al. 2026meta-analysis · 773 participantsDietary fibre supplementation, form not specified; vs. Control group without fibre supplementationSerum lipopolysaccharide: improved (p < 0.00001, I2 = 97%); TNF-α: improved (p < 0.02, I2 = 90%); IL-10: improved (p < 0.02, I2 = 85%)

Further studies in this area: 19 22 25 27 29 30 37 38 39 41 43 46 48 51 52 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 64 66 67 68 69 71 76 77 79 80 82 83 84 85 87 88 90 92 93 97 99 100 101 102 103 104 106 109 110 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 123 124 126 127 129 133 136 138 140 142 143 145 146 147 149 150 153 154 155 158 160 161 166 169 171 174 176 177 179 184 185 186 187 188 190 194 197 202 205 206 207 209 211 213 215 220 222 224 225 231 232 233

4. How Is Dietary Fibre and Psyllium Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies

The studies tested psyllium husks as whole or ground husks, as granules and as a stirred powder, as well as foods enriched with psyllium husks 5053545895. In addition came isolated fibres such as inulin, resistant starch, beta-glucan and fructo-oligosaccharides 1162100108 as well as fibre-rich foods such as oats, avocado, almonds or a fibre-rich DASH diet 344787203. The forms and preparations tested are not interchangeable; the table shows the doses.

Preparation or formDoseDurationStudy
dietary fiber intervention, form not specified—6 months43
psyllium husk as adjunct to PPI—16 weeks44
Probiotic and dietary fibre fermented milk (PFM)—From first trimester until OGTT45
calcium-enriched permeate with inulin (CP-Inu) vs. CP, calcium carbonate, placebo800 mg calcium daily in 2 doses; inulin amount not reported; 20 µg vitamin D daily12 months46
high-fiber DASH diet vs. low-fiber Western diet32 g fiber/d (DASH) vs. 11 g/d (control); sodium 50, 100, 150 mmol/dthree 30-day periods with 5-day breaks between47
GOS/inulin prebiotic versus placebo (maltodextrin)daily, amount not reportedfrom 20 weeks' gestation until delivery; follow-up to 1 year48
High-fiber diet plus daily soluble fiber supplement—until delivery49
Ispaghula husk7.0 or 10.5 g/day12 weeks treatment, some further 12 weeks; 8-week diet period50
DASH diet or FV diet (fruit- and vegetable-rich)—8 weeks of monitored feeding51
Free medically tailored groceries high in dietary fibre—12-week intervention, follow-up to 12 months52
Foods containing psyllium seed husk (PSH)0, 3.4, 6.8, or 10.2 g PSH/d24 weeks53
10 g psyllium vs. 10 g bran vs. 10 g placebo (rice flour)10 g daily12 weeks54
β-glucan tablet, high-medium molecular weight1.5, 3 or 6 g/day12 weeks55
A polydextrose; B psyllium husk; C wheat bran+psyllium husk; D probiotics; placebo maltodextrin—4 weeks56
Prebiotic blend of inulin and oligofructose—3 months57

5. Is Dietary Fibre and Psyllium Safe? Side Effects in Studies

Psyllium husks were well tolerated in a placebo-controlled study in people with elevated cholesterol 50; in faecal incontinence, constipation occurred less often with them than with loperamide 93. Other studies found no differences in intestinal complaints, intolerance or adverse events 588798. The evidence on tolerability is low, and little is known about longer-term use and different dosages.

StudyReported side effects
3 Xu et al. 2025Adverse events less frequent than control (RR 0.35)
7 Gholami et al. 2025not reported
10 Hartley et al. 2016mostly mild to moderate gastrointestinal side-effects, more frequent in fibre groups
17 Gholami et al. 2024not reported
20 Chalif et al. 2026Adverse events infrequent, no major safety concerns identified
22 Clark et al. 2020no reported side effects
25 Zhang et al. 2024not reported in abstract
27 Wang et al. 2026high-fiber diet safe in non-dialysis patients
31 Xi et al. 2025Adverse events assessed, results not reported
35 Limketkai et al. 2025Flatulence and bloating more common with OF-IN; otherwise similar to controls
44 Rana et al. 2025favourable safety profile, no details reported
46 Tetens et al. 2026not reported

6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence

  • Many studies were small and short, so long-term effects on the microbiome, blood lipids and blood sugar remain open.
  • Only few microbiome data are available on psyllium husks themselves; most microbiome findings come from isolated fibre powders.
  • Results on isolated fibre powders cannot be transferred to fibre-rich foods and vice versa.
  • Mixed preparations of several fibres or with probiotics, PPI or colestipol do not allow any statement about the individual fibre.
  • It remains open which preparation form and dose works most reliably for which complaints and patient groups.

7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Dietary Fibre and Psyllium

Fibre and psyllium husks are well-studied plant substances with predominantly favourable findings in humans. The findings apply in each case only to the form and preparation studied, and mixed preparations do not allow conclusions about individual fibres.

Frequently Asked Questions

How well has Dietary Fibre and Psyllium been studied in humans?

We evaluated 234 human studies on Dietary Fibre and Psyllium, including 186 randomised controlled trials and 42 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 14,547 participants in total. As of 4 October 2026.

Does Dietary Fibre and Psyllium help with gut Microbiome? What the studies show

We evaluated 3 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 66 controlled studies and 2 further studies; the controlled studies include 5,196 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 20273140

Does Dietary Fibre and Psyllium help with blood Lipids and Cholesterol? What the studies show

We evaluated 10 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 46 controlled studies and 3 further studies; the controlled studies include 4,100 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 5678

Does Dietary Fibre and Psyllium help with blood Glucose and Insulin? What the studies show

We evaluated 5 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 50 controlled studies and 8 further studies; the controlled studies include 4,069 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 2458

Does Dietary Fibre and Psyllium help with satiety and Body Weight? What the studies show

We evaluated 8 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 41 controlled studies and 3 further studies; the controlled studies include 2,128 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mixed. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 681213

Does Dietary Fibre and Psyllium help with irritable Bowel Syndrome and Digestive Complaints? What the studies show

We evaluated one meta-analysis or systematic review, 40 controlled studies and 5 further studies; the controlled studies include 2,970 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mixed. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 3202435

Does Dietary Fibre and Psyllium help with bowel Function and Stool Habits? What the studies show

We evaluated one meta-analysis or systematic review, 32 controlled studies and 5 further studies; the controlled studies include 2,356 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mixed. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 3202431

What are psyllium husks and how do they work?

Psyllium husks are the outer layer of the seeds of Plantago ovata and swell strongly in water. They count among the soluble, viscous fibres and form a gel-like mass in the intestine. In studies they were tested as whole or ground husks, as granules and as a stirred powder 505458.

What effects do studies in humans show on blood lipids and blood sugar?

In meta-analyses and controlled studies, psyllium husk lowered LDL cholesterol 723425053151, and in several cases also total cholesterol 742151. In meta-analyses, it also lowered fasting blood glucose and HbA1c 1623. However, individual studies found no difference for individual lipid values 185578144.

Do fibre and psyllium husks help with weight loss?

The picture is mixed: meta-analyses on psyllium husks before meals and on isolated soluble fibres found weight loss 1226, a meta-analysis in diabetes did not 23.

How does fibre affect the gut microbiome?

The findings come predominantly from isolated fibre powders such as inulin and resistant starch as well as from fibre-rich foods such as oat bran. On psyllium husks themselves there are few microbiome studies: in women with constipation they changed the gut flora compared with placebo 230, in children with irritable bowel syndrome they did not 77.

What side effects are known?

One study reported bloating, abdominal distension and discomfort with psyllium husk 144, another reported more side effects than with kiwis 95; little is known about longer-term use.

Sources

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
    Hartley L, May MD, Loveman E, Colquitt JL, Rees K · 2016
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
    de Jong JCBC, Lentjes MGW, Pietersma KF, Pasman WJ, Wopereis S, Hoevenaars FPM · 2026
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
    Chalif J, Morton M, Haight P, Mehra Y, O'Malley D, Spakowicz D et al. · 2026
  21. 21
    Hebbar S, Umakanth S, Thimmappa L, Amrutha MS, Galbao J, Nayak SH · 2026
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
    Victoria-Montesinos D, González-Louzao R, Barcina-Pérez P, Mercader-Ros MT, Lucas-Abellán C, Daruich-González IB et al. · 2026
  34. 34
    Mostafazadeh P, Etesamnia S, Nasiraei-Moghadam M, Jahan-Mihan A, Haghighi A, Zendedel A et al. · 2026
  35. 35
    Limketkai BN, Godoy-Brewer G, Shah ND, Maas L, White J, Parian AM et al. · 2025
  36. 36
    Ashoorion V, Hosseinian SZ, Rezaei N, Hajihashemi P, Zare-Farashbandi E, Adibi P · 2025
  37. 37
    Benedicto-Toboso MI, Freire Salviano A, Miguel-Berges ML, Rueda-De Torre I, Moreno LA, Santaliestra-Pasías AM · 2025
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
  47. 47
    Peng AW, Juraschek SP, Appel LJ, Miller ER, Mueller NT · 2019
  48. 48
    Barbarot S, Aubert H, Boivin M, Foureau A, Maruani A, Droitcourt C et al. · 2026
  49. 49
  50. 50
  51. 51
  52. 52
  53. 53
  54. 54
    Bijkerk CJ, de Wit NJ, Muris JW, Whorwell PJ, Knottnerus JA, Hoes AW · 2009
  55. 55
    Rioux-Labrecque V, Cossette M, Rufiange M, Bilodeau D, Guertin MC, Tardif JC · 2023
  56. 56
  57. 57
  58. 58
    Bliss DZ, Savik K, Jung HJ, Whitebird R, Lowry A, Sheng X · 2014
  59. 59
  60. 60
  61. 61
  62. 62
    Panichsillaphakit E, Visuthranukul C, Chongpison Y, Chuaypen N, Kwanbunbumpen T, Uaariyapanichkul J et al. · 2025
  63. 63
    Andriyas T, Sriswasdi S, Tansawat R, Uaariyapanichkul J, Chomtho S, Visuthranukul C · 2025
  64. 64
  65. 65
  66. 66
  67. 67
  68. 68
  69. 69
  70. 70
    Spence JD, Huff MW, Heidenheim P, Viswanatha A, Munoz C, Lindsay R et al. · 1995
  71. 71
    COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONSERVATIVE METHODS FOR ACCELERATING EPITHELIALIZATION IN ACUTE ANAL FISSURE
    Lukina V, Katibgadzhiev M, Solovyov S, Kovalenko P, Kuzmich V, Eremeeva M et al. · 2026
  72. 72
  73. 73
  74. 74
  75. 75
  76. 76
  77. 77
    Shulman RJ, Hollister EB, Cain K, Czyzewski DI, Self MM, Weidler EM et al. · 2017
  78. 78
  79. 79
    Mendivil EJ, Rivera-Iñiguez I, Arellano-Gómez LP, Martínez-López E, Hernández-Guerrero C, Sayago-Ayerdi SG et al. · 2025
  80. 80
    González AP, Flores-Ramírez A, Gutiérrez-Castro KP, Luévano-Contreras C, Gómez-Ojeda A, Sosa-Bustamante GP et al. · 2021
  81. 81
  82. 82
  83. 83
  84. 84
  85. 85
  86. 86
  87. 87
  88. 88
  89. 89
  90. 90
    A study to assess the effect of dietary supplementation with soluble fibre (Minolest) on lipid levels in normal subjects with hypercholesterolaemia
    Tai ES, Fok AC, Chu R, Tan CE · 1999
  91. 91
  92. 92
  93. 93
  94. 94
  95. 95
  96. 96
    Valcheva R, Armstrong H, Kovic O, Bording-Jorgensen M, Veniamin S, Pérez-Muñoz ME et al. · 2022
  97. 97
  98. 98
    Amar MJ, Kaler M, Courville AB, Shamburek R, Sampson M, Remaley AT · 2016
  99. 99
  100. 100
  101. 101
  102. 102
    van den Belt M, Liu Z, Janssen Duijghuijsen L, Zoetendal EG, Witteman B, de Roos NM et al. · 2025
  103. 103
  104. 104
  105. 105
  106. 106
  107. 107
  108. 108
  109. 109
  110. 110
    Zakis DR, Brandt BW, van der Waal SV, Keijser BJF, Crielaard W, van der Plas DWK et al. · 2024
  111. 111
    Psyllium fiber vs. placebo in early treatment after STARR for obstructed defecation: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
    Gabrielli F, Macchini D, Guttadauro A, Frassani S, Bertolini A, Giussani C et al. · 2016
  112. 112
  113. 113
  114. 114
    Vaghef-Mehrabany E, Ranjbar F, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Hosseinpour-Arjmand S, Ebrahimi-Mameghani M · 2021
  115. 115
  116. 116
  117. 117
  118. 118
  119. 119
    Charoensriwattanakul K, Visuthranukul C, Pongchaidacha P, Tepaamorndech S, Suppavorasatit I, Chomtho S · 2026
  120. 120
  121. 121
  122. 122
  123. 123
  124. 124
  125. 125
    Hoevenaars FPM, Scheithauer TPM, Eveleens Maarse BC, de Oliveira IM, Warnke I, Sybesma W et al. · 2025
  126. 126
  127. 127
  128. 128
  129. 129
  130. 130
    Hull MA, McIntire DD, Atnip SD, Dreadin J, Nihira MA, Drewes PG et al. · 2011
  131. 131
  132. 132
  133. 133
  134. 134
    Camacho-Díaz BH, Arenas-Ocampo ML, Osorio-Díaz P, Jiménez-Aparicio AR, Alvarado-Jasso GM, Saavedra-Briones EV et al. · 2023
  135. 135
  136. 136
  137. 137
  138. 138
  139. 139
    Hoffmann Sardá FA, Giuntini EB, Oliveira A, Souza GS, Prado SBR, Taddei CR et al. · 2025
  140. 140
  141. 141
  142. 142
  143. 143
  144. 144
  145. 145
    An Increase in Mediterranean Dietary Score, Through SunGold® Kiwifruit, Potentially Improves Mental Wellbeing
    · 2021
  146. 146
    Pucciani F, Raggioli M, Ringressi MN · 2011
  147. 147
  148. 148
  149. 149
  150. 150
  151. 151
    Wolever TM, Jenkins DJ, Mueller S, Patten R, Relle LK, Boctor D et al. · 1994
  152. 152
  153. 153
  154. 154
  155. 155
  156. 156
    Takahashi H, Fujii T, Yamada C, Kondo N, Kuramitsu K, Funasaka K et al. · 2025
  157. 157
  158. 158
  159. 159
  160. 160
  161. 161
    Besora-Moreno M, Jiménez-Ten Hoevel C, Queral J, Bernal G, Pérez-Merino L, Puzo J et al. · 2026
  162. 162
  163. 163
  164. 164
  165. 165
  166. 166
  167. 167
  168. 168
  169. 169
  170. 170
  171. 171
  172. 172
  173. 173
  174. 174
  175. 175
  176. 176
  177. 177
  178. 178
  179. 179
  180. 180
    So D, Yao CK, Ardalan ZS, Thwaites PA, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Gibson PR et al. · 2022
  181. 181
  182. 182
  183. 183
  184. 184
  185. 185
  186. 186
  187. 187
  188. 188
  189. 189
    Villalva M, García-Díez E, López de Las Hazas MDC, Lo Iacono O, Vicente-Díez JI, García-Cabrera S et al. · 2025
  190. 190
  191. 191
  192. 192
  193. 193
  194. 194
  195. 195
    Ad Libitum Energy Intake Differences Between a Plant-Based, Low-Fat and an Animal-Based, Low-Carbohydrate Diet: An Inpatient Randomized Crossover Study
    Gallagher I, Boring J, Courville A, Guo J, Howard R, Milley L et al. · 2020
  196. 196
  197. 197
  198. 198
  199. 199
  200. 200
  201. 201
  202. 202
  203. 203
  204. 204
    Piperni E, Blanco-Míguez A, Mengoni C, Piccinno G, Punčochář M, Ren J et al. · 2026
  205. 205
  206. 206
  207. 207
  208. 208
  209. 209
  210. 210
  211. 211
  212. 212
  213. 213
    Armet AM, Li F, Deehan EC, Nikolaeva DD, Delannoy-Bruno O, Siegwald L et al. · 2025
  214. 214
  215. 215
  216. 216
  217. 217
    Visuthranukul C, Sriswasdi S, Tepaamorndech S, Chamni S, Leelahavanichkul A, Joyjinda Y et al. · 2024
  218. 218
  219. 219
    Menon J, Thapa BR, Kumari R, Puttaiah Kadyada S, Rana S, Lal SB · 2023
  220. 220
  221. 221
    Beyond “Counting Macros”: Are Common Fad Diets Nutritionally Adequate? An Examination of Their Micronutrient Content
    Malik N, Tonstad S, Haddad E · 2020
  222. 222
  223. 223
  224. 224
  225. 225
    Jiménez JP, Serrano J, Tabernero M, Arranz S, Díaz-Rubio ME, García-Diz L et al. · 2008
  226. 226
  227. 227
  228. 228
    Four-week supplementation with a natural dietary compound produces favorable changes in body composition
    Hoeger WW, Harris C, Long EM, Hopkins DR · 1998
  229. 229
  230. 230
  231. 231
  232. 232
    Sripongpun P, Lertpipopmetha K, Chamroonkul N, Kongkamol C · 2021
  233. 233

Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.

International Health Research · https://ih-research.com/en/knowledge/dietary-fibre-and-psyllium/ · Last updated: 2026-10-15