Knowledge · Natural substances

Cinnamon

Database-based evaluation · 900 studies in our database, 55 of them controlled human trials · As of · How we work

Cinnamon is the dried inner bark of Cinnamomum species; human studies show reductions in blood pressure, with mixed results for blood sugar and weight.

We evaluated 138 human studies on Cinnamon, including 44 randomised controlled trials and 38 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 3,313 participants in total. As of 23 October 2026.

This page as PDF · Summary

1. What Is Cinnamon? Occurrence, Origin and Forms

Cinnamon is the dried inner bark of trees of the genus Cinnamomum in the laurel family (Lauraceae) and is used worldwide as a spice. Two species dominate trade: Ceylon cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) and cassia (Cinnamomum cassia). Traditionally, cinnamon is regarded as a warming remedy that was used, among other things, for digestive complaints.

The trees grow in tropical regions, including Sri Lanka, southern India, China, Indonesia and Vietnam. Cinnamon is used as a spice in foods and drinks as well as in capsules, extracts and oils.

For harvesting, young shoots are peeled, and the bark is dried and rolled into quills or ground. Extracts are made with water or alcohol, and the essential oil by steam distillation. In human studies, bark powder in capsules, aqueous and alcoholic extracts, and the essential oil are the forms mainly examined.

Forms and Preparations Studied

  • Ceylon cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) as bark or powder
  • Cassia cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia) as bark or powder
  • Aqueous or alcoholic bark extract, usually in capsule form
  • Essential oil from the bark
  • Cinnamon infusion or cinnamon tea
  • Cinnamon as an ingredient in fortified foods

Not covered on this page:

  • Isolated cinnamaldehyde or cinnamic acid as a single substance; a study on it is not a study on cinnamon.
  • Other spices such as clove, nutmeg or ginger.
  • Leaves and flowers of other Cinnamomum species traded as spice leaf or bud.

2. What Does Cinnamon Do? Results by Area

AreaResult in controlled studiesStrength of evidenceStudiesParticipants
Blood glucose and glucose metabolismmixedhigh15 meta-analyses · 21 controlled · 32 other1,560
Blood lipidsmixedhigh16 meta-analyses · 14 controlled · 11 other1,108
Body weight and body compositionmixedhigh10 meta-analyses · 9 controlled · 5 other668
Inflammatory and oxidative markersmostly no differencehigh5 meta-analyses · 10 controlled · 12 other751
Blood pressuremostly improvedhigh7 meta-analyses · 3 controlled · 3 other240
Menstrual painmixedmoderate1 meta-analyses · 2 controlled · 1 other99
Digestive complaintsmostly no differencelow0 meta-analyses · 2 controlled · 2 other134
Other investigationsmixedhigh5 meta-analyses · 16 controlled · 20 other924

How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.

3. What the Studies Show in Detail

Cinnamon, Blood Glucose and Glucose Metabolism: Human Studies

In adults with type 2 diabetes and in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, cinnamon lowered fasting blood sugar in several meta-analyses 419242636. Long-term blood sugar also improved in several controlled studies and meta-analyses 42426365862. Blood sugar after eating fell in meta-analyses 424. With a single test meal, cinnamon flattened the rise in blood sugar compared with the control meal 9496. In prediabetes, continuously measured glucose levels were lower with cinnamon than with placebo 97, and fasting blood sugar did not rise with cinnamon, but did with placebo 99. One meta-analysis and several randomized studies found no difference in fasting blood sugar 38879298. For HbA1c, insulin or insulin resistance, individual meta-analyses and one randomized study found no difference 63847525387. A single cinnamon infusion did not significantly change capillary glucose in healthy students shortly after drinking 61. The strength of evidence is high, but the results are mixed; many reviews do not state the cinnamon type and form, and the amounts tested differ; results for one form cannot be transferred to another. It remains open which cinnamon type and which preparation at which amount has the greatest benefit.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
4 de et al. 2025systematic review · 3,054 participantsCinnamon supplementation, mostly capsules; species not stated; ≤2 g/day and >2 g/day; 30 to 120 days; vs. Placebo or control groupFasting blood glucose: improved (WMD: -15.26 mg/dL; 95% CI: -22.23 to -8.30); Postprandial glucose: improved (WMD: -39.22 mg/dL; 95% CI: -63.90 to -14.55); HbA1c: improved (WMD: -0.56 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.99 to -0.13)
6 Krittanawong et al. 2022meta-analysis · 1,070 participantscinnamon consumption, type and form not specified; vs. cinnamon consumption vs no cinnamon consumptionhemoglobin A1C: no difference (WMD of 0.0 (CI, -0.44-0.45))
8 Zhou et al. 2022meta-analysis · 1,020 participantsCinnamon supplement (type/form not specified); 40 days to 4 months; vs. Placeboglycolipid levels (glucose): improved (All p < 0.05)
19 Wahyuningtyas et al. 2021meta-analysis · 206 participantsCinnamon extract (cinnamon species not stated); vs. Placebo or control (RCTs)Fasting blood glucose: improved (MD= -4.8 mg/dL, 95% CI: -8.04 to -1.57, p=0.004); Insulin level: improved (MD = -2.20 mIU/dL, 95% CI: -4.17 to -0.23, p=0.03)
23 Al-Makhmari et al. 2025reviewCassia cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia); vs. Randomised controlled trials and meta-analysesglucose transport and enzyme inhibition: improved
24 Jafari et al. 2025meta-analysisCinnamon supplementation; vs. Control groupFasting glucose: improved (SMD = - 1.28; 95% CI: - 1.65, - 0.90); Fasting insulin: improved (SMD = - 0.26; 95% CI: - 0.50, - 0.02); HbA1c: improved (SMD = - 0.71; 95% CI: - 1.02, - 0.40)
25 Gou et al. 2025reviewcinnamon supplementation (type and form not specified); higher doses >1.5 g/day favorable; shorter duration ≤2 months favorable; vs. placebo (randomized placebo-controlled trials)fasting blood glucose: improved; insulin resistance: improved
26 Moridpour et al. 2024meta-analysisCinnamon supplementation (type/form not specified); vs. Control groupFasting blood sugar: improved (SMD: -1.32; 95% CI: -1.77, -0.87, p < 0.001); Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance: improved (SMD: -1.32; 95% CI: -1.77, -0.87, p < 0.001); Hemoglobin A1C: improved (SMD: -0.67; 95% CI: -1.18, -0.15, p = 0.011)

Further studies in this area: 28 30 31 32 34 36 38 39 41 44 46 47 50 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 61 62 63 64 67 68 72 73 77 87 89 90 92 94 96 97 98 99 100 104 105 108 112 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 125 128 129 130 131 132 133 135 136 137

Cinnamon and Blood Lipids: Human Studies

In adults with type 2 diabetes and related metabolic disorders, LDL cholesterol fell in several meta-analyses 710242841. Total cholesterol and triglycerides also fell in several meta-analyses 7102441; one meta-analysis found a reduction only in triglycerides and total cholesterol 11, another only in triglycerides 27. For HDL cholesterol, some meta-analyses found an increase 243841, others no difference 671127. A meta-analysis on ground Cassia cinnamon bark powder found no differences in total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL and HDL 47, and a further review without stating type and form likewise found no differences in blood lipid levels 52. Individual randomized studies found no difference compared with placebo in LDL cholesterol 6064 and in the lipid profile 8992; after a cinnamon test meal, triglycerides did not differ from the control meal 94. The findings come predominantly from supplements in capsule form, whose cinnamon type was mostly not reported. The strength of evidence of the reviews is high, but the nonspecific statement of cinnamon type, form and amount as well as the short study durations limit the transferability to concrete preparations.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
4 de et al. 2025systematic review · 3,054 participantsCinnamon supplementation, mostly capsules; species not stated; ≤2 g/day and >2 g/day; 30 to 120 days; vs. Placebo or control groupTotal cholesterol (capsule form): improved (WMD: -13.39 mg/dL; 95% CI: -24.71 to -2.07); LDL-C (capsule form): improved (WMD: -6.49 mg/dL, 95% CI: -12.69 to -0.29); Triglycerides (capsule form): improved (WND: -19.75 mg/dL; 95% CI, -33.71 to -5.80)
6 Krittanawong et al. 2022meta-analysis · 1,070 participantscinnamon consumption, type and form not specified; vs. cinnamon consumption vs no cinnamon consumptionLDL cholesterol: no difference (WMD 0.38 (CI, -6.07-6.83)); HDL cholesterol: no difference (WMD 0.40 (CI, -1.14-1.94))
7 Jamali et al. 2020meta-analysis · 1,025 participantsCinnamon supplementation (type/form not stated); Trials < 2 and ≥ 2 months; vs. Control groups of included trialsTriglycerides: improved (WMD: -26.27 mg/dl, 95 % CI: [-38.93, -13.61], P < 0.001); Total cholesterol: improved (WMD: -13.93 mg/dl, 95 % CI: [-25.64, -2.22], P = 0.020); LDL-C: improved (WMD: -6.13 mg/dl, 95 % CI: [-10.72, -1.53], P = 0.009)
8 Zhou et al. 2022meta-analysis · 1,020 participantsCinnamon supplement (type/form not specified); 40 days to 4 months; vs. Placeboglycolipid levels (lipids): improved (All p < 0.05)
10 Wu et al. 2022meta-analysis · 773 participantsCinnamon or its extracts, species not specified; High-dose subgroup ≥1.5 g/d; vs. PlaceboTotal cholesterol: improved (WMD: -0.19 mmol/L [-7.34 mg/dL]; 95% CI: -0.24, -0.14 [-9.27, -5.41]); Triglycerides: improved (WMD: -0.10 mmol/L [-8.85 mg/dL]; 95% CI: -0.16, -0.04 [-14.16, -3.54]); LDL cholesterol: improved (WMD: -0.16 mmol/L [-6.18 mg/dL]; 95% CI: -0.20, -0.11 [-7.72, -4.25])
11 Maierean et al. 2017meta-analysis · 750 participantsCinnamon supplementation (type and form not specified); Dose not reported in abstract; Supplementation duration examined as meta-regressor; vs. Control groups of included RCTsTriglycerides: improved (WMD: -0.27 mmol/L [-23.91 mg/dL], 95% CI: -0.39, -0.14 [-34.54, -12.40], P < .01); Total cholesterol: improved (WMD: -0.36 mmol/L [-13.92 mg/dL], 95% CI: -0.63, -0.09 [-24.36, -3.48], P < .01); LDL cholesterol: no difference (WMD: -0.16 mmol/L [-6.19 mg/dL], 95% CI: -0.35, 0.03 [-13.53, 1.16], P = .10)
19 Wahyuningtyas et al. 2021meta-analysis · 206 participantsCinnamon extract (cinnamon species not stated); vs. Placebo or control (RCTs)HDL-cholesterol: unclear (MD= -27.24 mg/dL, 95% CI: -32.62 to -21.85, p< 0.00001)
24 Jafari et al. 2025meta-analysisCinnamon supplementation; vs. Control groupLDL-C: improved (SMD = - 0.71; 95% CI: - 1.02, - 0.40); Total cholesterol: improved (SMD = - 1.15; 95% CI: - 1.55, - 0.75); Triglycerides: improved (SMD = - 0.91; 95% CI: - 1.25, - 0.56)

Further studies in this area: 25 27 28 30 32 37 38 39 41 46 47 50 52 58 60 64 66 68 71 77 89 92 93 94 97 98 100 112 122 127 129 132 133

Cinnamon, Body Weight and Body Composition: Human Studies

In several meta-analyses, body mass index fell compared with the control groups 5942. Body weight also improved in several studies 592842. Waist circumference fell in several meta-analyses 92441 and in one randomized study in migraine 84; the waist-to-hip ratio fell in one meta-analysis and in the same study 584. One meta-analysis also found a reduction in fat mass 9. This is contrasted by several studies that showed no difference in weight, body mass index or waist circumference 205051536588; body adiposity index and neck circumference also did not differ in one randomized study 65. The findings come predominantly from cinnamon supplements in capsule or powder form, whose cinnamon type is often not stated. In one randomized study in type 2 diabetes, cinnamon added to black tea showed no confirmed difference in body measurements 59. The strength of evidence is high, but the results are mixed; preparations, forms and participant groups differ, and the cinnamon type is often missing.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
4 de et al. 2025systematic review · 3,054 participantsCinnamon supplementation, mostly capsules; species not stated; ≤2 g/day and >2 g/day; 30 to 120 days; vs. Placebo or control groupBMI (dose ≤2 g/day): improved (WMD: -1.18 kg/m2; 95% CI: -1.97 to -0.39)
5 Yazdanpanah et al. 2020meta-analysis · 1,480 participantsCinnamon supplementation (type and form not reported); vs. Control groups of included RCTsBody mass index: improved (WMD = -0.40 kg/m2, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.22 kg/m2, p < .001); Body weight: improved (WMD = -0.92 kg; 95% CI: -1.51, -0.33 kg; p = .002); Waist-hip ratio: improved (WMD = -0.02, 95% CI: -0.038, -0.018; p < 0.001)
9 Mousavi et al. 2020meta-analysis · 786 participantsCinnamon supplementation (type/form not stated); ≥2 g/d for fat mass effects; ≥12 weeks for fat mass effects; vs. Control groupBody weight: improved (WMD: -1.02 kg, 95% CI: -1.66 to -0.38, P = 0.002); Body Mass Index: improved (WMD: -0.51 kg/m2, 95% CI: -0.74, -0.28, P < 0.001); Waist circumference: improved (WMD: -2.40 cm, 95% CI: -4.48, -0.33, P = 0.02)
24 Jafari et al. 2025meta-analysisCinnamon supplementation; vs. Control groupWaist circumference: improved (SMD = - 0.40; 95% (CI): - 0.73, - 0.06)
28 Xiaomei et al. 2024systematic reviewCinnamon supplementation, form not specified; vs. Placebo or control (12 RCTs)Weight reduction (WMD): improved (-0.47 kg (95 % CI: -0.80 to -0.15, p < 0.001))
32 Novakovic et al. 2024reviewCinnamon, species and form not stated; vs. No uniform comparator; review of animal and clinical studiesobesity: improved
41 Kutbi et al. 2022meta-analysisCinnamon supplementation (type/form not reported); Robust in studies using dose ≤1.5 g; vs. Control groups of randomized trialsWaist circumference: improved (WMD = -1.68 cm; P = 0.016)
42 Keramati et al. 2022systematic reviewCinnamon supplementation, type and form not stated; ≥3 g/day more favorable; vs. Control groupbody weight: improved (ES: -0.67 kg; 95% CI: -0.99, -0.35, p ˂ .001); body mass index: improved (ES: -0.45 kg/m2 ; 95% CI: -0.57, -0.33, p ˂ .001); waist circumference: no difference (ES: -1.05 cm; 95% CI: -2.26, 0.15, p = .087)

Further studies in this area: 46 50 51 53 59 65 72 73 82 88 89 100 103 112 122 132

Cinnamon, Inflammatory and Oxidative Markers: Human Studies

In adults with metabolic disorders, type 2 diabetes, PCOS, rheumatoid arthritis and migraine, several controlled studies and meta-analyses found improvements in individual inflammation and oxidation markers. For CRP, improvements were shown in several controlled studies and meta-analyses 17244892. Malondialdehyde improved in several controlled studies and meta-analyses 244871. Antioxidant capacity improved in several controlled studies and meta-analyses 2529374871. Interleukin-6 fell borderline significantly in several meta-analyses and in one randomized study in migraine compared with placebo 29374883. Reviews of meta-analyses, by contrast, found no confirmed difference for malondialdehyde and CRP 2937, and one randomized study in type 2 diabetes found no difference for malondialdehyde and antioxidant capacity 87. The findings come predominantly from cinnamon powder in capsules, as well as from bark extracts and unspecified cinnamon supplements; the cinnamon type (Ceylon or Cassia) and the amount tested are mostly not reported. After a cinnamon test meal, interleukin-6 did not differ from the control meal 94. The strength of evidence is high, but most individual controlled studies found no difference; it remains open which preparation reliably influences which inflammation markers.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
2 Long et al. 2023review · 3,852 participantsCinnamon extract among 14 other polyphenol sources; vs. Control (placebo/standard care) per RCTDisease activity score DAS28: improved; CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate: improved; Oxidative stress: improved
17 Vallianou et al. 2019meta-analysis · 285 participantsCeylon cinnamon (Cinnamomum Zeylanicum), form not stated; Subgroups <1500 mg/day and ≥1500 mg/day; Subgroup >12 weeks; vs. Control groupsserum CRP: improved (WMD: -0.81 mg/L, 95% CI: -1.36 to -0.26, p = 0.004)
22 Johnson et al. 2026reviewcinnamon among other spices, type/form not stated; 7 days; vs. other spices or control, not separately reportedDNA strand breaks in PBMCs: no difference
24 Jafari et al. 2025meta-analysisCinnamon supplementation; vs. Control groupCRP: improved (SMD = - 0.78; 95% CI: - 1.28, - 0.27); MDA: improved (SMD = - 0.76; 95% CI: - 1.07, - 0.45)
25 Gou et al. 2025reviewcinnamon supplementation (type and form not specified); higher doses >1.5 g/day favorable; shorter duration ≤2 months favorable; vs. placebo (randomized placebo-controlled trials)antioxidant capacity: improved
29 Zhang et al. 2024systematic reviewCinnamon supplementation, type and form not stated; vs. Control groups of included RCTsTotal antioxidant capacity (TAC): improved (WMD = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.64); Interleukin-6 (IL-6): improved (WMD = -1.48; 95% CI: 2.96, -0.01); Malondialdehyde (MDA): no difference (WMD = -0.47; 95% CI: 0.99, 0.05)
30 Banaszak et al. 2024reviewCinnamon alongside curcumin and resveratrolTotal antioxidant capacity, MDA, TNF-α, IL-6, hs-CRP: improved
32 Novakovic et al. 2024reviewCinnamon, species and form not stated; vs. No uniform comparator; review of animal and clinical studiesoxidative stress and inflammation: improved

Further studies in this area: 37 40 46 48 49 59 67 71 72 83 85 86 87 92 94 121 122 132 133

Cinnamon and Blood Pressure: Human Studies

Several meta-analyses found a reduction in systolic blood pressure from cinnamon in adults, some with metabolic diseases or type 2 diabetes 131424294151. For diastolic blood pressure, the same meta-analyses also showed a reduction 131424294151. Another meta-analysis found no overall difference for systolic blood pressure, but a reduction for diastolic blood pressure 15. In early-stage hypertension, blood pressure at the end of the study did not differ between cinnamon and placebo; only the daytime change in the systolic value was greater with cinnamon 98. In type 2 diabetes, a randomized study with cinnamon added to black tea found no difference 59. In the meta-analyses and reviews, cinnamon type and preparation form are mostly not reported, so it remains open whether the findings apply to Ceylon cinnamon, Cassia cinnamon, powder or extract; the amount tested is also not stated there.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
13 Mousavi et al. 2020meta-analysis · 641 participantsOral cinnamon supplementation (type/form not reported); ≤2 g cinnamon showed greater SBP effect; ≥12 weeks showed greater SBP effect; vs. Control groups of included RCTsSystolic blood pressure: improved (WMD: -6.23 mmHg, 95% CI: -10.69 to -1.77, P = 0.006); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (WMD: -3.93 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.33 to -1.52, P = 0.001)
14 Hadi et al. 2020meta-analysis · 641 participantsCinnamon supplement, type not specified; ≤2 g/day in significant subgroups; longer than 8 weeks in significant subgroups; vs. placebo/control in 9 RCTsSystolic blood pressure: improved (WMD: -5.17 mmHg, 95% CI: -9.35 to -0.99, P = 0.01); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (WMD: -3.36 mmHg, 95% CI: -5.67 to -1.04, P ≤ 0.001)
15 Ghavami et al. 2021meta-analysis · 582 participantsCinnamon supplement, type and form not stated; high dose >1500 mg/day examined; long duration ≥8 weeks examined; vs. control groups of included RCTsSystolic blood pressure: no difference (WMD: -0.61mmHg; 95% CI: -1.36, 0.14, P= 0.111); Systolic blood pressure at ≥8 weeks: improved (WMD: -1.25 mmHg; 95% CI: -2.22, -0.28, P= 0.012); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (WMD: -0.93mmHg, 95% CI: -1.55 to -0.32, P= 0.003)
24 Jafari et al. 2025meta-analysisCinnamon supplementation; vs. Control groupDiastolic blood pressure: improved (SMD = - 1.04; 95% CI: - 1.54, - 0.55); Systolic blood pressure: improved (SMD = - 0.85; 95% CI: - 1.54, - 0.16)
25 Gou et al. 2025reviewcinnamon supplementation (type and form not specified); higher doses >1.5 g/day favorable; shorter duration ≤2 months favorable; vs. placebo (randomized placebo-controlled trials)blood pressure regulation: improved
29 Zhang et al. 2024systematic reviewCinnamon supplementation, type and form not stated; vs. Control groups of included RCTsSystolic blood pressure: improved (ES = -2.36 mmHg; 95% CI: 3.86, -1.40); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (ES = -1.65 mmHg; 95% CI: 2.41, -0.90)
41 Kutbi et al. 2022meta-analysisCinnamon supplementation (type/form not reported); Robust in studies using dose ≤1.5 g; vs. Control groups of randomized trialsSystolic blood pressure: improved (WMD = -3.95 mmHg; P = 0.018); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (WMD = -3.36 mmHg; P = 0.001)
51 Jamali et al. 2020meta-analysisCinnamon supplementation, type and form not specified; vs. Control group without cinnamonSystolic blood pressure: improved (SMD: -0.532, 95% CI: [-1.032, -0.033], P = 0.037); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (SMD: -0.681, 95% CI: [-1.297, -0.065], P = 0.030)

Further studies in this area: 59 92 98 112 126

Cinnamon and Menstrual Pain: Human Studies

In menstrual pain, cinnamon in capsules reduced pain intensity more than placebo in a randomized study 102. In a randomized study with female students, dried figs relieved pain intensity and duration more than cinnamon and placebo; a benefit of cinnamon over placebo is not reported 70. The strength of evidence is moderate; the number of controlled studies is small, the number of participants is limited, and for several studies precise information on the type, form and amount of cinnamon tested is missing. It remains open whether the findings can be transferred to a specific cinnamon type or preparation.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
12 Xu et al. 2020meta-analysis · 647 participantsCinnamon, fennel or ginger (form not reported); Observation period one cycle; vs. PlaceboPain intensity, cinnamon vs. placebo: improved (WMD = 1.815, 95% CI = 1.330-2.301); Pain duration, cinnamon vs. placebo: improved (WMD = 16.200, 95% CI = 15.271-17.129)
35 Tahir et al. 2024meta-analysisAromatherapy with essential oils, including cinnamon; vs. Control or no aromatherapy armPain score in primary dysmenorrhea: improved (SMD -3.19 (CI -5.09, -1.28; I² = 98%)); Pain score in RCTs: improved (− 0.98 (CI-1.40, -0.57; I² = 64%)); moderate to severe pain: improved (RR: 0.39; CI 0.25, 0.60; I² = 36%)
70 Amanak et al. 2020randomised controlled · 99 participantsCinnamon (form and species not stated); 3 menstrual cycles; vs. Placebo and dried figspain severity and duration: unclear
102 Jahangirifar et al. 2018randomised controlledCinnamon capsules, 1000 mg; 1000 mg during first 72 h of menstruation; two consecutive cycles; vs. Placebo (1000 mg starch)pain intensity (VAS): improved (P = 0.001); pain intensity (VAS), second treatment: improved (P = 0.002)

Cinnamon and Digestive Complaints: Human Studies

In cancer patients with nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy, inhaling cinnamon oil relieved the symptoms more than a saline control 74. In diarrheal symptoms, an aqueous extract of Cassia cinnamon prolonged intestinal transit time and changed stool values and gut flora compared with placebo 75. In functional dyspepsia, symptoms improved with cinnamon oil capsules and with a sesame oil placebo, with no difference between the groups 78. The strength of evidence is low, the studies are small and examine different forms, so findings cannot be transferred to other preparations.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
21 Phang et al. 2026reviewCinnamon oil, partly combined with peppermint-caraway oil; vs. various dietary categories, narratively synthesiseddyspepsia symptoms: unclear
75 Park et al. 2023randomised controlled · 70 participantsCinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia) water extract (CWE), capsules; three 400 mg CWE capsules twice daily; 8 weeks; vs. placebocolonic transit time: improved (p = 0.019); fecal isobutyric acid: improved (p = 0.008); fecal spermidine: improved (p = 0.009)
78 Zobeiri et al. 2021randomised controlled · 64 participantsCinnamon oil soft capsule (Cinnamomum zeylanicum), standardized to cinnamaldehyde; 6 weeks; vs. Sesame oil soft capsule as placebototal dyspepsia score: no difference (P=0.174)
97 Zelicha et al. 2024randomised controlled · 18 participantsCinnamon spice (species not stated in abstract); 4 g/d; 4 weeks per phase, 2-week washout; vs. Placebo, randomized, double-blind, crossoverdigestive symptoms

Cinnamon: Further Outcomes in Studies

In a network meta-analysis, cinnamon lowered liver enzymes in fatty liver (MASLD/MASH) 1; a meta-analysis in adults found no overall difference in liver enzymes 45. A cinnamon bark nasal rinse improved quality of life in allergic rhinitis 3, and a systematic review describes lower leptin and visfatin levels 16. In migraine, cinnamon powder reduced the frequency, intensity and duration of attacks compared with placebo 83. In women with rheumatoid arthritis, cinnamon powder reduced disease activity, pain and the number of painful and swollen joints compared with placebo 92. In women with polycystic ovary syndrome, cinnamon extract improved the regularity of the menstrual cycle in a meta-analysis 19. A systematic review describes favorable findings on ovarian function in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, which further studies should confirm 46. In women with polycystic ovary syndrome, cinnamon lowered testosterone levels similarly to metformin 73. DHEA levels remained without difference 2073. Adiponectin remained without difference 16. The findings come predominantly from small studies, some with incomplete reporting, several without information on cinnamon type, form and amount. Since findings for one form cannot be transferred to another, the type, preparation and amount tested remain open for most of these outcomes.

StudyDesign · participantsPreparation · dose · duration · comparisonResult
1 Chen et al. 2026meta-analysis · 9,191 participantsCinnamon (form not reported); vs. other herbal therapies and controlsAlanine aminotransferase: improved (MD -25.10; P = .01); Aspartate aminotransferase: improved (MD -23.50; P < .01); Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: improved (MD -12.44; P = .01)
3 Hu et al. 2025meta-analysis · 3,584 participantsCinnamon bark nasal irrigation; vs. Placebo nasal irrigation and other irrigation agentsQuality of life (RQLQ score): improved (MD: -1.3, 95% CrI (-1.6, -0.96))
16 Gheflati et al. 2023review · 363 participantsCinnamon supplementation, type and form not specified; vs. Control groups of included randomized trialsleptin levels: improved; visfatin levels: improved; adiponectin levels: no difference (non-significant)
18 Mousavi et al. 2021systematic review · 256 participantsOral cinnamon supplementation, type and form not stated; Low dose <1,500 mg/d in subgroups; Follow-up longer than 12 weeks in some trials; vs. Placebo or control (randomized trials)Serum ALT (overall): no difference; Serum AST (overall): no difference; Serum ALP (overall): no difference
19 Wahyuningtyas et al. 2021meta-analysis · 206 participantsCinnamon extract (cinnamon species not stated); vs. Placebo or control (RCTs)Menstrual cyclicity in six months: improved (MD= 2.28, 95% CI: 1.83 to 2.73, p< 0.00001)
32 Novakovic et al. 2024reviewCinnamon, species and form not stated; vs. No uniform comparator; review of animal and clinical studieshormonal status: improved
33 Służały et al. 2024reviewcinnamon (form not reported); vs. other natural products and controlliver enzymes: no difference
40 Kaag et al. 2023reviewCinnamon extract (Cinnamomum species not specified); vs. Placebo or control in RCTsallergic rhinitis symptoms: improved

Further studies in this area: 43 45 46 63 69 70 73 74 76 79 80 81 82 83 88 89 91 92 95 101 106 107 109 110 111 113 114 115 118 121 123 124 134

4. How Is Cinnamon Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies

The studies tested cinnamon predominantly as a capsule or powder, and also as an aqueous or alcoholic bark extract, as cinnamon oil and as a cinnamon infusion or cinnamon tea. Individual investigations used cinnamon as an ingredient in fortified foods or as a nasal rinse. Ceylon cinnamon and Cassia cinnamon were explicitly distinguished only in some of the studies; many reviews do not name the cinnamon type and the preparation form.

Preparation or formDoseDurationStudy
Cinnamomum zeylanicum (Ceylon cinnamon) extract250 mg or 500 mgfour months58
3 g cinnamon with three glasses of black tea3 g cinnamon daily8 weeks59
Cinnamon supplement (form not stated)—28 days60
250 mL cinnamon infusion250 mL infusionSingle administration, measured at 60 minutes61
Cinnamon capsules (species not stated)3 g per day90 days62
Young Ceylon cinnamon bark (Alba grade), capsules1.5 g/day120 days63
Standardized Cinnamomum zeylanicum (Ceylon cinnamon) extract, capsules1000 mg/day (two capsules daily)12 weeks64
Encapsulated Ceylon cinnamon powder (Cinnamomum verum)3 g/day90 days65
Cinnamon, species not stated3 g per day90 days66
cinnamon powder (species not stated)0.5 g cinnamon powder daily3 months67
Spice powder mixture with cinnamon, ginger and black seed3 g/day powder (spice or placebo)12 weeks68
Water-soluble cinnamon extract versus placebo—6 months69
Cinnamon (form and species not stated)—3 menstrual cycles70
3 cinnamon capsules daily, each 500 mg cinnamon (species not stated)3 capsules daily, each 500 mg cinnamon8 weeks71
cinnamon capsules, 500 mg cinnamon each3 capsules daily8 weeks72

5. Is Cinnamon Safe? Side Effects in Studies

The studies predominantly report good tolerability of cinnamon preparations. An overview of meta-analyses found no significant toxic or side effects compared with placebo, regardless of dose and duration 43. Individual studies report skin rash with cinnamon oil 78, dyspepsia with discontinuation in two participants 112, and oral mucosal changes from cinnamon-containing chewing gum and cinnamon-containing candies 109; in a study in prediabetes, no serious adverse events occurred 99.

StudyReported side effects
2 Long et al. 2023Adding polyphenols did not increase adverse events
8 Zhou et al. 2022Adverse effect in only one patient
10 Wu et al. 2022Safety assessed, no event data reported
11 Maierean et al. 2017not reported
23 Al-Makhmari et al. 2025Safety profile noted as research need, no data
34 Bakhach et al. 2024Safety extremely well documented, few adverse effects
43 Gu et al. 2021No significant toxic or side effects versus placebo regardless of dose and duration
54 Medagama et al. 2014safety data limited, not detailed
58 Ranasinghe et al. 2025described as safe, no details reported
60 Laffin et al. 2023Adverse event rates similar across groups
64 Muthukuda et al. 2025Favorable safety profile
76 Chen et al. 2021described as safe, no numbers reported

6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence

  • Many reviews name neither the cinnamon type (Ceylon or Cassia) nor the preparation form, so it remains open for which form the findings apply.
  • The amounts tested differ between the studies, and results for one form cannot be transferred to another.
  • Some of the studies investigated combination preparations with other active substances, whose results cannot be attributed to cinnamon alone.
  • The study durations are predominantly short, and several investigations are small or incompletely reported.
  • For menstrual pain and digestive complaints, the number of controlled studies is small.

7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Cinnamon

Cinnamon is the dried inner bark of trees of the genus Cinnamomum, traded mainly as Ceylon cinnamon and Cassia cinnamon. Human studies show improvements in fasting blood sugar, long-term blood sugar and postprandial glucose as well as in body mass index, body weight, waist circumference and blood pressure in adults with type 2 diabetes, PCOS and related metabolic disorders. Several meta-analyses also found improvements in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol and triglycerides, while other studies showed no differences. For inflammation and oxidation markers, the findings are mixed: improvements in individual markers stand alongside studies with no difference.

The strength of evidence is high for blood sugar, blood lipids, inflammation markers, body weight and blood pressure, moderate for menstrual pain and low for digestive complaints. However, the results are clearly favorable only for blood pressure; for blood sugar, blood lipids and weight they are mixed, and for inflammation markers most individual studies found no difference. It is crucial that many reviews do not report the cinnamon type, form and amount tested, and some of the studies investigated mixed preparations with other active ingredients. Results therefore apply only to the form and preparation tested in each case.

Frequently Asked Questions

How well has Cinnamon been studied in humans?

We evaluated 138 human studies on Cinnamon, including 44 randomised controlled trials and 38 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 3,313 participants in total. As of 23 October 2026.

Does Cinnamon help with blood glucose and glucose metabolism? What the studies show

We evaluated 15 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 21 controlled studies and 32 further studies; the controlled studies include 1,560 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mixed. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 46819

Does Cinnamon help with blood lipids? What the studies show

We evaluated 16 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 14 controlled studies and 11 further studies; the controlled studies include 1,108 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mixed. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 4678

Does Cinnamon help with body weight and body composition? What the studies show

We evaluated 10 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 9 controlled studies and 5 further studies; the controlled studies include 668 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mixed. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 45924

Does Cinnamon help with inflammatory and oxidative markers? What the studies show

We evaluated 5 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 10 controlled studies and 12 further studies; the controlled studies include 751 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly no difference. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 2172224

Does Cinnamon help with blood pressure? What the studies show

We evaluated 7 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 3 controlled studies and 3 further studies; the controlled studies include 240 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mostly improved. Strength of evidence under our published rules: high. Sources: 13141524

Does Cinnamon help with menstrual pain? What the studies show

We evaluated one meta-analysis or systematic review, 2 controlled studies and one further study; the controlled studies include 99 participants in total. Result of the controlled studies: mixed. Strength of evidence under our published rules: moderate. Sources: 123570102

Which cinnamon types were investigated in the studies?

Some of the studies explicitly tested Ceylon cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum), for example as bark extract or encapsulated powder 586465. Other studies used Cassia cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia), for example as aqueous bark extract 75. In many reviews, however, the cinnamon type is not named, so the findings cannot be reliably assigned to one type.

Do human studies show an effect on blood sugar?

In adults with type 2 diabetes and in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, cinnamon lowered fasting blood sugar and long-term blood sugar in several meta-analyses and randomized studies 41924263662. Individual meta-analyses and randomized studies, by contrast, found no difference in HbA1c, insulin or insulin resistance 63847525387. A single cinnamon infusion did not significantly change capillary glucose in healthy students shortly after drinking 61.

What do the studies on blood lipids show?

In several meta-analyses, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides fell 7102441. For HDL cholesterol, some meta-analyses found an increase 243841, others no difference 671127. A meta-analysis on ground Cassia cinnamon bark powder found no differences in blood lipid levels 47.

Are there studies on body weight and blood pressure?

Several meta-analyses found lower values for body weight, body mass index or waist circumference 5924284142; in a randomized study in migraine, weight and waist circumference increased under placebo, but not under cinnamon 84. Several studies, however, showed no difference in weight, body mass index or waist circumference 205051536588. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure fell in several meta-analyses 1314244151. Another meta-analysis found a reduction only in the diastolic value 15; in early-stage hypertension, only the systolic daytime value fell more under cinnamon than under placebo 98.

How tolerable is cinnamon in the studies?

The studies predominantly report good tolerability. An overview of meta-analyses found no significant toxic or side effects compared with placebo, regardless of dose and duration 43. Individual studies report skin rash with cinnamon oil 78, dyspepsia with discontinuation in two participants 112, and oral mucosal changes from cinnamon-containing chewing gum and cinnamon-containing candies 109.

Sources

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
    Maierean SM, Serban MC, Sahebkar A, Ursoniu S, Serban A, Penson P et al. · 2017
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
    Ghavami A, Haghighian HK, Roshanravan N, Ziaei R, Ghaedi E, Moravejolahkami AR et al. · 2021
  16. 16
    Gheflati A, Pahlavani N, Nattagh-Eshtivani E, Namkhah Z, Ghazvinikor M, Ranjbar G et al. · 2023
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
    Al-Makhmari S, Al-Aufi A, Al-Kindi S, Alriyami M, Sakr H, Boulassel MR et al. · 2025
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
    Garza MC, Pérez-Calahorra S, Rodrigo-Carbó C, Sánchez-Calavera MA, Jarauta E, Mateo-Gallego R et al. · 2024
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
  42. 42
    Keramati M, Musazadeh V, Malekahmadi M, Jamilian P, Jamilian P, Ghoreishi Z et al. · 2022
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
    Maleki V, Faghfouri AH, Tabrizi FPF, Moludi J, Saleh-Ghadimi S, Jafari-Vayghan H et al. · 2021
  47. 47
  48. 48
  49. 49
    Letarouilly JG, Sanchez P, Nguyen Y, Sigaux J, Czernichow S, Flipo RM et al. · 2020
  50. 50
  51. 51
  52. 52
  53. 53
  54. 54
  55. 55
  56. 56
    Diabetes mellitus and phytotherapy in Turkey
    Parildar H, Serter R, Yesilada E · 2011
  57. 57
    Complementary and alternative medicine for the treatment of type 2 diabetes
    Nahas R, Moher M · 2009
  58. 58
    Ranasinghe P, Galappatthy P, Constantine GR, Jayawardena R, Weeratunga HD, Premakumara S et al. · 2025
  59. 59
  60. 60
    Laffin LJ, Bruemmer D, Garcia M, Brennan DM, McErlean E, Jacoby DS et al. · 2023
  61. 61
  62. 62
  63. 63
    Mandal A, Sharma SK, Yadav SRM, Mirza AA, Thakur MS, Jachak S et al. · 2023
  64. 64
  65. 65
    Lira Neto JCG, Araújo MFM, Penha JCD, Bezerra MAR, Fernandes BKC, Maranhão TA et al. · 2025
  66. 66
    Lira Neto JCG, Araújo MFM, Araújo AVEC, Figueira JNR, Maranhão TA, Damasceno MMC · 2023
  67. 67
  68. 68
    Al Dhaheri AS, Alkhatib DH, Feehan J, Cheikh Ismail L, Apostolopoulos V, Stojanovska L · 2024
  69. 69
  70. 70
    Effects of Dry Figs on Primary Dysmenorrhea Symptoms, perceived Stress Levels and the Quality of Life
    Amanak K · 2020
  71. 71
  72. 72
  73. 73
  74. 74
    Mehrabian S, Tirgari B, Beitollahi M, Forouzi MA, Khandani BK · 2025
  75. 75
  76. 76
  77. 77
  78. 78
  79. 79
    Refaei M, Karami Z, Kazemi F, Moradkhani S, Masoumi SZ, Jenabi E et al. · 2024
  80. 80
  81. 81
  82. 82
  83. 83
    Zareie A, Sahebkar A, Khorvash F, Bagherniya M, Hasanzadeh A, Askari G · 2020
  84. 84
  85. 85
  86. 86
  87. 87
  88. 88
  89. 89
    Peivandi S, Heydari-Latibari S, Ghasemzadeh F, Zamaniyan M, Bahar A, Majidi H et al. · 2024
  90. 90
  91. 91
    de Araújo MRC, Maciel PP, Castellano LRC, Bonan PRF, Alves DDN, de Medeiros ACD et al. · 2021
  92. 92
  93. 93
  94. 94
  95. 95
    Soares APDC, de Faria NC, Graciano GF, Dos Santos ALS, Valenzuela VDC, Toulson Davisson Correia MI et al. · 2022
  96. 96
  97. 97
  98. 98
    Cinnamon effects on blood pressure and metabolic profile: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with stage 1 hypertension
    Shirzad F, Morovatdar N, Rezaee R, Tsarouhas K, Abdollahi Moghadam A · 2021
  99. 99
  100. 100
  101. 101
  102. 102
  103. 103
  104. 104
  105. 105
  106. 106
  107. 107
    Güngör Serin B, Temiz BE, Tuncer H, Atakul MO, Gunes AC, Onat T et al. · 2026
  108. 108
  109. 109
    Kalogirou EM, Aktypi-Bampouranou A, Vasilaki M, Chatzidimitriou K, Tosios KI · 2026
  110. 110
  111. 111
    Ngô C, Sidibe FM, Goossens S, Tapa DZ, Kriegel I, Kone AA et al. · 2025
  112. 112
    Ranasinghe P, Jayawardena R, Pigera S, Wathurapatha WS, Weeratunga HD, Premakumara GAS et al. · 2017
  113. 113
  114. 114
  115. 115
    Acharya SB, Ghosh S, Yadav G, Sharma K, Ghosh S, Joshi S · 2018
  116. 116
  117. 117
  118. 118
  119. 119
  120. 120
    Schenk S, Pignolet-Marti A, Graz B, Cavin AL, Puder JJ · 2026
  121. 121
  122. 122
  123. 123
  124. 124
  125. 125
    Cheng J, Li J, Xiong RG, Wu SX, Xu XY, Tang GY et al. · 2024
  126. 126
    Nyulas KI, Simon-Szabó Z, Pál S, Fodor MA, Dénes L, Cseh MJ et al. · 2024
  127. 127
  128. 128
    McBenedict B, Orfao AL, Goh KS, Yau RCC, Alphonse B, Machado Lima J et al. · 2024
  129. 129
  130. 130
    Srivastava SP, Upadhyay P, Das S, Tiwari N, Mishra S, Tripathi SM · 2024
  131. 131
  132. 132
  133. 133
  134. 134
    Tsui PF, Lin CS, Ho LJ, Lai JH · 2018
  135. 135
    Kim Y, Keogh JB, Clifton PM · 2016
  136. 136
  137. 137
    Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Options For Type 2 Diabetes: Complementary & Integrative Health Approaches (Including Natural Products And Mind/Body Practices)
    McKennon SA · 2000

Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.

International Health Research · https://ih-research.com/en/knowledge/cinnamon/ · Last updated: 2026-10-23