Cinnamon
Cinnamon is the dried inner bark of Cinnamomum species; human studies show reductions in blood pressure, with mixed results for blood sugar and weight.
We evaluated 138 human studies on Cinnamon, including 44 randomised controlled trials and 38 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 3,313 participants in total. As of 23 October 2026.
1. What Is Cinnamon? Occurrence, Origin and Forms
Cinnamon is the dried inner bark of trees of the genus Cinnamomum in the laurel family (Lauraceae) and is used worldwide as a spice. Two species dominate trade: Ceylon cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) and cassia (Cinnamomum cassia). Traditionally, cinnamon is regarded as a warming remedy that was used, among other things, for digestive complaints.
The trees grow in tropical regions, including Sri Lanka, southern India, China, Indonesia and Vietnam. Cinnamon is used as a spice in foods and drinks as well as in capsules, extracts and oils.
For harvesting, young shoots are peeled, and the bark is dried and rolled into quills or ground. Extracts are made with water or alcohol, and the essential oil by steam distillation. In human studies, bark powder in capsules, aqueous and alcoholic extracts, and the essential oil are the forms mainly examined.
Forms and Preparations Studied
- Ceylon cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) as bark or powder
- Cassia cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia) as bark or powder
- Aqueous or alcoholic bark extract, usually in capsule form
- Essential oil from the bark
- Cinnamon infusion or cinnamon tea
- Cinnamon as an ingredient in fortified foods
Not covered on this page:
- Isolated cinnamaldehyde or cinnamic acid as a single substance; a study on it is not a study on cinnamon.
- Other spices such as clove, nutmeg or ginger.
- Leaves and flowers of other Cinnamomum species traded as spice leaf or bud.
2. What Does Cinnamon Do? Results by Area
| Area | Result in controlled studies | Strength of evidence | Studies | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood glucose and glucose metabolism | mixed | high | 15 meta-analyses · 21 controlled · 32 other | 1,560 |
| Blood lipids | mixed | high | 16 meta-analyses · 14 controlled · 11 other | 1,108 |
| Body weight and body composition | mixed | high | 10 meta-analyses · 9 controlled · 5 other | 668 |
| Inflammatory and oxidative markers | mostly no difference | high | 5 meta-analyses · 10 controlled · 12 other | 751 |
| Blood pressure | mostly improved | high | 7 meta-analyses · 3 controlled · 3 other | 240 |
| Menstrual pain | mixed | moderate | 1 meta-analyses · 2 controlled · 1 other | 99 |
| Digestive complaints | mostly no difference | low | 0 meta-analyses · 2 controlled · 2 other | 134 |
| Other investigations | mixed | high | 5 meta-analyses · 16 controlled · 20 other | 924 |
How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.
3. What the Studies Show in Detail
Cinnamon, Blood Glucose and Glucose Metabolism: Human Studies
In adults with type 2 diabetes and in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, cinnamon lowered fasting blood sugar in several meta-analyses 419242636. Long-term blood sugar also improved in several controlled studies and meta-analyses 42426365862. Blood sugar after eating fell in meta-analyses 424. With a single test meal, cinnamon flattened the rise in blood sugar compared with the control meal 9496. In prediabetes, continuously measured glucose levels were lower with cinnamon than with placebo 97, and fasting blood sugar did not rise with cinnamon, but did with placebo 99. One meta-analysis and several randomized studies found no difference in fasting blood sugar 38879298. For HbA1c, insulin or insulin resistance, individual meta-analyses and one randomized study found no difference 63847525387. A single cinnamon infusion did not significantly change capillary glucose in healthy students shortly after drinking 61. The strength of evidence is high, but the results are mixed; many reviews do not state the cinnamon type and form, and the amounts tested differ; results for one form cannot be transferred to another. It remains open which cinnamon type and which preparation at which amount has the greatest benefit.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 de et al. 2025 | systematic review · 3,054 participants | Cinnamon supplementation, mostly capsules; species not stated; ≤2 g/day and >2 g/day; 30 to 120 days; vs. Placebo or control group | Fasting blood glucose: improved (WMD: -15.26 mg/dL; 95% CI: -22.23 to -8.30); Postprandial glucose: improved (WMD: -39.22 mg/dL; 95% CI: -63.90 to -14.55); HbA1c: improved (WMD: -0.56 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.99 to -0.13) |
| 6 Krittanawong et al. 2022 | meta-analysis · 1,070 participants | cinnamon consumption, type and form not specified; vs. cinnamon consumption vs no cinnamon consumption | hemoglobin A1C: no difference (WMD of 0.0 (CI, -0.44-0.45)) |
| 8 Zhou et al. 2022 | meta-analysis · 1,020 participants | Cinnamon supplement (type/form not specified); 40 days to 4 months; vs. Placebo | glycolipid levels (glucose): improved (All p < 0.05) |
| 19 Wahyuningtyas et al. 2021 | meta-analysis · 206 participants | Cinnamon extract (cinnamon species not stated); vs. Placebo or control (RCTs) | Fasting blood glucose: improved (MD= -4.8 mg/dL, 95% CI: -8.04 to -1.57, p=0.004); Insulin level: improved (MD = -2.20 mIU/dL, 95% CI: -4.17 to -0.23, p=0.03) |
| 23 Al-Makhmari et al. 2025 | review | Cassia cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia); vs. Randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses | glucose transport and enzyme inhibition: improved |
| 24 Jafari et al. 2025 | meta-analysis | Cinnamon supplementation; vs. Control group | Fasting glucose: improved (SMD = - 1.28; 95% CI: - 1.65, - 0.90); Fasting insulin: improved (SMD = - 0.26; 95% CI: - 0.50, - 0.02); HbA1c: improved (SMD = - 0.71; 95% CI: - 1.02, - 0.40) |
| 25 Gou et al. 2025 | review | cinnamon supplementation (type and form not specified); higher doses >1.5 g/day favorable; shorter duration ≤2 months favorable; vs. placebo (randomized placebo-controlled trials) | fasting blood glucose: improved; insulin resistance: improved |
| 26 Moridpour et al. 2024 | meta-analysis | Cinnamon supplementation (type/form not specified); vs. Control group | Fasting blood sugar: improved (SMD: -1.32; 95% CI: -1.77, -0.87, p < 0.001); Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance: improved (SMD: -1.32; 95% CI: -1.77, -0.87, p < 0.001); Hemoglobin A1C: improved (SMD: -0.67; 95% CI: -1.18, -0.15, p = 0.011) |
Further studies in this area: 28 30 31 32 34 36 38 39 41 44 46 47 50 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 61 62 63 64 67 68 72 73 77 87 89 90 92 94 96 97 98 99 100 104 105 108 112 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 125 128 129 130 131 132 133 135 136 137
Cinnamon and Blood Lipids: Human Studies
In adults with type 2 diabetes and related metabolic disorders, LDL cholesterol fell in several meta-analyses 710242841. Total cholesterol and triglycerides also fell in several meta-analyses 7102441; one meta-analysis found a reduction only in triglycerides and total cholesterol 11, another only in triglycerides 27. For HDL cholesterol, some meta-analyses found an increase 243841, others no difference 671127. A meta-analysis on ground Cassia cinnamon bark powder found no differences in total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL and HDL 47, and a further review without stating type and form likewise found no differences in blood lipid levels 52. Individual randomized studies found no difference compared with placebo in LDL cholesterol 6064 and in the lipid profile 8992; after a cinnamon test meal, triglycerides did not differ from the control meal 94. The findings come predominantly from supplements in capsule form, whose cinnamon type was mostly not reported. The strength of evidence of the reviews is high, but the nonspecific statement of cinnamon type, form and amount as well as the short study durations limit the transferability to concrete preparations.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 de et al. 2025 | systematic review · 3,054 participants | Cinnamon supplementation, mostly capsules; species not stated; ≤2 g/day and >2 g/day; 30 to 120 days; vs. Placebo or control group | Total cholesterol (capsule form): improved (WMD: -13.39 mg/dL; 95% CI: -24.71 to -2.07); LDL-C (capsule form): improved (WMD: -6.49 mg/dL, 95% CI: -12.69 to -0.29); Triglycerides (capsule form): improved (WND: -19.75 mg/dL; 95% CI, -33.71 to -5.80) |
| 6 Krittanawong et al. 2022 | meta-analysis · 1,070 participants | cinnamon consumption, type and form not specified; vs. cinnamon consumption vs no cinnamon consumption | LDL cholesterol: no difference (WMD 0.38 (CI, -6.07-6.83)); HDL cholesterol: no difference (WMD 0.40 (CI, -1.14-1.94)) |
| 7 Jamali et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 1,025 participants | Cinnamon supplementation (type/form not stated); Trials < 2 and ≥ 2 months; vs. Control groups of included trials | Triglycerides: improved (WMD: -26.27 mg/dl, 95 % CI: [-38.93, -13.61], P < 0.001); Total cholesterol: improved (WMD: -13.93 mg/dl, 95 % CI: [-25.64, -2.22], P = 0.020); LDL-C: improved (WMD: -6.13 mg/dl, 95 % CI: [-10.72, -1.53], P = 0.009) |
| 8 Zhou et al. 2022 | meta-analysis · 1,020 participants | Cinnamon supplement (type/form not specified); 40 days to 4 months; vs. Placebo | glycolipid levels (lipids): improved (All p < 0.05) |
| 10 Wu et al. 2022 | meta-analysis · 773 participants | Cinnamon or its extracts, species not specified; High-dose subgroup ≥1.5 g/d; vs. Placebo | Total cholesterol: improved (WMD: -0.19 mmol/L [-7.34 mg/dL]; 95% CI: -0.24, -0.14 [-9.27, -5.41]); Triglycerides: improved (WMD: -0.10 mmol/L [-8.85 mg/dL]; 95% CI: -0.16, -0.04 [-14.16, -3.54]); LDL cholesterol: improved (WMD: -0.16 mmol/L [-6.18 mg/dL]; 95% CI: -0.20, -0.11 [-7.72, -4.25]) |
| 11 Maierean et al. 2017 | meta-analysis · 750 participants | Cinnamon supplementation (type and form not specified); Dose not reported in abstract; Supplementation duration examined as meta-regressor; vs. Control groups of included RCTs | Triglycerides: improved (WMD: -0.27 mmol/L [-23.91 mg/dL], 95% CI: -0.39, -0.14 [-34.54, -12.40], P < .01); Total cholesterol: improved (WMD: -0.36 mmol/L [-13.92 mg/dL], 95% CI: -0.63, -0.09 [-24.36, -3.48], P < .01); LDL cholesterol: no difference (WMD: -0.16 mmol/L [-6.19 mg/dL], 95% CI: -0.35, 0.03 [-13.53, 1.16], P = .10) |
| 19 Wahyuningtyas et al. 2021 | meta-analysis · 206 participants | Cinnamon extract (cinnamon species not stated); vs. Placebo or control (RCTs) | HDL-cholesterol: unclear (MD= -27.24 mg/dL, 95% CI: -32.62 to -21.85, p< 0.00001) |
| 24 Jafari et al. 2025 | meta-analysis | Cinnamon supplementation; vs. Control group | LDL-C: improved (SMD = - 0.71; 95% CI: - 1.02, - 0.40); Total cholesterol: improved (SMD = - 1.15; 95% CI: - 1.55, - 0.75); Triglycerides: improved (SMD = - 0.91; 95% CI: - 1.25, - 0.56) |
Further studies in this area: 25 27 28 30 32 37 38 39 41 46 47 50 52 58 60 64 66 68 71 77 89 92 93 94 97 98 100 112 122 127 129 132 133
Cinnamon, Body Weight and Body Composition: Human Studies
In several meta-analyses, body mass index fell compared with the control groups 5942. Body weight also improved in several studies 592842. Waist circumference fell in several meta-analyses 92441 and in one randomized study in migraine 84; the waist-to-hip ratio fell in one meta-analysis and in the same study 584. One meta-analysis also found a reduction in fat mass 9. This is contrasted by several studies that showed no difference in weight, body mass index or waist circumference 205051536588; body adiposity index and neck circumference also did not differ in one randomized study 65. The findings come predominantly from cinnamon supplements in capsule or powder form, whose cinnamon type is often not stated. In one randomized study in type 2 diabetes, cinnamon added to black tea showed no confirmed difference in body measurements 59. The strength of evidence is high, but the results are mixed; preparations, forms and participant groups differ, and the cinnamon type is often missing.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 de et al. 2025 | systematic review · 3,054 participants | Cinnamon supplementation, mostly capsules; species not stated; ≤2 g/day and >2 g/day; 30 to 120 days; vs. Placebo or control group | BMI (dose ≤2 g/day): improved (WMD: -1.18 kg/m2; 95% CI: -1.97 to -0.39) |
| 5 Yazdanpanah et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 1,480 participants | Cinnamon supplementation (type and form not reported); vs. Control groups of included RCTs | Body mass index: improved (WMD = -0.40 kg/m2, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.22 kg/m2, p < .001); Body weight: improved (WMD = -0.92 kg; 95% CI: -1.51, -0.33 kg; p = .002); Waist-hip ratio: improved (WMD = -0.02, 95% CI: -0.038, -0.018; p < 0.001) |
| 9 Mousavi et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 786 participants | Cinnamon supplementation (type/form not stated); ≥2 g/d for fat mass effects; ≥12 weeks for fat mass effects; vs. Control group | Body weight: improved (WMD: -1.02 kg, 95% CI: -1.66 to -0.38, P = 0.002); Body Mass Index: improved (WMD: -0.51 kg/m2, 95% CI: -0.74, -0.28, P < 0.001); Waist circumference: improved (WMD: -2.40 cm, 95% CI: -4.48, -0.33, P = 0.02) |
| 24 Jafari et al. 2025 | meta-analysis | Cinnamon supplementation; vs. Control group | Waist circumference: improved (SMD = - 0.40; 95% (CI): - 0.73, - 0.06) |
| 28 Xiaomei et al. 2024 | systematic review | Cinnamon supplementation, form not specified; vs. Placebo or control (12 RCTs) | Weight reduction (WMD): improved (-0.47 kg (95 % CI: -0.80 to -0.15, p < 0.001)) |
| 32 Novakovic et al. 2024 | review | Cinnamon, species and form not stated; vs. No uniform comparator; review of animal and clinical studies | obesity: improved |
| 41 Kutbi et al. 2022 | meta-analysis | Cinnamon supplementation (type/form not reported); Robust in studies using dose ≤1.5 g; vs. Control groups of randomized trials | Waist circumference: improved (WMD = -1.68 cm; P = 0.016) |
| 42 Keramati et al. 2022 | systematic review | Cinnamon supplementation, type and form not stated; ≥3 g/day more favorable; vs. Control group | body weight: improved (ES: -0.67 kg; 95% CI: -0.99, -0.35, p ˂ .001); body mass index: improved (ES: -0.45 kg/m2 ; 95% CI: -0.57, -0.33, p ˂ .001); waist circumference: no difference (ES: -1.05 cm; 95% CI: -2.26, 0.15, p = .087) |
Further studies in this area: 46 50 51 53 59 65 72 73 82 88 89 100 103 112 122 132
Cinnamon, Inflammatory and Oxidative Markers: Human Studies
In adults with metabolic disorders, type 2 diabetes, PCOS, rheumatoid arthritis and migraine, several controlled studies and meta-analyses found improvements in individual inflammation and oxidation markers. For CRP, improvements were shown in several controlled studies and meta-analyses 17244892. Malondialdehyde improved in several controlled studies and meta-analyses 244871. Antioxidant capacity improved in several controlled studies and meta-analyses 2529374871. Interleukin-6 fell borderline significantly in several meta-analyses and in one randomized study in migraine compared with placebo 29374883. Reviews of meta-analyses, by contrast, found no confirmed difference for malondialdehyde and CRP 2937, and one randomized study in type 2 diabetes found no difference for malondialdehyde and antioxidant capacity 87. The findings come predominantly from cinnamon powder in capsules, as well as from bark extracts and unspecified cinnamon supplements; the cinnamon type (Ceylon or Cassia) and the amount tested are mostly not reported. After a cinnamon test meal, interleukin-6 did not differ from the control meal 94. The strength of evidence is high, but most individual controlled studies found no difference; it remains open which preparation reliably influences which inflammation markers.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Long et al. 2023 | review · 3,852 participants | Cinnamon extract among 14 other polyphenol sources; vs. Control (placebo/standard care) per RCT | Disease activity score DAS28: improved; CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate: improved; Oxidative stress: improved |
| 17 Vallianou et al. 2019 | meta-analysis · 285 participants | Ceylon cinnamon (Cinnamomum Zeylanicum), form not stated; Subgroups <1500 mg/day and ≥1500 mg/day; Subgroup >12 weeks; vs. Control groups | serum CRP: improved (WMD: -0.81 mg/L, 95% CI: -1.36 to -0.26, p = 0.004) |
| 22 Johnson et al. 2026 | review | cinnamon among other spices, type/form not stated; 7 days; vs. other spices or control, not separately reported | DNA strand breaks in PBMCs: no difference |
| 24 Jafari et al. 2025 | meta-analysis | Cinnamon supplementation; vs. Control group | CRP: improved (SMD = - 0.78; 95% CI: - 1.28, - 0.27); MDA: improved (SMD = - 0.76; 95% CI: - 1.07, - 0.45) |
| 25 Gou et al. 2025 | review | cinnamon supplementation (type and form not specified); higher doses >1.5 g/day favorable; shorter duration ≤2 months favorable; vs. placebo (randomized placebo-controlled trials) | antioxidant capacity: improved |
| 29 Zhang et al. 2024 | systematic review | Cinnamon supplementation, type and form not stated; vs. Control groups of included RCTs | Total antioxidant capacity (TAC): improved (WMD = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.64); Interleukin-6 (IL-6): improved (WMD = -1.48; 95% CI: 2.96, -0.01); Malondialdehyde (MDA): no difference (WMD = -0.47; 95% CI: 0.99, 0.05) |
| 30 Banaszak et al. 2024 | review | Cinnamon alongside curcumin and resveratrol | Total antioxidant capacity, MDA, TNF-α, IL-6, hs-CRP: improved |
| 32 Novakovic et al. 2024 | review | Cinnamon, species and form not stated; vs. No uniform comparator; review of animal and clinical studies | oxidative stress and inflammation: improved |
Further studies in this area: 37 40 46 48 49 59 67 71 72 83 85 86 87 92 94 121 122 132 133
Cinnamon and Blood Pressure: Human Studies
Several meta-analyses found a reduction in systolic blood pressure from cinnamon in adults, some with metabolic diseases or type 2 diabetes 131424294151. For diastolic blood pressure, the same meta-analyses also showed a reduction 131424294151. Another meta-analysis found no overall difference for systolic blood pressure, but a reduction for diastolic blood pressure 15. In early-stage hypertension, blood pressure at the end of the study did not differ between cinnamon and placebo; only the daytime change in the systolic value was greater with cinnamon 98. In type 2 diabetes, a randomized study with cinnamon added to black tea found no difference 59. In the meta-analyses and reviews, cinnamon type and preparation form are mostly not reported, so it remains open whether the findings apply to Ceylon cinnamon, Cassia cinnamon, powder or extract; the amount tested is also not stated there.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Mousavi et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 641 participants | Oral cinnamon supplementation (type/form not reported); ≤2 g cinnamon showed greater SBP effect; ≥12 weeks showed greater SBP effect; vs. Control groups of included RCTs | Systolic blood pressure: improved (WMD: -6.23 mmHg, 95% CI: -10.69 to -1.77, P = 0.006); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (WMD: -3.93 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.33 to -1.52, P = 0.001) |
| 14 Hadi et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 641 participants | Cinnamon supplement, type not specified; ≤2 g/day in significant subgroups; longer than 8 weeks in significant subgroups; vs. placebo/control in 9 RCTs | Systolic blood pressure: improved (WMD: -5.17 mmHg, 95% CI: -9.35 to -0.99, P = 0.01); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (WMD: -3.36 mmHg, 95% CI: -5.67 to -1.04, P ≤ 0.001) |
| 15 Ghavami et al. 2021 | meta-analysis · 582 participants | Cinnamon supplement, type and form not stated; high dose >1500 mg/day examined; long duration ≥8 weeks examined; vs. control groups of included RCTs | Systolic blood pressure: no difference (WMD: -0.61mmHg; 95% CI: -1.36, 0.14, P= 0.111); Systolic blood pressure at ≥8 weeks: improved (WMD: -1.25 mmHg; 95% CI: -2.22, -0.28, P= 0.012); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (WMD: -0.93mmHg, 95% CI: -1.55 to -0.32, P= 0.003) |
| 24 Jafari et al. 2025 | meta-analysis | Cinnamon supplementation; vs. Control group | Diastolic blood pressure: improved (SMD = - 1.04; 95% CI: - 1.54, - 0.55); Systolic blood pressure: improved (SMD = - 0.85; 95% CI: - 1.54, - 0.16) |
| 25 Gou et al. 2025 | review | cinnamon supplementation (type and form not specified); higher doses >1.5 g/day favorable; shorter duration ≤2 months favorable; vs. placebo (randomized placebo-controlled trials) | blood pressure regulation: improved |
| 29 Zhang et al. 2024 | systematic review | Cinnamon supplementation, type and form not stated; vs. Control groups of included RCTs | Systolic blood pressure: improved (ES = -2.36 mmHg; 95% CI: 3.86, -1.40); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (ES = -1.65 mmHg; 95% CI: 2.41, -0.90) |
| 41 Kutbi et al. 2022 | meta-analysis | Cinnamon supplementation (type/form not reported); Robust in studies using dose ≤1.5 g; vs. Control groups of randomized trials | Systolic blood pressure: improved (WMD = -3.95 mmHg; P = 0.018); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (WMD = -3.36 mmHg; P = 0.001) |
| 51 Jamali et al. 2020 | meta-analysis | Cinnamon supplementation, type and form not specified; vs. Control group without cinnamon | Systolic blood pressure: improved (SMD: -0.532, 95% CI: [-1.032, -0.033], P = 0.037); Diastolic blood pressure: improved (SMD: -0.681, 95% CI: [-1.297, -0.065], P = 0.030) |
Further studies in this area: 59 92 98 112 126
Cinnamon and Menstrual Pain: Human Studies
In menstrual pain, cinnamon in capsules reduced pain intensity more than placebo in a randomized study 102. In a randomized study with female students, dried figs relieved pain intensity and duration more than cinnamon and placebo; a benefit of cinnamon over placebo is not reported 70. The strength of evidence is moderate; the number of controlled studies is small, the number of participants is limited, and for several studies precise information on the type, form and amount of cinnamon tested is missing. It remains open whether the findings can be transferred to a specific cinnamon type or preparation.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Xu et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 647 participants | Cinnamon, fennel or ginger (form not reported); Observation period one cycle; vs. Placebo | Pain intensity, cinnamon vs. placebo: improved (WMD = 1.815, 95% CI = 1.330-2.301); Pain duration, cinnamon vs. placebo: improved (WMD = 16.200, 95% CI = 15.271-17.129) |
| 35 Tahir et al. 2024 | meta-analysis | Aromatherapy with essential oils, including cinnamon; vs. Control or no aromatherapy arm | Pain score in primary dysmenorrhea: improved (SMD -3.19 (CI -5.09, -1.28; I² = 98%)); Pain score in RCTs: improved (− 0.98 (CI-1.40, -0.57; I² = 64%)); moderate to severe pain: improved (RR: 0.39; CI 0.25, 0.60; I² = 36%) |
| 70 Amanak et al. 2020 | randomised controlled · 99 participants | Cinnamon (form and species not stated); 3 menstrual cycles; vs. Placebo and dried figs | pain severity and duration: unclear |
| 102 Jahangirifar et al. 2018 | randomised controlled | Cinnamon capsules, 1000 mg; 1000 mg during first 72 h of menstruation; two consecutive cycles; vs. Placebo (1000 mg starch) | pain intensity (VAS): improved (P = 0.001); pain intensity (VAS), second treatment: improved (P = 0.002) |
Cinnamon and Digestive Complaints: Human Studies
In cancer patients with nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy, inhaling cinnamon oil relieved the symptoms more than a saline control 74. In diarrheal symptoms, an aqueous extract of Cassia cinnamon prolonged intestinal transit time and changed stool values and gut flora compared with placebo 75. In functional dyspepsia, symptoms improved with cinnamon oil capsules and with a sesame oil placebo, with no difference between the groups 78. The strength of evidence is low, the studies are small and examine different forms, so findings cannot be transferred to other preparations.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Phang et al. 2026 | review | Cinnamon oil, partly combined with peppermint-caraway oil; vs. various dietary categories, narratively synthesised | dyspepsia symptoms: unclear |
| 75 Park et al. 2023 | randomised controlled · 70 participants | Cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia) water extract (CWE), capsules; three 400 mg CWE capsules twice daily; 8 weeks; vs. placebo | colonic transit time: improved (p = 0.019); fecal isobutyric acid: improved (p = 0.008); fecal spermidine: improved (p = 0.009) |
| 78 Zobeiri et al. 2021 | randomised controlled · 64 participants | Cinnamon oil soft capsule (Cinnamomum zeylanicum), standardized to cinnamaldehyde; 6 weeks; vs. Sesame oil soft capsule as placebo | total dyspepsia score: no difference (P=0.174) |
| 97 Zelicha et al. 2024 | randomised controlled · 18 participants | Cinnamon spice (species not stated in abstract); 4 g/d; 4 weeks per phase, 2-week washout; vs. Placebo, randomized, double-blind, crossover | digestive symptoms |
Cinnamon: Further Outcomes in Studies
In a network meta-analysis, cinnamon lowered liver enzymes in fatty liver (MASLD/MASH) 1; a meta-analysis in adults found no overall difference in liver enzymes 45. A cinnamon bark nasal rinse improved quality of life in allergic rhinitis 3, and a systematic review describes lower leptin and visfatin levels 16. In migraine, cinnamon powder reduced the frequency, intensity and duration of attacks compared with placebo 83. In women with rheumatoid arthritis, cinnamon powder reduced disease activity, pain and the number of painful and swollen joints compared with placebo 92. In women with polycystic ovary syndrome, cinnamon extract improved the regularity of the menstrual cycle in a meta-analysis 19. A systematic review describes favorable findings on ovarian function in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, which further studies should confirm 46. In women with polycystic ovary syndrome, cinnamon lowered testosterone levels similarly to metformin 73. DHEA levels remained without difference 2073. Adiponectin remained without difference 16. The findings come predominantly from small studies, some with incomplete reporting, several without information on cinnamon type, form and amount. Since findings for one form cannot be transferred to another, the type, preparation and amount tested remain open for most of these outcomes.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Chen et al. 2026 | meta-analysis · 9,191 participants | Cinnamon (form not reported); vs. other herbal therapies and controls | Alanine aminotransferase: improved (MD -25.10; P = .01); Aspartate aminotransferase: improved (MD -23.50; P < .01); Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: improved (MD -12.44; P = .01) |
| 3 Hu et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 3,584 participants | Cinnamon bark nasal irrigation; vs. Placebo nasal irrigation and other irrigation agents | Quality of life (RQLQ score): improved (MD: -1.3, 95% CrI (-1.6, -0.96)) |
| 16 Gheflati et al. 2023 | review · 363 participants | Cinnamon supplementation, type and form not specified; vs. Control groups of included randomized trials | leptin levels: improved; visfatin levels: improved; adiponectin levels: no difference (non-significant) |
| 18 Mousavi et al. 2021 | systematic review · 256 participants | Oral cinnamon supplementation, type and form not stated; Low dose <1,500 mg/d in subgroups; Follow-up longer than 12 weeks in some trials; vs. Placebo or control (randomized trials) | Serum ALT (overall): no difference; Serum AST (overall): no difference; Serum ALP (overall): no difference |
| 19 Wahyuningtyas et al. 2021 | meta-analysis · 206 participants | Cinnamon extract (cinnamon species not stated); vs. Placebo or control (RCTs) | Menstrual cyclicity in six months: improved (MD= 2.28, 95% CI: 1.83 to 2.73, p< 0.00001) |
| 32 Novakovic et al. 2024 | review | Cinnamon, species and form not stated; vs. No uniform comparator; review of animal and clinical studies | hormonal status: improved |
| 33 Służały et al. 2024 | review | cinnamon (form not reported); vs. other natural products and control | liver enzymes: no difference |
| 40 Kaag et al. 2023 | review | Cinnamon extract (Cinnamomum species not specified); vs. Placebo or control in RCTs | allergic rhinitis symptoms: improved |
Further studies in this area: 43 45 46 63 69 70 73 74 76 79 80 81 82 83 88 89 91 92 95 101 106 107 109 110 111 113 114 115 118 121 123 124 134
4. How Is Cinnamon Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies
The studies tested cinnamon predominantly as a capsule or powder, and also as an aqueous or alcoholic bark extract, as cinnamon oil and as a cinnamon infusion or cinnamon tea. Individual investigations used cinnamon as an ingredient in fortified foods or as a nasal rinse. Ceylon cinnamon and Cassia cinnamon were explicitly distinguished only in some of the studies; many reviews do not name the cinnamon type and the preparation form.
| Preparation or form | Dose | Duration | Study |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cinnamomum zeylanicum (Ceylon cinnamon) extract | 250 mg or 500 mg | four months | 58 |
| 3 g cinnamon with three glasses of black tea | 3 g cinnamon daily | 8 weeks | 59 |
| Cinnamon supplement (form not stated) | — | 28 days | 60 |
| 250 mL cinnamon infusion | 250 mL infusion | Single administration, measured at 60 minutes | 61 |
| Cinnamon capsules (species not stated) | 3 g per day | 90 days | 62 |
| Young Ceylon cinnamon bark (Alba grade), capsules | 1.5 g/day | 120 days | 63 |
| Standardized Cinnamomum zeylanicum (Ceylon cinnamon) extract, capsules | 1000 mg/day (two capsules daily) | 12 weeks | 64 |
| Encapsulated Ceylon cinnamon powder (Cinnamomum verum) | 3 g/day | 90 days | 65 |
| Cinnamon, species not stated | 3 g per day | 90 days | 66 |
| cinnamon powder (species not stated) | 0.5 g cinnamon powder daily | 3 months | 67 |
| Spice powder mixture with cinnamon, ginger and black seed | 3 g/day powder (spice or placebo) | 12 weeks | 68 |
| Water-soluble cinnamon extract versus placebo | — | 6 months | 69 |
| Cinnamon (form and species not stated) | — | 3 menstrual cycles | 70 |
| 3 cinnamon capsules daily, each 500 mg cinnamon (species not stated) | 3 capsules daily, each 500 mg cinnamon | 8 weeks | 71 |
| cinnamon capsules, 500 mg cinnamon each | 3 capsules daily | 8 weeks | 72 |
5. Is Cinnamon Safe? Side Effects in Studies
The studies predominantly report good tolerability of cinnamon preparations. An overview of meta-analyses found no significant toxic or side effects compared with placebo, regardless of dose and duration 43. Individual studies report skin rash with cinnamon oil 78, dyspepsia with discontinuation in two participants 112, and oral mucosal changes from cinnamon-containing chewing gum and cinnamon-containing candies 109; in a study in prediabetes, no serious adverse events occurred 99.
| Study | Reported side effects |
|---|---|
| 2 Long et al. 2023 | Adding polyphenols did not increase adverse events |
| 8 Zhou et al. 2022 | Adverse effect in only one patient |
| 10 Wu et al. 2022 | Safety assessed, no event data reported |
| 11 Maierean et al. 2017 | not reported |
| 23 Al-Makhmari et al. 2025 | Safety profile noted as research need, no data |
| 34 Bakhach et al. 2024 | Safety extremely well documented, few adverse effects |
| 43 Gu et al. 2021 | No significant toxic or side effects versus placebo regardless of dose and duration |
| 54 Medagama et al. 2014 | safety data limited, not detailed |
| 58 Ranasinghe et al. 2025 | described as safe, no details reported |
| 60 Laffin et al. 2023 | Adverse event rates similar across groups |
| 64 Muthukuda et al. 2025 | Favorable safety profile |
| 76 Chen et al. 2021 | described as safe, no numbers reported |
6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence
- Many reviews name neither the cinnamon type (Ceylon or Cassia) nor the preparation form, so it remains open for which form the findings apply.
- The amounts tested differ between the studies, and results for one form cannot be transferred to another.
- Some of the studies investigated combination preparations with other active substances, whose results cannot be attributed to cinnamon alone.
- The study durations are predominantly short, and several investigations are small or incompletely reported.
- For menstrual pain and digestive complaints, the number of controlled studies is small.
7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Cinnamon
Cinnamon is the dried inner bark of trees of the genus Cinnamomum, traded mainly as Ceylon cinnamon and Cassia cinnamon. Human studies show improvements in fasting blood sugar, long-term blood sugar and postprandial glucose as well as in body mass index, body weight, waist circumference and blood pressure in adults with type 2 diabetes, PCOS and related metabolic disorders. Several meta-analyses also found improvements in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol and triglycerides, while other studies showed no differences. For inflammation and oxidation markers, the findings are mixed: improvements in individual markers stand alongside studies with no difference.
The strength of evidence is high for blood sugar, blood lipids, inflammation markers, body weight and blood pressure, moderate for menstrual pain and low for digestive complaints. However, the results are clearly favorable only for blood pressure; for blood sugar, blood lipids and weight they are mixed, and for inflammation markers most individual studies found no difference. It is crucial that many reviews do not report the cinnamon type, form and amount tested, and some of the studies investigated mixed preparations with other active ingredients. Results therefore apply only to the form and preparation tested in each case.
Frequently Asked Questions
How well has Cinnamon been studied in humans?
We evaluated 138 human studies on Cinnamon, including 44 randomised controlled trials and 38 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 3,313 participants in total. As of 23 October 2026.
Does Cinnamon help with blood glucose and glucose metabolism? What the studies show
Does Cinnamon help with blood lipids? What the studies show
Does Cinnamon help with body weight and body composition? What the studies show
Does Cinnamon help with inflammatory and oxidative markers? What the studies show
Does Cinnamon help with blood pressure? What the studies show
Does Cinnamon help with menstrual pain? What the studies show
Which cinnamon types were investigated in the studies?
Some of the studies explicitly tested Ceylon cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum), for example as bark extract or encapsulated powder 586465. Other studies used Cassia cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia), for example as aqueous bark extract 75. In many reviews, however, the cinnamon type is not named, so the findings cannot be reliably assigned to one type.
Do human studies show an effect on blood sugar?
In adults with type 2 diabetes and in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, cinnamon lowered fasting blood sugar and long-term blood sugar in several meta-analyses and randomized studies 41924263662. Individual meta-analyses and randomized studies, by contrast, found no difference in HbA1c, insulin or insulin resistance 63847525387. A single cinnamon infusion did not significantly change capillary glucose in healthy students shortly after drinking 61.
What do the studies on blood lipids show?
Are there studies on body weight and blood pressure?
Several meta-analyses found lower values for body weight, body mass index or waist circumference 5924284142; in a randomized study in migraine, weight and waist circumference increased under placebo, but not under cinnamon 84. Several studies, however, showed no difference in weight, body mass index or waist circumference 205051536588. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure fell in several meta-analyses 1314244151. Another meta-analysis found a reduction only in the diastolic value 15; in early-stage hypertension, only the systolic daytime value fell more under cinnamon than under placebo 98.
How tolerable is cinnamon in the studies?
The studies predominantly report good tolerability. An overview of meta-analyses found no significant toxic or side effects compared with placebo, regardless of dose and duration 43. Individual studies report skin rash with cinnamon oil 78, dyspepsia with discontinuation in two participants 112, and oral mucosal changes from cinnamon-containing chewing gum and cinnamon-containing candies 109.
Sources
- 1Chen Liang A, Cruz Castillo Y, Fermin Madera MD, Sairaj RT, Medina J, Moreno Díaz TA et al. · 2026
- 2Long Z, Xiang W, He Q, Xiao W, Wei H, Li H et al. · 2023
- 3Hu Q, Kong L, Zhou Y, Shen W, Sun Y, Deng J · 2025
- 4de Moura SL, Gomes BGR, Guilarducci MJ, Coelho OGL, Guimarães NS, Gomes JMG · 2025
- 5Yazdanpanah Z, Azadi-Yazdi M, Hooshmandi H, Ramezani-Jolfaie N, Salehi-Abargouei A · 2020
- 6Krittanawong C, Isath A, Scott CZ, Wang Z, Kaplin S, Jneid H et al. · 2022
- 7Jamali N, Kazemi A, Saffari-Chaleshtori J, Samare-Najaf M, Mohammadi V, Clark CCT · 2020
- 8Zhou Q, Lei X, Fu S, Li Z, Chen Y, Long C et al. · 2022
- 9Mousavi SM, Rahmani J, Kord-Varkaneh H, Sheikhi A, Larijani B, Esmaillzadeh A · 2020
- 10
- 11Maierean SM, Serban MC, Sahebkar A, Ursoniu S, Serban A, Penson P et al. · 2017
- 12
- 13Mousavi SM, Karimi E, Hajishafiee M, Milajerdi A, Amini MR, Esmaillzadeh A · 2020
- 14Hadi A, Campbell MS, Hassani B, Pourmasoumi M, Salehi-Sahlabadi A, Hosseini SA · 2020
- 15Ghavami A, Haghighian HK, Roshanravan N, Ziaei R, Ghaedi E, Moravejolahkami AR et al. · 2021
- 16Gheflati A, Pahlavani N, Nattagh-Eshtivani E, Namkhah Z, Ghazvinikor M, Ranjbar G et al. · 2023
- 17Vallianou N, Tsang C, Taghizadeh M, Davoodvandi A, Jafarnejad S · 2019
- 18Mousavi SM, Mousavi SM, Jayedi A, Bagheri A, Zargarzadeh N, Wong A et al. · 2021
- 19
- 20
- 21Phang L, Kim A, Mu C, Rostami K · 2026
- 22
- 23Al-Makhmari S, Al-Aufi A, Al-Kindi S, Alriyami M, Sakr H, Boulassel MR et al. · 2025
- 24Jafari A, Mardani H, Faghfouri AH, AhmadianMoghaddam M, Musazadeh V, Alaghi A · 2025
- 25Gou H, Zhong L, Wei Q, Fan Y · 2025
- 26Moridpour AH, Kavyani Z, Khosravi S, Farmani E, Daneshvar M, Musazadeh V et al. · 2024
- 27
- 28
- 29Zhang K, Li Y, Lin X, Daneshar M, Karamian F, Li M · 2024
- 30Banaszak M, Górna I, Woźniak D, Przysławski J, Drzymała-Czyż S · 2024
- 31Garza MC, Pérez-Calahorra S, Rodrigo-Carbó C, Sánchez-Calavera MA, Jarauta E, Mateo-Gallego R et al. · 2024
- 32Novakovic S, Jakovljevic V, Jovic N, Andric K, Milinkovic M, Anicic T et al. · 2024
- 33Służały P, Paśko P, Galanty A · 2024
- 34Bakhach H, Nuffer M, Tall Bull S, Nuffer W · 2024
- 35Tahir HN, Rehman N, Tahir M, Alotaibi N, Al-Dhubaibi MS, Mohamed NEE et al. · 2024
- 36Zarezadeh M, Musazadeh V, Foroumandi E, Keramati M, Ostadrahimi A, Mekary RA · 2023
- 37Sarmadi B, Musazadeh V, Dehghan P, Karimi E · 2023
- 38Yu T, Lu K, Cao X, Xia H, Wang S, Sun G et al. · 2023
- 39Mackonochie M, Rodriguez-Mateos A, Mills S, Rolfe V · 2023
- 40Kaag S, Lorentz A · 2023
- 41Kutbi EH, Sohouli MH, Fatahi S, Lari A, Shidfar F, Aljhdali MM et al. · 2022
- 42Keramati M, Musazadeh V, Malekahmadi M, Jamilian P, Jamilian P, Ghoreishi Z et al. · 2022
- 43Gu DT, Tung TH, Jiesisibieke ZL, Chien CW, Liu WY · 2021
- 44Heshmati J, Sepidarkish M, Morvaridzadeh M, Farsi F, Tripathi N, Razavi M et al. · 2021
- 45Shekarchizadeh-Esfahani P, Heydarpour F, Izadi F, Jalili C · 2021
- 46Maleki V, Faghfouri AH, Tabrizi FPF, Moludi J, Saleh-Ghadimi S, Jafari-Vayghan H et al. · 2021
- 47Mandal A, Sharma S, Rani R, Ranjan S, Kant R, Mirza A · 2021
- 48Zhu C, Yan H, Zheng Y, Santos HO, Macit MS, Zhao K · 2020
- 49Letarouilly JG, Sanchez P, Nguyen Y, Sigaux J, Czernichow S, Flipo RM et al. · 2020
- 50Heydarpour F, Hemati N, Hadi A, Moradi S, Mohammadi E, Farzaei MH · 2020
- 51Jamali N, Jalali M, Saffari-Chaleshtori J, Samare-Najaf M, Samareh A · 2020
- 52Deyno S, Eneyew K, Seyfe S, Tuyiringire N, Peter EL, Muluye RA et al. · 2019
- 53Namazi N, Khodamoradi K, Khamechi SP, Heshmati J, Ayati MH, Larijani B · 2019
- 54
- 55
- 56Diabetes mellitus and phytotherapy in TurkeyParildar H, Serter R, Yesilada E · 2011
- 57Complementary and alternative medicine for the treatment of type 2 diabetesNahas R, Moher M · 2009
- 58Ranasinghe P, Galappatthy P, Constantine GR, Jayawardena R, Weeratunga HD, Premakumara S et al. · 2025
- 59Azimi P, Ghiasvand R, Feizi A, Hosseinzadeh J, Bahreynian M, Hariri M et al. · 2016
- 60Laffin LJ, Bruemmer D, Garcia M, Brennan DM, McErlean E, Jacoby DS et al. · 2023
- 61
- 62Lira Neto JCG, Damasceno MMC, Ciol MA, de Freitas RWJF, de Araújo MFM, Teixeira CRS et al. · 2022
- 63Mandal A, Sharma SK, Yadav SRM, Mirza AA, Thakur MS, Jachak S et al. · 2023
- 64Muthukuda D, de Silva CK, Ajanthan S, Wijesinghe N, Dahanayaka A, Pathmeswaran A · 2025
- 65Lira Neto JCG, Araújo MFM, Penha JCD, Bezerra MAR, Fernandes BKC, Maranhão TA et al. · 2025
- 66Lira Neto JCG, Araújo MFM, Araújo AVEC, Figueira JNR, Maranhão TA, Damasceno MMC · 2023
- 67Mirmiranpour H, Huseini HF, Derakhshanian H, Khodaii Z, Tavakoli-Far B · 2020
- 68Al Dhaheri AS, Alkhatib DH, Feehan J, Cheikh Ismail L, Apostolopoulos V, Stojanovska L · 2024
- 69Pender DN, Crawford PF, Clark JM, Crawford AJ, Prats AA, Shah SA · 2018
- 70Effects of Dry Figs on Primary Dysmenorrhea Symptoms, perceived Stress Levels and the Quality of LifeAmanak K · 2020
- 71Borzoei A, Rafraf M, Niromanesh S, Farzadi L, Narimani F, Doostan F · 2018
- 72Borzoei A, Rafraf M, Asghari-Jafarabadi M · 2018
- 73Dastgheib M, Barati-Boldaji R, Bahrampour N, Taheri R, Borghei M, Amooee S et al. · 2022
- 74Mehrabian S, Tirgari B, Beitollahi M, Forouzi MA, Khandani BK · 2025
- 75Park SY, Kim YD, Kim MS, Kim KT, Kim JY · 2023
- 76Chen LL, Shen YC, Ke CC, Imtiyaz Z, Chen HI, Chang CH et al. · 2021
- 77Hajimonfarednejad M, Nimrouzi M, Heydari M, Zarshenas MM, Raee MJ, Jahromi BN · 2018
- 78Zobeiri M, Parvizi F, Shahpiri Z, Heydarpour F, Pourfarzam M, Memarzadeh MR et al. · 2021
- 79Refaei M, Karami Z, Kazemi F, Moradkhani S, Masoumi SZ, Jenabi E et al. · 2024
- 80Gandhi HA, Srilatha KT, Deshmukh S, Venkatesh MP, Das T, Sharieff I · 2020
- 81Sethi KS, Mamajiwala A, Mahale S, Raut CP, Karde P · 2019
- 82Zareie A, Bagherniya M, Sahebkar A, Sharma M, Khorvash F, Hasanzadeh A et al. · 2024
- 83Zareie A, Sahebkar A, Khorvash F, Bagherniya M, Hasanzadeh A, Askari G · 2020
- 84Zareie A, Bagherniya M, Sharma M, Khorvash F, Hasanzadeh A, Askari G · 2020
- 85Davari M, Hashemi R, Mirmiran P, Hedayati M, Sahranavard S, Bahreini S et al. · 2020
- 86Mirmiran P, Davari M, Hashemi R, Hedayati M, Sahranavard S, Bahreini S et al. · 2019
- 87Talaei B, Amouzegar A, Amouzegar A, Sahranavard S, Hedayati M, Mirmiran P et al. · 2017
- 88Gholami M, Mokhtari E, Abolghasemi J, Vafa M · 2024
- 89Peivandi S, Heydari-Latibari S, Ghasemzadeh F, Zamaniyan M, Bahar A, Majidi H et al. · 2024
- 90Rachid AP, Moncada M, Mesquita MF, Brito J, Bernardo MA, Silva ML · 2022
- 91de Araújo MRC, Maciel PP, Castellano LRC, Bonan PRF, Alves DDN, de Medeiros ACD et al. · 2021
- 92Shishehbor F, Rezaeyan Safar M, Rajaei E, Haghighizadeh MH · 2018
- 93
- 94Huang Y, Tsai MF, Thorat RS, Xiao D, Zhang X, Sandhu AK et al. · 2022
- 95Soares APDC, de Faria NC, Graciano GF, Dos Santos ALS, Valenzuela VDC, Toulson Davisson Correia MI et al. · 2022
- 96Moreira FD, Reis CEG, Gallassi AD, Moreira DC, Welker AF · 2024
- 97Zelicha H, Yang J, Henning SM, Huang J, Lee RP, Thames G et al. · 2024
- 98Cinnamon effects on blood pressure and metabolic profile: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with stage 1 hypertensionShirzad F, Morovatdar N, Rezaee R, Tsarouhas K, Abdollahi Moghadam A · 2021
- 99Romeo GR, Lee J, Mulla CM, Noh Y, Holden C, Lee BC · 2020
- 100Zare R, Nadjarzadeh A, Zarshenas MM, Shams M, Heydari M · 2019
- 101Steels E, Steels E, Deshpande P, Thakurdesai P, Dighe S, Collet T · 2019
- 102Jahangirifar M, Taebi M, Dolatian M · 2018
- 103
- 104Wang J, Wang S, Yang J, Henning SM, Ezzat-Zadeh Z, Woo SL et al. · 2020
- 105Al-Luwaym AH, Al-Quwaidhi AJ, Al-Ghadeeb RB · 2024
- 106Candar A, Demirci H, Baran AK, Akpınar Y · 2018
- 107Güngör Serin B, Temiz BE, Tuncer H, Atakul MO, Gunes AC, Onat T et al. · 2026
- 108Alzahrani MA, Alsiary KA, Khan MA, Bushnaq A, Alzahrani B, Salama M et al. · 2023
- 109Kalogirou EM, Aktypi-Bampouranou A, Vasilaki M, Chatzidimitriou K, Tosios KI · 2026
- 110Sadr S, Tahermohammadi H, Kaveh S, Khanbabaee G, Tabatabaei SA, Choopani R et al. · 2023
- 111Ngô C, Sidibe FM, Goossens S, Tapa DZ, Kriegel I, Kone AA et al. · 2025
- 112Ranasinghe P, Jayawardena R, Pigera S, Wathurapatha WS, Weeratunga HD, Premakumara GAS et al. · 2017
- 113Yesukumar SJ, Bakir L, Mohamed IA, Danjuma M · 2025
- 114Mustapa MA, Guswenrivo I, Zurohtun A, Khairul Ikram NK, Muchtaridi M · 2023
- 115Acharya SB, Ghosh S, Yadav G, Sharma K, Ghosh S, Joshi S · 2018
- 116Balkrishna A, Tripathi SK, Singh SK, Verma S, Arya V · 2026
- 117
- 118Bashir S, Shah IM, Javeed S, Rafiquee A, Mir B, Hassan Mir R et al. · 2026
- 119Al-Rajaibi H, Elsamanoudy SA, Elsamanoudy AZ, Sakr HF · 2026
- 120Schenk S, Pignolet-Marti A, Graz B, Cavin AL, Puder JJ · 2026
- 121Muhammed Saeed AA, Noreen S, Awlqadr FH, Farooq MI, Qadeer M, Rai N et al. · 2025
- 122Beheshti AS, Qazvini MM, Abeq M, Abedi E, Fadaei MS, Fadaei MR et al. · 2025
- 123Adarthaiya S, Arivarasan VK · 2025
- 124Sivamaruthi BS, Kesika P, Sisubalan N, Chaiyasut C · 2025
- 125Cheng J, Li J, Xiong RG, Wu SX, Xu XY, Tang GY et al. · 2024
- 126Nyulas KI, Simon-Szabó Z, Pál S, Fodor MA, Dénes L, Cseh MJ et al. · 2024
- 127Grant JK, Dangl M, Ndumele CE, Michos ED, Martin SS · 2024
- 128McBenedict B, Orfao AL, Goh KS, Yau RCC, Alphonse B, Machado Lima J et al. · 2024
- 129Farhadnejad H, Saber N, Neshatbini Tehrani A, Kazemi Jahromi M, Mokhtari E, Norouzzadeh M et al. · 2024
- 130Srivastava SP, Upadhyay P, Das S, Tiwari N, Mishra S, Tripathi SM · 2024
- 131Cortez-Navarrete M, Pérez-Rubio KG, Escobedo-Gutiérrez MJ · 2023
- 132Mohsin SN, Saleem F, Humayun A, Tanweer A, Muddassir A · 2023
- 133Silva ML, Bernardo MA, Singh J, de Mesquita MF · 2022
- 134Tsui PF, Lin CS, Ho LJ, Lai JH · 2018
- 135Kim Y, Keogh JB, Clifton PM · 2016
- 136Xie W, Zhao Y, Zhang Y · 2011
- 137Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Options For Type 2 Diabetes: Complementary & Integrative Health Approaches (Including Natural Products And Mind/Body Practices)McKennon SA · 2000
Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.