Berberine
Berberine is a plant alkaloid; human studies show improvements in blood lipids, blood sugar, weight and other metabolic markers.
We evaluated 160 human studies on Berberine, including 45 randomised controlled trials and 33 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 4,809 participants in total. As of 9 October 2026.
1. What Is Berberine? Occurrence, Origin and Forms
Berberine is a plant alkaloid from the barberry family (Berberidaceae). It occurs mainly in the bark, roots and rhizomes of several Berberis and Coptis species and is used in traditional Chinese and Ayurvedic medicine. In studies it is usually tested as a salt or as a plant extract.
Berberine occurs in barberries (Berberis), in Coptis species and in goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis), as well as in Phellodendron. The highest levels are found in root, rhizome and bark, not in the fruit.
Berberine is obtained by extraction from root, rhizome or bark; in studies and in commerce it is usually supplied as a salt, for example as hydrochloride or sulfate. What is tested includes the pure substance, plant extracts and combinations with substances intended to change its absorption.
Forms and Preparations Studied
- Berberine hydrochloride
- Berberine sulfate
- Berberine citrate
- Dihydroberberine (derivative)
- Plant extracts from barberry bark, Coptis or goldenseal
- Combination products with absorption enhancers
Not covered on this page:
- Other alkaloids from the same plants, such as berbamine or palmatine
- Blood-sugar-lowering drugs such as metformin
- Barberry fruit and foods made from it, such as juice or jam
2. What Does Berberine Do? Results by Area
| Area | Result in controlled studies | Strength of evidence | Studies | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood Sugar and Insulin | mixed | high | 11 meta-analyses · 7 controlled · 34 other | 280 |
| Blood Lipids | mixed | high | 11 meta-analyses · 7 controlled · 23 other | 568 |
| Body Weight | mixed | high | 6 meta-analyses · 6 controlled · 8 other | 529 |
| Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | mostly improved | moderate | 2 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 6 other | 0 |
| Blood Pressure | mostly no difference | unclear | 4 meta-analyses · 3 controlled · 3 other | 132 |
| Gut Microbiome | reviews only | unclear | 2 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 7 other | 0 |
| Tolerability and Interactions | mostly no difference | unclear | 0 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 29 other | 19 |
| Other investigations | mixed | high | 5 meta-analyses · 11 controlled · 48 other | 1,041 |
How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.
3. What the Studies Show in Detail
Berberine, Blood Sugar and Insulin: Human Studies
In diabetes and related metabolic disorders, fasting glucose decreased more strongly in meta-analyses on berberine and barberry preparations than under the control 14182737. HbA1c also improved in meta-analyses and in a placebo-controlled study in prediabetes 141861. The HOMA index also improved in several studies 14183761. Postprandial glucose improved in several studies 273661, and insulin levels improved in several studies 171861. Some of the findings come from combination products of berberine with milk thistle (silymarin), probiotics or other nutraceuticals; these results belong to the mixture 51516. Individual investigations found no confirmed difference in fasting glucose 175964, in HbA1c 1721 or in the HOMA index 17. Compared with metformin, HbA1c under barberry root extract did not differ 54. The strength of evidence is high, but the forms, doses and populations tested are inconsistent, and most studies lasted only a few months.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Wang et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 4,150 participants | Berberine alone or with hypoglycemic drugs; mostly 0.9-1.5 g/d; treatment cycles typically 1-3 months; vs. control (placebo/standard care, not specified) | fasting plasma glucose (berberine alone): improved (MD = -0.59 mmol/L, p = 0.048); 2-h postprandial blood glucose (berberine alone): improved (MD = -1.57 mmol/L, p < 0.01); fasting plasma glucose (combination): improved (MD = -0.99 mmol/L, p < 0.01) |
| 6 Pirro et al. 2016 | meta-analysis · 1,670 participants | Nutraceutical combination (NComb) with berberine, red yeast rice, policosanol, astaxanthin, coenzyme Q10, folic acid; vs. Control (placebo or usual care) | Glucose: improved (-2.59mg/dL, p=0.010) |
| 9 Miao et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 1,337 participants | Berberine (form not specified); vs. Placebo and other phytochemicals | Blood glucose reduction: improved |
| 10 Zhao et al. 2021 | meta-analysis · 1,079 participants | Berberine compared with metformin, thiazolidinediones, inositols; vs. Metformin, thiazolidinediones, inositols | HOMA-IR: unclear |
| 14 Hussain et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 547 participants | Berberis vulgaris and/or Berberis integerrima; vs. Placebo or metformin | Fasting blood glucose (FBG): improved (WMD: -14.52; 95% CI = -22.97, -6.07; P = 0.0008); HbA1c: improved (WMD: -0.30; 95% CI = -0.53, -0.07; P = 0.01); HOMA-IR: improved (WMD: -0.97; 95% CI = -1.56, 0.37; P = 0.001) |
| 15 Fogacci et al. 2019 | meta-analysis · 497 participants | Berberine and silymarin combination; vs. Placebo | Fasting plasma glucose: improved (MD: -7.5, 95% CI [-13, -1.9] mg/dl; p = 0.008) |
| 16 Tóth et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 491 participants | Fixed combination Berberis aristata and Silybum marianum (Berberol); 3 months; vs. Placebo | Fasting plasma glucose: improved (significantly lowered); Homeostatic Model Assessment index: improved (significantly lowered) |
| 17 Safari et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 452 participants | Barberry (Berberis vulgaris) supplementation; vs. Control group (placebo or usual care) | insulin levels: improved (Hedges's: -0.67; 95% CI: -1.31 to -0.03, P = 0.04); fasting blood sugar (FBS): no difference (WMD: -8.06 mg/dL; 95% CI: -20.46 to 4.33, P = 0.23); HbA1c percentage: no difference (WMD: -0.83 %; 95% CI: -2.33 to 0.67, P = 0.27) |
Further studies in this area: 18 21 22 27 28 29 30 35 36 37 54 56 57 59 61 63 64 65 77 79 85 86 94 95 96 98 103 107 112 113 114 115 117 123 125 126 128 129 131 133 134 135 136 137
Berberine and Blood Lipids: Human Studies
LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol and triglycerides fell more with berberine and barberry preparations than in the control groups in several meta-analyses 118202737. In a large placebo-controlled study, LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B fell more than with placebo 40. HDL cholesterol improved in some meta-analyses 3537, but remained unchanged in others 1820212759; in one study in rheumatoid arthritis, it fell with barberry extract compared with placebo 56. The forms tested were predominantly berberine salts and plant extracts from barberry bark, coptis or goldenseal, partly as a pure substance, partly in combination preparations with absorption aids; absorption differs between these forms. Individual randomized studies found no difference in blood lipids in NAFLD and with antipsychotics 5964. Combination preparations of berberine with milk thistle (silymarin) or with red yeast rice, policosanol and other additives also lowered blood lipids; however, this does not prove an effect of berberine alone 461516. The strength of evidence is high, but many studies do not state the exact form and dose, and the follow-up periods are mostly short.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Osadnik et al. 2022 | meta-analysis · 13,062 participants | Berberine among other nutraceuticals; vs. Placebo/no intervention and other nutraceuticals | LDL cholesterol: improved (-1.21 [-46.8 mg/dL] to -0.17 [-6.6 mg/dL] mmol/l reduction); Total cholesterol: improved (-1.75 [-67.7 mg/dL] to -0.18 [7 mg/dL] mmol/l reduction) |
| 3 Wang et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 4,150 participants | Berberine alone or with hypoglycemic drugs; mostly 0.9-1.5 g/d; treatment cycles typically 1-3 months; vs. control (placebo/standard care, not specified) | LDL cholesterol (berberine alone): improved (MD = -0.30 mmol/L, p < 0.01); total cholesterol (berberine alone): improved (MD = -0.30 mmol/L, p = 0.034); triglycerides (berberine alone): improved (MD = -0.35 mmol/L, p < 0.01) |
| 4 Millán et al. 2016 | meta-analysis · 3,924 participants | Nutraceutical with berberine, policosanol and red yeast rice (Armolipid Plus); vs. Control | Total cholesterol: improved (-1.3 (9.9%)); LDL-c: improved (-1.17 (-13.7%)); HDL-c: improved (+0.17 (+3.7%)) |
| 6 Pirro et al. 2016 | meta-analysis · 1,670 participants | Nutraceutical combination (NComb) with berberine, red yeast rice, policosanol, astaxanthin, coenzyme Q10, folic acid; vs. Control (placebo or usual care) | Total cholesterol: improved (-26.15mg/dL, p<0.001); LDL-cholesterol: improved (-23.85mg/dL, p<0.001); HDL-cholesterol: improved (2.53mg/dL, p<0.001) |
| 9 Miao et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 1,337 participants | Berberine (form not specified); vs. Placebo and other phytochemicals | Blood lipid regulation: improved |
| 10 Zhao et al. 2021 | meta-analysis · 1,079 participants | Berberine compared with metformin, thiazolidinediones, inositols; vs. Metformin, thiazolidinediones, inositols | Triglycerides: unclear |
| 15 Fogacci et al. 2019 | meta-analysis · 497 participants | Berberine and silymarin combination; vs. Placebo | Total cholesterol: improved (MD: -25.3, 95% CI [-39.2, -11.4] mg/dl; p < 0.001); Triglycerides: improved (MD: -28, 95% CI [-35.3, -20.6] mg/dl; p < 0.001); HDL cholesterol: improved (MD: 6, 95% CI [3.2, 8.8] mg/dl; p < 0.001) |
| 16 Tóth et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 491 participants | Fixed combination Berberis aristata and Silybum marianum (Berberol); 3 months; vs. Placebo | LDL cholesterol: improved (significantly lowered); Total cholesterol: improved (significantly lowered); HDL cholesterol: no difference (not statistically significant) |
Further studies in this area: 18 20 21 22 27 29 30 34 35 37 38 40 46 56 59 62 64 65 70 73 74 86 92 95 96 103 107 114 125 131 132 136 137
Berberine and Body Weight: Human Studies
Meta-analyses of randomized trials found a decrease in body weight, BMI and waist circumference with berberine compared with the control 2124; another confirmed this for BMI and waist circumference 27. In women with polycystic ovary syndrome, weight, BMI and waist circumference improved with berberine hydrochloride, metformin and myo-inositol; berberine showed the greater changes in comparison 65. The mixture of Berberis aristata and silymarin lowered BMI, waist circumference and abdominal fat in a placebo-controlled study 66. No difference in weight or BMI was found in a meta-analysis of barberry preparations in diabetes and in a study in fatty liver 1459. In schizophrenia under antipsychotics, weight and waist circumference increased more with barberry root extract than with placebo 64. The forms examined range from berberine hydrochloride through plant extracts from barberry bark and root to combination preparations with milk thistle, soy isoflavones or mulberry leaf extract; results on mixtures cannot be transferred to berberine alone. The findings apply to the respective form and preparation examined, and many meta-analyses gave no information on the form, purity or dose of berberine.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Amini et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 849 participants | Berberine and barberry; vs. Control group | Body mass index: no difference (WMD: -0.16 kg/m2; 95 % CI: -0.43 to 0.11, P = 0.247); Body weight: no difference (WMD: -0.11 kg; 95 % CI: -0.13 to 0.91, P = 0.830); Waist circumference: no difference (WMD: -0.58 cm; 95 % CI: -1.89 to 0.72, P = 0.379) |
| 14 Hussain et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 547 participants | Berberis vulgaris and/or Berberis integerrima; vs. Placebo or metformin | Weight: no difference (WMD: -1.89; 95% CI = -4.55, 0.76; P = 0.16); BMI: no difference (WMD: -0.12; 95% CI = -0.90, 0.65; P = 0.76) |
| 16 Tóth et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 491 participants | Fixed combination Berberis aristata and Silybum marianum (Berberol); 3 months; vs. Placebo | Body mass index: no difference (not statistically significant) |
| 18 Musazadeh et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 451 participants | Berberis supplement (Berberis vulgaris and integerrima); vs. Control (placebo/standard care, not specified) | Body weight: improved (WMD: -2.25; 95% CI: -3.11 to -1.39); Body mass index: improved (WMD: -0.57; 95% CI: -0.98 to -0.17) |
| 21 Xie et al. 2026 | meta-analysis · 233 participants | Adjunctive berberine (form not stated); vs. Control group (RCT comparator arms) | Body weight: improved (SMD = -0.56, I² = 0%; P = 0.0003); Body mass index: improved (SMD = -0.51, I² = 0%; P = 0.0001); Waist circumference: improved (SMD = -0.31, I² = 20%; P = 0.04) |
| 24 Elahi et al. 2026 | meta-analysis | Berberine (form, purity and dose not reported); vs. Control groups | Body weight: improved (MD of -0.88 kg, 95% CI: -1.36 to -0.39, p = 0.0003); Body mass index: improved (MD of -0.48 kg/m², 95% CI: -0.89 to -0.07, p < 0.0216); Waist circumference: improved (MD of -1.32 kg/m², 95% CI: -2.24 to -0.41, p < 0.0046) |
| 27 Liu et al. 2025 | meta-analysis | Berberine (form not specified); Short-term (≤90 days) vs. long-term; vs. Placebo | Waist circumference: improved (WMD: -3.270 cm; 95% CI: -4.818 to -1.722; p < 0.001); Body mass index: improved (WMD: -0.435 kg/m2; 95% CI: -0.856 to -0.013; p = 0.043) |
| 29 Shi et al. 2025 | systematic review | Berberine (form not specified); vs. systematic reviews of berberine vs. controls | improved obesity outcomes: improved (57.14% (4/7)) |
Further studies in this area: 40 54 56 59 64 65 79 86 109 110 119 125
Berberine and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Human Studies
In polycystic ovary syndrome, a randomized study compared berberine hydrochloride with metformin and myo-inositol: testosterone, free androgen index and SHBG improved in all groups, most markedly with berberine 65. An overview of systematic reviews found improvements in most endpoints with berberine in PCOS, but rated the quality of the reviews as predominantly low 29. The strength of evidence is moderate: there are two meta-analyses and one controlled study, but the form examined is inconsistent and partly not specified in detail. It remains open how the different berberine forms and their differing bioavailability affect the results.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Zhao et al. 2021 | meta-analysis · 1,079 participants | Berberine compared with metformin, thiazolidinediones, inositols; vs. Metformin, thiazolidinediones, inositols | Menstrual frequency: unclear; Total testosterone: unclear |
| 29 Shi et al. 2025 | systematic review | Berberine (form not specified); vs. systematic reviews of berberine vs. controls | improved PCOS outcomes: improved (72.22% (13/18)) |
| 65 Mishra et al. 2022 | randomised controlled | Berberine hydrochloride 500 mg twice daily; 500 mg twice daily; three months; vs. Metformin 500 mg twice daily and myoinositol 1000 mg twice daily | Total testosterone, free androgen index, SHBG: improved (p<0.0001) |
| 79 Gao et al. 2026 | case-control study | oral berberine added to luteal-phase progesterone; 3 months; vs. progesterone alone | LH and LH/FSH ratio: improved; total testosterone: improved |
| 92 Rondanelli et al. 2020 | review · 1,078 participants | Berberine, exact form not stated; not stated; not stated; vs. metformin and controls in included studies | adipose tissue redistribution, visceral adipose tissue: improved; insulin sensitivity: improved; insulin resistance in theca cells, ovulation rate: improved |
| 93 Bashir et al. 2026 | review | Berberine as a botanical agent; vs. conventional therapy (metformin, contraceptives, ovulation inducers) | improvement in metabolism and hormones: improved |
| 95 Mohapatra et al. 2026 | review | Berberine and improved berberine formulations | Application in polycystic ovary syndrome management: improved |
| 97 Szukiewicz et al. 2026 | review | Berberine, a natural plant alkaloid; vs. Metformin (mentioned, not directly compared) | Insulin sensitivity and metabolic homeostasis: improved; chronic low-grade inflammation: improved |
Further studies in this area: 128
Berberine and Blood Pressure: Human Studies
Several meta-analyses found no difference from the control in either systolic or diastolic blood pressure 18192127. In a placebo-controlled study in fatty liver, the systolic pressure of pulse wave analysis fell with berberine compared with the baseline value; for vascular stiffness, no difference from placebo was found 55. A placebo-controlled study with barberry root extract in schizophrenia under antipsychotics also found no difference in blood pressure 64. The forms examined range from pure berberine substance through plant extracts from barberry bark or root to combination preparations with absorption aids. A mixed preparation of barberry extract with berberine, red yeast rice, milk thistle and guggul improved the vascular response (endothelial reactivity); this finding belongs to the mixture 53. The strength of evidence for an effect on blood pressure is unclear, and forms, preparations and comparison groups differ greatly.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Suadoni et al. 2021 | systematic review · 614 participants | Berberine alone or in combination products (with amlodipine, metformin, nutraceutical, Chunghyul-dan); vs. Amlodipine alone, metformin, placebo, dietary advice, no treatment | Systolic blood pressure (berberine plus amlodipine vs. amlodipine): no difference; Systolic blood pressure (berberine vs. metformin): improved (-11.87 [-16.64, -7.10] mmHg); Systolic blood pressure (berberine-containing nutraceutical vs. placebo): improved (-11.80 [-18.73, -4.87] mmHg) |
| 18 Musazadeh et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 451 participants | Berberis supplement (Berberis vulgaris and integerrima); vs. Control (placebo/standard care, not specified) | Blood pressure: no difference |
| 19 Atefi et al. 2021 | meta-analysis · 350 participants | Barberry (Berberis vulgaris) supplementation; 4 to 12 weeks; vs. Control group (175 cases per group) | Systolic blood pressure: no difference (WMD: -4.15 mmHg; 95 % CI: -10.3, 1.99, P = 0.185); Diastolic blood pressure: no difference (WMD: -1.22 mmHg; 95 % CI: -6.26, 3.82, P = 0.635) |
| 21 Xie et al. 2026 | meta-analysis · 233 participants | Adjunctive berberine (form not stated); vs. Control group (RCT comparator arms) | Systolic blood pressure: no difference (MD = -1.62, I² = 0%; P = 0.17); Diastolic blood pressure: no difference (MD = -1.68, I² = 39%; P = 0.15) |
| 27 Liu et al. 2025 | meta-analysis | Berberine (form not specified); Short-term (≤90 days) vs. long-term; vs. Placebo | Systolic blood pressure: no difference; Diastolic blood pressure: no difference |
| 32 Nyulas et al. 2024 | systematic review | Berberine and other phytotherapy products; vs. Antihypertensive drugs or control | Antihypertensive effect: unclear |
| 55 Koperska et al. 2025 | randomised controlled · 70 participants | oral berberine; 1500 mg/day; 12 weeks; vs. placebo, double-blind, randomized | PWA-SP: unclear (134.85 ± 16.26 vs. 124.46 ± 13.47 mmHg, p < 0.0001); arterial stiffness (PWV, AIx etc.): no difference |
| 56 Aryaeian et al. 2020 | randomised controlled · 62 participants | Hydroalcoholic extract of Berberis Integerrima, 500 mg capsules; 6 capsules of 500 mg daily; 3 months; vs. Placebo, double-blinded, randomized | Systolic blood pressure: unclear (p = 0.02) |
Further studies in this area: 64 136
Berberine and Gut Microbiome: Human Studies
In a network meta-analysis of randomized trials on small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), berberine alone achieved the highest rank for eradication of the overgrowth in uncomplicated SIBO 8. A systematic review of randomized trials describes an altered, not consistently favorable composition of the gut flora with berberine in diabetes, elevated blood lipids, intestinal polyps, mental illnesses and Parkinson's disease 22. Neither paper names the form examined; the underlying human studies are captured here only through these reviews, so the strength of evidence is unclear. Several further review articles describe a favorable influence on the gut microbiota by berberine, partly only as pure substance without a more detailed specification of form 107131, partly in mixtures with rifaximin, low-FODMAP diet, oregano oil, peppermint oil, garlic derivatives, vitamins and magnesium 105 or with herbal formulas, acupuncture, inulin, quinoa and linseed oil 113; these results of the mixtures are not evidence for berberine alone. What remains open are the exact form and dose examined, the transferability to individual patient groups and the value of berberine compared with established treatments.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Zhang et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 1,552 participants | Berberine monotherapy (form not specified); vs. Antibiotics, probiotics, prokinetics, rifaximin combinations | SIBO eradication, SUCRA ranking: unclear (highest surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value) |
| 22 Candrea et al. 2026 | systematic review | Berberine supplementation; vs. Control groups of included RCTs | Gut microbiota composition: unclear (Six of seven studies reported significant compositional shifts) |
| 105 Furqan et al. 2026 | review | Nutraceutical mixture with berberine, oregano oil, peppermint oil, garlic derivatives, vitamins, magnesium; vs. Antibiotics (rifaximin), diets | Clinical efficacy of nutraceutical approaches: unclear |
| 107 Asghari et al. 2025 | review | Berberine (BBR), form not specified; vs. Controls in randomized trials | regulation of gut microbiota: improved |
| 113 Yin et al. 2025 | review | Berberine as active compound alongside herbal formulas | Restoration of microbial balance: improved |
| 122 Yao et al. 2024 | review | Nutraceuticals incl. berberine | gut microbiota composition and gut-brain axis: improved |
| 127 Yang et al. 2023 | review | Berberine and other Chinese herbal compounds/formulae | Interaction with cell signaling pathways, immune function and gut microbiota: unclear |
| 129 Amssayef et al. 2023 | review | Berberine and other natural alkaloids | Gut microbiota dysbiosis: improved |
Further studies in this area: 131
Berberine, Tolerability and Interactions: Human Studies
Randomized controlled trials on oral berberine 4055 and on an extract from barberry root (Berberis integerrima) compared with metformin 54 found no accumulation of side effects. Serious adverse events as well as kidney or liver toxicity also did not occur with oral berberine 61. A randomized controlled trial on the micellar formulation berberine LipoMicel showed no differences in liver and kidney values and in tolerability 62. For combination preparations of berberine with red yeast rice, policosanol, coenzyme Q10 and further components, randomized controlled trials found no differences in adverse events 4149, serious side effects 47 or discontinuations due to muscle pain 48. An overview of the Armolipid Plus mixture describes the tolerability as excellent 38. The strength of evidence is overall unclear: the controlled trials are mostly small and short, and several concern combination preparations. Possible interactions with blood pressure-lowering agents are addressed in an overview of several medicinal plants, including berberine 32. Thus, robust statements on rare or longer-term side effects, on interactions and on the comparison between the different forms such as berberine hydrochloride, berberine sulfate, berberine citrate, dihydroberberine or plant extracts remain open.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Zhao et al. 2021 | meta-analysis · 1,079 participants | Berberine compared with metformin, thiazolidinediones, inositols; vs. Metformin, thiazolidinediones, inositols | Gastrointestinal adverse events |
| 16 Tóth et al. 2020 | meta-analysis · 491 participants | Fixed combination Berberis aristata and Silybum marianum (Berberol); 3 months; vs. Placebo | ALT, AST, creatine kinase: no difference (did not increase) |
| 27 Liu et al. 2025 | meta-analysis | Berberine (form not specified); Short-term (≤90 days) vs. long-term; vs. Placebo | Adverse events |
| 32 Nyulas et al. 2024 | systematic review | Berberine and other phytotherapy products; vs. Antihypertensive drugs or control | Interactions with antihypertensive drugs: unclear |
| 38 Barrios et al. 2017 | systematic review | Armolipid Plus: red yeast rice, policosanol, berberine plus folic acid, astaxanthin, coenzyme Q10; 6-48 weeks; vs. Placebo, ezetimibe, diet alone | Tolerability |
| 40 Lei et al. 2026 | randomised controlled · 337 participants | oral berberine vs placebo; 1 g/d; 6 months; vs. placebo, double-blind | Adverse events |
| 54 Sanjari et al. 2020 | randomised controlled · 80 participants | Methanol extract of Berberis integerrima root; 480 mg daily orally; 3 months; vs. Metformin 1000 mg daily; manufacturer-funded | Adverse events (No adverse event led to preventing the study) |
| 55 Koperska et al. 2025 | randomised controlled · 70 participants | oral berberine; 1500 mg/day; 12 weeks; vs. placebo, double-blind, randomized | serious adverse events (No serious adverse events were reported) |
Further studies in this area: 61 62 69 72 76 80 81 83 85 90 92 94 95 99 104 107 109 115 130 132 137 138
Berberine: Further Outcomes in Studies
In a large placebo-controlled study in fatty liver and obesity, berberine lowered high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, but not liver fat content 40. A randomized study in fatty liver also found no difference in liver enzymes 59. In a randomized study in gum inflammation, plaque and gum bleeding improved under a mouth rinse with berberine hydrochloride, as well as under chlorhexidine and saline solution 50. In bacterial vaginosis, a vaginal gel made from barberry extract in a metronidazole base led in a randomized study to a better response than metronidazole gel alone 43. A combination product of berberine, curcumin, inositol, banaba and chromium picolinate also reduced inflammation markers in a placebo-controlled study in impaired blood sugar 42. Results of the mixtures cannot be transferred to berberine alone. The strength of evidence is high, but many studies do not name the exact form and dose, and the comparison conditions differ greatly.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Li et al. 2025 | meta-analysis · 6,599 participants | Berberine as plant extract (form not specified); vs. Placebo and other plant extracts | Modified Rankin Scale (mRS): improved (SUCRA 84.1%) |
| 7 Vahedi-Mazdabadi et al. 2023 | meta-analysis · 1,600 participants | Berberine or barberry extract; effective below 1000 mg/day; effective under 5 weeks; vs. control group | Interleukin-6: improved (-1.18 pg/mL); Tumor necrosis factor-alpha: improved (-3.72 pg/mL); C-reactive protein: improved (-1.33 mg/L) |
| 13 Mohtashaminia et al. 2024 | meta-analysis · 549 participants | Berberis aristata plus Silybum marianum; vs. Control (placebo or other) | Alanine aminotransferase (ALT): no difference (WMD: −0.39 mg/dl; 95% CI: −1.67 to 0.89, P=0.55); Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): no difference (WMD: −0.44 mg/dl; 95% CI: −2.02 to 1.14, P=0.58) |
| 22 Candrea et al. 2026 | systematic review | Berberine supplementation; vs. Control groups of included RCTs | Inflammatory markers: improved (improvements in ... inflammatory markers) |
| 23 Paparozzi et al. 2026 | review | Berberine (form not specified); vs. Control in RCTs (not further described) | PON1 activity: improved |
| 25 Shakeri et al. 2026 | review | Berberis vulgaris and its bioactive constituents, including berberine | inflammatory and immune parameters: improved; symptoms in asthma, allergic rhinitis, lung infections: improved |
| 26 Ma et al. 2026 | review | Berberine (form not specified) | Anticancer and lipid-modulating effects in clinical trials: improved |
| 29 Shi et al. 2025 | systematic review | Berberine (form not specified); vs. systematic reviews of berberine vs. controls | improved cardiovascular disease outcomes: improved (78% (25/32)); improved gastrointestinal disorders outcomes: improved (94.74% (18/19)); improved schizophrenia outcomes: improved (92.31% (12/13)) |
Further studies in this area: 31 33 34 40 43 44 46 50 55 57 58 59 60 62 63 67 68 69 71 72 75 77 78 79 81 82 84 87 88 89 90 91 94 95 96 98 99 100 101 102 103 106 107 108 111 116 118 120 121 122 124 125 126 127 131 133
4. How Is Berberine Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies
Mainly berberine salts such as berberine hydrochloride, berberine sulfate and berberine citrate were tested, as well as plant extracts from barberry bark, coptis or goldenseal, sometimes as a pure substance, sometimes in combination preparations with absorption enhancers. Individual studies used dihydroberberine or a micellar formulation. Absorption differs between these forms, and many studies do not state the exact form and dose.
| Preparation or form | Dose | Duration | Study |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patented combination of red yeast rice, policosanol and berberine | 1 tablet per day | 16 weeks | 39 |
| oral berberine vs placebo | 1 g/d | 6 months | 40 |
| Food supplement Body Lipid (BL) containing berberine, red yeast rice, coenzyme Q10, hydroxytyrosol | daily oral dose (not specified) | 4 weeks | 41 |
| Nutraceutical Reglicem® with berberine, curcumin, inositol, banaba, chromium picolinate | 1 tablet once daily at breakfast | 3 months | 42 |
| Berberis vulgaris 5% vaginal gel in metronidazole base | 5% gel, five nights | 5 nights, assessment after 7 days, 3-week follow-up | 43 |
| Berberine or placebo | — | 3 months | 44 |
| Armolipid Plus (combination product containing berberine) | — | 12 weeks | 45 |
| Berberine 500 mg orally twice daily or placebo | 500 mg twice daily | 12 weeks | 46 |
| Armolipid Plus (red yeast rice, policosanol, berberine) plus low-dose statin, with or without ezetimibe | — | 3 to 6 months | 47 |
| Low-dose statin plus Armolipid Plus (including berberine) | — | 3 months | 48 |
| Armolipid Plus (nutraceutical mixture containing berberine) | — | 3 months, then 12 months combination | 49 |
| Berberine HCl mouthwash | 10 mL twice daily | 15 days use, follow-up to day 21 | 50 |
| Fixed-dose combination: berberine, mulberry leaf extract, chromium picolinate | Berberine 1000 mg, mulberry leaf extract 400 mg, chromium picolinate 0.644 mg daily | 12 weeks | 51 |
| dried purple-black barberry (Berberis integerrima) | 10 g/day dried barberry | 8 weeks | 52 |
| Zeta Colest: 400 mg Berberis aristata dry extract with 340 mg berberine plus red yeast rice, milk thistle, guggul | 1 pill/evening, 340 mg berberine daily | 8 weeks (after 8-week stabilization diet) | 53 |
5. Is Berberine Safe? Side Effects in Studies
In a large placebo-controlled study, adverse events occurred with berberine about as often as with placebo 40, and another study described berberine as well tolerated 55. A barberry root extract led to no study discontinuation due to side effects compared with metformin 54. Serious adverse events as well as kidney or liver toxicity did not occur with oral berberine 61.
| Study | Reported side effects |
|---|---|
| 3 Wang et al. 2024 | most common tolerability not reported |
| 10 Zhao et al. 2021 | Gastrointestinal adverse events reported |
| 12 Suadoni et al. 2021 | No study measured long-term adverse events |
| 16 Tóth et al. 2020 | Safe; no increase in ALT, AST, creatine kinase |
| 21 Xie et al. 2026 | Safety assessed, no numbers reported |
| 25 Shakeri et al. 2026 | minimal adverse effects |
| 27 Liu et al. 2025 | No significant difference vs. placebo |
| 38 Barrios et al. 2017 | Safety and tolerability reported as excellent |
| 40 Lei et al. 2026 | adverse event incidence similar between arms |
| 41 D'Addato et al. 2017 | 5 adverse events, mostly mild; insomnia in BL group judged treatment related |
| 45 Solà et al. 2014 | Product was well tolerated |
| 47 Marazzi et al. 2019 | No major side effects in any group |
6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence
- Many studies do not state the exact form, purity and dose of berberine tested.
- The follow-up periods are mostly short, so long-term effects and rare side effects remain open.
- Results for combination preparations cannot be transferred to berberine alone.
- Bioavailability differs greatly between the forms, which makes comparison of the studies difficult.
- Data on interactions with medications and on comparison of the forms with each other are still pending.
7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Berberine
Berberine is a plant alkaloid from barberry and Coptis species, which in studies is mostly tested as a salt or plant extract. In people with elevated blood lipids, impaired blood sugar or overweight, several meta-analyses showed improvements in LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting glucose, HbA1c and body weight 1141820242737. For blood pressure, however, several meta-analyses found no difference 192127.
In a large placebo-controlled study, adverse events under berberine did not occur more frequently than under placebo 40; two smaller studies observed no serious side effects 5561. However, the informative value is limited by the fact that the forms, doses and populations tested are inconsistent, many studies do not name the exact form, and the observation periods are short. Results of combination products of berberine with milk thistle (silymarin), red yeast rice or policosanol do not prove an effect of berberine alone 461516.
Frequently Asked Questions
How well has Berberine been studied in humans?
We evaluated 160 human studies on Berberine, including 45 randomised controlled trials and 33 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 4,809 participants in total. As of 9 October 2026.
Does Berberine help with blood Sugar and Insulin? What the studies show
Does Berberine help with blood Lipids? What the studies show
Does Berberine help with body Weight? What the studies show
Does Berberine help with polycystic Ovary Syndrome? What the studies show
Does Berberine help with blood Pressure? What the studies show
Does Berberine help with gut Microbiome? What the studies show
Which forms of berberine were investigated in the studies?
Mainly berberine salts such as berberine hydrochloride, berberine sulfate and berberine citrate were tested, as well as plant extracts from barberry bark, coptis or goldenseal. Individual studies used dihydroberberine or a micellar formulation. Absorption differs between these forms, and many studies do not state the exact form and dose.
What do the studies show about blood lipids?
In people with elevated blood lipids, LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol and triglycerides fell in several meta-analyses 11820273537. HDL cholesterol improved in some meta-analyses 3537, but remained unchanged in others 1820212759; in one study in rheumatoid arthritis, it fell with barberry extract compared with placebo 56.
What do the studies show about blood sugar and insulin?
In diabetes and related metabolic disorders, fasting glucose decreased in several meta-analyses 1418212728. HbA1c and HOMA index improved in meta-analyses on barberry preparations and in a placebo-controlled study in prediabetes 141861. Individual investigations found no confirmed difference in fasting glucose 175964, in HbA1c 1721 or in the HOMA index 17. Compared with metformin, HbA1c under barberry root extract did not differ 54. The forms, doses and populations tested are inconsistent.
How well tolerated is berberine?
In a large placebo-controlled study, adverse events occurred with berberine about as often as with placebo 40, and another study described berberine as well tolerated 55. A barberry root extract led to no study discontinuation due to side effects compared with metformin 54. Serious adverse events as well as kidney or liver toxicity did not occur with oral berberine 61. Statements on rare or longer-term side effects and on interactions are still pending.
What should be considered with combination preparations?
Combination preparations of berberine with milk thistle (silymarin) or with red yeast rice, policosanol and other additives also lowered blood lipids; however, this does not prove an effect of berberine alone 461516. The most frequently tested was the mixture Armolipid Plus of berberine, red yeast rice, policosanol, folic acid, astaxanthin and coenzyme Q10 38.
Sources
- 1Osadnik T, Goławski M, Lewandowski P, Morze J, Osadnik K, Pawlas N et al. · 2022
- 2Li J, Jin J, Cheng Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Chen Y et al. · 2025
- 3Wang J, Bi C, Xi H, Wei F · 2024
- 4
- 5Shadin M, Bhuia MS, Alfaifi M, Altemani FH, Altemani AH, Alsenani F et al. · 2026
- 6Pirro M, Mannarino MR, Bianconi V, Simental-Mendía LE, Bagaglia F, Mannarino E et al. · 2016
- 7Vahedi-Mazdabadi Y, Shahinfar H, Toushih M, Shidfar F · 2023
- 8Zhang Q, Li H, Chen C, Li M, Song J, Pan S et al. · 2025
- 9Miao R, Zhang B, Zhou D, Kang M, Tian J, Zhao L et al. · 2025
- 10
- 11Amini MR, Sheikhhossein F, Naghshi S, Djafari F, Askari M, Shahinfar H et al. · 2020
- 12Suadoni MT, Atherton I · 2021
- 13Mohtashaminia F, Amini MR, Shab-Bidar S, djafarian k · 2024
- 14Hussain HU, Ali E, Tanveer A, Ismail SM, Furqan H, Ahsan MN et al. · 2024
- 15Fogacci F, Grassi D, Rizzo M, Cicero AFG · 2019
- 16Tóth B, Németh D, Soós A, Hegyi P, Pham-Dobor G, Varga O et al. · 2020
- 17Safari Z, Farrokhzad A, Ghavami A, Fadel A, Hadi A, Rafiee S et al. · 2020
- 18Musazadeh V, Hamidi N, Noormohammadi M, Shidfar F · 2025
- 19Atefi M, Ghavami A, Hadi A, Askari G · 2021
- 20Hadi A, Arab A, Ghaedi E, Rafie N, Miraghajani M, Kafeshani M · 2019
- 21Xie K, Tian W, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Li J, Cao D et al. · 2026
- 22Candrea AR, Gavrilaș LI, Frumuzachi O, Mocan A, Babotă M, Crișan G · 2026
- 23Paparozzi J, Barroca C, Gogerdchian H, Girdler M, Akel M, Prashar S · 2026
- 24Elahi Vahed I, Shahir-Roudi E, Nojumi S, Golmohammadi S, Moradi Shahrebabak M, Sharafi Tafreshi Moghadam N et al. · 2026
- 25Shakeri F, Kiani S, Binabaj MM, Ghalibaf MH, Rahimi G, Rahbardar MG et al. · 2026
- 26Ma J, Zhang Y, Du J, Chen J, Sun J, Ma X et al. · 2026
- 27Liu D, Zhao H, Zhang Y, Hu J, Xu H · 2025
- 28Zhu W, Yang L, Dai Y, Wang H, Zhou J, Xia L et al. · 2025
- 29Shi L, Wang W, Jing C, Hu J, Liao X · 2025
- 30Xue C, Chen Y, Tang C, Zhao L, Tong X, Wang H · 2025
- 31de Lima EP, Laurindo LF, Catharin VCS, Direito R, Tanaka M, Jasmin Santos German I et al. · 2025
- 32Nyulas KI, Simon-Szabó Z, Pál S, Fodor MA, Dénes L, Cseh MJ et al. · 2024
- 33Służały P, Paśko P, Galanty A · 2024
- 34Ionita-Radu F, Patoni C, Nancoff AS, Marin FS, Gaman L, Bucurica A et al. · 2024
- 35Roshanravan B, Yousefizadeh S, Apaydin Yildirim B, Farkhondeh T, Amirabadizadeh A, Ashrafizadeh M et al. · 2023
- 36Derosa G, D'Angelo A, Maffioli P · 2022
- 37Ye Y, Liu X, Wu N, Han Y, Wang J, Yu Y et al. · 2021
- 38Barrios V, Escobar C, Cicero AF, Burke D, Fasching P, Banach M et al. · 2017
- 39Trimarco B, Benvenuti C, Rozza F, Cimmino CS, Giudice R, Crispo S · 2011
- 40Lei L, Wang B, Zhao L, Li J, Yan X, Jiang J et al. · 2026
- 41D'Addato S, Scandiani L, Mombelli G, Focanti F, Pelacchi F, Salvatori E et al. · 2017
- 42Derosa G, D'Angelo A, Vanelli A, Maffioli P · 2020
- 43Masoudi M, Miraj S, Rafieian-Kopaei M · 2016
- 44Pu Z, Wen H, Jiang H, Hou Q, Yan H · 2023
- 45Solà R, Valls RM, Puzo J, Calabuig JR, Brea A, Pedret A et al. · 2014
- 46Zhao JV, Chen B, Chan YH, Zhang J, Xia Y, Blais JE et al. · 2026
- 47Marazzi G, Campolongo G, Pelliccia F, Calabrò Md P, Cacciotti L, Vitale C et al. · 2019
- 48Marazzi G, Campolongo G, Pelliccia F, Quattrino S, Vitale C, Cacciotti L et al. · 2017
- 49Marazzi G, Pelliccia F, Campolongo G, Quattrino S, Cacciotti L, Volterrani M et al. · 2015
- 50Bora BB, Bhandary R, V AN, Kumari SN, Ramanujan R, Hoskeri NN · 2026
- 51Xenos K, Chalkias K, Chryssou G, Alexandrou E, Vassilopoulou E · 2026
- 52Emamat H, Zahedmehr A, Asadian S, Nasrollahzadeh J · 2022
- 53Fogacci F, Giovannini M, D'Addato S, Grandi E, Cicero AFG · 2023
- 54Sanjari M, Shamsinejad B, Khazaeli P, Safi Z, Mirrashidi F, Naghibzadeh-Tahami A · 2020
- 55Koperska A, Miller-Kasprzak E, Seraszek-Jaros A, Musialik K, Bogdański P, Szulińska M · 2025
- 56Aryaeian N, Sedehi SK, Khorshidi M, Zarezadeh M, Hosseini A, Shahram F · 2020
- 57Nikseresht M, Dabidi Roshan V, Nasiri K, Nasiri K · 2024
- 58Dabaghzadeh F, Sharififar F, Ahmadzadeh AM, Karami-Mohajeri S · 2023
- 59Nejati L, Movahedi A, Salari G, Moeineddin R, Nejati P · 2022
- 60Omidvar Tehrani S, Ghasemzadeh Rahbardar M, Shoorgashti K, Dehghan Nayeri MJ, Mohammadpour AH, Hosseinzadeh H · 2023
- 61
- 62Ibi A, Chang C, Kuo YC, Zhang Y, Du M, Roh YS et al. · 2025
- 63Zhao JV, Sarsani V, Chen B, Yun H, Hu J, Liang L · 2026
- 64Rostami H, Babaali F, Moradi L, Golfakhrabadi F, Abdi L · 2023
- 65Mishra N, Verma R, Jadaun P · 2022
- 66Bioimpedance analysis, metabolic effects and safety of the association Berberis aristata/Bilybum marianum: a 52-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study in obese patients with type 2 diabetesGuarino G, Strollo F, Carbone L, Della Corte T, Letizia M, Marino G et al. · 2017
- 67Tan YJ, Zou TH, Yu K, Sheng JQ, Jin P, Zhang MJ et al. · 2025
- 68
- 69Wade U, Pascual-Figal DA, Rabbani F, Ernst M, Albert A, Janssens I et al. · 2024
- 70De Castro-Orós I, Solà R, Valls RM, Brea A, Mozas P, Puzo J et al. · 2016
- 71Bertani L, Chico L, Balestrini L, Della Scala G, Satriano A, Manta R · 2026
- 72Zhan C, Huang Y, Yang Z, Wu H, Zheng J, Yang W et al. · 2026
- 73Vitulano N, Guida P, Abrusci V, Ceci E, De Nicolò EV, Martinotti S et al. · 2025
- 74M, Acanfora L, Tamellini G, Vassallo A · 2025
- 75Gravina AG, Pellegrino R, Palladino G, Coppola A, Brandimarte G, Tuccillo C et al. · 2023
- 76Mesmin MP, Tweet MS, Kim SH, Fulks TJ · 2026
- 77
- 78Tu D, Lu C, Guo J, Chen Q, Li X, Wang Y et al. · 2026
- 79
- 80Williams JM, Yadlapalli N, Franchi F · 2026
- 81
- 82Visalli F, Cappellani F, Gagliano G, Spinello A, Avitabile A, Cannizzaro L et al. · 2026
- 83Blöcher JA, Meyer-Tönnies MJ, Morof F, Rönnpagel V, Bethmann J, Vollmer M et al. · 2025
- 84
- 85Henshall A, Ambrogetti R, Pomeroy R, Money-Kyrle A · 2025
- 86Hyperlipidemia, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertriglyceridemia, and Glycemic Response Improvement in a 60-year-Old Male with Metabolic Syndrome Through a Personalized Six-Month Nutraceutical/Diet Protocol: A Case ReportBrady DM, Coetzee O · 2025
- 87Yuan S, Zhang T, Wu Y, Lu Y, Chang F, Zhu Y · 2024
- 88Han YC, Xie HZ, Lu B, Xiang RL, Li JY, Qian H et al. · 2022
- 89Evaluation of the effects of additional therapy with Berberis vulgaris oxymel in patients with refractory primary sclerosing cholangitis and primary biliary cholangitis: A quasi-experimental studyNaghibi Z, Rakhshandeh H, Jarahi L, Hosseini SM, Yousefi M · 2021
- 90Di Pierro F, Bertuccioli A, Giuberti R, Saponara M, Ivaldi L · 2020
- 91
- 92Rondanelli M, Infantino V, Riva A, Petrangolini G, Faliva MA, Peroni G et al. · 2020
- 93Bashir S, Shah IM, Javeed S, Rafiquee A, Mir B, Hassan Mir R et al. · 2026
- 94
- 95Mohapatra N, Singh TG, Kumar M, Awasthi A · 2026
- 96
- 97
- 98Prakash G, Chaudhary AA, Tanu R, Ali MAM, Boufahja F, Sharma PK et al. · 2026
- 99
- 100Chakraborty T, Kashyap SJ, Chetia PD, Purkayastha S · 2026
- 101Kovyanova TI, Nerush MO, Karagodin VP, Borodko DD, Rozhkova UV, Antonov SA et al. · 2026
- 102Chiba S, Niwa Y, Furukata M, Morishita K, Shinohara K · 2026
- 103Rani D, Chatterjee S, Goswami PK · 2026
- 104Dumitru CN, Marcu T, Dumitru AO, Tudor SS, Ferțu ID, Elisei AM et al. · 2026
- 105Furqan A, Sultan MT, Khalid MU, Waqar M, Maaz M, Tanvir L et al. · 2026
- 106Martinez P, Mosqueira EAM, Gillot L, Makis W, Peavler C, Vega-Galvez A et al. · 2026
- 107Asghari P, Babaei A, Zamanian N, Eshtivani EN · 2025
- 108Vrentzos E, Pavlidis G, Korakas E, Kountouri A, Pliouta L, Dimitriadis GD et al. · 2025
- 109Kong Y, Yang H, Nie R, Zhang X, Zhang H, Nian X · 2025
- 110Das M, Yagnik U, Raninga I, Banerjee D · 2025
- 111Janota B, Janion K, Buzek A, Janczewska E · 2025
- 112Nikolaidis CG, Gyriki D, Stavropoulou E, Karlafti E, Didangelos T, Tsigalou C et al. · 2025
- 113Yin L, Yang W, Xie Q, Xu J, Lan Y, Wu J · 2025
- 114Marchelak A, Gieleta M, Krasocka W, Magiera A · 2025
- 115Sikora B, Bahadori B, Magg AD, Moghadasian N, Moghadasian MH · 2025
- 116
- 117Liu S, Shen J, Xu F, Niu L, Wang F, Zhao G · 2025
- 118Shakeri F, Kiani S, Rahimi G, Boskabady MH · 2024
- 119Hidalgo-Lozada GM, Villarruel-López A, Nuño K, García-García A, Sánchez-Nuño YA, Ramos-García CO · 2024
- 120Ezhilarasan D, Langeswaran K · 2024
- 121Picheta N, Piekarz J, Burdan O, Satora M, Tarkowski R, Kułak K · 2024
- 122Yao L, Yang Y, Yang X, Rezaei MJ · 2024
- 123Cortez-Navarrete M, Pérez-Rubio KG, Escobedo-Gutiérrez MJ · 2023
- 124Cogorno L, Formisano E, Vignati A, Prigione A, Tramacere A, Borgarelli C et al. · 2023
- 125Luo Y, Zeng Y, Peng J, Zhang K, Wang L, Feng T et al. · 2023
- 126Askari VR, Khosravi K, Baradaran Rahimi V, Garzoli S · 2023
- 127Yang Y, Xiao G, Cheng P, Zeng J, Liu Y · 2023
- 128Ionescu OM, Frincu F, Mehedintu A, Plotogea M, Cirstoiu M, Petca A et al. · 2023
- 129Amssayef A, Eddouks M · 2023
- 130Khoshandam A, Imenshahidi M, Hosseinzadeh H · 2022
- 131Koperska A, Wesołek A, Moszak M, Szulińska M · 2022
- 132Cicero AFG, Fogacci F, Stoian AP, Vrablik M, Al Rasadi K, Banach M et al. · 2021
- 133Hedayati N, Oskouei Z, Tabeshpour J, Naeini MB · 2021
- 134Zhang X, Xu D, Chen M, Wang Y, He L, Wang L et al. · 2021
- 135Senesi P, Ferrulli A, Luzi L, Terruzzi I · 2021
- 136Belwal T, Bisht A, Devkota HP, Ullah H, Ullah H, Khan H et al. · 2020
- 137Imenshahidi M, Hosseinzadeh H · 2019
- 138Rad SZK, Rameshrad M, Hosseinzadeh H · 2017
Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.