Niacinamide
Niacinamide is the amide form of vitamin B3; human studies suggest benefits especially for the skin, otherwise the situation is unclear.
We evaluated 71 human studies on Niacinamide, including 25 randomised controlled trials and 3 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 2,588 participants in total. As of 16 October 2026.
1. What Is Niacinamide? Occurrence, Origin and Forms
Niacinamide is the amide form of vitamin B3 (niacin) and belongs to the water-soluble vitamins. It occurs in animal and plant foods and is also formed in the body from the amino acid tryptophan. It is used as a vitamin supplement and as an ingredient in skin care products.
Niacinamide is found in meat, fish, milk, eggs, legumes and cereals. In skin care it is applied topically to the skin.
For supplements and skin care, niacinamide is produced industrially; in foods it occurs naturally. In human studies, mainly oral forms (tablets, capsules) and topical preparations (cream, gel, serum) are examined.
Forms and Preparations Studied
- Oral form (tablets, capsules, powder)
- Topical preparation (cream, gel, serum, lotion)
- Fortified foods and beverages
- Injection solution
- Combination products with other B vitamins
Not covered on this page:
- Nicotinic acid (niacin) – a different form of vitamin B3 with its own properties
- Nicotinamide riboside and nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) – separate substances studied as NAD+ precursors
- NAD+ itself and infusions of it
- Tryptophan – an amino acid from which the body can form niacinamide
2. What Does Niacinamide Do? Results by Area
| Area | Result in controlled studies | Strength of evidence | Studies | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skin (acne, pigmentation, skin barrier) | mixed | moderate | 0 meta-analyses · 5 controlled · 36 other | 267 |
| Kidney and dialysis | mostly improved | low | 0 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 2 other | 26 |
| Skin cancer and precursor lesions | mixed | unclear | 0 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 3 other | 26 |
| Joints and inflammation | mixed | unclear | 0 meta-analyses · 1 controlled · 1 other | 90 |
| Niacin deficiency (pellagra) | reviews only | unclear | 0 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 1 other | 0 |
| Blood sugar and diabetes | observational data only | unclear | 0 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 1 other | 0 |
| Other investigations | observational data only | unclear | 0 meta-analyses · 0 controlled · 8 other | 0 |
How to read the table: counted are human studies whose results concern the area. “High” means at least one meta-analysis and two controlled studies showing improvement, or at least three controlled studies of which three quarters show improvement, with at least 300 participants in total. “Moderate” means at least two controlled studies showing improvement, as a majority, or one meta-analysis alongside controlled studies. “Low” means one controlled study showing improvement. Where an area has no controlled study, the strength of evidence is at most “low” (result “reviews only” or “observational data only”). Everything else is “unclear”. A study counts as showing improvement when at least half of its outcomes in this area improved. Reviews of combination products do not count as meta-analyses; results that only describe side effects or shares of users do not count as an effect. The same study is counted only once.
3. What the Studies Show in Detail
Niacinamide and Skin (Acne, Pigmentation, Skin Barrier): Human Studies
In acne, a systematic review, based on a single randomized trial, found lower sebum production with topical nicotinamide 1. For dark discolorations of the armpits, a systematic review counts topical niacinamide among the effective agents 2. A systematic review of natural active substances counts niacinamide, alongside azelaic acid, soy, arbutin, licorice and others, among the agents with a lightening effect in hyperpigmentation 5. In women with aged skin, a niacinamide formulation in a placebo-controlled trial improved stratum corneum moisture, water loss and sebum content; ultrasound alone brought no measurable improvement 13. In mild atopic dermatitis, niacinamide-containing body lotions, partly with cleansing gel, improved SCORAD, itching, quality of life and skin barrier more than in the control group; all received ebastine 8. In discoid lupus erythematosus, the skin lesions in a placebo-controlled trial responded better to 4% nicotinamide than to 2%, with more irritation 15. Against skin redness triggered by retinol, 3% niacinamide did not help in a placebo-controlled patch test 21. In acne, niacinamide as an addition to benzoyl peroxide lowered the non-inflammatory lesions more than benzoyl peroxide alone, but not the inflammatory ones 22. Investigated were predominantly topical preparations such as cream, gel and serum; the evidence is moderate, because the controlled trials are small, short and turned out mixed.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Althwanay et al. 2024 | review · 41 participants | Topical niacinamide; vs. Randomized controlled trial (comparator not reported) | Sebum production: improved |
| 2 Vahabi et al. 2025 | review | Topical niacinamide, among desonide, HQ, AHA, herbal extracts; vs. Laser/light therapies and other topical agents | Pigmentation reduction: improved |
| 3 Speeckaert et al. 2023 | systematic review | Niacinamide as antioxidant; vs. Baseline vs. follow-up (MASI) | Pigmentation (melasma): improved |
| 4 González-Molina et al. 2022 | review | Topical niacinamide as adjuvant; vs. Hydroquinone and triple combination therapy | Efficacy in melasma: improved |
| 5 Hollinger et al. 2018 | systematic review | Niacinamide as one of several natural depigmenting agents; vs. other natural ingredients or controls | Depigmenting efficacy in hyperpigmentation: improved |
| 8 Zhu et al. 2023 | randomised controlled · 122 participants | Niacinamide-containing body emollients, with or without cleansing gel; 28 days; vs. Placebo control; all groups also received oral ebastine 10 mg/day | SCORAD score: improved (12.43 ± 3); Peak pruritus NRS: improved (3.3 ± 0.9); DLQI score: improved (7.1 ± 2.33) |
| 13 Vergilio et al. 2025 | randomised controlled · 67 participants | Topical niacinamide formulation (cosmetic) vs. placebo; 8 weeks, 8 sessions of 5-US (weekly, 20 min); vs. Placebo formulation, placebo + 5-US, formulation + 5-US | stratum corneum aqueous content: improved; transepidermal water loss: improved; sebum reduction: improved |
| 15 Nouh et al. 2023 | randomised controlled · 60 participants | Topical nicotinamide 2% and 4% as cream and gel; 2% and 4% nicotinamide; vs. Cream/gel base as placebo control | Response of DLE skin lesions: unclear; Response 4% vs. 2% nicotinamide: improved; Irritation with 4% vs. 2% nicotinamide |
Further studies in this area: 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 37 39 40 41 42 43 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Niacinamide, Kidney and Dialysis: Human Studies
In adults on hemodialysis, orally taken nicotinamide as an addition to phosphate binders lowered the serum phosphate level more than placebo; in the analysis of all randomized participants, the difference was similar but not confirmed 19. This is the only controlled study in this area; it was double-blind, randomized and of crossover design, included 26 evaluable participants and lasted only a short time, so the evidence is weak 19. In an observational study of Chinese adults, the blood level of niacinamide was among several metabolic markers that predicted newly occurring chronic kidney disease; intake was not investigated 24. A review on polycystic kidney disease classifies the benefit of niacinamide, like that of curcumin or vitamin E, as uncertain and advises against such supplements 54. Thus, the efficacy and safety of oral administration in dialysis patients over longer periods remain open.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Schepers et al. 2024 | randomised controlled · 26 participants | Oral niacinamide (NAM) as add-on to phosphate binders; 250-500 mg/day; 12 weeks per treatment arm (crossover); vs. Placebo, double-blind, randomized, crossover | Serum phosphate (per-protocol): improved (reduced serum phosphate with 0.59 mg/dL (p = .03)); Serum phosphate, between-treatment difference (linear mixed-effects model): improved (0.77 mg/dL (95% CI 0.010, 1.43; P = .03)); Serum phosphate (intention-to-treat): no difference |
| 24 Liu et al. 2025 | cohort study · 3,802 participants | niacinamide as circulating metabolite (LC-MS metabolomics); follow-up 4.6 ± 0.2 years; vs. participants without vs. with incident CKD | niacinamide as predictor of incident CKD (LASSO panel of 8 metabolites): unclear (OR 8.79 (95 % CI: 7.49, 10.32; P < 0.001)) |
| 54 Chebib et al. 2024 | review | Niacinamide as supplement, mentioned among other substances; vs. no comparison reported | Clinical benefit in ADPKD: unclear (uncertain clinical benefit) |
Niacinamide, Skin Cancer and Precursor Lesions: Human Studies
For skin cancer and its precursors, the evidence is unclear. A randomized controlled trial in 26 patients with actinic keratosis lesions compared a topical niacinamide gel with topical fluorouracil and found fewer treatment complications such as burning, itching and erythema with niacinamide, while fluorouracil was superior in improvement according to photography and dermatoscopy as well as from the patient's perspective 18. Review articles report that non-melanoma skin cancer occurred less frequently with oral nicotinamide 51, describe topical preparations for actinic keratosis 53 and consider vitamin B3 promising for the prevention of non-melanoma skin cancer 57. The studies differ greatly in form, dose, duration and comparator, and the controlled evidence relies on a very small sample.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Poostiyan et al. 2025 | randomised controlled · 26 participants | 1% niacinamide topical gel; twice daily; 3 months; vs. 5% fluorouracil topical cream twice daily for 4 weeks | improvement by photography and dermoscopy: unclear; patients' perspectives: unclear; treatment complications (burning, itching, erythema) |
| 51 Shoukfeh et al. 2025 | review | Oral nicotinamide; vs. low versus high doses | Incidence of non-melanoma skin cancers: improved |
| 53 Ong et al. 2024 | review | Topical niacinamide in various formulations | Treatment of actinic keratosis: improved |
| 57 Elgharably et al. 2023 | review | Niacinamide and other B vitamins (B2, B6, B12, folic acid); vs. no uniform comparison | Nonmelanoma skin cancer prophylaxis: improved |
Niacinamide, Joints and Inflammation: Human Studies
For joints, only one randomized trial is available: in knee osteoarthritis, a hyaluronic acid preparation with niacinamide was compared with another hyaluronic acid preparation; only stiffness improved more 11. A case series with intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections plus niacinamide reported pain reduction, among others in meniscal damage, without a relationship to the radiological or MRI severity 44. Since niacinamide was given in both investigations only as a component of a mixture with hyaluronic acid, no effect can be attributed to niacinamide alone. The overall strength of evidence is unclear: there is no meta-analysis, and the only controlled study is small and limited to one injection form. For oral or topical niacinamide forms for joint complaints, controlled studies in this area are lacking.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Hofweber et al. 2024 | randomised controlled · 90 participants | INNORYOS 2.2% hyaluronic acid containing 15 mg niacinamide; 15 mg niacinamide per injection; 26 weeks, injections at baseline, week 1 and 2; vs. Synvisc 0.8%, 2.0 ml | WOMAC pain score: unclear (p = .26); WOMAC stiffness subscale: unclear (p = .009); WOMAC function score: unclear (p = .49) |
| 44 Pennekamp et al. 2024 | case series | Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections with niacinamide; vs. Subgroups by injection frequency (1, 2, >2) | Pain reduction on numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10): improved (mean decrease of 3.34 ± 1.65); Pain reduction between 1 and 2 injections: improved (p = 0.027); Pain reduction between 1 and >2 injections: improved (p = 0.032) |
Niacinamide and Niacin Deficiency (Pellagra): Human Studies
For pellagra, only one review article is available; it describes the treatment of pellagra with vitamin B3 as an early, historically documented benefit 58. Since the review treats nicotinic acid and nicotinamide together as niacin, the finding cannot be attributed to nicotinamide alone 58. Controlled studies on the treatment of pellagra with niacinamide were not found in this evaluation; the strength of evidence is therefore unclear. It remains open which form, dose and duration are effective for the treatment of pellagra.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58 Epstein et al. 2023 | review | Niacin/niacinamide, also topical | pellagra treatment: improved |
Niacinamide, Blood Sugar and Diabetes: Human Studies
For blood sugar and diabetes, no controlled trial on niacinamide is available; the strength of evidence is unclear. An observational study (cross-sectional) in Chinese adults found that diabetics with higher plasma levels of niacin had hyperlipidemia, hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia less frequently 25. Blood levels of nicotinamide and nicotinic acid were measured, not an intake; the association also held for nicotinamide alone 25. Since it is a cross-sectional observation, no cause-and-effect relationship can be derived from it. It remains open whether oral or topical niacinamide administration influences blood sugar or diabetic metabolic consequences.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Geng et al. 2024 | cross-sectional study · 2,647 participants | Plasma niacinamide/nicotinic acid (endogenous measurement); vs. highest vs. lowest quartile of plasma niacin | hyperlipidemia risk in diabetic participants: improved (54%, 50%, and 52% lower risk); hypercholesterolemia in diabetic participants: improved (0.54 (0.38, 0.77)); hypertriglyceridemia in diabetic participants: improved (0.61 (0.44, 0.85)) |
Niacinamide: Further Outcomes in Studies
In this area, mainly observations and individual controlled studies on oral nicotinamide were examined, not on topical application. A randomized controlled trial in adults on hemodialysis found no difference in platelet count with oral administration as an addition to phosphate binders 19. A single-arm study in glaucoma patients reported better vision-related quality of life after oral niacinamide, without a control group 23. Observational studies found no increased risk of serious cardiovascular events with oral nicotinamide 38 and less frequent heart attacks 35. The studies are small, uncontrolled or only observational; the overall strength of evidence is unclear.
| Study | Design · participants | Preparation · dose · duration · comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Schepers et al. 2024 | randomised controlled · 26 participants | Oral niacinamide (NAM) as add-on to phosphate binders; 250-500 mg/day; 12 weeks per treatment arm (crossover); vs. Placebo, double-blind, randomized, crossover | Platelet counts; Drop-outs due to side effects (3 drop-outs due to side effects (8.6%)) |
| 23 Nicola et al. 2025 | case series · 58 participants | oral niacinamide (B3); 500 mg daily; 6 months; vs. no control (single-arm, before-after) | Quality of life (GQL-15 total score): improved (mean difference = -2.10, 95% CI: [-2.89, -1.32], p < 0.0001); Central and near vision (GQL-15): improved (mean difference = -2.16, 95% CI: [-3.91, -0.4], p = 0.017); Peripheral vision (GQL-15): improved (mean difference = -2.66, 95% CI: [-0.23, -0.08], p < 0.001) |
| 33 Clark-Loeser et al. 2025 | case series · 7 participants | Topical cysteamine-isobionicamide formula; once daily; 16 weeks; vs. no control (case series) | quality of life: improved (significant improvement) |
| 35 Salem et al. 2026 | cohort study | oral niacinamide; ≥ 500 mg; 3 years; vs. niacinamide-naive controls (1:1 matched) | ST elevation myocardial infarction: improved (RR: 0.547, 95% CI: 0.349-0.858, P = .008); peripheral vascular disease: improved (RR: 0.741, 95% CI: 0.605-0.909, P = .004); cardiac arrest: improved (RR: 0.500, 95% CI: 0.275-0.909, P = .020) |
| 36 Nicola et al. 2026 | study | oral niacinamide (nicotinamide, vitamin B3); 500 mg daily; 6 months; vs. no control arm; comparison to baseline | Visual field Mean Deviation (MD): no difference (mean ΔMD +0.43 dB; GEE p = 0.099; LME p = 0.101); Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD): no difference (PSD remained stable); peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness: worsened (-1.26 µm; GEE p = 0.046) |
| 38 Wheless et al. 2025 | cohort study | nicotinamide; vs. nicotinamide-exposed vs unexposed patients | MACE incidence: no difference; MACE hazard ratio without prior MACE (VUMC): no difference (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 0.81-5.05); MACE hazard ratio with prior MACE (VUMC): improved (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.95) |
| 51 Shoukfeh et al. 2025 | review | Oral nicotinamide; vs. low versus high doses | Major adverse cardiovascular effects |
| 58 Epstein et al. 2023 | review | Niacin/niacinamide, also topical | COVID-19 adjunctive treatment: unclear |
4. How Is Niacinamide Dosed? Preparation, Dose and Duration in Studies
The studies predominantly used topical preparations such as cream, gel and serum, as well as oral forms as tablets or capsules and an injection solution into the knee joint. Many topical investigations tested niacinamide as a component of a mixture with other active substances such as salicylic acid, tranexamic acid or hyaluronic acid. The doses and durations of use are shown in the table.
| Preparation or form | Dose | Duration | Study |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30% SSA combined with 10% niacinamide vs. placebo | 30% SSA + 10% niacinamide | 16 weeks | 6 |
| Dermocosmetic cream with niacinamide et al. plus adapalene 0.1% cream | — | 8 weeks | 7 |
| Niacinamide-containing body emollients, with or without cleansing gel | — | 28 days | 8 |
| Dermocosmetic containing salicylic acid, niacinamide, and thermal spring water | — | Phase 1: 12 weeks; Phase 2: 12 weeks | 9 |
| Niosomal TXA 2%/NCA 2% cream or conventional TXA 5%/NCA 4% cream | TXA 2%/NCA 2% or TXA 5%/NCA 4% | three months | 10 |
| INNORYOS 2.2% hyaluronic acid containing 15 mg niacinamide | 15 mg niacinamide per injection | 26 weeks, injections at baseline, week 1 and 2 | 11 |
| Liquid botanical nutraceutical containing niacinamide and other ingredients | 60 mL twice daily | 90 days | 12 |
| Topical niacinamide formulation (cosmetic) vs. placebo | — | 8 weeks, 8 sessions of 5-US (weekly, 20 min) | 13 |
| Serum B3 (5% niacinamide) vs. 4% hydroquinone | 5% niacinamide in serum | 5 months Serum B3; HQ4% 3 months then 2 months Serum B3 | 14 |
| Topical nicotinamide 2% and 4% as cream and gel | 2% and 4% nicotinamide | — | 15 |
| Ceramide and niacinamide-containing moisturizer (CCM) vs. hydrophilic cream | — | 8 weeks | 16 |
| Topical emollient containing panthenol, niacinamide, and dipotassium glycyrrhizate | twice daily | 28 days | 17 |
| 1% niacinamide topical gel | twice daily | 3 months | 18 |
| Oral niacinamide (NAM) as add-on to phosphate binders | 250-500 mg/day | 12 weeks per treatment arm (crossover) | 19 |
| Cosmetic serum containing niacinamide, postbiotics and peptides | — | 4 weeks | 20 |
5. Is Niacinamide Safe? Side Effects in Studies
In the studies, niacinamide was predominantly well tolerated, with minor local side effects 15; burning, itching and redness occurred less often than with fluorouracil 18. With oral administration to dialysis patients, there were individual discontinuations due to side effects 19. A review warns against a possible cardiovascular risk from breakdown products at high oral doses 51; large observational studies found no increased risk of serious cardiovascular events 3538. A higher topical concentration was associated with more irritation 15.
| Study | Reported side effects |
|---|---|
| 2 Vahabi et al. 2025 | Desonide and C. rotundus oil with minimal side effects; laser more painful |
| 4 González-Molina et al. 2022 | Minimal side effects |
| 6 Xiong et al. 2024 | 1 drug-related AE and 1 drug-unrelated AE in the SSA group; no AE in the placebo group |
| 7 Sitohang et al. 2024 | Better tolerability in Groups B and C |
| 8 Zhu et al. 2023 | No obvious adverse reactions |
| 9 Khammari et al. 2023 | good tolerance |
| 10 Ghasemiyeh et al. 2025 | Less serious adverse reactions than hydroquinone; relapse observed in hydroquinone group |
| 11 Hofweber et al. 2024 | No adverse effects observed or reported |
| 12 Messier et al. 2026 | No adverse events reported |
| 14 Rocio et al. 2025 | Higher erythema in HQ group; Serum B3 better tolerated |
| 15 Nouh et al. 2023 | 4% had higher irritation incidence; overall minimal side effects |
| 16 Tempark et al. 2024 | No serious side effects from either cream |
6. What Remains Open: Limits of the Evidence
- Many skin studies are small and short, and niacinamide was often tested only as part of a mixture.
- For kidney, joints, blood sugar and pellagra, robust controlled studies are lacking.
- Findings on topical use cannot be transferred to oral forms and vice versa.
- Little is known about the long-term safety of oral administration in dialysis patients.
- Whether niacinamide prevents skin cancer cannot be assessed from the available studies; for the treatment of actinic keratosis there is only one small comparative study.
7. Bottom Line: What Is Established About Niacinamide
Niacinamide is the amide form of vitamin B3 and is used both orally and topically.
On the skin, niacinamide-containing preparations improved the skin barrier in small controlled studies 813, but did not alleviate redness triggered by retinol 21. In other areas, the evidence is weak. In hemodialysis, oral nicotinamide in addition to phosphate binders lowered the serum phosphate level more than placebo; in the analysis of all randomized participants, the difference was not confirmed 19. For joints, blood sugar and precancerous skin lesions, the available studies are insufficient for an assessment 1118; for pellagra, only a review is available 58. Tolerability was predominantly good in the studies, with local irritation as the most common side effect 15.
Frequently Asked Questions
How well has Niacinamide been studied in humans?
We evaluated 71 human studies on Niacinamide, including 25 randomised controlled trials and 3 meta-analyses or systematic reviews; the controlled studies include 2,588 participants in total. As of 16 October 2026.
Does Niacinamide help with skin (acne, pigmentation, skin barrier)? What the studies show
Does Niacinamide help with kidney and dialysis? What the studies show
Does Niacinamide help with skin cancer and precursor lesions? What the studies show
Does Niacinamide help with joints and inflammation? What the studies show
What is niacinamide and how does it differ from nicotinic acid?
Niacinamide is the amide form of vitamin B3 and belongs to the water-soluble vitamins. Nicotinic acid is another form of vitamin B3 with its own properties and its own studies. Findings on nicotinic acid cannot be transferred to niacinamide.
What effect do human studies show on the skin?
For acne, topical nicotinamide reduced sebum production according to a systematic review, based on a single randomized trial 1. For dark discolorations of the armpits, a systematic review counts topical niacinamide among the effective agents 2. For melasma, topical niacinamide is considered an effective adjunct treatment according to a systematic review 4.
How well is niacinamide tolerated?
Are there studies on oral niacinamide in kidney disease?
In adults on hemodialysis, orally taken nicotinamide as an addition to phosphate binders lowered the serum phosphate level 19. The study was small and short, the evidence is weak.
What should be considered with combination products?
A benefit then cannot be attributed to niacinamide alone. Such findings apply only to the mixture studied.
Sources
- 1Althwanay A, AlEdani EM, Kaur H, Kasapoglu M, Yadavalli R, Nawaz S et al. · 2024
- 2Vahabi SM, Sajjadi S, Kalantari Y, Pourgholi E, Heidari S, Etesami I · 2025
- 3Speeckaert R, Bulat V, Speeckaert MM, van Geel N · 2023
- 4Topical Treatments for Melasma and Their Mechanism of ActionGonzález-Molina V, Martí-Pineda A, González N · 2022
- 5Are Natural Ingredients Effective in the Management of Hyperpigmentation? A Systematic ReviewHollinger JC, Angra K, Halder RM · 2018
- 6Xiong Y, Jiang X, Lai W, Gao X, You Y, Huang Y et al. · 2024
- 7Sitohang IBS, Norawati L, Yenny SW, Kusumawardani A, Murlistyarini S, Setiawan SV et al. · 2024
- 8
- 9Khammari A, Demessant-Flavigny A, Kerob D, Seité S, Dréno B · 2023
- 10Ghasemiyeh P, Haghighi NF, Dastgheib L, Ranjbar S, Mohammadi-Samani S · 2025
- 11Hofweber L, von Stengel S, Nürnberger J, Kemmler W · 2024
- 12Messier H, D'Adamo CR, Panchal N, Patel G · 2026
- 13
- 14Rocio J, Pittet JC, Sachdev M, Kovylkina N, Deloche Bensmaine C, Passeron T · 2025
- 15Nouh AH, Elshahid AR, Kadah AS, Zeyada YA · 2023
- 16
- 17Morgado-Carrasco D, Balado-Simó P, Vivancos Cuadras F, Furmanczyk M, Delgado Ojeda J · 2026
- 18Poostiyan N, Barati M, Shahmoradi Z, Saber M · 2025
- 19Schepers L, Jans I, Pot GK, Smilde AJ, Hofstra JM, de Roos NM · 2024
- 20Rusic D, Ivic M, Slugan A, Leskur D, Modun D, Durdov T et al. · 2024
- 21Fang Y, Ying Y, Xiaolan W, Lin S, Chenlan X, Caixia W et al. · 2024
- 22Clinical Comparison of Topical 2.5% Benzoyl Peroxide plus 5% Niacinamide to 2.5% Benzoyl Peroxide Alone in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Facial Acne VulgarisKaewsanit T, Chakkavittumrong P, Waranuch N · 2021
- 23Nicola CA, Marinescu MC, Firan AM, Tartea G, Naidin MS, Ciuluvica RC et al. · 2025
- 24Liu L, Cai H, Yang H, Wang S, Li Y, Huang Y et al. · 2025
- 25Geng X, Lin Z, Zheng Z, Lin Q, Sun T, Yang Q et al. · 2024
- 26Evaluation of a Dermocosmetic Serum Containing a Multi-acid Complex and Niacinamide in Japanese Women with Mild AcneIgarashi A, Abe M, Gunji Y, Nemoto O, Kawamura K, Yokozeki M et al. · 2025
- 27Hsin S, Lourenço K, Porcello A, Chemali M, Marques C, Raffoul W et al. · 2025
- 28Guerra-Tapia A, Martínez H, Nieto C, Ruiz Alonso C, Bermejo R, Carrón N et al. · 2024
- 29Grimes P, Dias S, Huang P, Cheng T, Makino E · 2026
- 30Batistella M, Santaella E, Oliveira S, Maan C, Kopytina V, López Berroa J · 2025
- 31Kaegi M, Adlhart C, Lehmann M, Risch M, Wessling W, Klaffenbach P · 2020
- 32Villani A, Genco L, Coronella L, Ventura V, Milani M, Alfano S et al. · 2026
- 33Clark-Loeser L, Sfriso R, Dirlewanger L, Kasraee B · 2025
- 34Alexis A, Beach RA, Brieva P, Guénin S, Ibrahimi OA, Rodrigues M et al. · 2025
- 35Salem Y, Liaqat M, Gonna N, Zamil D, Abu-Ghosh F, Merie A et al. · 2026
- 36Nicola CA, Marinescu MC, Alexandrescu C, Firan AM, Alyamani W, Naidin MS et al. · 2026
- 37Hakozaki T, Laughlin T, Zhao W, Deng G, Wang J, Moulton L · 2026
- 38Wheless L, Guennoun R, Michalski-McNeely B, Gonzalez KM, Weiss R, Zhang S et al. · 2025
- 39Brady RT, Shah-Desai S · 2025
- 40Fonseca AP, Ribon R, Cascais L, Facchini G, Pinheiro ALTA, Eberlin S et al. · 2025
- 41Maldonado López A, da Silva Souza I · 2025
- 42Bogdanowicz P, Bensadoun P, Noizet M, Béganton B, Philippe A, Alvarez-Georges S et al. · 2024
- 43Lupin M, Bjerring P, Andriessen A, Chantrey J, Fabi SG, Liew S et al. · 2024
- 44Pennekamp S, Hegelmaier S, Hitzl W, Geßlein M, Bail HJ, Loose K et al. · 2024
- 45
- 46Gotera N, Weilg P, Heleno C, Ferrari-Gabilondo N · 2022
- 47Searle TN, Al-Niaimi F, Ali FR · 2026
- 48Yadav A, Gupta N, Alam MS, Thakur S · 2026
- 49Kazemeini S, Nadeem-Tariq A, Luthra A, Suha R, Turna A, Easterly J et al. · 2025
- 50Kapoor K, S S, Begum RF, S AS, N A · 2025
- 51Shoukfeh R, Tisack AM, Lim HW, Mohammad TF · 2025
- 52Marques C, Hadjab F, Porcello A, Lourenço K, Scaletta C, Abdel-Sayed P et al. · 2024
- 53Ong RR, Goh CF · 2024
- 54Chebib FT, Nowak KL, Chonchol MB, Bing K, Ghanem A, Rahbari-Oskoui FF et al. · 2024
- 55Hamie H, Yassine R, Shoukfeh R, Turk D, Huq F, Moossavi M · 2024
- 56Kurokawa I, Kobayashi M, Nomura Y, Abe M, Kerob D, Dreno B · 2023
- 57Elgharably N, Al Abadie M, Al Abadie M, Ball PA, Morrissey H · 2023
- 58A Second Look at NiacinEpstein H · 2023
- 59Babbush KM, Babbush RA, Khachemoune A · 2021
- 60
- 61Luger T, Seite S, Humbert P, Krutmann J, Triller R, Dréno B · 2014
Every statement on this page carries its evidence tier — proven, plausible or hypothesis — and leads to the original work. The decision in the individual case rests with the practitioner; we provide the connections.